Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

If The Phoenix Suns Continue To Struggle Could Nash Be Traded?

If the Phoenix Suns continue to struggle, the team will have to consider trading its most valuable asset, Steve Nash. (Photo by Max Simbron)

After struggling with a tough schedule in December and the loss of Leandro Barbosa to ankle injury, the Phoenix Suns were supposed to start the new year with renewed vigor and get back to their earlier winning ways.

Instead, the slope of the decline has only steepened and if the trend continues on this path over the next 3 to 4 weeks it could lead to the nuclear option. Trading Steve Nash.

 

The Suns' recent struggles are well documented but the numbers are still shocking to see:

  • 10 and 14 (.417) record since the 14 and 3 (.823) start
  • Bad defense (28th in points per 100 possessions)
  • Bad rebounding (26th in rebounding rate)
  • Turnovers (17th in turnover rate)
  • 6 double digit leads blown in last 7 games

Even more frustrating is that no one seems to know what's going on or what to do about it.

"I don't get why we do some of the things that we do," said Alvin Gentry before leaving Phoenix for a road trip that so far has seen the Suns blow a 24-point lead to the Pacers, a 4-point lead in the final 10 seconds of a well played game in Atlanta, and a total failure to compete while being run out of the gym in Charlotte.

Obviously, the answers aren't easy and it goes without saying that the Suns aren't the only team struggling right now. Orlando with their huge payroll and incredible depth are 3 and 9 in January. The Kings after showing signs of life have dropped 10 of their last 12. And there's always the Nets with their 3 win season.

Positionally the Suns are getting sub-par performances from Jason Richardson, Channing Frye, Jared Dudley, and Leandro Barbosa. Grant Hill clearly can bring it in spurts but has trouble sustaining his legs through the course of a game and is slowly declining before our eyes.

Aside from Hill, who's 37 years and 123 straight games played are reasons enough, there's no telling if the others are going through a collective slump, if they are simply coming back down to their natural ability levels, or if there is some other deeper chemistry or style of play issue going on.

Last season when the team played uninspired and non-competitive basketball the blame fell on Terry Porter's shoulders. This season there is no one left to blame for not playing hard every night.

You can live with getting beat by better teams or even teams who have great nights, but you simply can't accept a failure to compete for 48 minutes. Not if you are a fan. Not if you are the coach. And not if you are the owner who's going to be asked to pay $5m in luxury tax to help subsidize teams with smaller payrolls and in many cases better records.

The question now is what happens next.

Star-divide

The trade deadline is still about five weeks away. The Suns could get a win on Monday in Memphis (breaking the 0-17 TNT curse) and get right back on a roll with home games against the Nets, Bulls and Warriors. A 6 and 2 finish to the month is very possible and would quickly put everyone at ease rolling into the All-Star break.

But the way the team has been playing of late with inconsistent effort, poor individual performances and a general lack of confidence it is completely conceivable that on February 15th we are talking about a sub .500 record at which point the front office will have no choice but to consider every possible option for rebuilding for the future.

Forget about Amare and his complex situation or the Suns most tradable player, Leandro Barbosa, at that point the team's most valuable asset would have to be considered in play. Steve Nash.

With the way Steve has played this season putting up amazing numbers and showing his most steady and consistent physical health in years, his contract with two years and about $22m after this season starts to look extremely attractive to those teams who have been hording cap space for the Summer of LeBron.

The Knicks right now are positioned to be a big player in the free agency market but are generally considered a long shot to land a big name because they don't have any existing players to help attract a star. With Nash on their roster, guys like Bosh and yes, even LeBron, would have to give it a serious look.

We already know that Mike D'Antoni would sell his soul to get Nash back on his team and NY is obviously an acceptable destination for the urbane Nash. Given all those factors, is there any combination of players, expiring contracts and future draft picks that Donnie Walsh wouldn't package to get Steve at the deadline?

Consider it the nuclear option, but with the way things have looked and the very real prospect of being out of the playoff picture within the next 3 to 4 weeks (if the trend continues) it would be negligent for the team not to be digging up their launch codes.

 

The AZ Republic reports that Coach Gentry is considering putting Robin Lopez in the starting lineup in place of Channing Frye to give the team more of defensive look.

We saw Goran Dragic play the entire fourth quarter in Atlanta over a struggling Jason Richardson. Dragic playing the two with Nash takes some of the pressure to create off of Steve's hands and puts the team's best defensive guard on the floor in crunch time.

Earl Clark is slowly getting more opportunity and might provide another viable option at small forward.

Leandro Barbosa in garbage time Saturday might have been able to play himself out of a funk and Jason Richardson is only two made three's from getting hot.

