Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

time to fire terry porter?

Halfway into the season, it has become apparent that Terry Porter as our coach just isnt working. In fact, i would go so far to say that the person who cost us the MOST games is none other than our very own coach, Terry Porter. A list of a few bone-headed moves by TP at random:

1. "resting shaq" in back to back games rather stupidly. Im sure most of you remember a stretch where we played denver and minnesota back to back and TP decided to give shaq the night off playing denver. we lost that game in overtime, and when we played minnesota, we lost to them too. AT HOME. Let me first say that while resting shaq is good, some common sense should be used. you rest shaq against a playoff team in the west in the first night of a back-to-back? RIDICULOUS. what makes TP even more stupid is he played shaq two nights in a row, first against atlanta then against - the WIZARDS. Yes, dont play shaq in a potential playoff matchup because its a back to back but play him against the wizards. You go, TP.

 2. Terry Porter's poor rotations. Matt Barnes, who has been taking ill-advised shots, and shooting well below 40% still gets played 20 mins or more. Really? come on coach, i understand if hes in a slump but have you seen the shots he takes?

3. Coach TP's focus on DEFENSE. not only did our offense suffer, (from 1st last yr to 6th currently) but Terry Porter just slows down the pace a bit to make it SEEM like we are a better defensive team. its a shame then, that while we were a middle-of-the-pack defensive team under D' antoni, we currently are 25th in defensive efficiency. the knicks, btw, are 24th.

4. Terry Porter's ridiculous offensive system. I dont get who put in terry porter's head that he was a better offensive coach than d' antoni, but he sure fucked up our system bad. his new system "throw the ball to shaq and watch what happens" sure seems kind of stupid. we have a rejuvenated MVP center making his free throws, a 2-time MVP point guard, an all-star starter power forward, a dunk contest winner, a former rookie of the year, a former 6th man awardee, and throwing shaq the ball is the best you can do? COME ON. we are 6th in offensive efficiency, even though WITHOUT A DOUBT we possess the BEST OFFENSIVE TEAM IN THE HISTORY OF THE NBA. seriously: nash, mr. 50 - 40 - 90, barbosa, hill, amare, shaq, richardson?? are you kidding me, 6th???

5. Terry Porter's motivation skills. I especially love this. TP has done NOTHING. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to motivate our suns. when we lose, he just shrugs it off and says "we got a good ole ass whipping". well whoop dee do, TP, you think maybe you should call out your players for not playing defense, instead of just standing on the sidelines looking like a fool?

6. Porter's many other idiotic moves. Hack-a-bowen? WTF? theres a reason no one has tried that before - ITS STUPID. it undermines the players. its like tellng them, we are better off getting bruce bowen to the line and hoping he misses than trying to get a defensive stop. im sure the players hate TP so much after costing them the game.

If you guys know any more bone-headed moves by TP, feel free to post them in the comments, im sure i missed a lot. id also like to add that ive been asking stan to get this site running: www.fireterryporter.com - he claims its too early, but i disagree. we have a good team, which is being run to the ground. COACHES HAVE BEEN FIRED FOR A LOT LESS.

what are we waiting for? making it as the 8th seed, getting tossed in the first round and rebuilding the team coz we lost again? Id much rather fire the coach, hire a new one (who although late in the season, can AT LEAST fix the kinks and/or rotations of porter) and we have a much better shot for the playoffs. or it could backfire, we dont make the playoffs and get a higher first round pick - both options i gladly prefer.

lets do this stan! lets start our campaign to fire terry porter!

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Is the damage already too much?

I agree that TP is not looking so good…..at all. Yet even considering that would firing him now be that much better for the team?

I just think that this team is in too much of a funk as it is, and unless a Phil Jackson or Sloan like coach is out there waiting to whip this team into shape then I dont know that firing Porter will do any good.

Maybe in the long run, but in the short run I got a feeling that firing Porter just wont matter.

