Kerr looks to keep Nash. Shaq and Amare?
We've come to expect subtle GM-speak from Steve Kerr. He is after all a guy who left a position in the media to take this job. That makes his comments today all the more striking as he leaves little doubt that he intends to extend Steve Nash's contract and conversely doesn't see Shaq and/or Amare as being part of the future.
Kerr was perfectly clear about his plans for the aging point guard when asked about his being part of the solution moving forward saying,
"Absolutely. Steve is the face of the franchise. He's one of the top point guards in the league still and one of the greatest of all time...I want him to end his career here."
Kerr sees Dragic being able to play 18 minutes per game which would reduce Nash to about 30 minutes. "That's the goal and that's the plan and hopefully we can do that in the next few years."
Kerr also repeated what he's said recently that he hopes Gentry will be the head coach and it sounds like they intend to address that pretty quickly after the season ends.
As for Shaq and Amare, Kerr was a bit more circumspect.
Kerr on where the Suns stand now
"I don't know that this team as currently constituted can be a championship team. I don't think so actually. We are not good enough in certain areas."
What areas?
Steve talked first about the improvement on the bench but then went on to say that the pick and roll defense was a problem all year long, "So we've got to continue to address personnel issues there."
Personnel issues related to the pick and roll defense. Well, that can mean a few different things but fortunately Kerr was very clear what he meant.
"One of the things you have to do in this league is you have to have active big guys. There's a reason Boston was so good defensively...Those guys jump out on pick and rolls, they trap, they recover and protect the rim. That's why we drafted Robin and that's why we signed Lou. We're trying to get more mobile on the interior. We have to develop those guys and we have to continue to address the personnel issues." (emphasis added)
To me that means Amare and Shaq. Two big men that don't defend the pick and roll which Kerr sees as being a major weakness of the Suns. Kerr went down this path and I believe he's sending a message about what he intends to do this off-season.
Unfortunately, there wasn't time to ask more specific questions before the interview time was cut short by Suns PR master Jule Fie who's "bat phone" insisted that Kerr had other places to be.
Here's a bonus discussion I had with Goran Dragic. None of the other media types were interested in hearing from him, but I love talking to these young guys. I find their stories far more fascinating then the guys we've watched and heard from for some many seasons.
I asked Dragic a pretty tough question about the Suns season from his perspective and gave him a chance to frankly say something a bit controversial. He did a good job with the question even if he didn't give me much.
I also asked him about his reaction to the fans (and bloggers) who didn't believe in him. He responded with an understanding of how poorly he played early in the season and was thankful to those that did support him. He didn't take the opportunity I gave him to shoot a big Slovenian middle finger to the haters.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Amare...
I know Amare can be a pain but dude can play ball! If we can get good value for him then fine…trade him. But I would HATE to see him leave for nothing because he is a rare offensive talent. He needs a full season in Gentry’s system – I think Gentry can know how to make it so he and Shaq can coexist in an offense.
And as for Dragic, I have said before – if he wants to flip a big Slovenian middle finger to me – he needs to do it on the court and prove he can play at an NBA PG level – I am still very unimpressed with his output. He is more confident and slightly less turnover prone but he still can’t run an offense and it still scares the hell out of me when I see him running the fast break because of his slow decision making. He has had the chance to prove it lately getting more time against other scrubs and he hasn’t done a whole lot with those opportunities. We’ll see how he comes back after this summer – but just know I’m nowhere near the point where I’m going to admit I was wrong about this kid regardless of how many times Scott Williams is payed to say that he’s “really impressed” with him.
Oh...
and I wouldn’t necessarily be opposed to trading Shaq if we can…when dude gets unhappy or talks about leaving – things go downhill FAST! A la Magic, Lakers and Heat every time he’s been unhappy there and he seems to be getting grumpier in his old age.
Great guy off the court (all the tweeps know this) but he can become a grenade in the locker room.
Defensive Big
To me, that means either Shaq or Amare goes; I don’t think it means both have to go. I’m hoping Shaq.
A defensive big next to Amare can alleviate his defensive weaknesses. Lopez? I don’t know … maybe.
I mean, why have two “defensive” starters at 4 and 5 with no scorer. That doesn’t make too much sense.
