Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: PHOTOS: Mike Moser's Dunk Face Is Spectacular

The Amare Shift - Phoenix Fandom and the Love-Hate Relationship

Amareicyhot_medium

*Start Radio Transmission on [random date] at 8:33:54pm:*

Al McCoy:  "Nash at the top of the key - he waits.... he peels his defender off the Amare screen - drives the lane - dishes it to Amare... IT'S WHAMMO TIME FOLKS!!!   WHAT A WHAM BAM SLAM BY AMARE STOUDEMIRE!!!"

Tim Kempton:  "Wow, amazing execution of the pick and roll that time by Steve and Amare - when those two are on top of their game there's not a defense in the league that can stop that attack.  That two-handed jam there for Amare gives him 28 points for the game to go along with his 10 boards - a solid effort by Amare tonight!"

*End Radio Transmission on [same random date] at 8:35:47pm*

***

*Somewhere in Phoenix Arizona..."

Positive-Pete-the-Suns-Fan: "Man, Amare is a BEAST!  He is unstoppable!!"

***

Does this sound familiar at all?   Let me give you a hint...  IT SHOULD.  

Star-divide

So we all know the story - Amare is on the trading block... again.  But this time it feels different, this time it feels real to everybody.   Combine that feeling of trade inevitability with the recent struggles of this Suns team in December and January and 'VIOLA"! Planet Orange, we have a SCAPEGOAT 

Or at least from recent comments in trade discussion forums.. that's how it seems.   Amare is getting little love from his home-crowd.  Only a few renegades choose to defend #1, and I think I've figured out why... so hear me out and let's see what you have to say.

Orgj_medium

First of all on a personal note - Amare Stoudemire has been one of my favorite players in the NBA since we drafted the kid out of Cypress Creek.  I've rooted for him throughout his career thus far and I will continue to do so regardless of the uniform he ends up sporting.  But by no means am I blindly biased because of my affinity for the guy - I understand the frustration in Amare for his defensive awareness (PLEASE NOTICE I DID NOT SAY EFFORT) and his more recent turnover problems.

There is no denying the fact that Amare is one of the most explosive and talented players in the league.  One of those talents among many is his ability to recover from injury (I'm convinced the guy is related to Wolverine from the X-Men).  And throughout his career Amare has taken us on a roller-coaster ride of ups and downs with regards to his health - but his Basketball skills have always either stayed constant or actually increased.  Even at the beginning of this year many were praising Amare for his increased defensive abilities - how many charges or good defensive plays has Amare made already this year?  The answer is more than it seems like a lot of fans want to believe. 

Criticisms of Amare now are more exaggerated now than they've ever been. 

Debbie Downer the Wagoneer says: " Amare plays NO DEFENSE, GOOD RIDDENS HE'S LEAVING"

.... Really?  No defense?  If you can't tell you're exaggerating the truth when you type this with your keyboard...

I don't want to get too much into statistics.. but I will mention this quick comparison of a few career numbers with regards to Amare's defense:

42908310_medium

Besides the fact that Amare has better all around numbers than Pau Gasol... what really strikes me as interesting is the fact that his Defensive Player Rating (DRtg) is the exact same as Pau Gasol the mighty mighty Laker...  But I keep forgetting... Amare plays no defense right?

THE REAL DEAL

What appears to be occurring is that an Amare shift has taken place in the hearts of the citizens of Planet Orange.  I'll make the analogy of a separating couple to make my point.   We fell in love with Amare - he was ON FIRE - and he really turned us on - for years he excited us as we witnessed insane Dunks and Alley Oops and Gorilla Game tactics that carpet bombed the hardwood as Amare beasted the floor...    and we began expect more and more from the young stud.  His amazing talent tantalized us.  

Here is the definition of Tantalize;

Tantalize:

to torment with, or as if with, the sight of something desired but out of reach; tease by arousing expectations that are repeatedly disappointed.

