Beyond Amare...
Lately, a lot of blame has been put on Amare Stoudemire as to why the Suns aren't playing as well as everyone believes they should play. Granted, when someone comes out claiming they're going to bring the "gorilla game," one should expect more than 3 rebounds. However, it's gotten to the point where people are using Amare like a piece of duct tape covering a hole in a dam. You can cover up the real issue all you want, but sooner or later you're going to be in deep water.
So the question becomes, what is the real issue with the Phoenix Suns? Now, I'm going to skip the obvious answers (lack of a backup PG, inability to get stops, etc.) and try and point at the heart of the problem. What I am going to proceed to present to you, my fellow Suns fans, is my informed opinion as to what is really going on.
Basketball is a relatively simple game. You have five players trying to work together to put a round ball in a round hole. However, when played at its highest form, basketball becomes beautiful. The game requires a perfect balance of athletic ability, power and creativity. When all of these elements come together just right, the game becomes something more. NIKE was able to portray this better than most with this memorable ad:
Over these last 4 seasons, the Suns have been the poster child for how the game should be played - mixing perpetual motion with grace, finesse and power all at once. There is little wonder as to why the Suns have been one of the most popular teams over this span. They brought beauty and rhythm back to a game that had gotten lost in a monotone and ugly game. No, it never produced the championship everyone had hoped for, but many agree that were it not for some bad breaks or David Stern, the Suns were poised to win it all. The memorable mosaic was only one perfect piece short of becoming a masterpiece.
However, it was not meant to be. They started moving pieces and trying to recreate the same carbon-copy game that most other teams used and swore by. First, the Matrix was shipped out followed shortly by D'Antoni. This season, the Suns set out to be a defensive team under the direction of coach Terry Porter and just like that, the beauty that existed in the SSoL system died. The Suns went from being Steve Nash's team to being Shaq's team. We went from run-and-gun to give the ball to Shaq and stand around to see what he does with it. We became Rocky before he befriended Apollo - all power with no grace.
It seems as though Steve Kerr traded away this team's soul for the CHANCE to be like his beloved Spurs - well, it appears as if the devil (as he tends to do) got the best of the two. I think my brother put it best when he told me that he'd rather watch a fun team that was a contender every year than a boring team that could be good or could be bad, nobody really knows. Yes, the Suns have some nice pieces right now, but last I checked they were jumping between the 7th and 9th seeds. It is no longer a foregone conclusion that we'll even make the playoffs and anyone who has followed this team can see just how stale our offense has become.
This, I believe, is the root of all our problems. Our offense is now almost completely void of creativity. We come down, we throw the ball to Shaq, we watch what Shaq does, and we try to react. Yes, Shaquille O'Neal is having the best season he's had in years, yes, he has a chance to make the All-Star team this year (if the coaches find that he deserves it more than Al Jefferson) and yes, it is very fun to see him hit a left handed baby hook and run back staring at his own hand in what I can only call disbelief. However, when he gets the ball our offense shuts down. There may be one cut into the lane by Amare or J-Rich, but other than that, everyone stands around waiting to see what's going to happen next and what happens, more often than not, is a shot goes up. Shaq did surprise me last night against the Wizards with quite a few kick outs for open looks in the fourth, but I don't trust that his ego will allow him to do this on a consistent basis.
Wow, I just read that last paragraph and realize that their offense is as boring to read about as it is to watch. I can only imagine how boring it is to run on the court. This stale offense has made it so that Nash is no longer an All-Star (although I am hoping that when he doesn't make the team he takes it personal and goes on a tear the second half of the season), Amare loses interest (we all know that he just sort of gives up if he feels he is not involved in the offense) and a lot of our other offensive weapons are rendered useless. Not only that but we're forced to watch Shaq attempt these stupid 8-foot hook shots and fallaways that he has no business even taking!
So before pointing the finger at Amare, we need to look at the system in which he plays. While I'm sure Shaq loves it, you can tell that there are times when the players look like they're just going through the motions out there. Need proof? Just look at the Celtics game. In basketball, when you take the creativity away, you're left with a power game. The Suns cannot win a championship based entirely on a power type of game - it just won't happen. If the Suns truly want to make a run at the title with this team, they need to mix a little beauty and creativity in and stop relying on brute strength.
Enter Apollo Creed.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well said
A very well crafted explaination of the Too Much Shaq theory of what ails the Suns.
