Surprising Reaction to Shaq Comments
The reaction to Shaq's comments have been swift and uniformly negative. It's not surprising that his game has worn thin with NBA fans and commentators. Shaq did not endure himself to Phoenix fans who rightfully take pride in a Jerry Colango built culture of class and professionalism.
What has been surprising is how much of the coverage has focused on Shaq's calling out of the Spurs "cowardly" tactics. I don't fault Popovich for doing everything he can to win but there's little doubt that the hack-a-Shaq was a display of unmanly play. Fair yes. Cowardly perhaps.
There's also no doubt though that Shaq is better served, and serves his team better, by leaving such hyperbole to the likes of me. Shaq should let his game do his talking and focus his pie hole on pies.
Still, in the long history of Shaq's vocal diarrhea it doesn't rank that high.
What I do find utterly unacceptable is throwing your team mates under the bus in such an obvious and blatant manner. Calling out your guards for not staying in front of their man? Call out your mates for not rotating to cover your back?
This is the same guy that hurt his team repeatedly by not being able to move quickly enough to cover mobile big men and who teams attack constantly with pick and rolls.
Real or not, and I certainly think the Suns needed to make defensive improvements, Shaq did not do himself or his team any favors by airing these issues in such a public manner. How does this possibly help a Suns team trying to adjust to a new coach and new defensive philosophy?
Is that the Shaq locker room leadership we've heard so much about?
Is this what we replaced the Marion "cancer" with?
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
6 of one ...
The thing about defending the pick-and-roll is that you do normally need rotation defense if the other team is good at it. Few, if any, big guys can do an adequate job without some help from time to time.
I listened to the part about TD’ effing 3 a couple of times. I think that was more exasperation about Duncan actually hitting it than anything else.
The part about the guards, though … I still don’t get that.
On the Marion Cancer versus the Shaq cancer, I think its kind of like the difference between D’Antoni and Porter. D’Antoni and Marion both had this passive-agressive (almost feminine) anger-management thing. They’d just kind of pout and whine. Sometimes — right or wrong — it’s just nice to see the pissed-off guy say something. Of course, when you say something wrong, you probably should apologize. You shouldn’t talk bad about your team in public.
Mmmmm ... Guinness
by JSun on Oct 16, 2008 12:53 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I honestly think everybody's making way too big a deal out of this.
What he said about the team’s D didn’t make Sportscenter, Truehoop, nothing. It wasn’t even in Coro’s article that had quotes from the same interview. Probably because it wasn’t that big a deal.
I agree that the Duncan thing was more frustration than anything and to me the guard talk seemed to be more about being on the same page. Even if he was chastising Nash for not switching and guards for not staying in front of their men it’s no worse than anything Nash or Amare has said.
He has praised everybody on the Sun’s roster, maybe it’s not such a bad thing that they take some blame for their mistakes. Hopefully it’ll have the same effect as Bird calling his team sissies did and we’ll play some defense this year instead of losing a first round series to 3 guys.
by hcblankscreen on Oct 16, 2008 1:34 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe this public calling out could inspire the team to play better D
I’ve been a big fan of Nash’s offense for years, since his Dallas days, and overrated shooters like Stojakovic are easily bested by Nash’s incredibly pure stroke, but I can’t remember a single f***-ing game, out of the 300+ games I’ve watched him play, not one single f***-ing game in which Steve Nash’s defense could be regarded as anything better than “incredibly and unreasonably piss-poor beyond logical belief”.
If Nash wants to be a leader he needs to stop burdening his team either with defensive mismatches due to the 3-man needing to cover Nash’s guy for him, or simply Nash pretending to guard his man and just getting burned for 60% and 30ppg.
Tony Parker is bloody overrated. Monstrously overrated. He’s not that quick, and he’s not that good. He only looks like a superstar because every year in the playoffs he matches up against Steve Nash and gets 25 uncontested shots/drives per game as a result. Seen him play against CP3, or D-Will, or TJ Ford, and about half the PGs in the league? Tony Parker isn’t even a top 5 PG in the West.
by felixthm on Oct 16, 2008 6:41 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
What's with the Nash hatred?
I’d be willing to bet that someone has shot 60% and had over 30 points in a game on Nash no more than a dozen times in his 10+ year career. I’ll also bet that Steve has done it more to someone else than someone else has done it to him. Of course if you add the points produced by assists, your statement becomes ludicrous.
How many great offensive talents are also great defenders? Michael Jordan. Wilt Chamberlain. Kobe. Malone. That’s about it. On the other hand, you have LeBron (porous defender). Nash (admittedly below average). Watter Davis (couldn’t defend a post). Amare (well chronicled defensive problems)You also have Bill Russell (not much offense away from basket). Jason Kidd (no jumper) and Dennis Rodman (no offense, gread defense and rebounding).
These are just off the top of my head.
Leave Nash alone. He is what he is. He is not quick to react on D, and his lateral movement is awful. You only can improve those so much. If Shaq worked as hard as Nash, I think we’d have something.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
by Hawk42 on Oct 17, 2008 7:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you.
