The Future
I know that I only ever post about trades. It's a sickness. However, as fun as this year has been, it leaves me worried about the future. ESPN consistently puts the Suns in the bottom five in there "future power rankings" http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?page=FuturePowerRankings-6-091215
So yes, I'm proposing a trade. I did my homework, and I just want to see what everyone else thinks. It's at least as interesting as a Grizzlies game.
The Suns trade: Jason Richardson, Earl Clark and a 2012 #1 pick
The Warrios trade: Raja Bell, Speedy Claxton, Stephon Curry and Anthony Randolph.
I absolutely believe this trade would go through. Randolph's trade value has plummeted with his sulking and uninspired play, and it's becoming increasingly obvious Curry and Ellis cannot co-exist.
The Suns finally get good players under the age of 30. I think Bell and Curry can make up for J-Rich's contribution to the team, and Randolph is just gravy. Bell and Claxton's contracts come off the books at the end of the year, too, saving the Suns gobs of money, something we all know Sarver would go for. Lastly, who doesn't want Raja back?
J-Rich is a demi-god in the bay area. They love him there, he was the heart and soul of that team, and he obviously did great in NellieBall. Earl Clark is a winner for the warriors because of his upside (although I consider him a huge tool, David Thorpe on ESPN consistently ranks Clark with one of the highest upsides of all the rookies.) He is also a perfect fit for NellieBall. The future number one is consistent with the Sun's drafting policy of late, and helps get the trade done.
Honestly, I think this trade makes the Suns better now (once Bell gets back from surgery, he won't take nearly as long to acclimate as a normal mid-season acquisition) and in the future. Also, the idea that we basically traded Boris Diaw for Dudley, Randolph and Curry makes me smile.
God I hope this happens
107 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"who doesn't want raja back?"
Umm everyone but Steve Nash? In this trade we lose all of our back court size we already can’t guard any of the two guards in the league this would make it worse raja bell isn’t the same raja bell that clotheslined Kobe anymore even though I like curry i wouldn’t want to give much to get him because hes definitely too small to play the two and he would make our D worse at least J-Rich is tough and helps on the boards. Claxton is old and Anthony Randolphs mind has been destroyed by nellie hes a complete nutcase now I don’t want an Amare-lite when we already got the real thing. So yeah I dont like this trade at all when RoLo gets in the rotation regularly (which seems to be the plan) and Earl Clark starts to see the floor our future is going to be looking bright again with Amare entering his prime, dragic looking like a future starter barbosa being barbosa, j-rich isnt that old, channing frye has lots of basketball in front of him, dudley is young, lou is young and serviceable too.
by Wichita SunSteeler on Jan 2, 2010 2:47 PM MST reply actions
plus
we would be giving up another first round pick :(
by Wichita SunSteeler on Jan 2, 2010 2:52 PM MST up reply actions
no thanks.
i hope the Suns never trade away a 1st rounder again, never.
No, and No
and then no again. No draft picks. Suns have to acquire picks, no giving them up. We have been down this road to many times how the Suns have just butchered the drafts since 2002. Acquire not trade away please.
Can you imagine
where ESPN put the Suns in the “future power rankings” in 2004?
Next subject.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Even after the Grizzlies game?
Nash said it best – the team, as compromised, is not more talented than the Grizz. Why do we settle for that? This is the same fan base that was not satisfied with anything less than a championship. Now we are supposed to settle for 50 wins and C+ talent?
This team, as compromised, is the SAME EXACT team we had with Kidd in the beginning of the decade. One extremely talented point guard, one semi-star (Marion then, STAT now) and a bunch of role players combining for 50 wins and a first round exit. What the hell is the point in that?
Also, the comparison to 2004 is silly. We had a little thing called cap space back then. We have none of it now. No youth, no cap space, no championship aspirations.
Most of all, I feel like we owe it to Nash to give him a real shot. I’m proud of the way this team has done at times. I am. But Nash deserves better, and we should roll the dice for him
I agree.
I think we as fans, deserve more. We have it SO great over here in Suns land, that most of us are willing to have great seasons and entertaining basketball. Which, I suppose is good, as the NBA is largely just an entertainment option (albeit with some of the best athletes in the world and a bit of a storyline, depending on the team).
But, I think that we need to honor those who come play here. If we just keep playing fun, up tempo basketball (not saying we should stray from that), what is the incentive to come play here? Having a “fun” atmosphere? Players want to win, plain and simple. If we keep on playing the way we do, we’ll be touted as the team that gets bounced every year in the playoffs. A perennial disappointment. And while I don’t think we’ll ever be as bad as the Clippers, etc., a mediocre reputation can sometimes be a bad one.
I agree with UASun here. As much as it pains me to give up another draft pick, we get two solid young prospects, who have already shown they can straight up ball, if given the right chance (in Curry and Randolph). Bell was a fan favorite, and while he might have burned a few bridges, he knows the system. He can still defend adequately (even if he’s no “Kobe-stopper” anymore), and Claxton gives the team either a trade option or an expiring contract.
Like matrix7 said, you either improve your team through trades, free agency, or the draft. We don’t have to do all of them in order for our team to improve.
Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.
by Trevor Paxton on Jan 3, 2010 3:18 AM MST up reply actions
Grizz game didn't expose
lack of talent. It exposed lack of desire and some stupid coaching.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
and also
once more showed that Amare will never be a rebounder. (Why I wanted Silas as coach)
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Amare is 10th in league (forwards)
in rebounds per game:
1 Gerald Wallace , CHA 11.9
2 Marcus Camby , LAC 11.4
3 Zach Randolph , MEM 11.4
4 Chris Bosh , TOR 11.3
5 Carlos Boozer , UTA 10.5
6 Tim Duncan , SAS 10.2
7 Jason Thompson , SAC 9.2
8 Luis Scola , HOU 9.0
9 Lamar Odom , LAL 9.0
10 Amar’e Stoudemire , PHX 8.4
For December he’s over 10 per game which puts him right in the top 5 and I think it is fair to discount November given his recovery time. We’ll see if he keeps this up but if Amare is grabbing 10 rpg then I don’t think we can call him anything but a solid rebounder especially considering his offensive responsibilities as well
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan
Stats
don’t always tell the story. His rebounding in ther Memphis game was atrocious. I would like to know the 10th best salary among forwards. That’s probably what he should get.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Top 10
In salaries (among forwards):
1. Tim Duncan, $22,995,000
2. Dirk Nowitzki, $19,795,714
3. Rashard Lewis, $18,876,000
4. Pau Gasol, $16,451,260
5. Kevin Garnett, $16,400,000
6. Amare Stoudemire, $16,378,325
7. Zach Randolph, $16,000,000
8. Chris Bosh, $15,779,912
9. Kenyon Martin, $15,363,636
10. Elton Brand, $14,858,471
Currently, Amare is the 6th highest paid PF in the game. Of the top 10 (in salaries), only 3 players are ahead of him in the top 10 of rebounding. Though, Stan, Gasol should be listed as number 2 on that list, as he’s pulled down an average 11.5 boards this season. So, put him up there and extend this to a top 11, and there are only 4 forwards that are pulling down more boards than he is.