Whatever it is, lets all hope the the Suns find a way to turn it around and we are able to avoid Armageddon. Make no mistake, If Nash is traded it could mean 5+ years of painful nuclear winter in Phoenix.

Men of action always call for drastic moves but history has shown that patience is often the wiser course. But at some point your hand is forced and you live with the consequences. Right now, the future is in the players' hands. If they step up and play well the Suns will likely stand pat and give this group the opportunity to stay together. If not, they will have no one to blame but themselves.

Comment 89 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If Amare is traded...

there is no need to keep Nash here, let him go somewhere and try to win a Championship. Orlando is the first place to come to mind, however, Jameer Nelson is not who I envision running the point in PHX the coming years.

A S&T for David Lee is the best option IMHO.

by bradley281 on Jan 17, 2010 3:32 PM MST reply actions  

I don't think

We could pull Jameer straight up, without added pieces, which we really don’t have to spare. But I like him a lot. whether I’d do the deal is another story. Perhaps if Nash wanted to go….

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jan 17, 2010 3:34 PM MST up reply actions  

on the contrary, i think ORL would jump at this

i just don’t like Jameer that much, I would like to get Devin Harris here if at all possible. Keep in mind that Dallas gave up Harris for an aging(yet effective) Kidd. Nash still has plenty of gas in the tank.

by bradley281 on Jan 17, 2010 4:10 PM MST up reply actions  

It's scary

when your head coach has no answers. I like Alvin Gentry a lot and I respect him as a human being and a coach. However, there comes a point where you have to be accountable for your team’s performance. If he’s coached his ass off and nothing’s working, well then he either has a dead roster, or guys have tuned him out. Either way, he’s going to stay.

In normal cases when the team tunes out the coach, and the players are talented and young, or with potential, the coach goes. I cannot say this is the situation we have now.

Before we head towards the nuclear option, I advocate tinkering with the rotation, and giving it a good ten games to see how it works. I like that Gentry is sitting the guys who aren’t getting the job done. Whether that motivates anyone, and whether we have the talent to replace a starter remains to be seen.

Ideally you’d either sit or reduce minutes For JRich and LB. But they play the same position (this is making me chuckle). You play Dragic next to Nash and you’ve got no replacement for Nash.

If you reduce Dudley’s minutes to maximize his effectiveness, then you lean more on Hill (which you can’t) or you toss Clark in the fire and hope for the best.

If you sit Frye and start Lopez, on paper you have more offense off the bench and more D to start the game, which isn’t bad. You make a second unit front line of Dudley, Frye and Lopez.

If you start Dragic at 2, you bring in Rich off the bench, which intrigues me. If he could manage 20 minutes of hot shooting off the bench, that boosts the O of the second unit.

So, who runs the point? Has Darrell Armstrong retired? What’s KJ up to? Speedy Claxton?

As far as Steve Nash, I have enough respect for the guy to leave it up to him. If he wants to go to Toronoto or NY or something and I can swing a reasonable deal, I’d let go. He’s going into the ring of honor and the Hall of Fame as a Sun, the classy move is to let him choose his destiny for the remainder of his career with all he’s brought to our franchise.

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jan 17, 2010 3:33 PM MST reply actions  

If Nash goes

The Suns lose their most consistent player. Yes he has defensive shortcomings which are well documented, he commits a lot of TOs (that’s just how he plays) but you can expect a solid game from him night in and night out. I may be wrong, but I have never seen Steve mail in a game, or give up. He has been one of the most consistent figures on this team for years, and if he goes the Suns lose a large measure of consistency. However sometimes you need to shake things up. Either way tinkering with the rotations is still the best option right now, and seeing if there is some combo of personnel that will work very well.

by Willman on Jan 17, 2010 4:00 PM MST reply actions  

Nash also makes everybody around him better defensively

He needs some defensively-minded players around him who can hit the 3…Raja Bell comes to mind, but he’s washed up. Maybe the Suns should look at Courtney Lee?

"Left hand, right hand, it doesn't matter. I'm amphibious." - Charles Shackleford
"If the NBA were on channel 5 and a bunch of frogs making love were on channel 4, I'd watch the frogs, even if they were coming in fuzzy." - Bobby Knight
"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors." - Weldon Drew

by LACK on Jan 17, 2010 6:09 PM MST up reply actions  

Here is the complete NUKE scenario.....Miami gets a chip out of this probably

http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.php?tradeid=5389562

Nash, Amare and Hill to Miami
O’Neal, Beasley, Chalmers and 2 1st’s to PHX

Miami wins it all, PHX blows up, gets some young talent and picks + 15M capspace next year

by bradley281 on Jan 17, 2010 4:12 PM MST reply actions  

Uhh ... no.

