Bright Side Of The Sun: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Guest Blogger: Juco All-American Answers Five Questions

Revisting the Marion for Shaq trade: A bloggers Round Table

One year (and a couple of weeks) later, the Phoenix Suns have become Shaq's team. Except they haven't. Or maybe some days they are. Then they aren't. It's like the weather in the mid-west, if you don't like the answer just wait five minutes and it will change. Again.

And that's the story of the huge Marion for Shaq trade one-year (and a couple of weeks) later.

All the talk about Shaq's health, Shaq's contract and Shaq's restraining orders, what it comes down to is the fundamental and as yet unanswered question: Can Shaq fit into the Suns system or can the Suns system successfully fit around Shaq?

Fortunately for us though it is much more complex then all that and so we've assembled the finest minds from the NBA blogosphere (by finest I mean the ones kind enough to respond) to delve into the biggest trade to hit the Suns since the Chuckster arrived.

We asked our panelists three simple questions and sat back while the genius poured in. Now we are pleased to share the opinion of the opinionerati with you.

 

 

Star-divide

 

Meet your bloggers

Before we begin with today's agenda, lets go around the table and introduce everyone:

From our own Bright Side of the Sun we have ZonaFlash, Dustin aka watdogg10 and Mike Lisboa (boring name, Mike)

Joining us as our guests are:

Brett Pollakoff from AOL Fanhouse

Matt Moore from Hardwood Paroxysm

Tuffy from Sports by Brooks and Blog Talk Radio

Tas Melas from The Basketball Jones

Clipper Steve from Clips Nation

Michael Schwartz from Valley of the Suns ESPN True Hoop blog

Thank you everyone for your participation in this most earnest and sincere of blogoendeavors.

 

Let the opinions flow

We asked three questions and being bloggers got a mix of responses that either follow or didn't follow the specific directions. Bloggers generally don't like to be confined to little boxes or simple questions so this wasn't a surprise.

Here's the three questions and sampling of the responses (be sure to click the links to see the full answers from each respondent)

1) Shaq came to the Suns and had an undeniable impact. How do you think it's worked out so far?

Tuffy

Also undeniably impactful: meteorites.  Wildly entertaining, too, but I wouldn't want something I care about to be within the blast zone when it lands, like my ballclub.  (Plus, both are almost completely immobile once they smack terra firma.)

However, it's certainly helped the Tempe Police Reserve to have one more volunteer as long as Jason Richardson's allowed to drive in the Valley, no?

ZonaFlash

It's been one year since Shaq arrived and, you know, on the court we're not necessarily better. I think it would be hard to say we're much worse. We are different and with that there's hope. Handling the offense is going to take a lot of experimentation, as it has.

Imagine moving in a new giant full-sized sectional into your living room. You're gonna have to find the best way to fit it in. Same thing with Shaq in the paint!

Michael Schwartz

It's worked out better than we could have expected. None of us knew how much gas Shaq had left in his tank, and I think putting up 45 and 33 back to back to go with an All-Star Game MVP trophy tells us there's a little more diesel fuel left....the Suns have finally figured out how to be the Suns and accommodate Shaq with this so-called "Seven Seconds or Shaq" system. There certainly have been bumps in the road, but Steve Kerr might not have exactly earned a moron point for this one.

Mike Lisoba

The Shaq trade literally caused a full revolution (in the 360° sense of the word) in the Phoenix Suns’ game plan. 
 
The tragedy of the trade is the complete disintegration of Shawn Marion’s stature as a player.  The SSOL system played to all his strengths (his athleticism, ball-hawking, perimeter defense and finishing) while masking his weaknesses (no handle, creating his own shot, inability to function in a half-court set, and lack of a reliable jumper).  He’s a gazelle and, baby, he was born to run.  

wattdog10

The trade, also initially called "the Amare Stoudemire project" (or ASP) didn't bring a championship last year (or just as important, help us beat the Spurs in the playoffs), it ultimately drove D'Antoni out and the ASP has become the "revitalize Shaq's career and reputation project" (or RSCPP).

Brett Pollakoff

On paper, it seemed ridiculous to try to mesh an aging and broken Shaquille O'Neal with the 7SOL Phoenix Suns. I mean, how could that possibly work out, right? As it turns out, it hasn't -- so far. But honestly, it wasn't that bad of an idea.

Matt Moore

If Shaq's still putting out 30 point games in the playoffs, especially against Duncan (since apparently that's all Phoenix fans care about, beating San Antonio), then yeah, it's brilliant. That's the thing. We know they're not winning a title. They're just not. So by that standard, it has to be a mistake.