Now let’s put them in rank of points per game.
1. Dirk Nowitzki, 24.9
2. Chris Bosh, 23.7
3. Amare Stoudemire, 20.7
4. Zach Randolph, 20.2
5. Carlos Boozer, 19.3
6. Al Harrington, 18.4
7. Gerald Wallace, 17.9
8. David West, 17.2
9. Carl Landry, 16.4
10. LaMarcus Aldridge, 16.0
So…to sum it all up, among forwards, we have a player who is in the top 3 in scoring, the top 11 in rebounding, and is the 6th highest paid of those guys.
I think I’ll pay him his money.
Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.
by Trevor Paxton on Jan 5, 2010 3:14 PM MST up reply actions
dude he is a top 3 PF in the NBA
Pretty sure the Grizz have a couple of guys that can board with the best of them, wonder if that played any kind of a role?
Stat is a semi-star? Sorry he is an All-Star. He is at least trying to improve his weakness, most nights anyways. 20+pts and 8+rbs a game is pretty damn good. Stop nitpicking.
W don’t have youth? Nash, Hill, and Collins are the only players over 30. JRich has AT LEAST 5 good years left and Stat is just entering his prime. Barbs has been hurt all year. I could go player by player. This is not an OLD team like everyone keeps saying it is. Look it up
OK, Stud
Why does he keep disappearing for long stretches in games? I learned something when I nwasa young that I’ll never forget. I graduated 110th in a class of 1100 at Coronado HS in Scottsdale. I know I could have gotten in the top 50, but I just didn’t put in the work. I figured tio 10% was respectable. You should not compare yourself with others, just do your best. You may find that your best is better than everyone.
Amare’s best is at the LeBron-Kobe level. He can average 32-14 and throw down 50 four or five times a year. He CAN have an occasional 10 block game. AND, he can pass the ball – I’ve seen it. Are you saying he gave his best effort in the 2nd and 3rd Q against Sacto?
Who do you give the max contract to – the 21/8 guy who performs consistently and makes his teammates better – not the 21/8 underachiever that lets down his teammates by committing silly fouls that make him tentative, who won’t pass the ball, and refused after 7 years to develope post moves or a signature shot?
Stats mean NOTHING. I know that is hard to digest in this Fantasay sports world. I don’t mean to change sports, but look at the 49ers Frank Gore. He had 1000 yards and averaged 5 yards a carry. But he had a lot of 60+ yard runs and a few under 30 yard games. People love toi see a 60 yard run, but it only leads to one touchdown at best. If he really produced 5 yards a rush, he would be afirst down machine, contributing to many scores.
In the same way, Amare has unbelievable quarters, but a lot of scoreless ones. Oh no, I can see it right now – someone will come out with some stat they think proves me wrong. But I’m not.
When Amare was a rookie, he said he wanted to be the best ever. I have only heard that from one other athlete – Walter Payton – who said the same when he was drafted out of Jackson State. I was foolish enough to believe Amare meant it, and would put the work in to get there. The real shame is STAT’s declaration wasn’t an empty statement – he had the goods.
If he only had Walter’s heart.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
I think you overstate
his potential…
He has the physical gifts to be that good, surely. But I just don’t think he’s got the instincts/b-ball IQ of a top flight player nor does he have the leadership personality.
At this point, I think that is who he is. Expecting more of him is like asking Lou Amundson to become a 20ppg player. Just not in him.
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan
by Seth Pollack on Jan 6, 2010 12:46 PM MST up reply actions
Yes, but
Lou doesn’t have the talent. Larry Bird and Billy Cunningham are good examples of good players who made themselves great. He does not respond to coaching.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Who is he?
Im with Stan on this. Amare is good and I think has great athletic ability but he isnt the natural player that LeBron or Kobe is. And 10 blks a game? Doubtful at best. I am not even sure he could be like Howard the same way Howard is. Amare is athletic, but he isn’t big like that. He isn’t the big man that Howard is nor as quick as Lebron is. Cut STAT some SLACK. He plays hard and is playing better under adversity than ANYONE in perhaps the history of the NBA.
Go read a book!
Agreed.
People like Hawk are why Stat is how he is. Sure he has talent. He is also sensitive just like every other athlete with that kind of talent. Have we as Suns fans given him the same support that Lebron gets in Cleveland or Kove gets? No. All I’ve seen is people constantly complaining about what he should or could do instead of appreciating what he does do. I’m sure we have all been in that sort of situation at some point. Does it make you want to try harder? No. It eats away are your “heart” to the point that you have a chip on your shoulder just like Amare does.
Name one guy getting 30pts and 14rbs. That happens very rarely, yet you want Stat to do it on a consistent basis. Come one dude. I won’t come up with any stats because there are plenty already on this thread. Stat has never been respected and appreciated like he should be. So you get what you put in folks. I’ll be the first to admit Stat doesn’t have the brain like Kobe and Lebron to go with his brawn. But I can’t believe you can complain about 20 and 10. Guess we have been spoiled.
by NSU Stud on Jan 7, 2010 10:25 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't care
if he gets 16 and 4 as long as he gets us a championship. I read with amusement your crediting me with Amare’s problems. That is so moronic.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Don't flatter yourself.
I wasn’t crediting you alone for Stat’s issues. Merely making a point. With you and fans LIKE you, what is motivating him to go that next step? Sure ever player is responsible for motivating themselves, but that’s also our job as fans. Our way of giving back. They play their guts out and all you can do is complain and demean them. So again, other than himself and his team, what is motivating him to work harder for you fans that are just going to complain and nit pick regardless. I think anyone with a brain understands my point. I’m glad my post amused you though. Now you know how I feel anytime I see one of your posts.
I like it!
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
HELL NO
WHY would we do this? Giving up or future 1 and 4 for a n aging J rich, average Clark, a late 1st rounder and expirings? Are you shi*ing me?
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
and as for this trade...
no way jose….makes no sense for anyone….Curry at best will be a Ben Gordon type, I’ll keep JRich.
JRich has the skill set to do it all when he is healthy. The only thing this team is lacking is a great center. But as I said in another post, Frye is as close to a good center as we will get with how we play. I mean a center draining 3s is pretty much perfect in this system. I just keep repeating myself on all these dumb trade posts. Why do I even bother.
Current Suns players under the age of 30 and better than Curry and Randolph:
Definitely:
Amare
Richardson
Barbosa
Possibly:
Dudley
Dragic(yeah he won me finally)
Lopez
The second half are at least as good. So come off the “old team” crap. Please.
I don't mean to be rude
But do you watch basketball?? I would trade Dudley, Dragic and Lopez just for Curry, straight up.
Curry carried his crappy college team and shoots the lights out.
Randolph has come in sniffing distance of triple doubles and is more athletic than almost anyone in the league. And they’re both under 23.
Nobody is arguing that those two are better than Amare, J-Rich or even Barbosa at this point. I’m not sure why you pulled that up. But Amare is 27 and has already had two MAJOR surgeries. Plus, Amare’s surgery is only meant to be a 5-10 year fix. For a player who depends on his athleticism. You don’t build on that, or on 28 year old shooting guards who don’t play defense like J-RIch.
I have nothing bad to say about Barbosa – but I would like to see you find two rational people who would take Dudley, Dragic or Lopez over Curry and Randolph. Crazy
Did you not read the bottom half of my post?
I said they are possibly better, To me none of the 5 have played enough to say who is better than the other. I know Dragic, Dudley, and to a lesser extent, Lopez are fitting into our system quite well.
As far as Curry, we already have 3 guys at the guard spot that are hands down better and one that might be too. Curry is not a true point. Which, like I said, will more than likely make him a Ben Gordon type. Scoring and not much else.
Randolph, I’ll be honest, I don’t know much about. All I know is what I read. Haven’t watched him play once. I read that he is a head case, inconsistent, and has limitless potential. I read that Earl Clark has about the same size, limitless potential, and a lack of playing time.
Based on those two paragraphs, I don’t think I’m going to trade one of, if not THE best PF in basketball, a relatively young former All-Star, and a future 1st round draft pick for 2 expiring contracts and more of what we already have.
My point was not to say who is better than who, that much is obvious. My point is actually 3 points.
1-We are not an OLD team. Again, only 3 players over 30.
2-This trade wouldn’t really help us all that much. We already have everything we would be bringing in with this trade.
3-Stat and JRich are not must move players. They will be the core of the team once Nash and Hill retire. Even at their worst, that is better than more than a few teams have.
You folks just need to calm down. The sky…er…Sun is not falling. We have great veteran leadership. A stud in his prime. Two younger veterans, one ascending to his prime, the other just beginning to descend from his. The later still in his if you ask me. And a slew of young, talented, productive “role players” awaiting their turn. We could be in far worse shape.
Again, the main point is to relax on all the trade talk especially involving JRich and Stat. It’s pointless. And to some degree, rude and disrespectful. I mean what do they have to do to earn your respect? Does Stat have to get 30 and 15 every night? Does JRich have to score like Kobe and defend like Artest? (I just threw up in my mouth a little after referencing not one but two Lakers.) I mean really people.
How about I challenge you to tell me how Stephen Curry equals JRich. I guaruntee Curry doesn’t have the skill set that JRich does. You want to talk defense? I’m not even sure Curry has ever even heard of it. Also, is Anthony Randolph really worth a lottery pick AND another 1st rounder at this point? That’s what this trade boils down to. No sane person would make that trade. So tell me, do YOU watch basketball?
by NSU Stud on Jan 5, 2010 7:17 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
edit
Before someone says anything, I know Stat isn’t a part of this proposal. The reason I include him in the argument is because of the numerous other posts about trading him and the talk about him not being a Star in this league. He is a top 10 player in the entire league. Some folks need to realize that and be thankful we have him. Nash alone would not have us where we are. Stat is just as important as Nash. Give the man his due respect.
by NSU Stud on Jan 5, 2010 7:25 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I have seen few things written down that seemed sillier
Than arguing that STAT is just as important as Nash. Are you related to the man in some way? A member of his entourage, perhaps?
Nash is a two time MVP, a top-40 all time player, a top 5 all time point guard, and helped change the face of the entire NBA. I cannot believe you are willing to put STAT in that category. You talk about being “to some degree, rude and disrespectful?” You don’t think comparing everything Nash had done to STAT the least bit unthankful. Crazy
I also don’t understand how you can admit to not watching Curry or Randolph actually play (Randolph “never” in your own estimation) and then proceed to judge them as players. Or ask me if I watch ball when you admit you don’t?? It’s like walking into a courtroom, pleading guilty, and then starting your opening arguments.
You claimed J-Rich was a “former all star”. Wrong. J-RIch has never been an all-star, and certainly won’t be going forward. Curry equals J-RIch because he shoots as well, plays the same porous defense and isn’t getting paid $13 MILLION dollars this year. That’s how.
I did read your post. The point of everything you have been saying is that the Suns have better players under 30, and a big part of that point is that Dudley, Dragic, Frye and Lopez are those players. You can’t make a statement like that and then totally distance yourself from it once your realize it’s crazy. Not one of those players will ever make an all star game, and you know it.
Basically, your telling me we should build around 6 guys (Amare, J-Rich, Dudley, Frye, Dragic, Barbosa) only one of whom has been to an all-star game, and that one has had serious injury problems. Really? Really? Maybe you’re not related to Amare. More like Isiah Thomas
I'm not saying we should build around those 6
I’m saying thats who we will have. You lost me when you started implying that Curry and Randolph are better than Stat and JRich. You go on to completely disregard all stats and conclude by asking for stats. So to me, you, like stats in your opinion, mean nothing. You don’t seem to be much of a fan. I haven’t seen you say one supportive thing.
I won’t go point by point and defend my opinions either. Everyone knows that JRich was an all-star caliber player. Everyone knows that Stat is an All-Star player and top 10 player AT THE LEAST.
All the stats show that. And if stats don’t matter then why do we keep them? Oh yeah, for a point of reference for comparison. So I think that means they matter quite a bit.
Look I can tell your a little older. So that probabely means you feel like you know more and somehow that makes you a better fan. Well it doesn’t. Just cause you were there for the “goold old days” doesnt mean you know more or that you are right.
Lastly, my statement that Stat is as important as Nash was not about thier impact on the entire NBA and I guess universe. To this team though, Stat is as important. Let Stat go down and see what happens. We don’t have the Marion’s and Diaw’s and Joe Johnson’s to fall back on this time. Oh wait, those guys are nothing in your eyes too. Funny how we made it pretty far with nothing then. Didn’t win a championship but still did pretty well. But we don’t have that anymore. We have Nash and Stat. Either of those two goes down and whatever was going to be this year goes with them. Period.
um...
“I did read your post. The point of everything you have been saying is that the Suns have better players under 30, and a big part of that point is that Dudley, Dragic, Frye and Lopez are those players. You can’t make a statement like that and then totally distance yourself from it once your realize it’s crazy. Not one of those players will ever make an all star game, and you know it.”
You didnt read the post too well. I even put them under a different heading. The ’big part" of that point was Stat, JRich, and Barbosa. Then I went on to say it was possible that the others are/will be better.
I hate when people try to change what you said so they can make thier point. Stick to what was actually said. Not what you wish I had said so you can make what you think is a good point. Thanks.
This is a tertiary point
But I also can’t believe your calling Amare a top ten player. Would you care to back that up with . . . statistics? Comparisons to other players? Something besides simply repeating it over and over?
Or how about this, if it’s easier for you – which of the following players can you make a good, statistical case that Amare is better than. Go ahead.
1. LeBron James
2. Kobe Bryant
3. Chris Paul
4. Dwight Howard
5. Dwayne Wade
6. Deron Williams
7. Steve Nash
8. Brandon Roy
9. Tim Duncan
10. Dirk Nowitzki
And that’s ten. I don’t even think you can make a case for Amare over:
Carmelo Anthony
Kevin Garnett
Yao Ming
Kevin Durant
Chris Bosh
Danny Granger
Joe Johnson.
I see Amare somewhere around the Brook Lopez-Zach Randolph – Josh Smith area. And most of the statistics favor those three anyway.
Fantasy Basketball
You’re not arguing that fantasy basketball players are lesser fans, are you Hawk?
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
no
just that fantasy ball teaches you to ignore the realities of the game. So if you immmerse yourself in it, you can rely too much on stats.
It doesn’t make you a lesser fan. But it holds no interest for me. For instance, Shawn Marion was a top fantasy choice for a long time. BNut he brought thge Suns no real playoff success.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Time-out
No “real playoff success”? What playoff games were you watching? Marion was exactly the reason we got as far as we did all those years. Case in point – what happened when we traded him? We got ousted in the first round. Now I know that there is more to it, and I get your overall point that stats don’t mean everything, but I think you are downplaying them TOO much.
Go read a book!
not at all
His disapparances in the series’ with San Antonio were legendary. (And don’t go quoting me a bunch of stats – I SAW the games) And I think what we have experienced in the last eight years qualifies as ‘no reaal playoff success’. Unless of course you are happy with never making the Finals. If you are happy with that, you are not like most of the Suns fans I talk to.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
I wrote a fanpost on the subject a while back
I thoroughly disagree with you about Marion.
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
I think we have to remember
How tired Nash was and how Marion absolutely carried us when STAT was out a couple years ago. Everybody made a big deal about Diaw, but he’s obviously been exposed. Marion was a playoff monster in that series.
On the same hand, he never performed the same, perhaps because he was unhappy being that third banana. He did disappear in those SA series. Can anybody really deny this?
I think J-Rich gets some credit for taking to the third banana role so well. I think he’s done a great job on the team (and has a good, albiet short, playoff track record)
Marion
is/was a role player. Maybe one of the best, but still a role player. When he was the best player on the team (through ‘04), the Suns went nowhere. He then discovered he could make a name for himself with Steve Nash feeding him. Then when his temper tantrum did not result in big money, he had rather unimpressive stints with Miami, Toronto, and Dallas. Marion’s best year was ‘05-’06, and even then, Diaw’s presence helped him immensely, and the undermanned Suns beat two underwhelming teams (the LA teams) and ran out of gas against a flawed Dallas team.
In the year of thee Suspension Series, he disappeared in the 4th quarter meltown against the Spurs.
In the ‘04-’05 playoffs, his performance along with the tanking by Q and JJ’s missing face doomed the Suns.
I think you see Marion with Rose colored glasses.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
He was an All-Star before Nash came back I believe
His career stats were largely unchanged aside from his efficiency(the Nash effect).
I think that you’re ignoring Marion’s performance against the Mavericks and Clippers in order to make your point.
I’ll quote this again:
“It’s a myth that Marion “vanishes” in the playoffs. Because a half-court game isn’t his strong suit, he may offensively “vanish” for certain stretches against certain opponents (read: San Antonio), but his career playoff averages are as follows: 17.1 points, 10.9 rebounds, 1.5 steals, 1.5 blocks, .463 field goal percentage, .346 three-point field goal percentage, .811 free throw percentage. He’s also turned in the following single-game playoff performances:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/DAL20050520.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/LAC20060512.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/PHO20060516.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/LAC20060518.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/PHO20060522.html
In those five games (all of which contributed to series victories), Marion averaged 34.0 points and 14.6 rebounds.
http://boards.espn.go.com/boards/mb/mb?sport=nba&id=pho&tid=1771180&tsn=21
Also, in that seven-game 2006 Western Conference Semifinals versus a much bigger and physically stronger Clipper team, Marion averaged 25.6 points and 12.6 rebounds (vintage Barkley numbers), including 33.3 points and 12.7 rebounds over the last three games, after the series had been tied at 2-2. And in two career Game Sevens (both in 2006), Marion has averaged 22.0 points and 9.5 rebounds, shooting .545 from the field.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/PHO20060506.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/PHO20060522.html
http://boards.espn.go.com/boards/mb/mb?sport=nba&id=pho&tid=1816989&lid=11
I noted Marion’s career playoff averages, which are very solid and representative of his overall performance. Indeed, he’s produced many other impressive games that I didn’t bother to include, and here’s just one of the many more.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/200505110PHO.html
As for Marion versus the Spurs, it’s true that he suffered an offensively unproductive 2005 Western Conference Finals, during which he averaged just 7.8 points, shooting .391 from the field and .143 on three-pointers while only attempting three free throws in five games (although he did average 10.8 rebounds and 1.4 steals). Bruce Bowen really limited him and that one poor series forms the basis for the exaggerated “Marion vanishes in the playoffs” notion.
However, Marion bounced back smartly in the 2007 Western Conference Semifinals versus San Antonio by averaging 15.7 points, 10.5 rebounds, 2.3 blocks, 1.2 steals, a .521 field goal percentage, and a .471 three-point field goal percentage. Included in that series were a couple standout performances from him, as Marion proved the Suns’ best player in Game Five (24 points, 17 rebounds) while Stoudemire and Diaw were serving their suspensions. Marion also stepped-up in Game Three (26 points, 7 rebounds, 4 blocks, 2 steals) while Stoudemire was in foul trouble due in part to some questionable calls.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/200705120SAS.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/200705160PHO.html
….
How about Game Six of the 2003 Western Conference First Round versus San Antonio, when Marion posted 24 points, 15 rebounds, 2 steals, and 4-8 three-point shooting?
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/200305010PHO.html
How about Game Six of the 2005 Western Conference Semifinals at Dallas, when Marion delivered a stunning 38 points, 16 rebounds, 2 steals, and just 1 turnover, playing 51 of a possible 53 minutes, shooting 13-28 from the field, 4-7 on threes, and 8-9 from the foul line, and helping limit Nowitzki to 9-25 shooting?
http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/200505200DAL.html
Marion thus helped send the Suns to their first conference finals appearance in a dozen years."
And you think that Marion brought no real playoff success?
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
Wow. I should have kept my mough shut.
There are other people that are much better at making your opinions seem foolish. I should have just say back and let them work. They did a fine job.
And your response has been priceless. I guess it’s good to know when you have been bested and ask for mercy.
All Star
what does that mean, anyway? Tracy McGrady is an All Star.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
So you're comparing Marion's ~20/10 season in 02/03 to T-Mac's current season?
How does that make any sense?!
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
I remain unconvinced
I don’t think anything you said has anything at all to do with the topic at hand. No I am not happy with the Suns lack of a Championship but that does not equal having “no real playoff success.” I would say anything beyond losing in the first round is playoff success. Just because you are bitter about not having a championship doesn’t mean that we had no success.
And I too remember the so-called “legendary” playoff series’ against SA and agree with rsavaj about how totally wrong you are. Marion was a vital part of our defensive efforts and speed.
Go read a book!
Dreaming of Finals
I followed very closely the two Suns teams that DID make the Finals. Both had more heart than this decade’s teams. It took teams with two Hall of Famers to beat them.
No, I am not bitter. Disappointed. Especially with Marion, who left us in the lurch too many times.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Okay.
Fair enough. Sucks I know. And don’t get me wrong, I am not saying that the Suns teams recently have done anything to make me think of them as the best teams in the decade (though they did have one of the top W/L percentages of the decade).
However, equating this decades Suns with last decades Suns is totally non sequitur to the current conversation. It goes without saying that Marion, Amare and Nash were HUGE parts of our playoff success (however you judge it) and that without Marion (esp) we wouldn’t have done as well. It has become increasingly clear over the last year that he played a massive role in our defense abilities (as slight as they were) and that without him we would probably have had significantly less success with the team.
Go read a book!
Marion's defense was absolutely phenomenal
SHAWN MARION
Marion is a rarity among NBA players. In addition to his obvious offensive capabilities, Marion makes his presence felt in every imaginable defensive category. Marion has been in the top five in steals for most of the season, and because of his explosive speed it should come as no surprise that Marion’s OCR is among the highest. The fact that Marion is adept at playing the passing lanes is obvious, but Marion shines even more brightly in the big-man categories of blocks and rebounds. The fact that Marion has ranked in the top five in the league in defensive rebounding for most of the season is astounding. The 6’7 Marion starts at the small forward position, yet Marion grabbed more defensive boards per game than 53 of 60 starting centers and power forwards in the league, and did so playing next to an accomplished rebounder in 6’11 Amare Stoudemire. Analyzing Marion’s blocked shots shows similar production. While Marion is not in the same league as players like Camby or Okafor in raw shot-blocking ability, Marion’s 1.5 per-game average is more than half a block more than that of Gerald Wallace, the next best shot blocker of equivalent size. Like Artest and Bowen, Marion is given the toughest defensive assignments a great deal of the time, and sports a fantastic Block Value as a result. Yet Marion’s season block total is nearly triple of that of Artest or Bowen, and unlike Artest or Bowen, Marion maintains a very good Personal Foul Efficiency. Marion’s tougher-than-average defensive assignments put his stats into even greater perspective: while many of the big men on our list have the luxury of consistently playing near the basket on the defensive end, inflating their numbers in blocks and rebounds, Marion is often forced to defend very good perimeter players, making it that much more difficult to secure his position amongst the league-leaders in these categories. Marion, like all of our candidates, has his deficiencies. His Defensive Plus/Minus is less than impressive, and reduced minutes in the final six weeks of the season has caused a decline in his numbers across the board. Still, Marion’s impact in every statistical category and his ability to guard everyone on the floor from 1 to 5 make him our choice for the 2006-2007 Defensive Player of the Year.
http://www.82games.com/dpoy.htm
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
And that heart got you how many more championships?
Now we make excuses about who the other team has? You play who is put in front of you. And you dont know who of those players we lost to will be hall of famers. How about you support your current team a little.
What about the suspension series
I feel like I know exactly what Hawk is talking about. With STAT and Diaw out, we had built a lead and it was the absolute perfect time for Marion to prove himself. Nash, as usual, did everything he could be we absolutely collapsed in that 4th quarter and Marion did absolutely nothing. If Marion was going to anything other than a superb role player, that was the time. it didn’t happen. He let the team down when it mattered most. What’s to defend there?
Trix put up 24/17
One quarter(in which EVERYONE sucked and in which Nash left Bowen open for the dagger) does not negate that fact.
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
In the playoffs
quarters 1 through three DO NOT MATTER.
Why are Paxson and Kerr GMs and well respected? They both won championships with a 4th quarter shot.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Quarters 1 through 3 absolutely matter
If you suck in the first 3 quarters, you’re not even going to have a chance in the 4th. Every quarter matters.
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
by rsavaj on Jan 14, 2010 12:06 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Channing Frye
also belong on that list of Suns under 30 and better than both Curry and Randolph. We all know Frye is not a stud center in the traditional sense but he still rebounds and produces more than Randolph for sure and in some way Curry. How many other centers can drain the 3 from anywhere and can even drive it to the rim a little. Sure he isn’t the traditional post up scorer but we tried the best one of those the league has ever seen. Remind me how Shaq worked out again?
So yes, even Frye is under 30 and better than those two at this point. Just saying.
Why make this trade Earl Clark can do everything Randolph can do ..he just doesnt get playing time he can handle the ball rebound shoot and pass just let the kid develop
I'm sorry, NSU Stud...
But I’m going to side (mostly) with UASun, here.
I agree with you, NSU Stud, that our team is no longer the “old” team we were touted as a few years ago. Though, when your most important player (I don’t care what you say, Nash is our most important player, tonight against the Kings proved that…not that it needed much proving) is 36 and a player you just extended for two years is 37, you’ve got to wonder how much they have left in the tank. Grant Hill can still fill it up, and is playing with tremendous heart, but he shows his age at times.
And, I don’t think I can say that Frye is better than those two. Curry is a rookie and Randolph is a sophomore. Both are bound to make mistakes. And, when you’re in about as messed up as a system as you can get under Don Nelson, not knowing when you’ll be on the court or when you’ll be pulled, it’s hard to find your niche.
As for Clark, Dudley, Lopez, and Dragic, you can play the comparison game all you want (a la “Dragic plays physical defense!”, “Dudley is the league leader in three point accuracy!”, “Clark just needs time to develop!”, “Curry is too small!”, etc.), but what it boils down to is getting the right players for the system. That’s the ONLY reason you’re saying Frye is a better player than Randolph is. I guarantee that if Frye was still on Portland, you would not be saying those things about Channing. And don’t get me wrong, I am a huge Channing Frye fan. I think his game is invaluable to this system.
But…does that mean I wouldn’t trade him in an attempt to possibly land a fantastic player? No. There comes a point in every fan’s life when you have to stop looking at how entertaining your team is, and ask yourself the brutally honest question: are we even in the contention for the championship? If the answer is no, you can still shake things up. No one should be content with a perennial playoff team that gets bounced in the first or second round. Yes, we have it much better than some other teams (Clippers, Bucks, basically any team in the East that’s not in the top 4), but still, we can improve.
I’m pretty sure that was the only intention of this post. To try and get the ideas flowing about how we can improve ourselves for the future, and set ourselves up for long term success.
Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.
For example:
I would think about this trade:
We give: Channing Frye, Leandro Barbosa, and a 2012 1st round pick
Raptors give: Andrea Bargnani, DeMar DeRozan, and a 2010 2nd round pick
I just thought of that off hand, and I’m not sure if I’m totally sold on it (or if Toronto fans would laugh in our faces), but I could see it. The Raptors are an uptempo, gunning team. They score points in bunches. Barbosa has shown that he can do that (when healthy and getting playing time), and Frye has shown that he’s one of the top 3 point shooters in the league, netting enough 3’s for second most made (1st is Danilo Gallinari with 91, Frye in second with 86, and Mo Williams in 3rd with 85). Plus, they get a draft pick in 2012.
For us, we get Bargnani, who, up until midway through last year, was labeled a draft bust. But, what he does is similar to Frye: he’s a big man who can (and likes to) shoot. He’s also shown that he has a pretty impressive inside game, when he sets his mind to it. The Suns could use versatility like that, and Gentry could start him and leave him in with the second unit for awhile to provide stability. What we get in DeRozan is a dynamite athlete, though he’s still pretty raw. I know he’s been hyped up to a ridiculous degree in Toronto (nicknamed “Heir Canada”, I believe), but I think that if they can get back a more polished player in Barbosa, who is a great kid, they might consider it. Plus, we get a second round pick in this year’s draft, to try our chances on the lesser brother of some starbound NBA player. Haha.
Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.
by Trevor Paxton on Jan 6, 2010 2:12 AM MST up reply actions
Derozan
This may be worth it just to get this guy.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Seems like Hawk
Wants just about any young player not in a Suns uniform. Curry, Derozan, Randolph-Dragic, Dudley, Clark. I just dont see one group being all that better than the other. Sorry.
DeRozan
I just remember Derozan tearing apart James Harden in the Pac-10 tournament. You can keep Randolph and Curry. I never wanted them.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Yeah....
And if he can best a fellow rookie in a college game then he MUST be had. I wonder who is have a better NBA career so far?
DeRozan in 20:18mins-7.8 pts, 2.9 rbs, 0.6 ast, 46.7 FG%, 30.8 3PT%, 78.5 FT%
Harden in 22:41mins-9.7 pts, 3.2 rbs, 2.3 ast, 38.6 FG%, 36.0 3PT%, 79.7 FT%
OR
Dragic in 16:53mins-7.4 pts, 2.1 rbs, 2.3 ast, 43.1 FG%, 39.5 3PT%, 67.7 FT%
Sure Dragic isn’t a rookie but I figure it being Dragics second year balances out the fact that both DeRozan and Harden are going to be full time starters for their teams alot sooner than Dragic will be. Plus Dragic is getting fewer minutes and they are all playing about the same role.
So my point? A)Derozan is no worse or better than Harden at this point, regardless of a now meaningless college game. B)Once again, what we already have it just as good at worst.
So what if you start remembering how good “your” Suns are and stop demeaning them. One other thing, I watch the Thunder alot too, and Harden seems to have all his faculties well intact. So much for the tearing apart.
I agree with you somewhat.
I base all my arguments on THIS team. THIS system. THIS year. You can say Curry is a rookie and Randolph a sophmore, but this is really the first time Frye has been given a shot. So that puts him in the young and inexperienced category too. Nelly is crazy but he is not dumb. If Randolph was all that you guys are making him out to be then he would be on the floor consistently. I’m not saying he is not good. I’m not saying he won’t be an All-Star. Hawk and UA write off enough players already. I’m just saying this scenario doesn’t really give us anything more than what we already have but could cost us a lot. That’s all. I’m all for improving. This one does not do that. I’ll give you this Coke for that Diet Coke is not really doing anything.
A simple point.
You probably need a better defense of this trade from the Golden State perspective than stating that their front office is a total “SNAFU.” I mean, if that’s the end of your logic then there’s not much point in discussing this trade at all. The idea that GS would give up its expiring contracts in addition to Curry and Randolph seems fairly untenable to me.
Also, keep in mind that Bell at most will play a month + playoffs this year and it’s still possible he won’t play at all. So inserting his present value to the Suns into the mix probably should be avoided.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
There were several defense listed
You just chose to ignore them.
J-RIch is popular in O-town. Even the amazing fans in Oakland are waning on the team (make no mistake, they have great fans). He replaces the leadership and scoring the lost with David and Captain Jack.
Clark does have potential. The Warriors have always been willing to take on massive potential guys (see Wright, Brandon). The future first helps selling it.
I’m not saying it’s a great trade for them. I’m saying it matches their modus operendi perfectly. I’m saying Nellie runs that team, and Curry and Randolph are in his dog house, and he like J-RIch a lot.
And it’s absolutely logical to go after teams whose front office is a mess. Look at teams who pirated the Knicks or Grizzlies the past few years. That’s how you get winning trades – you’re not likely to win as many trades when your dealing with Sam Presti or Popovich
End of your logic
You’ve now twice turned from your other reasons (see your response to dubzfan) and moved to the “I’m not saying it’s a great trade for them” but its their mode of operation argument or calling their front office a “SNAFU” argument instead.
You wouldn’t need to say these things if your other reasons were persuasive. I mean, if you had a strong case for why this trade would help Golden State, it wouldn’t matter how the Warriors’ front office operated.
But you don’t have a strong case because this isn’t a likely or sensible trade. So you have to ultimately rely on the fact that Don Nelson would make this trade because he’s crazy. This is your decisive (and really only) argument why Golden State would make this trade or, as I said, the end of your logic.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
In my very last post
I explained why the Warrios would make that trade. How I abandoning the point if I bring up the point again and again. J-Rich is popular in Oakland. Clark is there type of player. This is the fourth time I’ve said those things. How does that count as abandoning them?
I’m also quite sure you don’t understand the meaning of the word logic. Defined, in the Greek (as logos) it means a hypothesis or series of thoughts. Saying that Don Nelson is crazy can be logic as long as it comes from a series of thoughts (how he berates players, constantly loses team’s support, makes horrible personal decisions). Just because you don’t agree with or like my logic doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I may be acting like a grammar nazi, but use the word correctly
Logic
By turning to the Nellie argument, you undermine the other arguments. As I stated, you are admitting the other reasons are insufficient if you need also to assume that only an irrational person would follow through. So state them all you want. You’re making it fairly obvious that not even you believe them by turning to your Nellie argument.
it means a hypothesis or series of thoughts. Saying that Don Nelson is crazy can be logic as long as it comes from a series of thoughts (how he berates players, constantly loses team’s support, makes horrible personal decisions). Just because you don’t agree with or like my logic doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
I don’t understand your point here. I said that your Nellie argument was the end of your logic i.e. the last step in your logic. What else did you think I meant by “end?” I also said it was the crucial one as the other steps were insufficient, but the Nellie step remedies that since any reasons will work if you assume an irrational decision maker. I also didn’t say that the other arguments didn’t exist. You’re simply undermining their merit (and rightly so b/c they’re not persuasive) by turning to your Nellie argument, which is the end of your logic. If you take it out, your argument doesn’t work.
Also a couple of “grammar nazi” notes:
1) You’re actually not being a “grammar” nazi here. You’re being a word choice nazi. Grammar would imply I had a dangling participle or something like that.
2) Did you really mean bad “personal” decisions in reference to Nellie? Are you honestly using his struggle with alcoholism as a reason why your trade works? If so, you lose points in the class category.
3) Why are you using an Ancient Greek definition for a word that has meaning in common English? If you do that, I’m misusing “amoeba” every time I describe the single cell creature and really getting it wrong when I use the word “nectar” to describe the product of plants.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
Alright
Congrats, you can talk a lot to try and justify your points. I honestly thinks it’s a good trade for the Suns and a good enough trade for the Warriors. I made my point clearly, and one or two people agreed with me, so I don’t feel crazy. If you want to win, feel free. You win.
1. True. “word choice” nazi has a funny ring to it. I like it
2. I meant “personnel”. I did use the wrong word, so I can see how you went here. I did not know he struggled with alcoholism. But he has made poor personnel decisions, His personal decisions are none of my business.
3. The Greek definition is important because the concept of logic comes from the Greek philosophers, particularily the Sophists. I figure if they invented the concept they should get to define it.
Ah..
So your going to make a personal jibe at me (and an ungrounded one at that) and then dismiss me (“you can try to talk a lot” is phenomenally condescending) and “take the high road” when I respond.
Sorry UA, but once you take it to the remarkably petty level of bickering about “grammar” (and especially when you do it incorrectly) the high road is road blocked for you.
Nice try.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
a lot like the Suns season
Fast-paced, entertaining, but ultimately will end up in disappointment.
Hopefully, I’ll be around more. I miss this place.
Good to “see” you too, man.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
Listen
The condescension is clearly mutual, and while I seem to have upset you (and for some reason followed up on that in a different section) I don’t think it’s entirely fair to pretend as though you were, are or plan on being above the mud slinging. Also, yes, I still think it’s a good trade. I’m not sure how that got lost in the shuffle.
Mutual?
Arguments are condescending. That’s just how it goes. I don’t care about that. But when you turn to patently schmuck moves like:
1. Being a “grammar” nazi
2. Making irrelevant sophomoric references (formal logic may have its foundations in Ancient Greece, but that doesn’t mean that those foundations even remotely establish the current breadth of reference for the English word “logic”) or
3. Renouncing your stake in the argument in order to appear as though you are above it after you sunk it to a lower level of dialogue ( “grammar” nazi followed by “tone down the seriousness” and “If you want to win, feel free. You win.”).
you’ve exceeded the acceptable bounds of sports argument prickness and entered into general life prickness. And I will point that out and make fun of that. Everytime. It’s how it goes.
I would expect the same from you.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
Well
one last disagreement for us, I suppose. I find that people who are “sports arguments pricks” are always “general life pricks.” And that the best arguments are entertaining but not condescending.
But if you want to rip me a new one for the basketball idea, go for it. Which brings me to my final question – you really don’t think this is the kind of trade G-State has gone for? That there team would not be immediately improved?
And, to avoid further argument
I was not classifying you as a prick. Only crazing for not agreeing with the trade
Trade
There is no trade between the two teams that would be for the Suns future.
The Warriors are currently 10-24 and in last place in their division. They’re not playing for right now. Their most valuable players (Ellis, Curry, Randolph, Biedrins) are all under 25. They should have another high draft pick this summer in a very solid draft. After the 2010-2011 season, they should be in an excellent financial position. But right now they’re not a good basketball team, and they know it.
Look at their last trade. On the surface, they traded Stephen Jackson for two veterans, Bell and Radmanovic. But really what happened here: The Warriors sent Jackson and his 34M over 4 years contract to the Bobcats for Bell’s 5M expiring contract and Radman’s 2 yr 13M contract (if Radman opts into his second year, which you would think he would). This trade saves them 16M over the next four years.
With these facts in mind, let’s look at your trade: You’re asking the Warriors to give up nearly 11M in expiring contracts and two of their top 4 prospects for:
1. Jason Richardson – an about to be 29 yr. old shooting guard due to make 14.4M dollars next year.
2. Earl Clark – an intriguing rookie, but nonetheless one the Warriors passed on in favor of Curry.
3. A speculative pick that won’t play a game until the 2012-2013 season.
4. An additional 11.4M in salary next year (which completely removes them from the free agent market) and 6-8M over five years (assuming 4M over 2 for the 1st rounder).
So to summarize, you want a rebuilding team to give up two of its best prospects and remove itself from this summer’s free agent market for a lesser prospect they already passed over, a distant pick of indeterminate value and an aging SG. Based not only on common sense, but also on the Warriors most recent trade (a money saver), there is absolutely no good reason to think that they would make this trade.
If the Suns want to deal with Warriors, it will have to be to eat salary from the Warriors. For instance, if the Suns thought they really had a chance this year, they could spring for Maggette, who the Warriors would love to scrap. Unfortunately, the Suns are neither a) really in contention this year nor b) in possession of any contracts that could make a reasonable trade for Maggette, who really isn’t even that good.
But that’s the kind of trade the Warriors are making right now. They couldn’t care less about the present. They’re building for the future.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
Also
Keep in mind that Curry was the dealbreaker this summer in the Amare trade. I have a hard time believing that now he’s available for Richardson.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
He's definitely not being shopped, or anything
But it seems pretty clear to me that he and Randolph are in the doghouse. I think you have the Warriors liking those two players more than they do, or have given any indication of. Randolph, for one, is almost definitely on the block.
