Bright Side Of The Sun: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

Hypothetical 3-team trade (Hinrich-JRich-Boozer)

Ok, the offseason is long and even I'm falling for this. My proposed trade involves Suns sending JRich to the Jazz, Boozer going to the Bulls and us getting Kirk Hinrich and Tyrus Thomas.

Here's how that trade looks on ESPN's Trade Machine:

I'll explain this trade in more detail after the jump.

Star-divide

Why the Jazz would want to do it: It's well known that the Jazz is looking to move Boozer. JRich may not be Jerry Sloan's favourite type of player but he's a talented swingman who can bring another dimension to their offense. Currently, the only players on the Jazz who can shoot the 3 are Okur and Korver.

After what's been publicized about the Jazz and Boozer parting ways, it's almost inevitable that he has to be moved, and the Jazz would be hard pressed to get a player of JRich's caliber in any Boozer deal.

Why the Jazz wouldn't want to do it: Money money money. Boozer for JRich doesn't give them any cap relief. They actually add $1M to this year's already-crazy payroll. Also, since JRich's contract runs a year longer than Boozer's, that adds $14.4M to their 2010-2011 payroll, which will take them past next year's tax line already even if they don't add any more contracts.

But if they decide to go San Antonio (which could be the case, as they had the guts to match for Millsap), this is a trade that can give them more firepower and keep up with the haves of the league.

Why the Bulls would want to do it: Derrick Rose is obviously their point guard of the future (and present), and they would not want Hinrich riding the pine and making $9M per just like how we (or Kerr) didn't want Diaw making $9M per in a backup role. Given that the Bulls had brought back Lindsey Hunter and signed Pargo (and they have Salmons who can handle the ball part-time and play some SG), Hinrich is even more expandable. From all indication they almost traded him to the Blazers in July. And Boozer is obviously a low post scoring threat that they have been coveting since 1967.

Doing this trade, they essentially upgrade Tyrus Thomas to Boozer (both expirings), at the "cost" of losing Hinrich's services and contract ($9.5M this season, $9M in 10-11, $8M in 11-12). It would also get Bulls a BOATLOAD of cap space in the summer of 2010, which they can use to re-sign Boozer plus another max contract player.

Moreover, the Bulls payroll currently stands at $69M this season, which is dangerously close to the tax line. This trade would shave about $2M off that and give them some wiggle room. They can use that to re-sign another half-decent player, or just sign some vet-min 13th man and keep the rest in their pockets.

Why the Bulls wouldn't want to do it: One may argue that Thomas and Hinrich is a lot of talent to give away for Boozer, the betrayal skullhead Duke guy who can be a locker room cancer and has a 65% chance of breaking his leg within 2 months into the season. But I really think that (and I'm trying to be objective here) the Bulls are a more balanced and complete team after this trade. And it gives them a shot at DWade the next summer. To me, the good seems to outweigh the bad.

Why the Suns would want to do it: If we can turn JRich into Hinrich and Tyrus Thomas, I'd totally be doing backflips. First of all, let's all be honest that Dragic isn't ready to play 15-18mins every night. And it's also inevitable that Nash will have to sit out 10 or so games due to injuries and what not. LB is great but he really isn't a full-time PG material. Hinrich, however, is a natural PG. He makes his 3's (41% last season, 38% career) and defends 2.5 positions. In the immortal Bulls-Celtics series, he turned out to be their best defender on Paul Pierce. He's like Raja Bell with good PG skills.

After the trade, Hinrich, Nash and LB can just share the backcourt minutes, each getting around 32mpg. In the event of any of them getting injured, the other two can start together and play 40-ish minutes, with Goran/Tucker/Grant Hill pitching in. We may have problems against big backcourts with that, but it's not like we have a solution for that now.

As for Thomas, he's easily more talented than any of our frontcourt players who doesn't have an apostrophe in his first name. Plus, he's actually already a better defender than Amar'e right now. And he's an expiring contract so if it doesn't work out for whatever reason, we're not stuck with him.

Also, this trade takes us to 13 guys under contract, and thus will save about 14 hours of BSotS's members' time  arguing about whom should we sign for the 13th spot.

Why the Suns wouldn't want to do it: The trade increases our payroll by $0.9M. But since we now only have 12 guys and need to fill another roster spot anyway, it's not like we could have saved all of that $0.9M.