All too often Amare is bashed for not rebounding in double digits and constantly compared to the likes of... lets see... how about one of the greatest power forwards to ever play the game and who is a shoe into the basketball hall of fame Tim Duncan.   Amare is not Tim Duncan.   Very few players in HISTORY have averaged double digit rebounds and maintain the scoring ability that Amare brings to the table.

Do you think maybe as fans we were tantalized by Amare's hops - and we started to expect things that were out of reach... and we've been repeatedly disappointed because of it?    I THINK SO.

Back to the lovers analogy...

So our expectations haven't been met... and now as lovers we have "The Talk".  You know, this is the part where the woman (or sometimes the fruity guy will initiate it) comes forward and asks the question..  "so... WHAT ARE WE".  It's a plea for commitment.   Conventionally there are two answers to the question:

1)  "I love you and we should be together!"   [Then you fork over the cash for the wedding (contract).]

or

2) "... maybe we should see other people for a while..?"   [You keep your cash and buy a shiny new XBox and you hide in your room for weeks at a time playing online video games with your nerdy online frien... wait... I'll stop now]

These conventional answers might seem like they fit the mold with STAT - but there is a difference between our situation here with Amare and a real life lovers' talk.   In a real life situation "The Talk" usually happens pretty fast and without notice and you are forced to make a 'think quick' decision .   Here with Amare - we have had months... check that - years to sit and evaluate our relationship with the ball player - to analyze and nit-pick every little aspect of his game and personality.  And as a shadowy feeling of trade inevitability has swept over Planet Orange it all starts to pile up.  YOU KNOW WHAT I THINK?

The tantalizing became our only thought and tunnel vision has set in with many fans.  We began to focus on only the negative aspects of Amare's game and the disappointments that we've felt - the heart break our lover has caused... and we dwell and dwell and dwell on it until finally.... the shift occurs.

A light goes on the brain that says - "I don't want to deal with this anymore"  - and just like that the lover becomes the enemy.  It makes the separation that much easier you know?  Just turn you emotions around and everything will be fine right?  If I hate the guy - it makes it that much easier to erase from my memories and heart the love.  

Now, any and everything that happens it seems to be....  HIS/HER fault.  You can't find your keys?  It's her fault.  We can't get our offense into a rhythm?  It's his fault.  Amare has officially become the scapegoat.   He is the reason our team has sucked during December and January and the solution to the problem is to eliminate the source... never mind his great rebounding numbers and his ever steadily creeping scoring numbers.   It's HIS fault.  Yeah, that's it.  Him.  The Enemy.  He needs to leave now.  Trade him for Doritos.  He's worthless.

***

I know it's a little dramatic right?  And the analogy isn't perfect - but I think I might be right with many fans. 

103amare_medium

Amare is an amazing basketball player.  Let's not drown his major positives with minor negatives we feel he could change.  Regardless of whether or not Amare Stoudemire will remain a Phoenix Sun - he will always be an All-Star and fan favorite of mine.

Comment 290 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Does Stat’s injury history have anything to do with the Suns desire to trade him or is it purely that your owner is a cheap arse?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:02 PM MST reply actions  

Hold on let me call the front office...

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:05 PM MST up reply actions  

One can infer from a franchises behavior.

For instance, from the sixers behavior since they didn’t trade Andre Miller one can infer that the 2011 luxury tax scares the crap out of them more than any concept of improving their basketball team.

It was a good read though, thanks, I think all sixer fans should read it too

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:07 PM MST up reply actions  

Facetiousness aside

My inference would be that it has more to do with the kind of money Amare wants and a real evaluation of the future direction of the team with regards to adding more youth than it has to do with anything else.

He has proven he can bounce back from injury.

As for our owner being a cheap arse, though I do personally think he should stick to real estate… we are only out of the top 10 in NBA payroll by a few pennies in change and some lint… so really he’s not so cheap as he is stupid.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Well if Amar’e and his 18 mil come off the cap this off season and Sarver doesn’t pay anyone else – that top 10 closeness will drop precipitously :)

It would seem weird to give nash an extension and then take his best most experienced running mate away from him wouldn’t i?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:14 PM MST up reply actions  

The problem is

if he opts out this final year the 18 mil WILL NOT come off the cap this off season. That’s why it’s such a sticky situation right now. If he walks we get no cap relief and nothing in return – that’s why they are entertaining everything.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Sorry, was referring to next season.