I certainly think there’s some truth to this but I also think that the other guys effort has to come into play. A few weeks ago the Suns look like they had found the hybrid of power and creativity and it was the other guys moving without the ball that was the difference. It was the fun and passion on both ends.
If Shaq wasn’t out there working hard while everyone else was standing around I would have more sympathy for this arguement. But if you’ve got one guy. A proven champion. Who brings it every night while most of the others get bored then do something about it. Move with out the ball. Shaq is unselfish and a great passer. If you work and cut and use screens to get open he will find you.
If you stand around and wait for something to happen then I don’t blame Shaq for taking the high % shot. Especially when he’s increased his FT% as well.
Teams are not double teaming b/c they clearly know they would rather have Shaq score 25 and not double then to let this team get open looks. It is incumbant on the other guys to work harder on defense and get themselves into the game.
As for the beauty of the style – certainly there’s something to that. But there’s always a beauty to watching a great defensive team. The rotations can be just as ellegant and the work effort just as satisfying. That’s why Lou Amundson is so popular. People appreciate that effort.
So, bottom line I don’t blame Porter and Shaq for stepping up when Amare failed to and I certainly don’t have much sympathy for him not playing hard just because he’s not getting the same number of touches.
Blogging Suns Basketball
All valid points...
Oh I agree, I’m just saying that we aint winning nothing with this team until we go back to being creative and having fun in the hybrid offense. I’m not saying go away from Shaq completely, just enough to get some other players having fun again. You saw Nash and Barbosa smiling and having fun last night vs the Wizards, that just needs to continue – especially when we play against the better teams.
Yes, but who's responsibility is that?
Do you give Shaq fewer touches? Do you blame Porter b/c he’s the coach? Is it Nash’s issue since he’s you know, the guy with the ball?
I totally agree when they are playing better they are having more fun and getting out in transition. I just can’t help come back to the fact that those fast break opportunities are going to come from good defense and rebounding first.
How do you “create” that kind of fun creativity you speak of?
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Jan 27, 2009 4:34 PM MST up reply actions
That's the trick...
If I knew for sure the answer, I’d be making a lot more money in a field that’s a lot more entertaining. I would say they need to run some more motion based offenses – get the ball moving while still looking for Shaq inside once he has position established. The Suns have always been at their best when the ball is moving around and getting the defense out of position.
no we are getting somewhere
so run some more motion and cuts and try and get guys good looks early in the clock and then go to Shaq later if no thing opens up?
I would think the issue is that Shaq’s low post position clogging the lane limits the other offensive options unless they result in a jump shot. In the last couple of game they were getting those open outside looks and missing them. In the past that would have meant a sure Suns loss. Now they have a “security blanket” they can go to.
To me that’s an improvement. If JRich, Barnes, Hill etc are shooting well from outside then great, you can limit Shaq’s minutes and go more to those options. But they haven’t been shooting well.
Chicken meet egg.
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Jan 27, 2009 4:49 PM MST up reply actions
I think this hits the nail on the head...
…really, we have no bench. This year, at least, it’s not because we’re not trying to develop a bench, but quite simply b/c our guys off the bench suck. All we have is Barbosa and Barnes, and not even that, as long as Matt Barnes continues to think that he’s the next Kobe Bryant, chucking up shots that he has no business taking. Usually, our team will start off nicely, and then the bench will come and squander even the largest leads. By the time our starters come back in, what was a sizeable or respectable lead has been cut to a deficit, and our starters find themselves trying to make a comeback the rest of the game.
That's why I hated the Rich trade.
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
Sure I agree BUT
these stars have to know their role in the midst of each other and play accordingly….. Look at Kobe attempting fewer shots and stuff…….
The grass is always greener on the other side…… The trick is you can jump once, but to jump back again is foolishness….. Amare is surrounded by stars, neither Kobe, Lebron or KG or anyone has that LUXURY…. (MVP Center, MVP PG, SF who was supposed to be the next MJ, and a SG who had the highest 3PT FGM this season)…… He should embrace his inner role player……..
Shaq did reduce himself as long as Amare was dominating (early part of the Shaq trade last season, when Amare’s numbers skyrocketed)….. but now that the team demands more of Shaq, and wants Shaq to dominate more (because he can), its time for Amare to become the role player with a championship ring in mind…..
I’m sure that Hill and Nash, are all playing the part of role player to perfection….. and JRich looks like he is too……
Whats up doc?
