Bright Side Of The Sun: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Team Chemistry, the Winning Formula

Photo

More photos » by Paul Connors - AP

While visiting my parents last week, I went in my old room to look for a book I wanted to read. It had been a long time since I had stayed in that room for more than a minute and it was nice to see that nothing had been moved or changed. The desk where I used to sit for hours studying offensive and defensive plays was still there. This desk had always been my domain, neither mom or dad had ever set hand to it and the drawers were full of 8 years' worth of junk. But going through this junk was kind of cool, old letters which I had put aside to answer  but never did, what had once seemed so important now looking antique, postcards that I had bought but never mailed. I was getting ready to get up from my chair when I saw an old photo. It was 1999, 16 year old PanamaSun (skinny as hell) along with my team mates from the National Team. We were at a party after beating Puerto Rico in the Tournament Finals. I played for my country since I was 14 years old until I turned 20, and this team in the picture is, by far, the best one that I have been a part of. We weren't as talented as you may think. My scouting report probably said the following: P-Sun, average shooter, force him to his left hand, If he's double teamed he'll freak out,  very emotional, make sure to taunt him and he will lose his temper. Truth is that we were an average team and it's not like we held hands after each game either. As a matter of fact there were guys on the team that I didn't like. So what made us a good team?

Was it team chemistry? But I just mentioned we didn't like each other...

Does team chemistry exist? And most importantly, does it affect a teams performance?

Star-divide

The first question is an easy one to answer. Yes. It does exist and sport's psychologists define it as a group dynamic that occurs when members of a team work together and make a united effort to accomplish goals and objectives of the collective whole.

But could it be possible that team chemistry has nothing to do with performance at all? Maybe good chemistry is a by-product of the teams success, who knows..

To me (and many people) Team Chemistry could be determined by:

  • Social Cohesion: Team mates like each other, they go out for dinner, they love to hang out, they feel like family, they enjoy each others' company.
  • Task Cohesion: Teams ability to focus on a specific goal and perform well and effectively on the court.

Having a team with a high amount of social cohesion means very little when it comes down to predict your teams performance on the court. It's way more important to show task cohesion, meaning that if they play together and remain united throughout the season, they'll have a better shot at enjoying success.

Unlike many people think, players that don't like each other at a personal level can play well together.

Think about it. Before the Shaq trade everyone was talking about how Marion was a cancer to the team, that everyone was upset because of his attitude. But did this ever show on the court? Did Nash deny the ball to Shawn? Do you remember Raja Bell missing a three point shot because he was upset at Marion or Amar'e or anyone? The answer is no.

On the other hand we noticed that Boris Diaw was unable to perform while playing beside Stat. I'm sure they liked each other, I'm sure they hung out and stuff but the on-court chemistry (task cohesion) was awful.

Task cohesion goes beyond liking each other and for this to happen everyone should know their role and stick to it. Role players following the leaders and all leaders being on the same page.

Chemistry is why the Suns never made it to the playoffs this year (among other things). Role players were not accepting their roles. Both leaders, Shaq and Nash were never on the same page and we saw this every single night without the need of listening to Shaq's post games interviews saying that the way to reach a championship was through him, while on the other side of the locker room Nash was saying that they needed to run more.

Believe it or not, chemistry plays a huge role in the NBA. It's the reason why coaches get fired and players get traded, and it's the reason why very talented teams don't reach their ultimate goal.

1 recs  |  Comment 12 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

nice post

too bad we can’t see the pic

by be-the-ball on Apr 27, 2009 11:39 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm with Be..let's see the pic!!!!

and on a side note, I kind of doubt that Diaw and Amare got along too well..on court or off…for all the grief suns fans gave Boris, he was at his best when Amare was not around…my theory is that amare didn’t like diaw on his turf and diaw didn’t want to stir up trouble and so deferred..

ah well

by Fritzy on Apr 27, 2009 11:52 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

lol, I'll have to scan it

Probably, I guess we’ll never know. At least the hung out together in The Dirty.

"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"

by PanamaSun on Apr 27, 2009 11:55 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's up Panama?

I just finished The Rising. What an awesome book! If there is a zombie apocalypse, I hope they’re not as smart as the ones in the book or we’re screwed. Anyway, I agree with you, you don’t have to have a lovefest going on in the workplace to get the job done, as long as everyone on board has the same objective in mind. Of course, Amare just wants somebody to hug and hold, so Kerr should by him a teddy bear or a security blanket like Linus.