The two firsts we’d get out of this would be the 30th pick in the draft.

by jburning on Jan 17, 2010 4:15 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm still just baffled.

Obviously we knew we weren’t as good as the 14-3 start indicated, but I just don’t understand how we’ve regressed this much.

by Azreous on Jan 17, 2010 4:16 PM MST reply actions  

Further explaination

First, I didn’t start this article intending to end up here. It just sort of took me here as I thought it though.

I don’t think any smaller trade (LB) really make the team that much better and I don’t think trading Amare at this point brings back enough to make a big impact either. Could be wrong there.

But there’s no question that Nash is at high value right now and can yield a LOT coming back.

That said, I don’t want this to happen. I don’t think it will happen. And if it does happen it will be bad in the short term. But I do think the team needs to have this option available IF (BIG IF) they can’t get it together over the next 3 to 4 weeks.

Oh, and I also am not nearly as down on Jason as most readers seem to be. I think his D is solid and his size is not easily replaced. Goran and Lopez looked good against the Hawks in large part b/c the Suns were in a zone and those guys play that well. In a straight up match-up you can’t put Goran on guys like Kobe, Roy or Joe Johnson like you can with Jason.

I do wonder if he needs to be getting more shots. Playing with Steve, he just seems to not find the ball in his hands enough and when he is getting looks he is pressing. But all that can turn around with a couple of good games. Bottom line, he’s not very tradable b/c the Suns system has hurt his numbers and his contract is too big but he’s an incredibly talented player in his prime. He doesn’t turn the ball over (70th among all guards) and when he’s on he helps spread the floor.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan

by Seth Pollack on Jan 17, 2010 4:26 PM MST reply actions  

Very good post about Rich.

He’s been frustrating to watch over the past few weeks, but, like you said, it seems like he’s pressing for his opportunities. But you’re right, his defense has been largely solid and his size/athleticism is key.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Jan 17, 2010 6:53 PM MST up reply actions  

don't forget

that Richardson is likely our best rebounder who is a starter.

there are games where even though he hasn’t been good offensively has been very good defensively and with rebounding

by ArizonaCactus on Jan 17, 2010 8:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Totally.

I like to see him, when the shots aren’t falling, trying to do other things aside from huck up shots. Which he’ll still do, but he’ll focus more on rebounding, trying to make the extra pass, etc.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Jan 18, 2010 4:02 PM MST up reply actions  

I was looking at a lot of JRich numbers today

working on a full post….here’s the highlights:

His FG% is down 8 points since his hand injury but he’s still above his career average.

He’s ranked 10th in PER of all shooting guards
His salary isn’t in the top 30 in the league
He doesn’t turn the ball over

I still think he’s playing better than people give him credit for. He’s totally changed his game from being a #1 option, high volume scorer to fitting in with Nash and Amare in a system where he rarely touches the ball

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan

by Seth Pollack on Jan 18, 2010 4:37 PM MST up reply actions  

with a better defensive plan and

we will be fine.

i think our biggest problem is that we don’t have a lock-down defensive big man down the stretch. both amare and frye cannot play great defense. Lopez is showing promise, but he is too young. as long as we can somehow fix this problem, we are ok. so yeah, do NOT blow up this team. stick it out!!!!!!

by sonicking on Jan 17, 2010 5:25 PM MST reply actions  

Always a step behind me Phoenix Stan

When I made this post I was taboo, welcome to the side of reason :D

by Teske22 on Jan 17, 2010 5:39 PM MST reply actions  

i could be wrong

but i think that even though you both came to the same conclusion, the reasons you came to that conclusion varied…

Banzai!

by Suns' Sensei on Jan 17, 2010 9:04 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks but

I’ve not concluded anything beyond possibly considering a trade IF certain other things happen.

Let’s see what the next four weeks bring

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan

by Seth Pollack on Jan 17, 2010 11:40 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah I agree

I think a trade is going to bank on what the Suns do within the next month. I think Amar’e would be the most likely to go considering the track record of high priced players coming into a new contract (JJ, Marion).

I think Nash is almost impossible to move, (A contender with expiring contracts, young talent, and draft picks in need of a point guard). I believe i mentioned the reasons why in my first post in that link.

by Teske22 on Jan 18, 2010 1:32 PM MST up reply actions  

Always here to help

http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2009/12/22/1213178/why-the-suns-should-have-traded

I think the Suns should trade both Amar’e and Nash now. The reasoning was to see if they could muster a championship run out of the two. I’m not one to over react to a bad spurt, or get too excited about a good spurt. But regardless of how well or how poorly they are currently playing, it is clear to even the casual fan that this team can’t compete for a championship. They should make the playoffs, and could even have home court in the first round, but I don’t think it’s probable they even advance beyond the second round.
And now with a bunch of young teams coming into their own, Memphis, Thunder, I could even imagine losing a first round series to one of those two, or even the playoff spot.

