Bright Side Of The Sun: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows



Guess That Punishment

[Note by Phoenix Stan, 11/17/08 4:12 PM PST ]

And the winner is.....Flagrant 2 plus fine for not leaving the court fast enough and running of the Big Mouth.

Thank you for playing. You will get another chance soon.

 

 

With Shaq getting the boot for his Flagrant 2 foul, Stu Jackson and his NBA lawyer trolls will be reviewing the play. We should be hearing the ruling from on-high sometime today.

First, here's your chance to Guess that Punishment!

A dart board is probably the best approach to predicting what those chuckleheads will do but perhaps the wisdom of (our) crowd can Guess that Punishment.

First, review the evidence

 

 

Poll
Stu Jackson and his lawyer trolls will...
Find that Shaq was trying to kill Stuckey and sentence him to death
23 votes
Rule that Shaq's action was tuurible and suspend him 2 games
6 votes
Opine that the calling on the field should stand - Flagrant 2
23 votes
Come to their collective senses and downgrade the call to a Flagrant 1
35 votes
Do us all a favor and resign
16 votes

103 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs | Comment 15 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Is it me?

or did it actually look like Stuckey’s head never hit the floor? It looks like he braced his fall with his arms but I’m not sure his head/chin ever actually hit the floor. His head shot up like it did but the more I watch, the more I question if it ever hit.

Am I crazy?

It's Ba-Nash. It's a no brainer.

by Suns Ben on Nov 17, 2008 11:49 AM MST   0 recs

I thought it did

It seemed that his forehead hits and bounces pretty hard. Hard to see on YouTube but up close on my the HD TV….

by Phoenix Stan on Nov 17, 2008 11:56 AM MST to parent up   0 recs

I agree with you, it looked to me that his whiplash thing was feigned or something.

by RD74 on Nov 17, 2008 3:39 PM MST to parent up   0 recs

Here's a thought

If that had been TJ Ford he would be dead. I mean literally dead.

That poor kid should watch this video and retire now.

by Phoenix Stan on Nov 17, 2008 11:59 AM MST   0 recs

Ford

Yes, Ford would’ve been a goner for sure.

It's Ba-Nash. It's a no brainer.

by Suns Ben on Nov 17, 2008 12:08 PM MST to parent up   0 recs

Look at Shaq's history

Hopefully, the league will downgrade the call to a flagrant 1.
I watched Shaq play as a Laker for years. He is just not a dirty player. With his size, if
Shaq was intending to harm Stuckey, Stuckey would be in the hospital.

by bizmhamama on Nov 17, 2008 12:30 PM MST   0 recs

I'm fine with a Flagrant II here.

Regardless of the physics and the intentions, you have to protect the player in the air. All I need be reminded of is Jerry Stackhouse and Joe Johnson.

Window Closed? Shit, just break it then.

by ZonaFlash on Nov 17, 2008 1:34 PM MST   0 recs

But should have been

I don’t even care about the specifics. So what JJ held onto the rim. So what Shaq was going for ball.

Hit someone in midair at full speed, risk them injury then F2, baby.

Window Closed? Shit, just break it then.

by ZonaFlash on Nov 17, 2008 4:46 PM MST to parent up   0 recs

I watched it in slow motion six times

You must be crazy if you think that was a flagrant two. Stuckey fell to the floor body first, and his body took the impact before his CHIN touched the floor. He feigned some monstrous whiplash there, and jerked his head up and down like he was bouncing on flubber. And critically, he landed on his CHIN but rolled around on the floor clutching his FOREHEAD. And he rolls around pretending to be hurt when it was merely a hard foul. It would not have even been enough to get him winded for more than half a minute, I assure you. They’re tougher than that even in the WNBA.

And yes, Zonaflash, midair at full speed should be flagrant two. I rip on Shaq’s elbow-fu and occasional travel every now and then but there is simply too much evidence proving that it is NOT a flagrant two. There was no body collision whatsoever, Shaq got the ball and the arm and pulled. The usual prerequisite in defining flagrant is body contact/collision. And more critically, as you said, hitting someone in mid-air constitutes a flagrant 2; Stuckey was nowhere near mid-air. He was only in mid-stride. He was just going into his one-two and considering the distance from the ground, that does not come anywhere close to qualifying as a mid-air collision. Ever. If you make this sort of pussy swipe a Flagrant Two, you will need to establish Flagrant Three, Four, and Five for the REAL flagrant fouls.

Obviously you’re dramatising Shaq’s attack on Stuckey. Come playoff time, there’ll be many incidents of Flagrant 3s and 4s, with malicious intent, tons more physical impact, in mid-air/full momentum, with lots of potential danger and damage in terms of injury, and they will be classified as Flagrant 1s, with the coaches and players defending themselves talking about “I didn’t wanna hurt nobody” and how it was an “honest basketball play”, as opposed to this weak foul being needlessly blown out of proportion and scandalised.

In fact, if maybe a guy the size of Diaw committed a similar foul no one would even imagine that this could ever amount to anything more than a personal foul. Shaq himself has been victimised by much more brutality from opposing teams then he could possibly dish out. You always get away with much more in beating up on big men and it’s probably the small-guy vs hulking-giant bias that deluded and misled the referees in making such a monumental error in categorising the foul.

by felixthm on Nov 19, 2008 3:14 AM MST to parent up   0 recs

Exactly

This is really the key

In fact, if maybe a guy the size of Diaw committed a similar foul no one would even imagine that this could ever amount to anything more than a personal foul.

and that was Shaq’s point in giving us a physics lesson. I think. Or maybe he just wanted to talk about physics. You never know with that guy. Anyway….

I consider a Flagrant 2 going after someone’s head. Or undercutting them with no play on the ball like Stackhouse did to Joe Johnson.

Shaq went for the ball and had chance at the ball. Stuckey held the ball and fell. There was no body contact at all. No F2.

by Phoenix Stan on Nov 19, 2008 9:17 AM MST to parent up   0 recs

Ah I'm so dense I didn't even address the main point of this post

Who cares if its F2 or not?

The point is that it’s so stinking arbitrary that no one can agree on it. This is the poverty of Stern’s dictatorship.

Save the NBA! Down with the dictator!

Window Closed? Shit, just break it then.

by ZonaFlash on Nov 20, 2008 1:19 AM MST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mark_west_small
T'was the night before...Not Again!

Recent FanPosts

Small
amare 3rd among forwards in all-star voting
Dark_yankees_small
How to Improve
Rng_podcast-sml_small
Run’N'Gun Ep#70:On and on and on
Small
Awesome Shaq Interview w/Men's Journal
Nash_small
Suns Drop Yet Another Close Game
15082008473_small
Destination Phoenix blog 6
Mark_west_small
What Might Be, or Why the Suns Should Sign Stephon Marbury
Nash_small
All-Star Voting?
Dunk_small
What might have been
Side_fat_small
Dee Brown Released

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds
Fanster.com Network Member


Bloggers in Chief

Bsos_logo_small Phoenix Stan

Sunrise_small TexSUN

Suns_small ZonaFlash

Featured Bloggers

Pintura_skim_small PanamaSun

Side_fat_small JSun

Mark_west_small Mike Lisboa

ad

Site Meter