Mmmmm ... Guinness
I would love to have Biedris (it's that how is spelled)
"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"
Beidrins and Anthony Randolph
Would solve both problems. A defender and a scorer
by Funky Flapsack on Apr 14, 2009 5:16 PM MST up reply actions
i'd love to have biedrins as well.
unfortunately, golden state runs just as much (if not more) than the suns. so, would they be interested in an aging shaq?
by Trevor Paxton on Apr 14, 2009 6:22 PM MST up reply actions
but i think biedrins would be the one to complement him.
letting amaré do his thing offensively while biedrins, a mobile and active defensive big, controls the boards and does the defensive stuff.
ah, in a perfect world…
by Trevor Paxton on Apr 14, 2009 9:10 PM MST up reply actions
The problem with Biedrins
is that you can’t play him with Robin or with Shaq. He’d be great with Amare but that’s not going to happen…
So, if you get a guy like Biedrins you better also find a PF that can step out and shoot. David Lee? That would be grand but I don’t see how it happens
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Apr 14, 2009 9:14 PM MST up reply actions
i think he could play with robin.
biedrins has enough offensive talent to at least not make it like diop and robin on the floor at the same time. i agree with the problem with shaq, though. shaq clogging the lane leaves biedrins basically rendered useless.
by Trevor Paxton on Apr 15, 2009 12:53 AM MST up reply actions
Pstan
any chance you can have the audio transcribed as a matter of SOP everytime? i’ve got poor internet connection.. and i’m missing a lot…
perhaps we can get Tucker to do it.. since he ain’t really doin much on the bench during games… lol
uh...sorry
I barely have time for what I do now. Transcribing the audio would take many many hours..and I believe Tucker is busy putting arch on his shot
Blogging Suns Basketball
by Seth Pollack on Apr 14, 2009 9:03 PM MST up reply actions
Nash isn't the one we need to keep. It's Amare.
How many PGs need to lie on the ground to rest during games?
How many forwards can score, rebound and block like Amare?
And how many talents do we have that people are actually interested in getting?
We could get a high draft pick and Lee while letting Barbarossa run the point as he can still become better offensively and defensively.
The win over the Lakers without Nash is the most feasible Gentry blueprint.
Improving Lou and Lopez is not going to help us address our perimeter defence needs or guards are going to have career nights against us day in and day out.
How many PGs need to lie on the ground to rest during games?
What is the significance of your statement? I have seen a number of guys around the league lie down as opposed to sitting. Who cares?
Nash is about to finish the season with 50%FG’s 90% FT and 40% 3 PT. Yes he’s lost a step, but Barbosa is not a better player. No way.
We could get a high draft pick and Lee while letting Barbarossa run the point as he can still become better offensively and defensively.
Really? What is a “high draft pick?” And how do you know? I very much doubt that Nash nets us David Lee and a high draft pick. And who would you draft that could be as good a point guard as Nash? Who would have an impact the first year to match what Nash brings? Or are you saying Barbosa, who has never played a full season as point guard is as good a point guard as Nash?
The win over the Lakers without Nash is the most feasible Gentry blueprint.
I don’t even know what this means.
Listen, it would take an amazing deal for Nash to go. They want him in the Ring an Honor, they want another Hall of Famer as a Sun. Steve Nash is the prototypical Sun, the prototypical Arizonan. If the team is in transition, there is no reason for them to dump their most popular player and risk alienating the fan base, which is what exactly would happen. Amare, the fans don’t really care so much because we all know he has an attitude problem. Sure we like his dunks but we all know he won’t be a Garnett.
+ 1000
At this point, I say we keep Amare, keep Nash, and trade Shaq away. Even though I thought differently throughout the course of the season, Amare is just too much of a talent to give up. I really want to see how he works with Gentry, who he says (supposedly) he likes. As big a Kerr defender as I am, and as stunningly well that Shaq has played for us this season, we’re just not gonna go anywhere with him. Trade him, draft a big man, and keep Nash so that Dragic can continue to grow, hopefully as a back-up pg. EVEN IF we were able to get something like Griffin for Amare, there’s no guarantee that Griffin or whomever we would take with a top pick would ever become a star like Amare…
D Minus for all the Nash Love and defending his lack of defense
You can call out Amare every single time he does not play enough defense but Nash gets a free pass half the time. And you expect the team to play defense with that bright example?