If Amar’e walks – the suns only have about 45 million committed in contracts next season – so then you’ll get to see if Sarver is about the money or not I guess?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:20 PM MST up reply actions  

that's the idea

and with everything that the FO has said up to this point – they portray themselves as determined to put together a competitive team that is relevant in the playoff picture.

I think all that contributes to the tense feelings of Suns fans currently – we really aren’t convinced that our ownership will make sound basketball decisions. Steve Kerr is slowly redeeming his worth to the disgruntled fans because of Goran and Lopez playing so well.. but Sarver still has a lot to prove.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:24 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

If Amar’e walks and the cap comes down as projected, and I don’t know where the suns are going ot pick – they won’t have more than 8 million or so under the cap to make a contract offfer…

Not sure what you’re getting for 8 million base in this off season.

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Yup -

That’s why it wouldn’t be a bad idea to try and get lots of draft picks for Amare – though that move might enforce perceptions of Sarver being a tight arse – it would actually make basketball sense in the long run.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Money

this is not a cap issue for the Suns. If Amare were to decide to not opt out (which is highly unlikely for reasons I’ve stated many times) the Suns would only have $63m in payroll with the one unsigned FA of Lou Amundson.

The Suns would be fine with that if they thought that group was a winner.

He’s being traded b/c he wants more money than the Suns think they should give him and Amare thinks some other team will pay him more than the Suns think he’s worth. We shall see what the market says about that. That’s not a money decision as much as a basketball value decision.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Jan 29, 2010 2:13 PM MST up reply actions  

It depends on what he’s traded for in my opinion…if he’s traded for table scraps and picks – or stuff that expires next year – you can’t say it’s not about the money.

Suns recent history is littered with given away draft picks that had to do with money

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Speaking of Amundson, I heard last year (possibly here) that Lou Amundson wants a raise. Since he deserves one, I wouldn’t sign Amare Stoudemire if there wouldn’t be enough money left for Amundson’s raise.

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:23 PM MST up reply actions  

If the Cardinals can’t sign their back up left tackle they shouldn’t give Larry Fitzegerald a raise

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:26 PM MST up reply actions  

That's not very sound reasoning...

but Lou rightfully has earned a raise based on his play.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:32 PM MST up reply actions  

Come on – there are sixers fans who miss reggie evans :)

Fan(aticism) isn’t a place for sound reasoning :)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

:) no doubt

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:44 PM MST up reply actions  

Lou's raise

is small in comparison. He’s making around $800k this year. Chris Anderson signed before this season for $2m. No way is Lou deserving of more than the Birdman.

Even if Amare stays, the Suns payroll will only be $63 which is well below the lux tax (but above the salary cap). But Amare isn’t staying.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Jan 29, 2010 3:21 PM MST up reply actions  

I thought

everyone considers Pau Gasol soft. I know I do.

by atwater on Jan 29, 2010 2:09 PM MST reply actions  

but no one is out there begging the lakers to trade him because he’s soft…

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:42 PM MST up reply actions  

and he is making MAX money - check his salary for the next 3-4 years...

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Ah but he’s not the ‘super star’ of the team (hell if you factor in coach, he’s like third) – I think ‘expectation’ is something to do with it obviously, and Iguodala suffers from the same problem…he’s the same player he was before his extension but expectations are so much higher because now everyone wants him to be something he never has been and never will be. It’s a problem of perception :)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:47 PM MST up reply actions  

too true -

That’s why I feel for Amare.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:50 PM MST up reply actions  

Yup - the Yankees of the NBA

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Because they understand the maxim – if you win it they will come

plus they can charge outrageous amounts for their seats that no onter franchise can

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:52 PM MST up reply actions  

Eh only LA and NY franchises can do that

Because a lot of their clientele are rich folks and celebs.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 2:56 PM MST up reply actions  

I guess Dallas is just a fluke then

80+ million payroll

If you win it they will come

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:57 PM MST up reply actions  

No NBA owners are hurting for money

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 3:02 PM MST up reply actions  

You're kidding, right?