But the great thing about it is that Shaq's personality, payroll, and PR image means that it can't be blamed on him. If he plays well and they lose, then it's because his teammates didn't step up. "Shaq did everything he could!" If he doesn't play well and they lose, his teammates still didn't step up.

Tas Melas

How has it worked out? It hasn't. The Suns didn't make it past the 5th game of the playoffs last season.

 The team didn't have Shaq for the full year in '07-'08 so you have to give them at least one more season to make it work. Midway through that season, his coach gets fired - definitely not Shaq's fault, but Stoudemire's injury was!

Now, the only way Shaq and the Suns can make this trade a successful one is if they make a long playoff run, and I'm talking NBA Finals.

 

Consensus mashup of the views is...

The trade has all the impact of a meteorite dropping into onto your living room couch but we are still waiting to see for sure how it will really turn out but in the mean time it's been better then expected except that it really hurt Shawn Marion which is painful but don't forget that it didn't result in beating the Spurs even though you can't blame Shaq for that or anything else and in the end the Suns had better win now. Right now.

 


2) Knowing what you know now would you do the deal again (assuming you have that awesome power to make deals at all....and go back in time)?

Mike Lisoba

So would I do the trade over again?  Absolutely.  Let’s not forget we also dumped Marcus Banks’ albatross of a contract in the process of bringing in the Big Cactus.  

Matt Moore

Would I trade Shawn Marion? Absolutely. I argued for it before it happened. Marion was a malcontent who thought he could be "The Man" with an  option-expiring contract.

Would I trade him for a 36 year old $40 million investment with conditioning issues who fits but NOT AT ALL with the rest of our team which is built on speed? Yeah, not so much.

 

Tas Melas

If I could go back, I would definitely reverse the trade.

Steve Kerr may not agree with that, but when he fired Porter, he made the decision that the uptempo game is where the Suns butter their bread. Kerr would tell you Shaq could be a part of that and that's difficult to argue with the show he's putting on right now.

Brett Pollakoff

Only if I could also have the power to have Mike D'Antoni still in the head coach's seat. But Alvin Gentry seems to be doing his bidding anyway, so right now, (except for Amare's injury) things are going pretty much as initially planned.

Tuffy

The problem with the '07-'08 Suns was never the petulance of Shawn Marion.  Remember when Kobe absolutely positively had to be traded and the Bulls were absolutely the best home for him, bar none?  Marion doesn't move at the trade deadline and he sucks it up.  He never had the stamina for a Vince Carter-style Operation Shutdown.

ZonaFlash

Now, the trade looks pretty good with Shaq a legitimate All-Star and Marion grassing around in loservilles of bottom-feeding Toronto and Miami.

Michael Schwartz

With what I said in the last response notwithstanding, I would not do the deal. I wanted to see if the Suns could win a title in Seven Seconds or Less, and trading for a 325-pound behemoth fundamentally changed the way the Suns were.

watdogg10

No. People tend to forget that when the trade went down last year we were in first place.

Yes it was a shaky first place and yes the Lakers were gifted Pau Gasol, but it was first place all the same.

I would have liked to see them give it one more shot with that core.

Clipper Steve

I would not have done the deal at the time, nor would I do it in hindsight.

Here's the thing... when you're the Suns, and you've gone deep into the Western Conference playoffs three straight years without emerging, you either have to take the next step, or you have to start over because Steve Nash isn't getting any younger. Of course, that was Kerr's thinking at the time he acquired Shaq as well - he chose to take one big gamble on breaking through during the Nash era. But it didn't work last season (when the Suns exited the playoffs in the first round) and it probably isn't going to work this season either.

 

Consensus mashup of the views is...

would you do the deal again..

Yes. No. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. No. No.

The No's have it 6 - 3.


3) If you wouldn't have done this deal with Shaq, what would you have done with Marion (assuming again that anyone other then the rest of us listens to you)?

Matt Moore

Well, since it looks like Elton Brand was capable of being coaxed out of LA, and since the Phoenix training staff would giggle at Lazarus and sey they could do better (and could), I'd aim for what I argued at that point for Marion. A series of role players, one to two with size and rebounding (who aren't capable of killing someone with a poorly aimed crowd dive- seriously, he's going to squash a toddler one of these times), and a backup point guard who's at least capable of running the offense while Nash rests his back.

Tuffy

Knowing what I know now about everyone's desperate need to clear space to survive the drop in the cap (especially Bob Sarver, who ordered the house staff 18 months ago to rifle through all the copies of Monopoly in his houses and cover the luxury tax spaces with Suns stickers), I might have held Marion and let him walk this summer.