I can't recall a team
in such a short span go through a change like they have. Not to make an excuse but this has to play some part of it, considering the ego’s that is Professional sports.
That been said, these professionals have to put aside selfish ideals and play for a championship. That is where I don’t think Amare is on the same page. Nash gets it, Hill gets it, Shaq gets it, J. Rich I don’t know, Amare, nope, to concerned about being “STAT”.
That is why I see continued inconsistency with this team. Amare has to get on board.
This is my unprofessional opinion.
"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"
Getting J-Rich...
has been pointless and just total garbage. He’s a Michael Finley clone, who the Suns gave up too much for. Kerr should trade him in the off-season. Hopefully Golden State takes him back, cuz I don’t know if anyone else believes the missing piece on their team is a one-dimensional 2-Guard, who makes $12 Million. I don’t care if Raja was losing a step, atleast he wouldn’t blow a defensive assignment at the end of a game like J-Rich, costing a couple games. Bell was an overachieving role player, who played like a star on D, against the other team’s best perimeter player. He also could shoot almost as well as J-Rich, so it’s not like he was a blackhole on offense. J-Rich is treated like a star, but plays like a role player. And with Doris Meow gone, all the frustration we had towards him, quickly shifted to Amare, which he totally deserves for being a selfish diva. Diaw had to go, but he’s a better player than J-Rich, even if they have different games. Time for a new GM.
by Aluminum Foyle on Jan 27, 2009 8:19 PM MST up reply actions
No way
Bell was overrated on defense… He wasn’t the Bruce Bowen type……
And once Mike D left, all these OVERACHIEVING players started achieving just about the same as they would have achieved under anybody else…..
look at NY…..all the players on their team are overachieving….. (Chris Duhon – 23 assists??? )…. plus Bell wasn’t buying into Porter………
atleast Nash and Barbosa, have, they didnt suddenly turn into locker room “cancers” (as not me, but everybody else likes to call them) once Mike D left……..
Whats up doc?
I agree completely.
Trade STAT for two first rounders before the deadline…..one less mouth to ‘feed’.
Play the bench they haven’t had enough minutes to prove or disprove themselves, you gotta know what they can do.
so basically tank
this season and play for the lottery….I think it’s a bit too soon for the Clippers to be considering that let alone the Suns
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Jan 28, 2009 7:26 AM MST up reply actions
I think they have enough to make the post season without him.
But ok a pick and a body. Isn’t he worth more now then later, unless they go a long way in the playoffs and then they will not trade him.
‘Cause it means he has to figure it out in three weeks time….I don’t like the chances tho’ it would be nice.
Something needs to change..
Or maybe thats the real problem. Too much change. Perhaps if Kerr would’ve kept some core players, rather then mixing up the offense, then this team would be one of the best. Now there is a group of players that have no chemistry and can’t put anything together on the court.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
Its easy..
No peer leadership. Porter can only try to lead the team so much. Stat was to take this role more than a year ago and he did not. Now the team has nobody to take control as a player and be the team leader. It was obvious back when Bell and Nash said we have no identity. I said it over a week ago on another post. Look at KG. That guy sweets heart and pride. When Boston loses KG takes it very hard and it shows. When the suns get blown out they do not care.
did you write this in response
to this recent quote by Steve Nash or is it just coincidentally appropriate?
“Everyone other than Shaq plays that (fast) style better,” Nash said. "It’s great to go into Shaq. We love his advantage and he’s a big part of our team. But if we’re going to be great, we have to have a balance. He can’t do it alone – and he doesn’t want to. We have enough guys who are capable but we can’t just stand and watch. We’ll lose our connectivity.
Seems like you’re not the only one worried about the Suns “standing and watching”. Glad to see that our point guard is calling out the danger in this.
Just a couple of points
I agree with some of it
But I think there are a lot of generalizations. SSOL is beautiful and entertaining basketball but I don’t think it wins championships. Some of the points I’ve raised before.
- Reliance on a few guys (7 to 8) in the entire season and the playoffs — Stamina is obviously a problem here
- Absolute dependence on Steve Nash centered offense. When Nash is guarded well, like with Bowen, the offense shuts as well.
- “Pace-centered defense” or sucking teams into SSOL so they’d rush their shots and hope they’d get tired and miss. In every playoff game against the Spurs, they couldn’t get a stop when they needed to. It’s also hard to argue that if not for Stern or injuries, the Suns would have pass through, because counterfactuals will always be counterfactuals.
- The Suns have been running the same offense for the past four years. Teams have certainly adapted to it. That’s why it was harder for the Suns to win games last year even before the Shaq Trade.
- True that SSOL is unpredictable basketball, in terms of entertainment, maybe but not in terms of strategy. You have to rely on quick passing, fast breaks, quick drives, cuts, volume 3 point shooting, and PNR. It didn’t work with elite teams like the Lakers or Spurs last year.
- Teams that won using offense, Shaq’s Lakers and Hakeem’s Rockets were very much low post offense teams. The good thing about the low post is relying on high% shots instead of “good shooting nights”.
- The Celtics demonstrate an effective M2M and team defense basketball. Something that the Spurs were doing for the past years. Suns’ players stagnated on that aspect of the game.
- Another problem with SSOL is it’s an ego filler system. It keeps guys happy by padding their stats with production. What’s the problem here? Obviously, when the offense siwtched during Porter, everyone’s stats went down and others complained. I think with Basketball, it has to be a team effort where people are ready to sacrifice their own personal gain for the good of the team. SSOL inflated the stats of players in the Suns, not to mention their “market value”. Any protest Porter’s system is obviously related to SSOL.
*Other variables to consider for the issue with Porter
- Nash is older and he’s obviously passed his peak. Some argued that Steve couldn’t work with the normal and predictable offense. I think with statistics, there may be some truth to it.
- Similar to Nash, I think Amare has a problem adapting to normal and predictable offense and still rides in SSOL.
- Too many alpha dogs in this team wanting to take the lead and pad their stats. (J-Rich’s shots). This was explained earlier in SSOL as an ego padding system. It keeps guys happy
- The team is going through a transition and is expecting high returns.
I agree with
- True that the offense relies on Shaq too much, but how can we blame him if he’s up against, I don’t know, Pryzbilla? Or Greg Ostertag, is that guy still alive? Shaq is taking high % shots after all.
- However, I think the offense should be more Amare and Nash than Shaq all in all. This can be done by benching Shaq if Amare and Nash are on the court. And maybe put them all together at a certain point. Other guys should get involved and Porter should “democratize” the offense a lot more.
- More than offense, I think defense is the bigger issue of the Suns. If we’re comparing stats, than Coach D is better than Porter, but that’s a mirage at most. Since Porter doesn’t reply on SSOL or pace centered defense, it’s been hard for guys to adjust to real team defense. I support the move for more defense to win a championship. Going back to SSOL is not going to do it, at least, in my opinion.
*Predictability or creativity
Creativity or Predictablility? I’d say predictability is better. The Spurs were running through the same thing over and over again in every playoff game that we went up against them and we couldn’t stop them. The same thing for the Bulls, Lakers, Rockets before. It was predictable because it works, the plays and sets would produce a certain outcome for the players to manuever. Predictablity that is effective works. While predictability of the Suns is not operating on optimal effectiveness but that doesn’t mean predictability itself is a bad thing.
I also think SSOL, while creative is very flash, it’s also predictable. It also runs a certain logic that teams realized after playing the Suns 3 year straight. You know they’re going to run and take that 3 point or slash. It just looks so brilliant the way the Suns did it.
I think it’s an issue of player development. When Marion moved to the Heat, he couldn’t produce as much (maybe an ego problem) when he was on the Suns. I think it’s based on playing another kind of game, the more predictable one, that the Suns’ are having a hard time adapting to.
Just my two cents. Thanks
Nice discussion here. Thanks.
Great post
You should copy this over and post as a Fan Post and I can bump it to the front page
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Jan 28, 2009 9:19 AM MST up reply actions
I believe the problem is Terry Porter.
I have no evidence to back it up, it’s just my honest opinion.
Same here, except the evidence is in the W/L record...
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
So many problems...
I think, ultimately, the problems the Suns are having are because of chemistry, and the fact that the Suns don’t seem to have an identity or to really be a team. Each individual player, and the coach, each contributes a bit to this lack of cohesion and fluidity, so lets take a look at them.
First of all, the big Cactus, Shaqovich
The thing that makes me wonder about Shaq on the Suns is that, I don’t feel Shaq thinks, or wants the Suns to be his team. I know its often talked about Shaq’s ego and what not, but when he came to Phoenix, he wanted to play as a role player, and let Amare emerge, not be the focal point of the offense. But Porter’s offensive schemes have called for the new Shaq to be the primary offensive weapon, something I’m sure Shaq is not complaining about, but I’m not sure if Shaq really feels like he’s the Suns man.