What is with the Nash hatred? Nash works hard, does his job and unlike Shaq keeps his mouth shut. If Nash does say things, it doesn’t rate near as bad as Shaq.
by CanadianBlazerfan on Oct 20, 2008 4:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bottom Line
Let me begin by saying that I’m a diehard Knick fan, so you can take what I’m about to say with a grain of salt if need be.
What’s lost in all of the “Hack-a-Shaq” talk is the actual reason why it became necessary. And that reason is because the game is not called properly.
Sure, you want to talk about superstars getting calls, fine. But in all of my years of watching the NBA, Shaq has by FAR been given the most leeway. Look at his game and even how it has evolved over his prime years. He’s NEVER even added a face-the-basket little 10-foot set shot! And why should he since he’s been allowed to barge his way to the basket on a nightly basis. Other power forwards and centers have been whistled for charges trying to do what Shaq does each and every possession of his career. If his “moves” don’t result in a dunk or layup, it still provides the necessary separation for him to release his patented ugly jump hook or spin baseline for his off-the-window 8 footer.
Since he is STILL less than a 50% shooter from the line- which is an utter disgrace- what was left for teams to do to defend him? Are they going to let him brutalize their front line and still have the call go against the guy laying flat on the floor? What a joke!
The bottom line is that Shaq is a lazy individual. He has very little skill, other than the skill of being big and mobile for someone his size, and having hands that are well above average. He can’t shoot free throws, can’t shoot a simple set shot while square to the basket, can’t use both hands, plays zero defense, unless you count his endless attempts to reach and swipe and block shots while never moving his feet or defending the pick-and-roll, while in the days of the illegal defense NEVER coming out to guard his man on the perimeter. Plus, he routinely played his way into shape as the season went along because he never worked out hard during the summer. Lazy.
And the media over the years has made it worse. I’ll always remember the lack of respect I found for Bob Costas when he said during the Laker/Indiana FInals that if Shaq was 6’1" 185 that he’d still be in the league. What an insult to everyone. The guy would be watching the guy bagging groceries if he was that size.
Furthermore, the audacity announcers have had in saying that Shaq takes more of a beating than anyone in the league. You think? The guy is 330 lbs- in his prime years- and is permitted to create contact against defensive players that have established position, then is allowed to camp out in the three-second lane for as long as he wants. What are opponents supposed to do? Let him dunk? And maybe there’s the answer. The league loved him bending basket stanchions and shattering backboards- all a fix- and in return let the guy play football in what is supposed to be the National Basketball Association. What a joke Shaq is. I like the Suns, but I think it was a bad move in getting him. Just retire already…your game is a fraud, and I’ve known it since day one.
by SteveS on Oct 16, 2008 12:24 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
On the other hand
In regard to the charging, I think Shaq has always gotten away with quite a bit. But, especially over the last few years, little guys are “getting position” and if the big guy in the post sneezes they fall over and get the call. It’s a tough call for officials to make, and Shaq (in his prime) did not make things much easier. Every time he was in the post, there probably could’ve been a foul called one way or the other.
The rest of the stuff, though, is pretty hard to argue against.
Mmmmm ... Guinness
by JSun on Oct 16, 2008 3:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn Knick fan
How’s you’re team done lately?
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
by Hawk42 on Oct 17, 2008 7:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shaq shot 60% from the line
And for D’Antoni, that’s 60% eFG.
Now, you can call the game by the letter of the law, or the spirit of the law, but don’t change how you’ve called the whole of some guy’s career in the middle of PO match
Spurs are cowards. That’s why they pulled out all the stops, including sending FT tapes to the league. The league should have warned suns/shaq that if he steps over the line (again), this would disqualify the FTs..
Amare is moving.
by ZonaFlash on Oct 17, 2008 6:35 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
even though nash’s defense was minimal in dallas, wasn’t it the strategy under mike D to funnel to the paint? it’s seems rediculous to fault him for it if so.
as far as shaq is concerned, is it really untrue? is it something unexpected?
it’s a new year, and i have FAITH that under a proper defensive scheme, shaq and amare, even with nash on the perimeter, can have an effective defensive presence in the paint.
lastly, timmy’s three…i fault no one for. manu, parker, bowen and every other player on the spur bench was covered. in that situation i’d let timmy take that shot all freakin’ day long!
by lee4 on Oct 16, 2008 12:47 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Duncan's three
I am sure I am not the only one that’s watched these two places hundreds of times. I agree there’s not much else the Suns should have done on that play.
Do you have Nash switch off and cover Duncan at the 3 pt line? Then you are left with Manu driving on Shaq and almost certainly scoring and likely drawing a foul as well. It was a balsy play to have Duncan take that shot and he and the Spurs deserve the credit for a clutch play. I don’t see it as a Suns defensive breakdown.
Now, on the other hand Finley’s three at the end of regulation was flat out missed assignment by Amare. Watch Amare on this play. He ABSOLUTELY should have switched off the poor shooting Omberto (who wasn’t even at the 3 pt line). If Amare jumps that pick he forces Finley to try and shoot over him. Instead, Finley get’s a wide open look and drains it.
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Oct 16, 2008 1:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
An Even More bottom line...