Tas Melas

I would have put Marion on program covers, got media members to interview him pre, mid and post game, sent my kid to jump on his leg and never let go, etcetera.

Marion is an extrmemely special fit for the uptempo system that you just don't find very often and I would have done everything in my power to make him happy, which means give him the pub his ego demands.

Michael Schwartz

I probably just let Marion's deal expire and get out of the luxury tax zone next year. If I'm not Robert Sarver, I look into re-signing him to a one-year contract at a sizable pay cut consistent with the depressed NBA market

Mike Lisoba

Looking back at the trade, it’s almost impossible to deny the Suns got the better of this deal.  A revitalized Shaq coupled with a revitalized Suns squad hell-bent on scorching their way into the playoffs and making life miserable for their first round opponent is almost enough to make Steve Kerr look like... a genius?

 

Consensus mashup of the views is...

Instead of trading Marion for Shaq the Suns should have gone after Elton Brand or another rebounding big or a point guard and role players but barring that cap space is nice or better yet just never let Shawn go by resigning him to a cheap 1 year deal and if that all doesn't work just trade him for Shaq.

 

 

Thank you again to everyone that participated. I hope that cleared everything up. It certainly did for me. Then it didn't....

 

 

Poll
Knowing what you know now would you do the deal again (assuming you have that awesome power to make deals at all....and go back in time)?
Yes. Marion had to go. Shaq > Marion. Genius Point for Kerr
61 votes
No. Shaq (while better then expected) was too disruptive. Moron Point for Kerr
117 votes
Too soon to say
21 votes
Leave me alone. 10 Moron Points for Bright Side of the Sun
36 votes

235 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 18 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Let me clear it up.

Shaq is the best thing to happen to the franchise since Steve Nash!!

In Nash we trust - for better and for worse...

by ZonaFlash on Mar 4, 2009 4:06 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

Really?

I don’t figure it that way. Shaq always looks at his hand and sees rings. A ring will not happen here in Phoenix, unless Joe Johnson, Kevin Johnson, Paul Westphal and Alvin Adams swoop in.
 A team is based on wins and losses, and this team will have to fight tooth and nail to get to the playoffs to match up against the Lakers.
 I view Shaq coming to the Valley as a Push, either way this team was doomed before the trade, the groundwork was already put in place by Sarver and Kerr.

"Have You heard of the Boom on Mizar 5?"

by Grockcubs on Mar 4, 2009 7:07 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree it was a push in the W/L column

but it has more upside potential. The year has been a lot more fun with Shaq’s antics. And if you ain’t winnin, you better be havin some fun.

In Nash we trust - for better and for worse...

by ZonaFlash on Mar 4, 2009 7:36 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

How has it been a push in the W/L column?

And then you say “if you ain’t winnin, you better be having some fun.” Before the Shaq trade, we were winning!

I wasn’t totally against trading Marion, but it had to be for the right player in exchange.. Shaq was clearly not that. Yes, he has played way better than I expected, but he has caused Nash’s value to drop significantly.

by brian13 on Mar 4, 2009 11:04 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

it was fool's gold

In Nash we trust - for better and for worse...

by ZonaFlash on Mar 4, 2009 12:14 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I know I'm gonna piss someone off....

But I am not buying all the Steven Nash hype. I know he’s good, but he’s not great. He’s not great like Kobe, like Magic, like Garnet, like Jordan, like Wilt, like so many others. He’s good and I think he’d be coveted by any team in this league and would deserve to play for any team in this league, but he’s not got “It.”

Shaq has “It” and he has a little more. He’s probably the most dominant player to ever play in this league based on his size alone. He’s not Jordan, but who is? If I picked a player to build around, I’d pick Shaq hands down over anyone who has ever played in the NBA. He fits any style, and in his youth he could not be stopped. Even in his old age he shows glimpses of what he used to be, and sometimes I wonder if he won’t play forever.

Take care of the little things, and the big things will take care of themselves.

by SunDolphin on Mar 5, 2009 4:35 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Shaq til 40, why not?

oh yeah, his pick and roll defense. =)

In Nash we trust - for better and for worse...

by ZonaFlash on Mar 6, 2009 7:37 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

it's not the same

coach change, lots of players in and out, this is not the only thing to quantify the difference from then to now.

by stingy d on Mar 4, 2009 8:58 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

Marion was a great player but he wasnt worth the money he was asking for.

by mteo78 on Mar 4, 2009 10:52 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

Right..