Secondly, I think your ignoring personalities waaaaay to much in this trade – Captain Jack asked to be traded. He and Nellie were butting heads big time. He was in Nellie’s dog house. I think it has to be the major reason for the trade – not, as you say, to clear cap space. If that was their motive, they would have sent him to the Cavs, who were offering total cap relief, instead of the Bobcats, who did not give up all expiring contracts (like you yourself pointed out, Radmonovich is still on the hook for a massive amount of money next year).
If it was about cap space, why not trade Captain Jack to the Cavs? Why sign Maggette to such a huge contract?
No, I think personalities had way more to deal with this than you are saying – the cap space if a perfectly good reason to make the trade, but you’re trying to ram a square peg in a round hole. All of the press and sources about the trade mentioned personalities. The cap space “facts” don’t line up – and that’s why the trade is in play.
To be fair, I think you’re right – the trade would happen 100 times faster if Maggette was in it. But would that be a bad trade then? What if the Suns just send J-RIch to the Warriors for Maggette and Randolph?
The Suns would still get randolph, a great cornerstone going forward. Maggette, although his contract looks bad, is actually having a killer season(this is a good time to go to the stats – I think Hollinger even gave him some props yesterday). Scoring and rebounding more often and more effeciently than J-RIch already does. The Warriors clear the cap space you are talking about, and fix the personality problem I’m mentioning.
You’ve impressed me enough, rosewood, that now for some woe-begon ereason I have to know what you think. Its like crack cocaine.
Nice
I think you are right about the personalities thing. Capt Jacks trade had little to do with money and a lot to do with personality but also the ability for GS to put their rookies on the floor. With Jackson gone they can start both Randolph and Curry who are both playing pretty well….not great….but well. But in the same vein, I have to wonder why you would think, personality wise, that GS would want JRich back at all? I mean, yeah he was part of the reason they did so well several years back but the reason he left was because of discontent between himself and the office/coaching. To assume that GS would even WANT Rich is a bit of a stretch.
One thing is for sure. We need to get some more talent. However we do that, its important. Honestly, I think JRich is the most tradable piece right now. Everyone else is just too important (besides Hill who is playing horribly but I wouldn’t trade for anything because of the way we went after him in the pre-season). Its not as though our guys are bad or lack talent, we just need a few more guys with talent at various positions NOT called PG and SG.
Go read a book!
Finally some sense.
While I still wouldn’t want to see JRich go, at least Maggette and Randolph makes more sense. I don’t know how the money works out on it though. Everyone hates JRich solely because of his contract so if Maggette’s is bigger or longer than lord help him. However, that would actually allow Barbosa to start and Randolph and Maggette coming off the bench OR Hill to slide over to the 2 spot and Maggette play the 3. You would have to throw Dudley or Lou in the trade to, I would think, simply because it would put a major kink in the rotation for those guys.
I still don’t like that trade in all honesty but it makes a lot more sense than the first one and many other ones I’ve seen proposed. There might be some hope for you yet UA. Hawk is too far gone though I think.
Maybe this one will go to the right spot.
Rosewood is the man. He basically just shut you down on all fronts. I argue with my heart and opinions. He argues with the facts. Compared to me, I concede that he is the champ. Nice!
Thats what Lawyers do.
They argue. Just stick to the facts with Rose and everything will be fine.
Go read a book!
And they'll screw it up
without our help. ‘Cause they’re the Warriors. It’s what they do.
April 29, 2008 Total Eclipse of the Sun. Is the sky falling?
Ok fine, JRich and Clark are his type of players.
Agreed. But are Curry and Randolph out type? I don’t know. Someone help me. As I’ve admitted, I don’t see these guys much.
Does Randolph spread the floor and knock down threes? Does he have ANY inside presence? (Frye doesn’t have much, but a little still counts.) Is he humble and willing to be the 5th wheel with NO fanfare?
Does Curry throw it down with power and finish tough shot around the basket? Does he have anything close to the athleticism that “old” JRich still has? Does he have the size or strength to defend players like Lebron and Kobe in the post?(Noone stops them, but he tries.)
I ask these questions legitimately. I’m not being a smart ass at all. I just think people sometimes forget to look at what they might be losing and only focus on what they could be getting.
Definitely not smart-ass questions or anything.
Randolph actually has an impressive mid-range number. He doesn’t spread the floor as much as frye, but still does it fairly well for a big man (about Amare’s range, but not as lethal). I think all he needs is some playing time.
Curry does not have J-Rich’s size. He cannot replace J-Rich by himself. I think J-Rich’s minutes go to Barbosa and Dudley (Barbosa for offense, Dudley for defense). Curry gets some of those minutes (he would be amazing next to Nash) but is also the point guard of the future. Maybe I’m jumping the gun a bit, but I dream of KJ when I see Curry play
Also, I'm being a little bit silly here
But do you even really disagree? It’s not a huge point or anything, but can’t we all agree Nellie has gone a little bit nutso? Don’t we have some common ground, rosewood? Truly, Nellie’s craziness can unite all basketball fans.
Best
It’s best not to try and strike a conciliatory tone immediately after accusing the other party of not knowing what a common English word means.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
Also
butt hurt much? You’re anonymously contributing to a non-official sports blog- I didn’t go after you personally, or anything. Maybe tone down the seriousness. A bit.
Ah
So you were simply stating that my writing did not know what a common English word meant while not meaning to state anything about me or my personal competence.
How did I miss that? Wait, it isn’t true.
Also see:
I don’t mean to be rude
But do you watch basketball??
Stay classy, Arizona.
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
Also
If this isn’t serious, why be a “grammar” nazi?
Don't feel bad, Channing. We can't rebound either.
I've clearly upset you quite a bit.
Which was never my intent. My intent was to write a post about a basketball trade, and then defend the log . . er, reasoning behind it when questioned.
If you feel insulted, I apologize. It’s never my intention to purposefully attack people, even in the world of blogs. Please don’t take this for “taking the high road” . I wish I had not said some of the things I said, and I ask for your forgiveness. Hopefully you see my seriousness – it’s hard on the internet to detect sarcasm, obviously, but I intend none of it, and if I’ve actually offended you, even on the internet, you deserve my apology.
Also, for the love of God
For all of the ripping I’ve got for this trade (most of it well-deserved) somebody just posted a J-Rich and Earl Clark for Arenas swap. Give me some credit people.
Wow
quite the little brouhaha you all had going here….sorry I missed it (not really)
favorite moment of the day was that “brouhaha” was in my spell check. That’s just awesome
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @phoenixstan

by 



