Also, Hinrich's contract runs a year longer than JRich's. But it's 2012 we're talking about so let's not worry about it now. You may also argue that Tyrus Thomas isn't a model kid but it's not like he had 2 DUIs last season.

Finally, Goran and Earl Clark will see their minutes decrease after this trade. But the players we're bringing in are relatively young and are genuinely better players. So undermining our "own" young players should not be a concern.

 

So that's my case. What do y'all think about this?

Poll
How do you feel about the proposed trade?
Too good to be true.
79 votes
Intrigued but not sold.
40 votes
Hate it to no end.
11 votes

130 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 61 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Well....

I think you made a very strong case. Well put together. A model for what trade speculation/idea posts should look like.

As for the trade itself…I’m not really sure. The upside as you laid out is interesting but I don’t like the idea of having Heinrich riding the pine for all those years behind Nash for $9m either. Sure – he and Nash could play together at times but mostly you lose a lot of back court offense for better back court defense and one year of Tyrus who if nothing else would be happy to play in Phx with his pal Cappie Pondexter.

So…over all…hmmm…how about Salmons instead of Kirk? I think I like that better

by Seth Pollack on Aug 11, 2009 4:36 PM MDT reply actions  

Substituting Salmons for Kinrich

the trade still works, but since Salmons makes less ($6.4M next season), Chicago’s payroll actually goes up after the trade, into tax territory, with a roster spot to fill.

Bulls can do Salmons + Jerome James ($6.6M expiring) to stay below the tax. But then it’d be a salary dump for us. Although Salmons can do 80% of what JRich can, he isn’t going to be happy being the 3rd/4th option.

Interestingly, ESPN’s trade machine and hoopshype has different salary #s for Salmons…

I think I like Hinrich enough to look past his contract, and I don’t think we lose THAT much offsense. For every shot JRich takes, there’s one less shot for Nash/Amare/Grant Hill/LB/… who are all no less efficient scorers than JRich himself. Hinrich can avg 12-14ppg just as a spot up shooter like Raja did. And having another playmaker on the court is what made us dangerous when we had Diaw. JRich avged 2 assists per game last season. In a sense he’s as black as a hole Shaq was on offense.

If we really want offense in the backcourt, we can just start LB at the 2. He can’t dunk and rebound like JRich but he can do everything else. I actually think that, against some teams, we can play Nash, LB and Hinrich together in stretches like the Bulls went Rose-Gordon-Hinrich-Salmons-Brad Miller last season.

And how do you know Cappie will stay in Phx during the WNBA offseason? I thought most of them go to the Europe and make some extra dough. But maybe Tyrus can keep her here :)

by gadogry on Aug 11, 2009 5:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

I had the impression that posting intelligent trade ideas without substantiation from a source was discouraged.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 11, 2009 7:06 PM MDT reply actions  

Unless it’s something obviously ridiculous, whether a trade is unintelligent is a judgment call by the moderators, isn’t it. Two or three weeks ago, I posted a trade idea that just happened to involve Jason Richardson. I can’t remember whom for—I’m sure it was a forward—but it must have been a pretty stupid idea, because it mysteriously disappeared within a few hours.

Other than that I’ve always thought Kirk Hinrich was good, I have no comment on this trade, and if I did, would not venture it.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 11, 2009 9:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

Did you...

take an hour or two looking up cap numbers, and end up writing like 1000 words analysing the proposed trade for each team involved?

by gadogry on Aug 11, 2009 10:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think I come out looking worse whichever way I answer that; but I probably didn’t take an hour. As for length…I’m a compulsive writer.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 11, 2009 10:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hey

I thought you were pulling your own stories.

Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.

by rosewood on Aug 12, 2009 2:30 AM MDT up reply actions  

If you mean my threads: yup, and can’t see why I would post more.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 12, 2009 10:58 AM MDT up reply actions  

Solution!
Two or three weeks ago, I posted a trade idea that just happened to involve Jason Richardson. I can’t remember whom for—I’m sure it was a forward—but it must have been a pretty stupid idea, because it mysteriously disappeared within a few hours.

then:

I thought you were pulling your own stories.

then:

If you mean my threads: yup, and can’t see why I would post more.

That should solve the mystery, no?

Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.

by rosewood on Aug 12, 2009 12:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

I wasn’t using misleading language. I didn’t delete the trade idea; it disappeared. So no, it doesn’t solve anything.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 12, 2009 4:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

According to Ric Bucher early this summer we was trying to work on a deal that sent J-rich to houston for T-Mac but they couldnt get the numbers to match

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 12, 2009 6:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's interesting...