"Yeah I could have been king, but maybe I already am king. Hail to the king baby." Ash from Army of Darkness

by Turambar on Jan 30, 2009 9:37 AM MST reply actions  

i agree that there MAY be no immediate effects in the short run

but does anyone think with our current lineup we could make it past the 1st (or 2nd) round? isnt that a risk worth taking? firing porter will show the players that everyone (even someone hand-picked by the GM) will own up to their mistakes one way or the other. if we do fire him, we dont have to change the entire system fully. maybe we can just gradually improve one step at a time and still be a better team than we were under TP. at the very LEAST the interim coach could stop playing matt barnes so damn much, rip his players for not playing D and stop the “hack-a-clutch player with a proven history of beating the suns” strategy.

by ryansunsfan on Jan 30, 2009 9:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Fire him at the end of the year

Nothing to be gained by doing it now … if he keeps this up, though, he needs to go

props to Point No. 5 — dead-on

Mmmmm ... Guinness

by JSun on Jan 30, 2009 12:48 PM MST reply actions  

All good points

Remember at the end of the 3rd qt against the Spurs, there was maybe 3 secs left and Pops immediately subs in some shooters. TP does nothing, leaves Nash out there (we’re on defense with one possession left) and Nash picks up the foul on Manu and then a tech. (A lot can be summed up this year from those few seconds—misuse of players strengths and weaknesses, laziness on details etc).

Then in the 4th, the Spurs keep Duncan on the bench, but TP has Shaq, Amare, and Nash out there together… at least Mike D was careful to balance Shaq’s time with TD.

And does anyone remember TP saying before the season started something like: “we don’t need many offensive plays, just a couple and mix those up”

Dough Collins anyone?

There's magic out there. Telepathy. Power. Precision. Speed. But don't invest your emotional entirety or be swallowed up by addiction. After all, it's just a game.

by Permapaulur on Jan 30, 2009 1:09 PM MST reply actions  

Amen

I couldn’t agree more. While D’Antonio didn’t figure out how to incorporate Shaq in the lineup last year, they had glimpses of what could be. Under Porter I’m sorry this team has taken a step backwards. They’ll be competitive simply because of talent alone. However there is no way in hell that they will get by a well coached team in the playoffs or in a regular season matchup for that matter.

by krazy807 on Jan 30, 2009 3:09 PM MST reply actions  

agree

with that much talent and just the 7th seed is embarassing. i think any other coach would shit his pants for the chance to coach this team. i honestly deep in my heart believe i could at least give the team a better record by telling nash to just “go do your thing”.

by ryansunsfan on Jan 30, 2009 9:40 PM MST up reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

Nash is like a coach on the floor…I’d let him make me look like a great coach

by ron_dasun on Jan 31, 2009 11:04 AM MST up reply actions  

I really wanted Porter to succeed.

I loved him as a player and hoped good things for his tenure here.

HOWEVER, it has become blatantly clear that our players are not responding to him AT ALL. He may be a good coach for young players but I don’t know what Kerr was thinking bringing a relatively inexperienced coach for such a veteran squad.

I agree on all of your points. The lack of motivation, the questionable rotations, the idiotic in-game decisions; it’s all becoming too much to watch. I’ve never had such ambivalence towards the suns, but as I commented last night, I don’t want to watch the journey anymore, I just want to see the ending, so that I can move on and find something new to enjoy.

The chance of Porter getting fired is extremely low, however. Kerr/Sarver won’t ever admit they made a mistake this early. Even though it is CLEARLY not working. I wish Kerr would include Porter in his ‘no one is untouchable’ rhetoric.

by ArizonaCactus on Jan 30, 2009 7:54 PM MST reply actions  

We have to isolate the problems independent of Porter

I’m not going up against any of your points. But I feel it’s necessary to point out problems that exist in the system instead of the coach. I think some of the problems you’ve pointed out would have existed with any other coach (at least, a conventional defensive/low post minded coach) with the exception of Coach D (and people who follow his style). And also, I think some of the problems also extend to the chemistry and the type of skills of the players.

1.) On defense, I think it would have happened with any other defensive minded coach (other than coach D) because SSOL relies on pace-centered defense. If we want real M2M and team defense, then a transition would have been absolutely necessary with any other coach.

2.) On offense, I think chemistry and offensive are issues here. While there are a lot of good offensive players, it mainly depends on what kind “offense” they are playing. Nash, Barbosa, and STAT came from SSOL era while Shaq from the low post offensive teams. I think the issue here is player selection and mixing the players together. It was a hard decision for Porter to choose between SSOL or low post. Yes, there’s a balancing act right now for the Suns but the “balancing” is more of an indecisiveness to what the offense should be. I think it would have been a hard decision for any coach given that we have different kinds of players who work under different offensive ideas. Porter was/is caught between two walls.

3.) Motivation? Maybe it’s hard to say, I like Porter for dissing Stat. Who knows what Porter has been doing behind the scenes? Assuming he is doing something, then it’s the players problem

4. The hack-a-bown, I feel, is not a problem in a vacuum, the problem was doing it repeatedly. I thought it was a risk worth taking. His fault was ordering it again and again.