Aprende epsaƱol y esto tendra mas sentido para ti.

by Diosnomeama on Apr 28, 2009 6:59 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Yup! You should try to get the sequel. City of the dead.

Having good chemistry with your coach is a little bit different. I’m an old school guy, I still think a coach should keep his distance. I might write something about that in the future.

"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"

by PanamaSun on Apr 28, 2009 10:02 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chemistry with a coach

Is important in any sport, but I back you Panama in that they have to keep a distance. They can’t be too distant, they have to be someone you can trust and someone who can put you in your place when you screw up. I’ve played on basketball teams where the coach and players have great chemistry, you know your coach has your back, but you know he’s still the coach. I’ve also been on teams where the coach tries to be too much of a friend, or too much of a disciplinarian. Those teams I found, never had the success as I had with my other coach. I’ve encountered the same problem in rugby. Coaching chemistry is as key as player chemistry.

by Willman on Apr 28, 2009 10:12 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good post man

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Apr 28, 2009 1:27 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

PSun for President

amen to all you’ve said bud!

now let’s see that photo.. lol.. btw.. double teams freaked me out too… you’re not alone… lol

by menacejinx on Apr 28, 2009 11:08 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Good post

and I agree on getting the pic scanned. Chemistry is not so much as important as working together with a leader. You do not have to like the people you work with. As long as everybody checks the ego at the door and focus’ on the same goal then chemisty is not needed. But you need that one person who takes responsibility for the team when it does not work. That one person who organizes who takes those teammates who disagree to see a middle ground. That is something this team has lacked for years.

by Gorilla Game on Apr 29, 2009 3:06 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm going to get it scanned this weekend at my parents' house, I promise!

It’s difficult to like everyone on your team. You spend so much time together that somebody starts getting on your nerves. I agree that a good leader is someone who can talk to players and get them to be on the same page. Maybe Nash is not as vocal as he should be, who knows… I’ve talked to friends and asked them if they prefer someone like CP3 or KG screaming in their face to “motivate them” or if they would take a leader like Nash who leads by example (on the offensive end of the court). Believe it or not they always choose the KG guys…

"Basketball doesn't build character. It reveals it"

by PanamaSun on Apr 29, 2009 4:04 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice post

The question I have is which one is more important to the Suns right now? If social cohesion then Shaq should stay because he definitely brings that out in most of the team. I mean, if Nash is able to Twitter that he is watching the playoffs without much trouble or regret this year then clearly he has reached a place of peace in all of this. However, if task cohesion is the main goal then some changes clearly need to be made. I am not sure if trading Shaq will solve this or if it needs to be someone else. What seems obvious to some is that there is some disconnect in the task cohesion of the group because they were consistently able to fail defensively without trying too hard. Personally, I am willing to see what happens after the summer with Amare back in full gear with a summer of work under his belt before I make too many task cohesion claims. I would like to see the Suns pick up some big-er man who can come in and play good 3-4 and defense/rebound. Other than that, I am really pretty content with the group as it is since social cohesion seems to be at an all time high. I mean, isnt that what Suns fans REALLY want, fun and gun? Cant do that with the social.

Go read a book!

by N8lol on Apr 30, 2009 9:01 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.
Start posting about the Suns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

1nash_small
Between being and becoming..

Recent FanPosts

Real_duffman_small
The JYD Bark
New_picture__1__small
Already Dumping Dragic? A Tragic Mistake
Small
Do you guys even realize
New_picture__1__small
My experience at the filming of "Nothing but Net"
Small
Steve Nash moments
Small
Maybe the NBA did have it in for the Phoenix Suns
Small
An exceprt from Tim Donaghy's book.
Small
Wild suggestion #2: Barkley for GM
Small
Who else can we added to the "Team of Lesser Brothers"?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds
Fanster.com Network Member


Editor in Chief

Seth_avatar_4_small Phoenix Stan

Photo Editor

Photo_1_small Max Simbron

Staff Writer

Suns_small ZonaFlash

Yankees_small PanamaSun

Real_duffman_small JSun

Mark_west_small Mike Lisboa

Amare_small watdogg10

P1000778_small Wil Cantrell