My point is – Nash is not going to last forever, He lies down almost all the time because of his back condition. Are you asking him to keep carrying the Suns forever? Or for how long?
I never said Barbarossa is a better player but he could run the point without Nash as could be seen in the few games they played without Nash. The win over the Lakers with LB at the point is by far the best and most meaningful win in this season.
If you don’t know what that victory means, then you are still trapped in the past with Nash leading the Suns to victory with 7SOL. I hope that you dun forget that only 3 members of the 7SOL team are around and we traded the defensive players, key role players and the coach who made all that possible.
Nash as a prototypical Sun? Hmm, you may want to talk to Barkley about that…
Knicks are in desperate straits becos of their lack of an all star PG with Duhon breaking down and D Antoni’s loves Nash and they are playing Nash game in New York. The Knicks are lottery bound for 1-2 more years and they may get high picks. Lee and Robinson are hardly untouchable where the management is concerned as they want cap space.
To be frank, I don’t know that much as compared to fans who write off the Suns from the play-offs when they were leading in the West because they are all so all knowing and cheering kerr’s moves and defending them to the bitter end. They must really know something that rest of the NBA league don’t know…
I only know that Suns fans can never underestimate our own team after doubting them and seeing them playing well and deep into the play-offs after they lost Amare to microsurgery a few years back.
Nash is 7SOL personified. And that’s the past.
If we want to play defense in a league that has got used to up-tempo, the Suns must rise in another direction and keep their faith in it.
I know that Nash is a great player
and a great role model of a person. So I can see why Kerr and Sarver would not want to trade him and keep him on the team. Here is my question though. Would fans care as much if the FO got rid of Nash for some vaule that would keep the team winning and making playoffs?
I personnely think Nash should be traded and I can see why they wont trade him. The fan base would just take such a huge blow espesically after a controversial season of not making the playoffs. This was the first year in many that I would see a large number of seats open at every game I went to. Can the team afford another hit espesically being over the cap? Is the FO more concerned about fan base or about trying to put together a winning team?
It is funny how winning makes all of these problems go away..
dear steve kerr...
you complain on p&r defense, yet you decide to trade two players that are very good at it… for one that cannot… and yet, you dont trade neither of two big men that cannot…
The next Suns team
I think the most important thing right now is we find a way to keep Grant Hill on the team. I think he was the MVP of the Suns this year and I’d hate to see him go. The good news is that he already said he wants to remain a Sun and hopefully Gentry (his friend/coach) will be back next season also. Then we also have to keep Lou, which is more likely to happen because we have the option on his contract. I know you guys don’t like Barnes, but as far as he doesn’t ask for a lot of money, I’d also like to keep him on the roster.
About the trades, I think Kerr is right on keeping Nash. You don’t get a two time MVP who’s still on his prime (look at his numbers) very easily. I wouldn’t trade Amare also, because he is an All Star so young who can add a lot, especially offensively, to Phoenix. I think the piece we don’t need is Shaq. Phoenix has never depended on a center to play (and reach sucess) and it has showed this season. I vote for trade Shaq and get a role player, a draft pick and the most important thing – cap relief. Why don’t we start Rubin (a defensive big) in the middle with Amare and Hill?
And, IMO, Barbosa is not a PG, he’s a 2, trust me. I know I’m brazilian and didn’t get to see an NBA game live my whole life, but I sometimes know what I’m talking about. I said that the Suns could catch the Jazz and not the Mavs in the playoff race. And guess what? Had we won that @#$%%*& game in March 28 at Utah, perhaps would be telling our girlfriends we couldn’t go to the movies this weekend.
Grant Hill will stay with us only if we keep to D Antoni's light practises
Will the fans be ok with that?
I agree that we dun need Shaq that critically.
As for LB, I like him in that he still has room to grow offensively and defensively.
Wanting to see steve nash get traded is ABSOLUTELY CRAZY TALK
Come on people, Please tell me how the suns can better by trading Steve Nash. They say he will be the first person in NBA history to record over 50%FG, 40%3P 90% in 3 seasons, and he will do that this year. He IS still a top 5 point guard in league any way you slice it, so unless they can get another top 5 point guard in return, the suns would be that much worst without him
I find it ridiculous that people keep saying he is declining. Why, because his stats are “slightly” down from the last 3 years? well he was stuck in Porter’ dump-a-shaq strategy for 2/3 of a season. He still HANDS DOWN one of the best passers and shooters in the game. I guarantee if Gentry was the coach for the full season, and he decided to take as many shots per game as Chris Paul, his stats would just as high as CP’s.