5. Rotations? Maybe we can fault Porter for not maximizing the potential of the rotations. But it begs the question, can the potential be maximize more? I think the problem is the mixing of players in the team. Any other coach might have had the same problem. If we’re pissed at Barnes for being like that, than we should criticize Barnes and not just Porter. In fact, if i remember right, Porter was the one who was wanted an adjustment not to rush the shots (Barnes) and wait for the best opportunity. I’m not sure who to blame Barnes for, maybe Porter is doing something from behind and Barnes is not listening.

6. Resting Shaq issue. I don’t think we should blame TP for this. In a vacuum, Shaq’s incapability to play b2b games is an age issue that would give any other coach a problem. I think the problem with Porter is “selecting” the games regarding resting Shaq. I agree that resting Shaq against Denver was a problem, but remember, at that time, the Suns were playing very well. We all thought (and I m sure even the players and TP) that the Suns we getting their act together. We did have victories against good teams without Shaq (Orlando) and Denver was playing without Anthony (we won against Denver early in the season with Anthony playing). Regarding the Wolves, that was a blunder but nost just Porter, but the whole team. I think TP wanted to rest Shaq to go up against Jefferson. Afterall, Minnesota relies more on the post than Denver.

Regarding Atlanta and Wizards, this happened recently and Porter must have learned from the Denver/Minessota issue and decided against resting Shaq. We cannot analyze the Denver/Minnesota – Hawks/Wizards in the same standard but also look at the different circumstances that the actor (TP) learned from the evolution of events.

Now, I don’t disagree with firing Porter. I’m very open to the possibility and slowly getting irritated at some of his decisions. But it’s only fair that we blame him for mistakes that we can isolate and specific mistakes he made (repeated hack-a-Bowen) instead of mistakes that exist beyond him.

Cheers and thank you.

by Azrael on Jan 30, 2009 11:50 PM MST reply actions  

I’m not defending is actions at all. However, I’m rationalizing and looking at the logic of what made him decide on things. Those were not easy decisions and his reasons (for some of his decisions) are not total blunders.

Some of his decisions are not stupid but were taken with benefits and risk at mind. Such as the resting Shaq issue.

by Azrael on Jan 31, 2009 12:04 AM MST up reply actions  

i somewhat agree but not really

your premise is that TP had reasons for all his decisions and it could have gone either way. i agree with that. however, when it continuously results in losses, then bad luck cant be blamed. im sure everyone remembers when steve kerr said “if it works, im a genius, if not im a moron” regarding the shaq trade. that trade was a big risk – a risk which could have gone either way. terry porter, like kerr, is a horrible gambler – and i hate gamblers. dont get me wrong, im a poker fan, but i dont gamble – i STRATEGIZE. something all coaches should do. do you think sitting shaq against denver was a strategy or a gamble? seriously, he could have sat shaq against minnesota (at home) instead of denver (on the road, albeit without anthony). that was pure idiocy. hacking bowen wasnt a strategy either- it was a gamble. sure bowen could have hit 1 out of 8, we win the game. but he didnt. and porter wanted us to win because of LUCK. not skill, luck. we replaced d’ antoni because his system relied heavily on luck and we replace him with a coach much worse than him?

i understand that all decisions involve significant risk but porter does not use his head. he roles the dice hoping for sixes and if that is the only way we win a championship under him, then forget it.

by ryansunsfan on Jan 31, 2009 3:28 AM MST up reply actions  

Every strategy at a certain extent is a gamble

don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that the guy is completely competent or should remain as coach. However, I’m staying away from the other position that everything that he did is a blunder.
Obviously, every strategy is gamble, and the extent varies. We cannot just say that every gamble is “pure idocy” without analyzing the specifics of the situation. If we look at history, or even a history of Sports, there are variables that cannot be predicted whenever shits happens. The Spaniards didn’t know that they had the genes with them that would almost eradicated the Indians. Similarly, Pearl Harbor was a risk, and so is Hitler’s decision of going against Russia (if he didn’t, then he would have to risk going up against a more powerful Soviet Union.

I’m not going to respond to the claim about Denver/Min. Please kindly read what I posted about it. And who knows, Coach D might have been facing the same kinds of problems if he stayed at coach, maybe not. Like I said, counter-factuals cannot be debated.

What’s my point? While his decisions could have gone either way, it’s not fair to assign full blame on Porter alone. He deserves the blame, maybe he deserves to be fired (after the Chicago game, why not). But I’m saying that if we look at his decisions, it’s not totally stupid or idocy. There were merits to it and it’s not something as idotic as trading Gasol for, I don’t know, Kwame Brown.