We could do it only if we still had Ben Wallace’s contract…

But I guess HOU, with the knowledge that Yao won’t play the next season, aren’t looking at immediate upgrades. It’s not like they’re contending with JRich-Ariza-Battier-Brooks-Scola.

by gadogry on Aug 12, 2009 6:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yup, that was the one. Evidently, my trade ideas are no more stupid than the Phoenix Suns’ trade ideas. I wonder if the numbers would come within matching range if Pavlovic were thrown in (once he can be).

by lonesomepoint on Aug 12, 2009 10:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ok ok...

We get it lonesomepoint, You are a bit upset about getting tagged as a frequent poster. I dont think anyone meant that you should stop or pull your posts, I think we were jsut startled by your passion. Now, take the hanky away from your nose, pony up and stop whining.

Go read a book!

by N8lol on Aug 13, 2009 10:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

The problem is

you posted your idea after Wallace was bought out. And we’d NEVER do Pavlovic + JRich for TMac even if the #s allowed, because we’d be giving them 14.8M guaranteed and take back 23.2M. Take that difference and multiply it by 2, you’re looking at 16.8M. It makes zero sense to pay 16,8M extra this season just to turn a healthy shooting guard into a microfrature patient shooting guard. JRich doesn’t even cost us that much in 10-11.

Do you get it?

by gadogry on Aug 13, 2009 6:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

I see. Thanks, that was helpful.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 13, 2009 8:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ok ok...

We get it lonesomepoint, You are a bit upset about getting tagged as a frequent poster. I dont think anyone meant that you should stop or pull your posts, I think we were jsut startled by your passion. Now, take the hanky away from your nose, pony up and stop whining.

Go read a book!

by N8lol on Aug 13, 2009 10:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

Why don’t you stop double posting first? And then go back to your comic book store.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 13, 2009 10:19 AM MDT up reply actions  

i actually enjoy new posts they get me thru my work shifts..so boooored..dmn i cant wait til basketball or football start November December is the best you got both sports..I cant wait to hear Mark Jackson set off the “Momma there goes that man” going into commercial..

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 13, 2009 10:56 AM MDT up reply actions  

Lol

I double posted on purpose. I figured with all your bitching you needed a reminder. And what does the comic store thing even mean? I dont get it? Enlighten me.

Go read a book!

by N8lol on Aug 13, 2009 5:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

[sigh] I can only elaborate so much without running afoul of the new anti-flaming warning that was established today after I insulted a moderator in response to his insulting me first. (You know—it’s a moderator’s prerogative to insult lesser members. Resistance would probably constitute “bitching,” eh?) But it’s an allusion to the Simpsons character Comic Book Guy.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 13, 2009 6:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

If this site is so horrible and you are so oppressed, then why do you persist in coming back to keep crying? You are only destroying any respect that we might have had for you.

by egp the great on Aug 13, 2009 7:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

That’s okay, I wasn’t looking for respect from pixels.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 13, 2009 8:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

And besides, it is the humans you are angry at anyway, not the computer itself.

by egp the great on Aug 13, 2009 10:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

If you think you're being oppressed

just report it to the BSOS Ministry of Truth; you know Flag@Br … oh, I’ve posted that joke before? (twice?)

Although I appreciate any reference to The Simpsons, the Comic Book Store Guy would never post on a sports blog. Milhouse might, though.

Mmmmm ... Guinness

by JSun on Aug 13, 2009 8:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

I personally

a joke is old until someone tells you to stop.

That may not be good advice.

Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.

by rosewood on Aug 14, 2009 8:38 AM MDT up reply actions  

Wow.

I meant to say

“I personally think that a joke isn’t old until someone tells you to stop.”

but came out with:

“I personally a joke is old until someone tells you to stop.”

Writing Fail.

Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.

by rosewood on Aug 14, 2009 8:41 AM MDT up reply actions  

Ministry of Truth? Is that really feasible when the BSOS Ministry of Love appears to be after me? Really…I have always known that the grave is there and is waiting for me.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 14, 2009 12:49 PM MDT up reply actions  

hey...

Im not trying to be mean. I want you to stick around and post and bring up ideas. Its important for the community. I’m just a little tired of the “other” tongue in cheek stuff. But its cool. As for the comic book store thing….I think i get it now. Witty. I wish I watched more simpsons…love that show.