Sure he is not a great defender, but is that a big deal? Most point guards in the league are smaller and therefore not great defenders. steve nash blows by tony parker, just as much as tony parker blows by nash. The screen and roll is just about impossible to defend if you have the right point guard and finishers. Its like gentry says, whatever they do they are not going to be the spurs, the cavs or the celts. Cavs have the best defense, but the suns have the best offense. The suns just need to play average D to win, they don’t need to slow down all the time and play lockdown amazing on D just to win. They never will anyway with their current personnel.
I think what Kerr was saying is legit
“One of the things you have to do in this league is you have to have active big guys. There’s a reason Boston was so good defensively…Those guys jump out on pick and rolls, they trap, they recover and protect the rim. That’s why we drafted Robin and that’s why we signed Lou. We’re trying to get more mobile on the interior. We have to develop those guys and we have to continue to address the personnel issues”
The fact remains we have two of the softest, selfish laziest big men in the game on the defensive end. We get no weak side, or interior defense help EVER. Shaq is so slow on D, and and stands around most of the time thinking about how many “shaq-touches” he gets. And watching Amare get rolled over by just about any 1st string or second string PF in the league is cringe worthy.
I think we need to try to trade shaq for a more mobile defensive minded presence.
Amare can play D, but wont. Thats another huge problem and needs to be addressed.
Shaq is being made the scapegoat...
But the truth of the matter is, he is not the one to be blamed for the disappointing season.
I see a lot of post saying that “shaq is not needed”, “dump Shaq to whomever will take him”, etc.
But let us take a look at the Suns record for a moment…45 wins. It’s really not that bad. If the Suns are in the East they will be in the 5th playoff spot. Of course, that is neither here nor there. The Suns are in the West, and they belong in the 9th spot. However, they will miss the playoff by only a few games behind the numbers 5-8 teams in the West. They could have been in the thick of things if they had won some key games which they should not have lost (considering that they beat the Lakers without Nash and Amare). If you look at the games where the Suns had a winning streak without Nash, Shaq dominated with more touches. Then Nash came back, Shaq fewer touches, all of a sudden 5 game losing streak (all the while Nash is attempting way more shots than his assists).
Nash averaged more than 9 assists a game the whole season, which is not bad (third among point guards), but in those games where the Suns lost, his assists were severely lacking in relation to his shot attempts. So, overall Nash had a decent assist output, but when it mattered most he chose to shoot.
Even after Shaq’s phenomenal season he is being made the scapegoat. Which is unfair. He leads the Suns in scoring,rebounds,blocks and field goal percentage. He is 3rd in the whole NBA in the center position in scoring. He leads the whole NBA in field goal percentage. He has better stats than Kevin Garnet. The only argument about Shaq is his age and his speed (or lack of it). Shaq is 37 years old, but he put up better numbers than most 25 year olds in the NBA. You want your center next season to be Lopez? Youth over experience and talent? Give me a freakin’ break!
Here are your scapegoats:
-Matt Barnes have been given a lot of responsibility on offense, but he failed miserably.
-J-Rich proved to be less productive than Diaw overall. Oh he can score, but like Kobe, he has to take lots of shots to do it.
-Steve Nash is a defensive liability.
-The Suns bench is crap. Very little production from Lopez,Amundson,Dragic, you know, your “younger” players.
-The Suns changed strategy mid-season, changed coaches, which is never a good thing. They would have done better if Gentry was selected as D’Antoni’s replacement from the start.
-Most of the Suns were so in-love with D’Antoni’s ways that they did not give Porter a chance, and in the process rebelled against him.
-Amare is so in-love with Amare.
Trading Nash is painful but necessary
My issue with Nash is that he is 35 and has back problems.
He also doesn’t play defense, which as the floor general, sets a bad example for the rest of the team
But my most important concern is that Nash deserves to play on a championship bound team.
He is wasted on a rebuilding team like our Suns.

by 




