Actually the Heat are in the best position to sign free agents. 24 million on the books next year is all, and 17 million of that is Wade’s player option. The rest is Beasley. Beasley Wade Amar’e? I’m on board with that.

The Suns have the awful blend of slow and inexperienced. Not exactly the winning formula.

by Teske22 on Jan 17, 2010 5:48 PM MST reply actions  

I dont think its a good idea to trade either player

We got Nash back this year for pretty cheap considering his abililty and Amare, frankly, is playing like he is worth it. To me, it seems like we need to get our promising players more time on the court and limit minutes to them. Trade LB, play Clark and Lopez more. Send in Frye with the second unit. Play Dragic with Nash more. Shorten the rotation for a bit and get them used to each other. No sense blowing things up yet. Its just not time. Rich should go, at some point, but only because his contract is so unbearable right now.

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Jan 17, 2010 6:32 PM MST up reply actions  

The answer is simple...

Firstly, lets not panic. .500 ball from here until the end of the season gets us into the playoffs, thanks to that 14-3 start. I’d rather that, without a first rounder, than blow it up and give OKC a lottery pick. That’s the thing: without a 1st rounder, lets just stay the course.

Besides, do you really think anyone wants to play a Suns squad in the playoffs? They get hot from 3 and they could cause a massive upset. We won’t win, but neither will 28 other teams!

Second, I think the answer of why they are struggling is simple: the opponents have worked out the Suns a little bit.

Whereas the Marion Suns scored a lot of fast break points, this team doesn’t, which means that when the threes aren’t falling, or the pick and roll is ineffective, the Suns struggle as they have no other goto play in the half-court.

On top of that, the second unit has no real go to play, which makes their play a hit and miss affair, with great and extremely poor stretches.

The Suns need, desperately, to develop another offensive play they can go to. And there are two things the Suns should do: run Nash off screens ala Reggie Miller, & JRich in the post.

Nash is such a good shooter, when all else fails, running him of screens and letting him jack it up seems a no brainer. I know he is a great passer, but sometimes, letting him just fire away makes sense. And JRich in the post is just an underused play. He is physically so big, that he’d be almost impossible for most 2 or 3s to stop, and make him our first double team threat in a while.

The second unit, especially if Frye moves there, could surround JRich with three point shooters, making doubling him a risky proposition. Imagine: Dragic, JRich, Dudley, Frye and Louis / Lopez, and you have three shooters, and a weakside rebounder on every post play. I call this the “Ginobli Ploy”, i.e. putting a great player on the second unit to abuse opponents benches.

Playing JRich with the 2nd unit would also create more minutes for LB to play with Nash, which would help him & get the Suns a few more fast break points,. The Nash “Hail Mary” pass to a streaking LB on the break has always been a Suns special – and usually good for ~4 points a game. When was the last time we saw that play?

I think the Suns should think about getting LB into the game sooner (say, 3-6 minutes in), and getting JRich more minutes with the second unit as a post threat. That should pretty much cure the offensive flat patches that lead to lost leads, which is the major deficiency we’ve suffered recently.

by MMotherwell on Jan 17, 2010 6:00 PM MST reply actions  

yeah right…steve is the face of the franchise…if he wants to leave, they’ll trade him but they won’t trade him otherwise..he makes the team better, so without him, they’ll be even worse.

by kuato lives on Jan 17, 2010 7:54 PM MST reply actions  

i don’t even know why you guys are talking about this…strong suns fans. strong hope.

by kuato lives on Jan 17, 2010 7:58 PM MST reply actions  

The Suns are in the unenviable position of having mortgaged their future, and their current roster is not performing.

If we continue to struggle we can say goodbye to Amare (for nothing if we don’t trade by the deadline). and our young players are far from talented enough to be starting.

The problem is, teams have figured out how to stop the suns. Press Nash so he has to pass early, and push the ball to the post players to contend with Amare and Frye who don’t exactly play the best post defense.

There is only one thing that will fix it for us. time.

by Chucko667 on Jan 17, 2010 8:04 PM MST reply actions  

Hey, I’m new here. I’m a huge Suns fan and here is my take on the current situation.

We’re obviously struggling, but were still one game better than our record the previous year. Only this time we don’t have excuses. Everybody, but Nash has been inconsistent and for some reason nobody can explain it. We just need to tweak around the rotations a bit. Whether that works or not we need to put Amar’e on the trading block like right now. Lets just see what teams would offer for him. I really think we need to consider trading Amare; not Nash.

Now here is my trade ideal; Amare, J-Rich and Collins(expire) to the Rockets for Landry, Battier or Ariza and tmac(expire).

Landry has a lot of potential in him and is still improving. Playing with Nash will only make him better. Playing in this system should also make him better too(you notice how he’s had all his career highs against the Suns?) Either Battier or Ariza would work. They are the defensive stoppers we need. Its their job and their life; they want to do it and will do it all the time no matter how big or how down their team is. Plus, they can shoot the three. These guys would really help us out a lot and give us some consistency. We can give T-mac a shot, but if he cant play than we let him walk and go after another guy like Bosh or Dirk(Who has expressed interest in playing with Nash again).

Landry and either Battier or Ariza alone should be good enough to get us to the playoffs and should make us better defensively, so that way we aren’t sacrificing this season for next.

 This trade would help us as well as the Rockets. It works too according to the trade machine. This is a gamble worth taking. Hey, if giving up our #1 scorer and our #2 scorer(half the time) seems bad than just remember that were at least getting back the MOST IMPROVED PLAYER OF THE YEAR and one of the BEST DEFENDERS IN THE GAME and tmac; WHO’s CONTRACT EXPIRES AFTER THE SEASON! YEA BOY!

I like Amar’e, but hes not our guy. Nash is. This is why Amar’e doesn’t deserve all that dough. I think its time to part ways. I know people got mad when Marion was traded, but he was going to leave the following summer anyway. I think people were more so mad because it was for Shaq. At least this time we could get some good players in return who could help right away.

Peace out!

by Beavis 25 on Jan 17, 2010 8:35 PM MST reply actions  

Houston would not

make that deal. Landry and Ariza add to much to that team, mainly defense and youth.

by Grockcubs on Jan 17, 2010 10:10 PM MST up reply actions  

I would prefer Ariza, but I wouldn’t mind getting Battier instead. By the way, Landry is only a year younger than Amar’e. I think they would accept because they become contenders with this deal. They get a big lift offensively without losing too much defense. They also get a lot of cap relief in two years when Yao Ming and J-Rich’s contracts expire.

by Beavis 25 on Jan 17, 2010 10:31 PM MST reply actions  

J Richardson getting 13.3 million a year will not be taken by anyone, Trades where we offer him will be laughed at. The best thing to do with him is to put him on the bench and hope that wakes him up and he starts playing at even an average level. The idea of giving him more shots is amazing.. the real problem however is not simply Richardson it is that Gentry is being allowed to coach this team.
He is a nice man. So What. After each disaster, he says they beat ys bad or I do not understand why we do these things. I believe him. He does not understand very much of anything. The top teams always have someone that drives them. Pops for the Spurs, Kobe for the Lakers, LeBron for the Cavaliers.
We have no one. The only player we have smart enough really for the job is Hill and in b-b games he just gets too tired.
We NEED A COACH. Kerr is ignoring a very obvious cry for help every time the team gets slaughtered by 20 points.
The problem is nor ability. We have one of the best benches in the NBA if they are allowed to work, The problen is our starting 5 are all loaded with weakness.
Nash who has tremendous talent but plays little d and carries around these mental problems where he finds it hard to play against old friends, on TNT, after Spurs game and many others,
Amare actually the best of the bunch.
Hill whose weakness is age.
Frye with real talent but no direction,
Richardson whose problem is that he can rarely play well against good teams.
A good coach could fix much of this. Hill in b-b should be saved for the second half of the game.
Richardson made a bench player while we try to wake him up and get something from him.
Frye being talked to about responsibility and being given goals and useful feedback.
Nash being given more rest and not having to feel he must be superman.
Use the young players more. Especial with an intelligent coach that actually understands match ups they can and will get the job done.
And if they fail——well how can it be worse than this but I think they can win. They have been dealing with no coach and very poor role models and they are still very good.
We have to trust them and help them by giving them a coach that can LIFT the team and not simply be an admission of inferiority.
GL

by catseyetwice on Jan 18, 2010 5:50 AM MST reply actions  

Nonsense.

All of it. Gentry hasn’t done anything to suggest that he is a bad coach. Has been with the organization for years and knows the stuff. We just don’t have the players to be truly effective on the court.

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Jan 18, 2010 7:34 AM MST up reply actions  

I think it's a mix of the two.

Gentry’s not the greatest tactician in the world, but he is in a bad position, as far as his roster and management’s goals, I think. If he puts in his defensive squad that tries hard, it’s difficult to generate points.

I think we’re pretty close, though, to the point where Lopez, Dragic, and Clark start getting 20-30 minutes a game.

by jburning on Jan 18, 2010 9:12 AM MST up reply actions  

I think youre right

Its nice to see some optimism. We may be slowly moving away from the aggressive SSOL days to a more methodically offensive powerhouse. Having Lopez on the floor with the starters will help as will getting Clark more minutes and Duds.

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Jan 18, 2010 11:10 AM MST up reply actions  

Bottom Line

With this slump for the Suns, what could be more frustrating than a team that gets a big lead, then blows it and loses on a regular basis.

If that becomes your product, you kindof have to blow it up. They have a few weeks to turn it around, If they cant, whose gonna watch them?

by dCoye on Jan 18, 2010 7:58 AM MST reply actions  

Bucks play b-b at Suns and lose by 4 points. Bucks play b-b at Utah and lose by 17.
Gentry is a nice man. That qualifies him as a boy scout coach. Sloan just wants to lock up wins. As to our players, I wonder if any of them except for Richardson would have any problem getting other jobs.
By the way are Sloan, Jackson and Pops NICE GUYS

by catseyetwice on Jan 18, 2010 8:11 AM MST reply actions  

Having stood outside

the closed doors of Suns practice court and being able to hear Gentry scream at his team, I think your “nice guy” formulation isn’t quite the problem.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan

by Seth Pollack on Jan 18, 2010 8:41 AM MST up reply actions  

Amare for....

Harden, Ibaka, Expiring + our 2010 pick back.

by bradley281 on Jan 18, 2010 8:57 AM MST reply actions  

hmm very interesting trade idea.

Not sure that Harden is enough, though. He’s the perfect compliment on the Thunder, but not a guy I think will be a star. The Thunder are never going to give up Durant or Westbrook and I’m not sure Jeff Green is enough, either. Don’t know if I’d make a trade with the Thunder, but this is definitely an interesting one.

by jburning on Jan 18, 2010 9:14 AM MST up reply actions  

you can swap Green in for Harden

I just think Harden’s upside is greater, or I’m an ASU homer

by bradley281 on Jan 18, 2010 10:30 AM MST up reply actions  

I don't think OKC would do that at ALL.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 18, 2010 10:49 AM MST up reply actions  

Well, ESPN is talking about a package of...

Green, Ibaka and a pair of 1st’s for Bosh. Bosh’s value is not That much higher than Amar’e.

by bradley281 on Jan 18, 2010 11:01 AM MST up reply actions  

Bosh more likely to stay in OKC than Amare

could be wrong about that but Amare seems like he wants to be in a big market.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan

by Seth Pollack on Jan 18, 2010 11:06 AM MST up reply actions  

I thought he wanted to win?

Westbrook, Harden, Durant and Amare would do a lot of winning.

by bradley281 on Jan 18, 2010 11:32 AM MST up reply actions  

well....

we may yet find out how important winning really is to Amare when the time comes

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan

by Seth Pollack on Jan 18, 2010 11:46 AM MST up reply actions  

While I kinda like this trade ...

It would be a kick in the groin, if you stop to think that we will be giving up our biggest asset to get back a draft pick we made a huge mistake in giving away in the first place.

by jburning on Jan 18, 2010 11:33 AM MST up reply actions  

Blow it up

When the Suns decided to keep this aging team together they mortgaged their future. They believed that going back to “run and gun” would equal past success but that was incorrect. Nash deserves the chance to win a championship b4 he is done and so does Hill. Lets trade Amare (who is not worth a max contract ) and begin rebuilding asap!

by JT80 on Jan 18, 2010 9:01 AM MST reply actions  

i agree

look at oklahoma…it can be done smartly and afford-ably….but phoenix has not often been either

the diamond backs were very poorly financially structured team for a while…they got their championship

the suns with consistent smart decisions could be back in the mix within 2-3 years…but I honestly don’t see us as a smartly run team….sadly

by be-the-ball on Jan 18, 2010 10:01 AM MST up reply actions  

Sad thing is that we're not even going back to "run and gun"

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 18, 2010 10:50 AM MST up reply actions  

man..why the hell would we trade amare? he is our most consistent player, next to nash. j-rich is so inconsistent and frye is going to start hurting with less minutes…he needs confidence. and these trade ideas are dumb as hell…nash for jameer? that’s terrible, and i’ve never heard of a team trading people to help another team win. then nash, amare and hill for o’neal, chalmers and beasley? another bad trade…and who would start? chalmers or goran? that’s not fair. you guys need some hope and dedication.

by kuato lives on Jan 18, 2010 10:36 AM MST reply actions  

If you trade Nash, you have to trade Amare

His efficiency will nosedive without Nash setting him up.