Go read a book!

by N8lol on Aug 14, 2009 8:28 AM MDT up reply actions  

Nah, I really shouldn’t start any more threads. When the moderator takes it on himself to call them all stupid out of hand, it’s not a good sign for me or for this website. I should let my interest slowly peter out until I go away and we all forget I was here.
As for my Comic Book Guy reference: I’m not sure I’d call it witty, but consider CBG’s typical attitude and behavior.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 14, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

Dislike.

When fictionally asked to comment on the state of the Phoenix Suns, GM Steve Kerr said, "Arizona."

by hookedonphoenix on Aug 11, 2009 9:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

HookedonPhoenix works for me!

by lonesomepoint on Aug 14, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

How about Jerome James instead of Kirk?

Big expiring contract, which, if you don’t mind, we need to clear space for 2010.

When fictionally asked to comment on the state of the Phoenix Suns, GM Steve Kerr said, "Arizona."

by hookedonphoenix on Aug 11, 2009 8:49 PM MDT reply actions  

slash why not straight up J-Rich for J. James/Thomas?

Thomas is the prize, James is the expiring contract, and the bulls need a scorer, seeing as John Salmons is not a shooting guard and Luol Deng isn’t either.

When fictionally asked to comment on the state of the Phoenix Suns, GM Steve Kerr said, "Arizona."

by hookedonphoenix on Aug 11, 2009 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Three things

1) The Bulls doesn’t need another freaking guard. Rose-Hinrich-Pargo-Hunter. And Salmons CAN play the 2. He can even play some spot duty 1.
2) This puts the Bulls over the tax, with one roster spot to fill
3) We’d be REALLY counting on Dragic and Tucker if we do that. This IMO is a horrible trade for the Suns.

by gadogry on Aug 11, 2009 9:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

And even after we dump JRich's contract

we’ll have cap space in 2010 only if Amar’e opts out as well, and we don’t resign him. Then the only players under contract are Nash, Grant Hill (both 37), LB and the other kids. Will LeBron be killing himself to come and play on that team?

by gadogry on Aug 11, 2009 9:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Lebron

If we are willing to go over the cap i dont see why he or anyone else would not be interested..Great system, good fan base and a solid core with Steve Nash Grant Hill Amare Barbosa Frye and Earl Clark who if he gets on the floor will surprise people you add a solid big that team can be championship worthy…

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 11, 2009 10:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

That’s a thought, but even if it did clear space, I think that if the team took on the contract of such a deadweight player, fans would come after Steve Kerr with pitchforks.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 14, 2009 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

hell i’d even throw in Pavlovic after August 26 he can be traded with a player

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 11, 2009 9:29 PM MDT reply actions  

Pavlovic, for what?

If we trade pavlovic, that means we’re taking on extra dollars. We’re talking about $3-4M here, which is $6-8M ‘cause we’re already over the tax. Don’t see that happening.

Pavlovic is kept to be cut.

by gadogry on Aug 11, 2009 9:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

There would be a sign and trade only if

1. There’s a player that makes ~$4M- 5M joining us.
2. We’re willing to pay $6-8M extra this year (luxury tax included) to get him.

You do these moves only if you’re a contender. It doesn’t make sense to spend $8M just so we win 51 games instead of 48.

Moreover, unless that player we get in the above sign-and-trade signs a 1yr deal, we’d be sniffing at next year’s luxury tax threshold already, unless Amar’e opts out.

by gadogry on Aug 12, 2009 9:36 AM MDT up reply actions  

its hard to argue that if we get both those players in this trade that we couldnt be very competitive we got a backup and a shawn marion type of player

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 11, 2009 9:33 PM MDT reply actions  

IMO

Hinrich is a legit starting PG. He avged 16 and 7 when he was healthy. And he’s a terrific defender. He’s the best PG you can get on the market.

I do this trade to get Hinrich. Thomas to me is just a nice throw in. He has a lot of upside but isn’t close to being a sure thing.

by gadogry on Aug 11, 2009 9:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

I like Hinrich too. I’m not sure why he was not only replaced by Derrick Rose but seemingly not coveted in many trade proposals this summer.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 11, 2009 10:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

This trade benefits everybody but utah why would they do it..i cant name their starting 2 guard so its a upgrade but why do it..If not i wouldnt mind keeping j-rich i just dont like that we went to him early to get him going..

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 11, 2009 10:08 PM MDT reply actions  

Ronnie Brewer is their starting 2

who actually is a great defender and avged about 10ppg last season. But he has no 3pt range and his FT% is in the 60s I think. They also have Korver who’s a great spot-up shooter but can’t really create his own shot.