I know when Shaq was in the Lakers ( I live in LA so its better than a Miami ref) the Lakers were his team, and he put the team on his back for games at a time, especially in Kobe’s early years. When I see Shaq on the Suns, I get the feeling he doesn’t know what he should do. Yes, he’s taking high percentage shots, and yes, he’s the newer, faster, stronger Shaq, but I don’t think that Shaq really has ownership over this team the way he did in LA, and to a lesser degree in MIA.
Even though he gets pissed off when they lose games, its not like he straight up comes out and calls his team mates(Amare) out for their mistakes, because it doesn’t seem like Shaq’s sure whether or not he’s the man in Phoenix, and if he’s not he would be making a mistake to call out a seemingly franchise player. Shaq seems disconnected to the Suns because when he shoots many shots, even at a high percentage, even at a record percentage from the free throw line, the media attacks him as being selfish and what not, even though the schemes ask for that, and when he doesn’t take a good number of shots, and isn’t agressive, the team loses. So it seems Shaq is stuck between being the odd man out and being the man, which causes discontent among the other “men” in Phoenix, which brings me to.
STAT, Amare
Amare, in my opinion, has been this season’s more erratic player. It seems as though Amare, who’s said many times before that he wants to be in the same discussion as DWade, Kobe, and LeBron, feels that his grip on “his team” is slipping away with the emergence of Shaq. Amare seems to be pouting, almost in the mindset of, ‘if its his team, let him win the games’, and the problem with that is, that 1. it loses the team games when Amare doesn’t bring it, and 2. Shaq is bringing it, and putting the team on his back, so where does that leave Amare?
Even though he’s stated he wants to stay with the Suns, I feel that Amare, like JJ before him, just wants to be “the man” on a team, regardless of its a good team, bad team, any team. Amare just doesn’t seem like he’s buying into the whole “team” aspect of the new Suns that was never present before. With the old suns, it was Nash, who was never selfish, Marion who was fed by Nash, Bell who shot when open, and Diaw, who was erratic. Among those players, the only ones that can create their own shots are Diaw at times, Nash, and Amare.
Before, Amare was much more “the man” because he was the one taking 20 shots a game, every game, because nobody on Phoenix could make their own shots. Now that the suns have JRich and Shaq, and to a lesser extent Hill, Amare isn’t as much the man as he was before, and it seems to be affecting him mentally. He seems disconnected, because he doesn’t have that same confidence that he had before, because now that the team is pretty officially Shaq’s team, where does that leave Amare? A role player? For all the talk of Amare the role player, he has never been interested in being a role player, only a star, and I think that once 2010 hits, if Amare hasn’t been allowed to be the man in phoenix, he’s going to bolt for some god-awful town where he can shoot the ball 25 times a game.
Canadian Bacon, Nash
Steve Nash needs to be a more vocal leader. That, in and of itself seems to be the main problem. Nash always was the guy who led by example, never really super vocal, and that left almost a leadership gap, which Amare, try as he might, could not fill. The chemistry problems that the Suns are having right now stem from the fact that they have a tenuous leadership structure. They have Nash, who is quiet, and they have Shaq, who is vocal, but is still a newcomer to this team, and they have Amare, who wants to be a leader, but obviously isn’t. The leadership vaccuum that Nash creates leaves so much room for other peoplet hat it’s no surprise that there is such bad chemistry.
Really, those three are the most important to the Suns chemistry. If Amare would learn to grow a pair, like DWade did when he was paired with Shaq, and show a little humility toward the 4 time champion, 3 time finals mvp, and let him dominate while still playing his team, and Steve Nash continues to facilitate the offense, then this team really has a chance to be good. They have the raw talent to match up toe to toe with any team in the league, but they lack the cohesion. This team needs a better coach, someone they can trust. Get an Avery Johnson, someone that can whip the Suns into shape, someone who wont take Amare’s excuses, because Porter, as good a player as he was, is not a strong enough coach to really influence Amare, let alone Shaq and Nash.
Interesting how so much of the discussion here is about offense. What’s killing the Suns is defense and turnovers. The problem is simply that a bunch of veteran offensive specialists were thrown together on this team and expected to play together on both ends of the court. There hasn’t been a whole lot of buy-in and it might be asking too much for this group to figure it out at this stage of their careers.

by 
