If we do get rid of Steve(and I hope we don’t), I want us to land a pick that can net us John Wall. That’s all I want. GIVE US JOHN WALL!

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 18, 2010 10:50 AM MST reply actions  

Having watched Nash this season, I don’t want him traded. This team needs a total blowup and rebuild to become a contender again. We all know this. We know we are just also rans this season, and probably next season too.

But we should appreciate what we have in Steve Nash and his offense. It’s entertaining, and we play winning basketball, albeit with slumps like the current road trip.

It makes a lot of sense to trade him and move on, but I’d rather we kept him. Sometimes there’s more than winning.

by Toon Army Sun on Jan 18, 2010 11:11 AM MST reply actions  

Also

I think the RoLo/Frye move is a good one. Frye can be an impact off the bench instead.

by Toon Army Sun on Jan 18, 2010 11:12 AM MST reply actions  

if we’re talking about bad trades, let’s trade j-rich to the bucks for jerry stackhouse and ilyasova

by kuato lives on Jan 18, 2010 12:03 PM MST reply actions  

keep with it

i know the team are playing with no heart at time but keep with it.

i was all for trading steve nash start of season but seeing him play this year i think we should keep him we can get JNelson of JCalederon but i would take NASH all night long.

i think only 2 players we can trade are JRich and Amare.

Jrich to dallas for JHoward his contract end this summer.

Amare and Hill to Knicks for DLee JJefferies CMobley

these are some of the trades (work on ESPN trade) but i think we should keep with it until the end of the season.

we will make the playoffs and maybe be out in the second round if we are lucky.
i think Coach needs to grow a pair and change the line up.

Starters :Nash LB GH AS Lopez
Reservers: GD JR JD Clark/LOU Frye

play out season then low ball amare in contract decision then have some money not a lot to spend in free agency.

by phxuk: Ap on Jan 18, 2010 12:11 PM MST reply actions  

i’d like to see LB in the starting line-up…but calderon sucks…and josh howard hasn’t been playing well either

by kuato lives on Jan 18, 2010 12:29 PM MST up reply actions  

trade

Amare and JRich to PHI. Suns get Iguodala, Dalembert, Speights.

The Suns would lockup the best back court in the league with Nash/Iguodala. They’d get a promising young PF prospect in Speights to replace Amare. And both teams would essentially swap bloated contracts in Richardson and Dalembert that would address weaknesses on both team. And of course Phili gets Amare.

Which team would say no?

by atwater on Jan 18, 2010 12:26 PM MST reply actions  

It might be possible if we took Brand instead of Dalembert

but theres no f*****g way i want brand here with his cap-killing contract for the next 4 years

by DaveJD on Jan 18, 2010 12:36 PM MST up reply actions  

amare/j-rich for thaddeus young, iguodala, speights

by kuato lives on Jan 18, 2010 12:46 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare for Speights, Young and Dalembert

Thats a trade i’d do in a heartbeat if i though STAT might leave and Philly just might do it if Amar’e resigned.

by DaveJD on Jan 18, 2010 12:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Sure, but...

they’ve been trying to unload Dalembert for years. And his salary added with Speights’ almost offsets Amare’s. Since Amare’s salary is essentially expiring, it gives them more financial flexibility moving forward as well if they don’t want to pick him up. They also free themselves of all that money they have committed to Iguodala on a losing team. You’d have to think that at 13-26, Phili would be willing to add Amare and JRich for the price of Iguodala especially if it helped them financially moving forward.

by atwater on Jan 18, 2010 12:44 PM MST up reply actions  

I suppose

but Dalembert is playing really well at the moment and has only got one year left. Theres no way STAT stays for a 13 win team so they’d effectively be trading J-rich for dalembert (they’ve got very similar contracts) and losing iggy for nothing.

by DaveJD on Jan 18, 2010 12:51 PM MST up reply actions  

OR

The Suns should just trade Barbosa straight up for B.Haywood. Suns get their defensive-minded big man with an expiring contract for financial flexibility moving forward. Wash gets Barbosa, the world’s most lovable guy who will be difficult to give up. But the game’s about winning.

by atwater on Jan 18, 2010 12:54 PM MST up reply actions  

Sorry just noticed the note about expiring.