But trading for Shaq was not the right move at all.

by brian13 on Mar 4, 2009 10:57 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm no expert, but here's my two cents......

Part One:

Ok, the trade was because there was a NEED at center… We couldn’t have Amar’e masquerading as a center anymore… It wasn’t going to get us past the Spurs, or any team with a big frontline (like the Lakers post Gasol)…. we tried to make that work the past few years but didn’t happen… Even Mike D’Antoni wanted size in the middle…..

So trading Marion was the right move…..

Now onto, who they traded for…..
If the Need was for a mobile center, then Tyson Chandler or Elton Brand may have been a good fit…. But the thinking was the NEED for SIZE…..and with Amar’e and Grant Hill (at the PF and SF) likely matching up with Gasol and Odom, there was an irresistible urge to add as much size as they could at Center….and thats why they sold themselves on Shaq

It all made perfect logical sense….
(when you keep trying the same thing and you lose (albeit in the WCF) you know you need to do something a bit different to get you over the hump)

But
The problem there was that Shaq couldn’t be integrated into the system seamlessly… Mike D’Antoni had to believe that he COULD integrate Shaq, because his input was taken into consideration before the trigger was pulled on the Shaq trade… so essentially it was a failure of the coach to maximize the potential of the group of players he was given to work with….. That being said, he really didn’t have enough time to do it last season, and I truly believe he could have made it work this season, IF he had not quit on his team after the heartbreaking loss to SA in game 1.

Part Two:

The sad part of it all is this:

Its clear to almost all the viewers and some of the bloggers here, that Nash and Amar’e are most effective with the high pick ‘n roll with Amar’e having more room in the paint to drive/roll to the rim…… and Shaq is most effective down low…..

I understand all the politics involved with asking professional sportsmen (especially bonafide All Stars) to move to the bench, or take a reduction in minutes…..but considering what is most effective for the team, the Suns should play two units…… much like Football with Offensive Teams, Defensive Teams, and Special Teams…..

Run The Fastbreak Unit
PG: Nash, SG: JRich, SF: Barnes, PF: Amar’e, C: Robin Lopez.
6th : Stromile Swift

Dominate the Paint Unit
PG: Barbosa, SG: Tucker, SF: Grant Hill, PF: Amundson, C: Shaq
6th: Dudley

now this would be a killer combo…….. depending on our opponents strengths and weaknesses, we can use either unit as the starting unit, and the other coming off the bench……

sure, we telegraph our intentions by doing this, but so did 7SoL :-)

Its disgusting that this team with such a staggering array of highly talented offensive weapons is still searching for its identity…..

Whats up doc?

by RottPhiler on Mar 4, 2009 1:02 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

its another all-star team and that's its problem

In Nash we trust - for better and for worse...

by ZonaFlash on Mar 6, 2009 7:38 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

AAAAAHHH!!!

I don’t know how else to pound it into my fellow Suns fans’ heads: we weren’t going anywhere with Marion last year!! We were not just going to magically beat the Spurs, or have our defense improve tenfold in the playoffs. It just wasn’t gonna happen. Oh yeah, does everyone just blindly forget that he was a locker room cancer?! Would we have beaten a team like the Lakers with Nash and Amare going down? No!! Clearly, Shaq is not the BEST fit for this team, but that’s not the point – the point is that he is a definite upgrade over Marion. Seriously, forgive the “moronic” Steve Kerr for trying to improve our miserable rebounding rates and interior defense, I mean, what was he thinking?

by Silkster on Mar 4, 2009 8:46 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.
Start posting about the Suns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sunslollo_small
The new Suns bring this thousands-miles-away fan back to the good ol' days
1nash_small
Between being and becoming..

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Amare the problem?
Real_duffman_small
The world is schocked -- Tony Parker's Comrades Cheat, Too
1024_small
luke ridnour??
Small
Dudley + Jrich trade
Small
Best part of a bad LA game
Elektra2_small
Suns playing the best basketball in the league....
Teratorn-25ft_small
All praise Steve Kerr: Genius not Moron!
Small
Analysing the offense of the Suns
Small
Leandro's Brazilian Bash

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds
Fanster.com Network Member


Editor in Chief

Seth_avatar_4_small Phoenix Stan

Photo Editor

Photo_1_small Max Simbron

Staff Writer

Suns_small ZonaFlash

Dsc03465_small PanamaSun

Real_duffman_small JSun

Mark_west_small Mike Lisboa

Amare_small watdogg10

P1000778_small Wil Cantrell