Odom to Suns? Don't laugh
Apparently Odom's return to the Lake's isn't moving very smoothly. Apparently the Suns covet Odom, having tried to land him multiple times over the past couple years. I'm not saying this is going to happen - with us cutting Wallace instead of trading him for Chandler, we do seem to be in 2010 mode. It just seems a weird strategy to me, if we gave Hill and Frye money for 2010, as well as extending Nash, and with J-Rich and Barbosa getting paid in 2010 - the most we might have is Amare's expiring contract, which would mean we are letting him walk. Just weird all around. Instead, I suggest we try the following Sign-and-Trade:
Odom at $9 a year to the Suns
Earl Clark, Alando Tucker, and Pavlovic to the Lakers.
This works at the cap level because of the $2 million trade exception we have with the Shaq trade. We end up not saving any money overall - I think we go right back to where we were pre-Shaq trade, but gives us the following lineup:
Nash-Dragic
Richardson-Barbosa
Hill-Dudley
Odom-Frye
Stoudemire-Lopez
That team is 10 deep! Well, nine, not counting Dragic. But I think this team would be the best since 2004 - J-Rich can pull off JJ's offense, Barbosa is still on the bench, goodness knows Hill is better than Q, and can defend, Odom puts up way better offensive numbers than marion, and rebounds just as well, and doesn't clog the paint for Amare. We've also got two legit backup big men, not even counting Lou.
Who, in the west, could stop this team besides the Lakers? Hill is at least = Jefferson, and Duncan can't keep up with Amare and Odom. The Mavs would get absolutely shredded in the front court, as would the Blazers. The Rockets, Jazz are falling apart. Isn't it worth trying?
0 recs |
14 comments
Comments
worth trying
but I doubt the Lakers would bite. They would be dealing with an in-division rival for one. And they can probably get something a lot better than that
Let the fools have their tartar sauce!
by Funky Flapsack on Jul 14, 2009 2:44 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly ...
I’d rather keep Earl Clark. Trading away all our picks is what got us into this mess in the first place. Especially since Earl Clark has most been compared to Lamar Odom. I’d rather take the younger version.
by jburning on Jul 14, 2009 2:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Hells yeah, keep Clark.
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Jul 14, 2009 7:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah... not worth it
i think if Odom goes anywhere but the lakers he is going to suffer from a sever lack of intensity. He can just cruise through games and not play hard. I think Phil Jackson is the only guy who has and will be able to get the most out of Lamar…
Keep the guys we have.. make a play for Camby or maybe David Lee… Lamar doesn’t solve the problem of guarding the big guys like Duncan…
TRADE FOR DAVID LEE!!!!
Mark West Should be a Hall of Famer-----maybe
by jpartington99 on Jul 14, 2009 3:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I would like that trade and it could very well happen then the lineup would be something like this
Frye/Lopez
Amare/Odom
Clark/Hill/Dudley
Rihardson/Barbosa
Nash/Dragic
Hopefully the will get Odom.
by PhxSuns# on Jul 14, 2009 3:37 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
They traded Clark in this trade
Which is why I would not do it.
by egp the great on Jul 14, 2009 4:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The trade I fear is Amare for Odom and change
Who are these guys again?
by ZonaFlash on Jul 14, 2009 7:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ugh…Amare on the Lakers? I’d leave the country….
by Wil Cantrell on Jul 14, 2009 8:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Odom at $9 a year to the Suns"
Yep. $9 is pretty much what he’s worth…
He’s got serious motivation problems. He won’t play well again until he’s in a contract year.
by Chucko667 on Jul 14, 2009 9:40 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Could this be the first case of a
candy clause in an NBA contract? No sweets allowed unless certain criteria are met.
by Gorilla Game on Jul 15, 2009 3:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
$9
Supposedly Odom has been ignoring the Lakers because they are only offering 9 mil a year and he wants more.
by eagleheart on Jul 14, 2009 11:49 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Lamar Would Help+
I’m pretty solid on the Suns apparent roster for 2009-10 but adding Lamar Odom would open all kiinds of possibilities. I won’t be screaming for Steve Kerr’s head if he can’t pull this off – and I would never sacrifice Amare to a trade – but if we could get Odom for Clark, Sasha and Tucker it would be a big plus for the Suns.
Think of it, we would be getting a proven pro for an unproven rookie, sasha with his limited skills and Tucker with his limitations. If those were the terms, it is time to welcome Lamar with open arms and big warm smiles.
by fedres on Jul 15, 2009 12:13 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