I don’t think it’s worth it to trade Barbosa for an expiring, since he’s already got a reasonable deal.

by jburning on Jan 18, 2010 1:02 PM MST up reply actions  

i don’t see these “defensive big men” really fitting in…kinda like shaq

by kuato lives on Jan 18, 2010 1:01 PM MST up reply actions  

i seriously think the team needs a good talking to, explaining how they need to play with heart and play hard if they want to win and surprise everyone…they have the skill. a separate speech to amare about how he has to play hard and play great defense if he wants a better team.

by kuato lives on Jan 18, 2010 1:17 PM MST reply actions  

If The Phoenix Suns Continue To Struggle Could Nash Be Traded?

no. i was raised to believe there were no stupid questions, so i’ll just say this one was idiotic.

amare is on the block. not steve.

i didn’t even read past the headline it is so preposterous.

by misteradiant on Jan 18, 2010 1:36 PM MST reply actions  

"i didn’t even read past the headline it is so preposterous."

Mkay then.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 18, 2010 1:50 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t get why people say if Amare has to go than Nash has to go? He was MVP the year without Amare.

Who doesn’t love Nash? He’s our most consistent player and he plays with heart all the time. He’s our guy which is why we need to keep him. I love Amare and his dunks, but he wants too much cash; cash that only “the guys” get and Amare isn’t one of them. Plus, if we extend him we really won’t have enough money to improve the roster. We could trade J-Rich, but we all know that is highly unlikely. He’d have to be included in a deal with Amare if we wanted to trade him.

by Beavis 25 on Jan 18, 2010 2:46 PM MST reply actions  

Here is my take on the Gentry topic. I think he is doing a good job and all that he can(however, I still think he should start Barbosa just for a few games to see how it works out). You can only do so much as a Coach. The rest is up to the players. Last year, Porter did do a bad job. He wasn’t playing the team to its strengths which is why he got fired. This year there are no excuses. The players are at fault and need to get it together.

 The biggest problem with this team is defense. We are allowing over 107ppg with only a 2 point differential! We just don’t have the personnel. Under Coach D we were allowing 102 ppg with an 8 point differential. We had Marion, Bell, Thomas, Diaw… Guys who were good or exceptional defenders. We were an average team defensively through those years; our biggest problem during that span was our bench. Now we have a bench, but no defenders. This year we don’t have one good defender and its hurting us.

by Beavis 25 on Jan 18, 2010 2:58 PM MST reply actions  

let’s trade j-rich and get raja bell back…he’s always been one of my favorite suns.

BARBOSA AND LOPEZ ARE STARTING TONIGHT

by kuato lives on Jan 18, 2010 3:16 PM MST reply actions  

Raja Bell has lost too many steps, but I would still do it just to get rid of J-Rich’s contract.

by Beavis 25 on Jan 18, 2010 6:33 PM MST reply actions  

The Knicks

As a Knick fan, I’d like to see Nash in orange and blue, but something annoys me about this article—the idea that the Knicks don’t have the talent to attract Lebron and other free agents. I’m sorry, but that’s an old idea that is quickly being disproven. In fact, David Lee alone has risen to star caliber level this season, has developed a mid-range jumper, and can potentially be re-signed with a back-loaded deal, as he wants to remain a Knick. Add the emergence of Gallinari, as well as Wil Chandler—who has been playing very well and still has much upside, and the Knicks have just as much or more talent than any of the other teams with max level cap room this summer.

by paul a on Jan 19, 2010 11:28 AM MST reply actions  

Trouble here

Is that the Knicks probably can’t afford to keep David Lee ($10m/year) and still snatch LeBron. Gallinari and Chandler are about the only real talent the Knicks will have after this season.

If he really wanted talent, he’d go to the Clippers, where he’d still in the spotlight, in LA, but be playing with Eric Gordon, Blake Griffin, Chris Kaman, Baron Davis, JaVale McGee, and Al Thornton.

by jburning on Jan 19, 2010 4:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Sorry ...

Meant DeAndre Jordan, but JaVale McGee.

by jburning on Jan 19, 2010 4:21 PM MST up reply actions  

word is kevin martin is on the trading block….let’s get this f*cker

by kuato lives on Jan 19, 2010 12:27 PM MST reply actions  

Too bad he's been hurt most of the season

Plus he has a history of injuries…I’m also bitter because his injury really screwed my fantasy team over.

by Willman on Jan 19, 2010 6:01 PM MST up reply actions  

I think if you’re Sarver, you pull Nash aside, and ask him if he wants to continue here, then the Suns try to make a big play to free up cap space and sign a big name over the summer. If not, then you trade him to a contender, wish him well knowing that he brought Suns basketball back. Either way, Nash should be able to choose his own destiny. The team owes him that much.

Yet another Suns blog: http://phxsunsnews.com

by JasonEllis on Jan 19, 2010 8:28 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Nash_3_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Divinginlevanto_small PHXgp

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_3111433_9952_1451357_main_small 7footer