SteveS, I’m with you. Never liked the Big Diesel and I’m a lifelong Lakers fan. I mean, I was happy when the team won three straight, but never appreciated anything about Shaq and knew, the second he left L.A. he’d be my least favorite player in the league.
He spent his off seasons in Los Angeles making movies (Steel, Shizaam, etc.) or making rap albums (I like playing on the Westside..), or, more recently, trying to get a sheriff’s badge. But like Iverson…practice? Never. Unlike Iverson however, he never gave his heart and soul in each and every game.
One key element to Shaq’s game that you didn’t mention is the fact that he travels on nearly every play. My cousin and I used to laugh about the “Shaq Hop” that he would do. Getting the ball in the post. Using one pivot foot, then hopping to another spot, before dunking it home.
And for being the biggest and baddest dude the NBA has ever seen, he’s never led the league in rebounds or blocked shots.
The saddest part is that Shaq had all the tools (size, speed, agility) to be the most dominating player ever, MJ included. Unfortunately, he lacked any sort of will power to get better. He never pushed himself, never tried, and that, ultimately is what drove Kobe nuts. Kobe’s a gym rat. He tried to improve his game every year, while Shaq simply got lazier and more self-satisfied every year. No wonder there was no respect.
I’d be pissed too.
Good luck Suns fans. If the Suns don’t win it this year (actually, it goes even more so if they somehow do), look for Shaq to have a horrible next season, piss everyone off for not living up to his $20 million per, and then find a way to get out of town.
The pessimist in me somehow sees a reunion in Los Angeles down the road so he can get that 5th ring. lol. We’ll hear the same spiel about wanting to bring Kobe a ring, and help mentor the best young big (this time, Bynum), etc. etc.
by Dodgerblue15 on Oct 16, 2008 1:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
OMG - the world really is coming to an end
Suns fans and Lakers fans in agreement!
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Oct 16, 2008 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This sucks ( an understatement ).
We traded Marion and a serviceable point guard in Marcus Banks for this? This sucks. Calling them out like that is uncalled for. If they do wrong Coach Porter should call them out. Not Shaq. I’m a big Nash fan, so obviously that bugs me. Still this sucks and he is not right to do that.
by CanadianBlazerfan on Oct 16, 2008 3:50 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Marcus Banks serviceable?
your kidding. Hey I am counting the days when Shaq leaves town. He is funny once in awhile, plays about 40 games a year. But Marcus Banks? Thank goodness he is gone.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
by Grockcubs on Oct 16, 2008 9:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read that somewhere.
I got that serviceable quote from someone writing in SLAM. Not really my true feelings, and why I borrowed that quote I can’t give you a good reason why. Judging by the looks of things you aren’t the only one counting the days until he leaves.
by CanadianBlazerfan on Oct 17, 2008 8:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Servicable indeed
I’ve always thought that Banks is a serviceable NBA point guard. He might be in the bottom third of the class but still – that’s not a bad class to be in.
The guy can score inside and out. He can defend. He just can’t seem to lead. But in Miami they let that other guard lead things. He might actually do well in Miami next to Wade where he doesn’t have to actually run things. He can shoot from range and isn’t a disaster with the ball in his hands. I think he got a bad rap in Phoenix and certainly suffered from playing in D’Antoni’s system behind Nash. That’s some pretty big shoes to fill. He always looked horrible in comparison and he obviously didn’t help himself in the locker room.
Banks put up some decent numbers in this game anyway…
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Oct 17, 2008 8:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
SteveS, Dodgerblue, right on the money
That’s what I’ve been blasting Shaq for since he was leaving the Lakers. I don’t think there’s been any player in the NBA quite the ridiculously dominant physical size of Shaq. Having a sense of humour doesn’t excuse the complete lack of work ethic. He’s taken 10,000++ career free throws, and he’s been in the league 16 seasons.
He doesn’t defend well himself either, although he did a pretty solid job of containing Duncan man-to-man in the post, but that’s about all. His rotations were almost always a couple steps slow, he doesn’t show on the pick-and-roll or pick-and-pop, and his offensive game, even after 16 years in the league, consists of nothing but dunking or laying the ball in from 5 feet away. His ugly hook shot is just a random toss into the air and towards the basket.
Hawk42, how about this bit of Shaq hatred then? I’ve got a lot of Boris Diaw hatred as well.
I don’t hate Nash. I just wish he would defend tougher than wet toilet paper. Nash is sensationally quick for his age, and his reactions are anything but slow. Yet on defense he makes slow and old guards like Sam Cassell look blistering quick. It just doesn’t tally that someone who has quick feet and reactions on offense suddenly becomes lumbering and clumsy when defending.
by felixthm on Oct 17, 2008 9:20 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I like shaq
I hope he keeps opening his mouth.
I hope he keeps knocking people down
I hope Robin gets better real real fast.
Amare is moving.
by ZonaFlash on Oct 17, 2008 6:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I think he's right about Posey's and Kapono's huge paydays
Wrong about everything else.
by Ben Q Rock on Oct 17, 2008 6:55 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