IMO basketballwise Boozer for JRich is a good trade for Utah. The only drawbacks are $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. They already have Millsap. Also, people forget that Kirilenko is a natural 4, and was forced to play the 3 only because of Utah’s surplus in frontcourt players.

by gadogry on Aug 11, 2009 11:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Oh yea..i forgot about Brewer and always thought Kyle Korver would be good in a james Jones role for us..Utah does seem invested in Millsap so yea..but like you said they would be in trouble financially damn if only we had Ben Wallaces contract still this trade would have been possible with a few alterations

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 11, 2009 11:41 PM MDT reply actions  

We used to have Eric Piakowski

who was a B+ version of Korver. Mike D couldn’t use him though.

James Jones can’t shoot as well but he’s bigger than Pike and Korver and could defend 3s and some 4s.

by gadogry on Aug 12, 2009 9:38 AM MDT up reply actions  

Couldn’t use Piatkowski? Or just didn’t want to?

by lonesomepoint on Aug 12, 2009 10:59 AM MDT up reply actions  

For "couldn't use"

I meant “unable to utilize.”

It was weird too because the famous SSOL book actually quoted Mike D saying that he really likes Eric Pike. Then they actually get him in free agency that offseason. Then Mike D keeps him on the bench.

by gadogry on Aug 12, 2009 5:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Criticizing the coach in question will make a lot of people furious, so all I’ll say is: he liked Marcus Banks, too.

by lonesomepoint on Aug 12, 2009 10:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

It's best

not to confuse D’Antoni the coach with D’Antoni the GM.

Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.

by rosewood on Aug 14, 2009 8:37 AM MDT up reply actions  

we just gotta

give them pavlovic too to relieve their cap, i think its legit once that happens for sure

"Check out progressive stats and the latest Suns news at ifiredterryporter.com

by ifiredterryporter.com on Aug 11, 2009 11:43 PM MDT reply actions  

D’antoni the gm sucks..i was always a fan of his brother..I bet you cant say Dan D’Antoni 5 times without laughin..hell i cant

by Lebrontophx2010 on Aug 14, 2009 9:43 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.
Start posting about the Suns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Roleplaying

Recent FanPosts

Small
Goran Dragic
75361_suns_bobcats_basketball_small
Superstars, lets define em.
Be_20optimistic_small
One Month and Three Days to Go!
Small
This is just ridiculous
Small
Denver and JSmith
Small
Goran Dragic Update: Slovenia Vs. Croatia (3rd game in FIBA Worlds)
Funny-pictures-laugh2_small
WRAPPING UP NBA ASIA CHALLENGE-MANILA EDITION
79485_1_ninja_small
Back in 1996....
Small
David Griffin
Small
Lakers Lost. Suns Possible Gain?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Friend Us On Facebook

SBNation.com Recent Stories

PHOENIX - SEPTEMBER 05:  Sue Bird #10 of the Seattle Storm puts up a shot against the Phoenix Mercury in Game Two of the Western Conference Finals during the 2010 WNBA Playoffs at US Airways Center on September 5 2010 in Phoenix Arizona.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that by downloading and or using this photograph User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.  (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images) +1 updates

Bird's Game-Winner Sends Seattle Storm Into WNBA Finals

NEW YORK CITY NY - AUGUST 12:  Kevin Durant #5 looks on during the World Basketball Festival USAB Showcase at Radio City Music Hall on August 12 2010 in New York City. (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images for Nike) +4 updates

FIBA World Championships 2010: Team USA Routs Iran 88-51, Clinches Top Spot In Group B

FILE - This Feb. 21, 2010, file photo shows Denver Nuggets head coach George Karl before an NBA basketball game against the Boston Celtics,  in Denver. Karl will miss Wednesday night's,  March 10, 2010, game at Minnesota as he undergoes another round of cancer treatment.  (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File) +4 updates

Nuggets Coach George Karl Says He'll Return To Coaching Next Season

More from SBNation.com >

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Editor in Chief

Seth_avatar_bw_small Seth Pollack

Site Editor

P1010251_small Wil Cantrell

Phoenix-suns-wallpaper_small Justin Burning

Staff Writer

P1010096_small PanamaSun

Cass_and_trevor_small iamtrevorpaxton

Nashty_twit_small watdogg10

Teenwolf_small Scott Howard

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan