Is Alvin Gentry to Blame?
The 2009-10 Phoenix Suns season has turned into a train wreck. The team began 14-3 in October and November. They are 12-18 in December and January. On paper that doesn't sound incredibly terrible. Nor do the Western Conference standings, which shows the Suns the 8th seed, only a game and half back from the 4th seed. They are 7-3 versus the Pacific, 14-11 versus the Western Conference, and 17-6 at home.
You didn't let those numbers fool you did you? This team is in a tail spin collectively, and now they have to deal with the circus side show that is the annual Amare Stoudemire orgy of trade rumors. They have little to zero momentum going into the All-Star break, and will certainly plummet further down the ranks in the second half of this season, whether Amare is here or not. Count on Nash,Hill, and Richardson tiring, count on Amare (if he's here) worrying about his future, count on an injured LB returning and being...who knows what (we assume he will return, but there is no guarantee). The lone bright spots at the moment Robin Lopez and Goran Dragic cannot and will not carry this team alone.
An NBA team cannot simply turn it on like flicking a switch. That is, this NBA team cannot. And while the Suns would seem to have the talent, experience, and chemistry to play fairly consistent basketball, they have not for the majority of this season. I want to explore where the blame lies. More specifically, how much of it should be placed on Alvin Gentry's shoulders
First, I would like to express my personal feelings about Gentry. I have spoken to him on a number of occasions and I like him. This is a man with 21 years of coaching experience in the NBA. albeit a 45% win percentage. I have no beef with anything he has or hasn't done for the most part.
Next, Gentry was not the architect of this team nor can he go out on the court and play the game with the individuals assembled that constitute the Phoenix Suns. Further, it cannot be easy to deal with a mostly veteran team who are fairly set in their ways. We saw Terry Porter try that and fail.
With that said, I am going to get to the point-the Suns have been afflicted by a number of problems this season that have little to do with talent and have more to do with player effort and motivation:
- Loss of double digit leads: Gentry: "This is the third straight game where we've done this -- played great and gotten the lead, and we're not able to maintain. We have to start finishing games." (Vs. Blazers 12/17/09)
- Lack of defensive effort: Gentry: "We've got to find some kind of resolve to come away with a win in these situations...It just really got away from us. We gave up 70 points in the second half and obviously you can't do that." (Vs. Indiana 1/13/09)
- Turnovers: Gentry: "You give up 132 points, you're not guarding anybody...the bottom line is that they played harder than we did. We won't beat anybody in the Pac-10 if we turn it over for 35 points." (Vs. Golden State, 12/26/09)
- Overall Effort: Gentry: "In some sort of way, we need to resolve that situation so we aren't playing from behind at the half. I'm disappointed at some of the things we did, effort-wise." (Vs. Miami, 1/8/10)
Gentry is getting paid to come up with answers. However he has none pertaining to why this team goes through these phases. In his quotes above we hear him acknowledge the problems, but he clearly has no answers, since on any given night, even at the end of January, the Suns are still suffering from one of the afore mentioned problems: effort, focus, desire, motivation. I submit that these are all areas that Gentry can and should be responsible for as a head coach.
There is something else we have to consider if we are to place blame on Alvin Gentry: Are the Suns really underachieving? Was the 14-3 start a mirage? Was it just good luck? Or are the Suns constructed as such where this is as good as any of us could have expected? Judging by the problems this team has experienced, it's pretty clear that they are usually competitive throughout nearly every game they play. Yet it's one of the same problems cropping up over and over again. Alvin Gentry cannot explain it, the players are through trying to explain it. No one has any answers. But it's the coach's job to have answers. When he doesn't, one of two things usually happens:
1. If the personnel is right, then the coach has to go because most likely the players have tuned him out.
2. If the personnel is wrong, a trade has to be made to get the coach the right personnel.
So I ask you all Suns fans, which is it: the players or the coach? And lastly, if the Suns weren't paying Terry Porter still, would Gentry have been fired by now?
What do you think?
64 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
well said
an excellent starting point for a discussion.
i, personally, really like coach Gentry as a person. His major downfall, however, is his being a “players coach” in my opinion. He needs to hold players more accountable for their mistakes, and I wish he would no longer cater to the veterans who are not performing. If the starters aren’t playing hard, let ’em sit.
Look what happened in the Golden State game….he let the bench stay in late in the game and we actually won. lately, in end game situations he puts all of the starters back in and it is to our detriment. it’s time for Gentry to start making the hard decisions, and to start pissing some starters off by limiting their minutes if they aren’t putting forth effort.
The starters feel entirely too entitled on this team and it’s time to go Popovich on them. I think Gentry can do it, i just hope he has the confidence in himself to do so.
+1
Excellent points.
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
by Wil Cantrell on Jan 27, 2010 11:20 PM MST up reply actions
+1 also
interesting…i don’t think it’s so black and white, porter vs gentry, different styles….but within those styles you have “how coaches treat the players”. I wish I knew more about how many of the most successful coaches treated their players off the court. I think porter was a dick (if what I’ve heard and read is true). Just from hearing how he treated dragic vs how gentry is treating him, it’s clear porter needed to go. But, I’m not so sure his style needed to go, at least (careful wording here to not say “more”) some thought to defense might be nice.
The most frustrating part, is that this team in spurts is a fantastic offensive team, and even in spurts a good defensive team. I just don’t see the collective effort. Part of why many like Lou and Lopez right now, they try.
On Nash, he’s in a different camp. He always tries, but I think he needs a game off here and there. Same with Hill.
Let's come back to this now
Just returned from the Maverick’s game. A certain defensive liabilty and all-star didn’t play the entire fourth quarter. The Maverick’s scored 16 fourth quarter points and the Suns erased a six point deficit, with hustle, effort and determination.
I hereby commend coach Alvin Gentry for making the tough decision and sitting an ineffective starter for the sake of the team.
by ArizonaCactus on Jan 29, 2010 12:00 AM MST up reply actions
Shorter bench
One thing D’Antoni did that Porter and Gentry do not is keep the bench short. I hate to say it because it has been a weakness we have called to be strengthened year after year. We aren’t running and gunning with Lopez starting and we shy away from playing small ball with 3 guards/small forwards, nash, and amare to run teams out of the building. Lopez shouldn’t be on the floor with Amare and Sweet Lou (god bless your hustle and tenacity) doesn’t have the offensive skills for our team. Grant needs to come off the bench and LB needs to play more when he gets back. Injuries aside, rotation needs to shorten by 1 or 2 when everyone is healthy, with Frye taking center duties in spurts to keep those big leads cushioned. Too many people on the floor and too many different combinations of players to be cohesive. An injection of athleticism via trade wouldn’t hurt either.
"Hes very cerebral when he plays out there"--Hubie
Sorry, but I completely disagree.
Our bench players are about the only ones coming out with the necessary focus and intensity. JRich is putting up effort but his shooting is horrendous. Nash is doing what he can. However, Stoudemire, Frye, Grant Hill, and LB not playing well is what has killed us. Those guys all play 25-35 minutes a game. That’s a lot of minutes being sapped away by unproductive players. Hill does the other little things he can to help us win, but Stoudemire, Frye, and LB are all one-dimensional players.
I think it’ll be our young players who have something to prove that gets us a win most nights. They’re always hustling and playing hard because they know that’s what it takes (or should take, anyway) to stay on the floor. Unfortunately, Gentry keeps forcing in our starters (this includes Frye and LB) even when it’s not effective.
i disagree also
if you hadn’t noticed…new york sucks. They lost to the Mavs by 50!!! the other day. Granted he doesn’t have the personel. But 50!
actually i agree on some level...
I dont think that the bench needs to be as short as DAntoni’s was, but my feel is that we play too many people for too much time. This is why I think that we should trade LB and put Dragic in his spot. We don’t need a bunch of backups. We need a few backups and then a few guys like Lou and Duds and Frye that can play multiple positions. I think maybe 8-9 man rotation is enough.
Reading is good...
It's not completely Gentry's fault.
No coach for the Suns will ever be a hard nosed coach because Nash has a key to the city. This can be successful (as Duncan has complete free reign in the Popovich system) but when you have a guy that is the leader to the team in Steve Nash with a lack of defensive tenacity it leaks all over the court.
The offensive mindset of the coaching staff where all of the pressure is on Nash to create on every possession is just to much for any player. Since Nash does most of the play calling and creating offensively AND we are this bad on the defensive end what is Gentry actually doing??? We’ve seen this lately with Nash’s end of game performances, where teams double Nash in close games to get the ball out of his hands and the other players get scared Amare and Richardson and frantically try to create something. There needs to be some play calling by the coach if Nash is unable to create off the dribble.
The same goes for D-Antoni I think is was Nash that made him great not the other way around. I know its NY but he has way too much talent in NY to be this bad especially in the East he should be a 5 seed right now!!!
The thing that makes San Antonio so successful is their versatility in their offensive game plan multiple times per game. A team cant just walk in there and come up with a defensive strategy for the Spurs because they can throw you a ton of different looks, teams have to adjust to that on the fly. They can run a lineup with a lot of shooters and smalls to spread the floor to shoot and run the court, and they can also buckle down and play inside out basketball with Duncan, they can overload the wing players and let Ginoboli run the point.
In the past years the Suns could only produce with Nash running things which is why SA beat the piss out of the D’Antoni system. It is way too easy for Popovich to only have to shut down one player, and in a 7 game series you should have things pretty well figured out.
So what are you saying? We need to get another person that can help create a shot? The Spurs had two guys who could create a shot for themselves or their teammates; Manu and Duncan. Both of them were also good decision makers.
I think the answer is simple. The west may be better this year than last, but we should be better as well. We are underachieving, but part of it is that we lack the defenders to close out games as well as the extra play-maker. We need to make a trade. I think Gentry is doing a good job. All that he can with his personnel. He’s made some mistakes here and there, but he’s not a great coach, so don’t expect him to be perfect or near it. Last year we could blame Porter, but this year its on the players. They’re not good enough defensively to close out games and they know it which is why they get intimidated when a team makes a run late in the game and they are unable to stop it. Plus, I can see our team get scared out there when Nash gets double-teamed and someone else has to find a way to score. They don’t have confidence in either of these things. We just need to make a trade. It’s time we trade Amar’e. We trade him for defenders, 1st round pick and maybe another play-maker if possible. That should help.
Back in the day under Coach D. Our team was a lot more confident out there because we had good defenders in Bell and Marion.
Most importantly Marion. He did so much for us like getting the rebounds to start a fast-break. He did a whole lot of the small things too. He was also a smart player. I know he failed to score when needed in the playoffs sometimes, but he was also responsible for the defensive stops we were able to get in a few of the wins vrs the Spurs. He helped us in more ways than most fans give him credit for in those playoffs.
Dudley and Amundson combined can’t even make up for the things he did for this team. This system and our team relied a lot on him; not just Nash. The reality is that Marion was our second best player, not Amar’e who I used to think was. We lost him and our team hasn’t been the same since. We need to get a guy similar.
Marion was our Holy Spirit :(
Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."
I dont care how "Well" you thought Marion played
Marion played hard and was athletic but the point is we could never get past the Spurs because of our “system”. I would have loved to keep him but Marion was the one who wanted a Max deal and if we’d have given him one we’d have no room to sign anyone else and probably never get past the Spurs. Plus we could never build around Marion he shoots like a T-Rex.
Point is D-Antoni sucked he played the same game every single game against the Spurs for 3-4 playoffs in a row… I really think it was D-Antoni that held us back from a championship while our players were in their primes. I can recall countless instances in those playoffs where I’d pull my hair out because of his play calling. Like being up by 3 with limited time remaining and not fouling and sending SA to the line for 2 when we have the best free throw shooter in the history of the NBA, and not only that we are shooting in the 80% for our team! "He would just tell the media how he “didn’t see it being drawn up that way”.
We could never get past the Spurs because Coach D wouldn’t play enough guys. Sorry, but the Spurs only won because they didn’t have Manu get hurt and miss half the series and they didn’t have Duncan get suspended for a game. They didn’t have Bowen get hurt either in their series vrs Dallas. Coach D didn’t have enough role players on his team and that hurt us each year in the playoffs because it forced us to go about 6 guys deep the entire game when somebody got hurt or suspended. We could have won with his system, but again it still comes down to Coach D. We just weren’t going to go all the way with him in less everything went our way which it never did. Truth is that our short bench was the biggest problem in that run. For some reason it gets highly overlooked. Our defense was good enough; we got stops, but lacked the deep good bench that all Championship teams have.
I think you forget fast
Back then we may have gotten stops in periods of the game (granted we cannot do that now) but it was spotty at best. Also our rebounding those years was terrible, and Duncan cleaned up the offensive glass with Marion’s face.
In 07 our rebounding wasn’t bad. It could’ve been better, but again Coach D is the one to blame because he wouldn’t play Kurt Thomas more than 15mpg. Boris should have got less minutes and those minutes should have went to Kurt.
Theres always someone to blame
but the fact is we wern’t a good rebounding team that has been our trouble for years, Marion is not a big powerful guy to grab rebounds look at his production in Dallas with over 30 min a game he is only grabbing 6-7 boards.
Were were decent when we got Shaq. Just imagined if we traded Amare for Shaq instead. That would have made us a top 10 defensively and rebounding wise. Grant Hill would have came off the bench with Skinner and Barbosa, but its still the same problem; short bench. I believe with that team we would have made the finals, but the short bench would have been our downfall to the Celtics.
Shaq didn't help us that much defensively
He is too slow and old to effectively guard anyone, sure he rebounded. But the quickest way to get Shaq off the floor is to 1. drive it in and he will foul anyone who gets into the paint. or 2. Play HACK-A-Shaq like Popovich did and he will have to sit!!
No Way
the shaq trade was horrible… if you remember that at that point in the year in Feb 2008, we were on top of the west by 2.5 games… since then it has been nothing but a slow downward spiral, other than a quick start this season we havent sniffed the top spot this late in the year…
Focus, effort, desire and motivation. These are all up to the players; not the coach. He can say all he wants, but only the players can do it. You can’t make a player play with heart; only he can.
The problem as I stated above is that our guys lack the confidence. They know they can’t get the stops and that they can’t create for themselves in the moments they need too. We’ve seen them try and fail or we’ve seen them back down because of that lack of confidence in those areas. There are probably about 5-8 games we could have won in these past two months if we just could have gotten the defensive stops when needed. Having another play-maker late in those games could have helped as well. We have no option, but to make a trade.
So
Are you saying if your players lack confidence then you must trade them?
Remember these are NBA players. Some of the best athletes in the world who play at the very highest level of basketball there is. Should they be lacking confidence?
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
by Wil Cantrell on Jan 28, 2010 6:58 AM MST up reply actions
its the players and coaches fault, really there should of been an option in the pole for its the coach and players fault.
Yes we need to make a trade BAD! cuz were in limbo at the moment and were just wasting time and players wont be able to fully concentrate until this is sorted.
But i also still believe that if our plans is to rebuild and start again (portland like) which is what we should be doing then gentry needs to do along with alot of our players cuz as ive stated before gentry wont ever coach this team to a style where good defense will be played, hes basically a poor mans d’antoni.
If were starting fresh with personnel we should be starting fresh with a new coach aswell
there should of been an option in the pole for its the coach and players fault.
Sorry you don’t get off that easy!
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
by Wil Cantrell on Jan 28, 2010 10:40 AM MST up reply actions
The personel is poor...
But a trade wouldn’t help, I’m afraid.
The suns need to have a better bench starter balance. I’d like to see barbosa start, and JRich be our Manu, which would add options.
I like JRich being our Manu
but with Barbs at the SG he cant guard anyone and that is the biggest issue Suns are facing right now, the SG spot is deep in the NBA
i think
its not gentry’s fault its just the other teams reads our play always. i think we should change our offensive plays.
that’s right. we just got pick and roll in our offensive plays. i hope gentry comes up with a play that has a pick and roll similarities.
haha. gee thanks.
actually
over the course of the season the Suns have been mixing in some non-pick and roll plays but yeah…it’s still the main and go to option
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Jan 28, 2010 9:55 AM MST up reply actions
Theres nothing wrong with the pick and roll
UNFORTUNATELY Nash cannot play 48 min a game so there has to be something else in our offensive scheme for the 20 min a game Nash isn’t playing
Gentry is fine. The issues are...
I think after the Shaq and Porter experiment, Gentry is still searching for the right combo and chemistry with the 1st and 2nd teams. The good news is we have a deep bench…the bad news is we have a deep bench. I agree with points above that point to maybe leaning on the bench for a little too long or at the wrong time in games. And depending on who’s starting, it has to be a challenge to find minutes for the other guys who can contribute…Amundson, Frye, LB, Dudley, Goran. D’Antoni figured out over time what combo could work on the court and that’s part of the reason he had a short bench. I know we’re stuck between trying to not wear Nash and Hill out early in the season so they can go in the playoffs…assuming we hang in there and make it.
Regarding losing big leads, I’ve said this before that the problem is when we get ahead, we continue to jack up quick 3’s, which leads to misses, long rebounds and layups for the other team. When we get a lead, we have to be a little more deliberate on offense…do more pick and rolls, post up JRich, make the extra pass to get a higher % shot and/or get to the foul line. The by product to doing this would be we’d turn the ball over less because we’d slow things down just a tad. Maybe when we get big leads we need to go with a more defensive line up for a stretch, that can at least try to shut the other team down AND be able to rebound misses. That said, we can’t have a line up on the floor that can’t score. But if we’re up by 20, I don’t think we need Nash, LB, Frye on the floor together in that situation because: all 3 are defensive liabilities, LB has a tendency to get himself caught in the air on passes and/or he’s taking ill advised 3’s, and Frye is basically a 3 pt shooter as well. And neither can rebound. I think getting Dudley and Amundson on the floor in those situations gives us more energy on defense, and Nash and Stat can still run the pick and roll. We just get to stagnant and depend too much on the 3 or on Nash bailing us out with a long 3 with the shot clock running down.
So in a nutshell:
1. Gentry is doing fine, keep him.
2. Put a shorter leash on the bench and/or find the right combo of players for given situations.
3. When we have big leads, we need to be a little more deliberate on offense and focus on a more defensive minded group for a few minutes.
Marion was our second best player. The loss of Boris was huge as well. Would not blame gentry as much as Kerr. We have a new owner who tolerates insanity. Think people here are too hard on Frye who since going to the bench has played much better.
The fact that Marion and Boris left does not change the fact that we have one of the best benches in the NBA.
Winning teams have discipline and coaches who are do not tolerate silly behavior.
Gentry is a joke. If you do not know that then your eyes need examination.
Not like Hill? He has limits thats true but a great deal for the money and if you put strict limits on his time played in b-b he would be exceptional.
The problem is Richardson, Gentry, Amare and a Nash that has become too self indulgent. These are facts. I am only sorry for the young players who have only 1 good role model. Hill.
GL
make Amundson start for Stoudemire
In light of both the current state of things not working and Amare Stoudemire not playing particularly well, allegedly looking “disinterested,” and apparently being a player on his way out of here, I think he should be benched indefinitely and replaced by Lou Amundson. Let the players who are willing to play hard start, even if they are less skilled.
That will eliminate our trade leverage
We cant bench Amare and try to get value for him, teams will low ball us because they know we want to ship him.
I honestly believe there is little or no trade leverage. Even more certain is that other teams already know full well that the Suns (I’m avoiding saying “we,” falling into the fan trap of thinking fans are part of the team) want to ship Stoudemire. I don’t think there would be much to lose.
by species8473 on Jan 28, 2010 10:18 AM MST up reply actions
The problem with that is your not looking at the big picture.
Amare has not gotten charged with sexual assault or something giving management no option but to trade him. That management did this last year, and when nothing good bit they kept him. If nothing bites this year I can guarantee that the Suns will give Amare his contract, they don’t WANT to get rid of him . They simply want to see if they can get value for him to shed cap space. And if they can’t they aren’t stupid enough to get rid of all future hope to shed salary,. As much as we all love to hate him that kid has ridiculous skills.
I'd be shocked if they did this. I think they'll do a sign-and-trade if anything.
Only problem is that they have to get Amare’s buy-in on it. He might be up for it, though, because he’d get more money and length on that deal.
How could that shock you?
Has anyone in the Suns front office indicated that they do not want Amare playing for Phoenix? All of this is speculation by bored fans. The one thing worse than paying Amare a max deal is the loss in revenue from not paying Amare a max deal to stay. Sure a sign and trade would be a good thing but the point I am trying to make is that he will not be let go for nothing as indicated in earlier posts. And that Phoenix actually does have some leverage in the whole thing. They can resign him and shed cap to get under the tax and keep him if nothing good comes to their doorstep. JRich can be traded in the off season because it will be the final year on his deal. Which will make him attractive to teams. Also Barbs can go he will be making 6M for the next few years and any team would love to pick up Barbs. So we have options we do not have to trade for nothing.
People are just overreacting. I don’t believe Amare will be traded for nothing. The problem is that I hope he gets traded for the right pieces.
Totally agree.
Everyone acts like we are backed up against a wall with no other option but to trade Amare for nothing. I do not think other teams are viewing our situation this way, which is why if he is traded we will get some nice pieces for him.
Then we get into it again, about how trading him now for SOME assets
Is better than letting him walk for nothing.
I think you are speaking from your perspective
If it means he walks or we get Tyrus Thomas for him, I can guarantee they would rather keep Amare and pay him than being non competitive for Nash’s last few years in the league. Amare said he wants close to max contract, and as it stands he is making 17 million I bet he would bite if we just extended that for 4-5 years.
Gentry needs to go.
This team is not broken.
This team lacks a head coach which knows how to coach.
I read here among the blogs the clear and accurate analysis of who is on the court, how many minutes is played by players in funks, the execution of the team in the stretch and it goes on and on.
I am personally tee-off at putting our offense on the floor when defense is required in close games at the end of the 4th. I love Steve, but when you need a stop at the end of a game, he should NOT be on the floor. Simple.
Yet, Gentry keeps sending him out there.
I am personally tee-off at not using time outs when the momentum shifts. AKA POP! Popovich always calls a time out when sees a momentum shift, and he never waits for the score to shift 4-6 points. ( I hate it when he does this to us.)
Yet, Gentry waits until our leads are gone. ( it seems he always waits, it would be a nice stat to measure)
He is D’Antoni student, but the spacing on the floor is ugly at times, offensive execution non existent. There are very few open looks for the shooters which leads to poor shot selection and decreased shot percentages.
Yet, Gentry does nothing about it.
These observations are easy, clear and simple. Any coach which understands the game would see them. Yet Gentry hangs his head in defeat.
Gentry needs to go.
by Grey_Hound on Jan 28, 2010 11:09 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
Genrty
So was he a good coach when we were 14-3 and we were overcoming deficits and winning games in the 4Q? Was it him or the team then? And is the problem him or the team now? Did Gentry somehow get stupid in Dec vs. Nov? Or is it something else on the court?
The other thing which hasn’t been mentioned, which may not be fair, is that in Nov, we didn’t have Lopez in the mix. Amundson got those minutes. With Lopez back, we now have a deeper bench, which is good in a way, but it mucks with the rotation. So not a that this is on Lopez, because his play has gotten progressively better and we need his size. But trying to get minutes for everyone is an issue now and it’s got the rotation and chemistry out of whack.
Now, what Gentry can do is figure out the right mix, the right rotation, and help get the ship on the right track. But that takes games and time, and it’s obvious that he’s tinkering now with Lopez starting. But now with all of the Amar’e trade drama, things will be in a state of flux until it’s all resolved. That’s not on Gentry, that’s human nature and is a result of the position Kerr and Sarver have put us in.
Gentry (IMHO)
Good points.
Early, I would say that his team was getting good looks and shooting well during that stretch. When your team is in the grove, coaching is mostly hands off. Supporting my argument.
My concern with Gentry is this lack of basic coaching.
I agree he is playing with the team chemistry. And chemistry is a difficult and amorphous ideal to achieve. I will say the leadership requires vision and that vision should not waver to implement the vision. So, playing with the chemistry can lead to confusion on the court. We see that alot. Is he playing too much? if so, it supports my argument.
Calling a time out before the lead is blown is not an option for a coach. The timeout must be called in the attempt to disrupt the flow. To not call it, is bad coaching. Also, supporting my argument.
From my armchair, I think offense spacing is bad, defensive space is bad, ball movement is bad, and basketball IQ is bad. I think game preparation is a coaching requirement. Again, I hold the coach responsible.
If it is the players, then the coach should call them out. If we have players who are incapable of playing intelligent basketball, that is, on offense and defense the player knows where they belong, when to rotate and block out, then the coach should call that out too.
Best thing for team and Amare...
Would be for them to work this out. Look, guys are right in that the issue is not that the team doesn’t want Amar’e, it’s the fear of losing him if a deal isn’t reached. And Amar’e hasn’t said he doesn’t want to be here. But since Marion was traded, he’s been the one that the Suns can get the most value for. If you look at what both sides want:
Amar’e – max contract for team in decent/big market that is willing to invest to contend
Suns – if we believe Kerr, they want to improve the team to contend- now Sarver may have a different opinion because of the economics.
There’s not one deal out there that will bring us the value we would really deserve for Amar’e. And we would cripple this team for the next 3 years. We’d have to see if Nash and Hill would want to stay on a team that would be unlikely to contend before 2012.
And the Suns offer Amar’e the best chance to be on a team that can contend, in on a team that he’s already comfortable and in a system that can use his strneghts… IF Kerr/Sarver really want to strengthen the team. The question is how? What’s missing? But if we can get good D and reasonable scoring out of JRich/LB, and with the emergence of Goran, JDud and Lopez, we don’t have any glaring holes. It’s chemistry and the proper rotation that’s the issue.
Win-Win is finding a number that is close to what Amar’e might be looking for, make other moves to strengthen the team…whether that’s addition, or addition by subtraction (other than Amar’e) as we’ve got a lot of players with similar styles. The team needs tweaking not overhauling.
Agree with some of that. Just wonder why you assume Amar’e can be trusted to play hard AFTER getting a max contract. OK someone asked me about Nash and self indulgence.
Not sure where to start. Remember Nash in NY playing vs Marbury. Incredible numbers for both and then some team won. I am not so interested in wonderful numbers/ I want my team to win the game. This team playing in the regular season after playing the Spurs, 3-17. We just seem to lose after playing them. Nash mental lock.
Suns are 9-3 vs Bobcats. We started losing after Boris went there. Nash finds it very hard to play against old friends from this team. If we win tonight it will be the first time we beat Marion since he left.
So what have we got. Tremendous talent. Loyalty to friends. I want loyalty to TEAM.
I still love to watch Nash. Just— a few years ago NO owned us and were coming to town. Nash had a game coming up against Dallas and said he felt bad so he did not play. Our team got cratered when Nash did not play. No big deal. He was sick. Fine. Elite players like Kobe and MJ hold a different view. They stand up for their team. If they have cuts or broken bones. If it hurts to stand up. They find a way. NO beat us by 13. Too bad. Never mind.
I know Nash is friendly and talented. The trouble is I want someone consumed with the desire to Win and that is not Nash but it could be Dragic. Wish him the best but a top point guard does not play no d and go 7 of 21. That is someone with a clouded mind.
Play the young players and I hope Nash makes me eat my words against Dallas and Marion.
GO SUNS
Nash is what he is
and a part of what he is is almost 36 yrs old. The Suns have played a lot of games in a short period of time and it’s had an impact on him physically. Earlier in the season he was find but he’s carried a lot of the load this season and it’s wearing on him.
It’s totally predictable – we’ve seen it in years past where he wears down as the season goes on and he’s admitted that running the pick and roll all the time takes a lot out of him. The Suns are overly dependent on him right now.
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Jan 28, 2010 3:16 PM MST up reply actions
Acquiring an excellent iso player who can create his own shot would be sweet... hmmm, like Andre Iguadala
can you tell I’m having tunnel vision?
They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...
Dont blame the coach?!
the coach is doing fine, its just the players that have been seeming to perform worse lately. Their legs are tired after a long and tough season traveling on the road. The Pick n Roll with Nash and STAT has not been working lately and their d and run and gun seems to be slipping too.
Love the D
Last night’s defensive performance vs the Mavs was very impressive. Watching both Hill and Dudley “man up” on Nowitzki was just beautiful. There is some defense effort in this team. Perhaps the team will draw some confidence from that game.
BTW, Earl Clark is showing signs that he can get a shot in the face of a defender. This young player needs time on the court. He one of only two players on the team who is actually good size for his position.

by 




