Strategy - defined in the most idotic way as plan of action -- also includes gambles. Whether or not it works depends on unpredictable variables because human agency is obviously unpredictable. We’re not doing advance mathematics here or algorithms. I don’t think the strategy, after looking at the benefits and risk in mind, was purely idioti. The price to pay was as high as the price to gain. That’s what I m going against, assigning culpability especially when it’s not commensurate.

On the other hand, losing to the Bulls, Knicks, and Bobcats. Now, that’s something that Terry Porter must answer to. And maybe he should get fired.

Cheers

by Azrael on Feb 1, 2009 1:16 AM MST up reply actions  

I hope we fire TP, he’s horrible at his job. Let’s fire our coach like everybody else has been doing.

The only Suns fan from Boston!

by ShaqAttack on Feb 1, 2009 6:01 PM MST reply actions  

along the lines of poor rotation...

D’antoni had this figured out; Nash/Amare as a combo and Shaq on the court at the same time is a bad idea. Porter has figured this out recently, but it may be too late. Last season Shaq would sit early around the 6 or 7 minute mark then he would come back into the game to anchor the second unit. Last year Barbosa, Boris, and Giricek all played well with Shaq. This year i picture playing small around Shaq with JRich, LB, Hill and Barnes. All slashers, cutters, and three point shooters aside from Hill’s shaky 3 point touch. Shaq simply cannot coincide with Amare and Nash for extended periods of time, for 5-6 minute intervals they can be unbelievable as we’ve seen for stretches since the J-rich trade pre-temper tantrums. Why even bother having Nash/Amare and Shaq on the court at the same time? Even I could make a post entry pass to Shaq, why waste Nash’s minutes to accomplish this casual task? I’ve been pulling my hair out for months watching Amare play like Kurt Thomas; pick and pop, pick and pop, pick and pop. AH!! That was the most devastating 2 man game in the NBA and we sacrifice that for left handed baby hooks from a 36 year old? Instead we have Shaq defending Nash and Amare’s devastating pick and roll. I could go on forever…

by Teske22 on Feb 1, 2009 9:01 PM MST reply actions  

genius

The only thing I like about Porter is that he uses more of his bench than D’antoni. I think we could have one a championship if a deeper bench was used during the course of the season and playoffs.

Your comment make complete sense! I completely agree.

Why not Bobby April?

by nickdaniels on Feb 3, 2009 11:45 AM MST up reply actions  

Ok, I'm just very upset...

So I live in Connecticut, I have trained some friends to be Suns fans but they have lost interest. I need Phoenix Suns therapy. So I’ll just talk to a blog. Sounds reasonable right? Whatever.

Keeping Nash and shaq off the court also covers up the massive defensive liability in the pick and roll. I went to the Knicks game. Duhon and David Lee shredding Nash and Shaq in the pick and role for 48 minutes was just depressing.

Another thing Porter has been awful with is managing Amare. This is a dangerous point, but a valid point nonetheless. Amare clearly plays 500% better when he is the guy, and we all know he has the talent to be that guy. Ironically his words; not mine. D’antoni knew to get any defense from Amare whatsoever he had to pet his offensive ego. In games that the Suns were up comfortably in the 4th coach mike would put Amare in the game during scrub time to pad the STAT (couldn’t resist) sheet. Is it a flaw in amare? Of course. Does it make sense to do what Coach Mike did to get the best out of his player…OF COURSE. The team has to look out for themselves first, if it means Amare has to beat up scrubs for 4 minutes for 10 points and 4 rebs to stroke his ego to play well. Then do it. Unfortunately we are rarely up comfortably anymore.

by Teske22 on Feb 1, 2009 9:13 PM MST reply actions  

I'm with you

Porter is just not a good coach. In any sport you have to coach and implement systems that meet your talent. Of course your GM has to be on the same page. Passing to Shaq to see what happens, and trading two starters for a defensive liability are not good moves. One thing I notice from watching Suns games is the lack of any fundimental basketball. Of course its common in the NBA, but boxing out is still legal.

Why not Bobby April?

by nickdaniels on Feb 3, 2009 11:41 AM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

At_small
A Rough Draft Of A Rough Draft: Players The Suns Should Target In The 2012 NBA Draft Lottery
Small
View of One Fan: Rebuilding the Suns Through The Draft

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Gortat_nash_dudley_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Divinginlevanto_small PHXgp

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_3111433_9952_1451357_main_small 7footer