Relatively speaking, lots of NBA owners are losing money.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 3:04 PM MST up reply actions  

I mean, they're not living out of cardboard boxes

But it’s rare when an NBA team makes them any money, and many of their day jobs are causing them to leak cash.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 3:08 PM MST up reply actions  

I was talking specifically about Mark Cuban

in response to someones comment about the Dallas Mavaricks being able to afford an $80million payroll without being uber-successful

by DaveJD on Jan 29, 2010 3:11 PM MST up reply actions  

I think we all like Amare for what he is. Problem is, he thinks he should be paid max money and I don’t believe he’s worth that. If he wanted to take $13m a year, I’d gladly keep him around.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 2:14 PM MST reply actions  

He’s worth more than 13 million dollars based on what he does right now.

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:16 PM MST up reply actions  

+1, I agree word for word

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 29, 2010 2:19 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm just sick of all the negative banter now spewed

which drowns out his positive contributions.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:20 PM MST up reply actions  

He brings it on himself.

If he realized his own worth, or stepped up his game to match his perceived worth, then there’d be no negative nellies.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 2:24 PM MST up reply actions  

Doesn't mean I can't be sick of it.

Understanding the kid’s background I don’t blame him for wanting more… because he darn well might get more somewhere else.

I just choose to focus on the good memories and hope the best for the Suns moving forward.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm sure once he's gone

There will be mostly positive memories. He’s been a good trooper this year, too.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 2:27 PM MST up reply actions  

This is just what fans do.

We’re all armchair GMs and coaches. Always been the case and it’s part of the package of being a professional athelete.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 2:27 PM MST up reply actions  

I know - I thought

I’d try to write something to keep things in perspective

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:33 PM MST up reply actions  

The whole ‘take less’ , ‘settle for less than you’re offered’ thing fascinates me in sports fans, cause in ‘their’ lives do you suppose that they’d take less money if more seemed available somewhere else?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Fans are not outside forces of any relevance.

There’s no way to determine if these outside forces perceive his worth to be the same as he does until he hits the open market – the nba doesn’t allow you to negotiate with another team while you’re still employed.

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:30 PM MST up reply actions  

If we're not outside forces of any relevance than this article is irrelevant, since it is directed towards and addressing fans.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 29, 2010 2:32 PM MST up reply actions  

Fans are not outside of forces in any relevance in terms to the contract a player gets :)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:33 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't know about that

Seems mostly true but I think fan perception of a player or a franchise can lead to a lot of bad personnel decisions.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 29, 2010 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

Like with Michael Vick?

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

Turst me, I"m a phillies fan, I know all about fan perception leading a franchise to doing stupid things

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

haha +1

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:35 PM MST up reply actions  

cough Eric Byrnes

Banzai!

by Suns' Sensei on Jan 29, 2010 8:56 PM MST up reply actions  

If it meant staying where my family was happy and I had great people to work with

I absolutely would. In fact there are lots of reasons i stay someplace for less. Money does not buy happiness. In fact if you get a job only for the money you will never be happy or satisfied.

by Suns Fan For Life on Jan 29, 2010 2:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Money doesn’t buy happiness you’re absolutely right

But money can buy you things that make you happy.

And why couldn’t you move your family for more money?

Or take these new fangled things called airplanes.

And of course there’s the fact that not everyone sees the world exactly the same wya you do

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:39 PM MST up reply actions  

15 million $1 gift cards

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 29, 2010 5:53 PM MST up reply actions  

+1 to Eutychus: Amare played badly with the trade rumours hanging over him

I noticed other fans on other teams support the key players even when they are in a slump.

Btw, worse performers like VC gets less grief from fans online when you compare them to the shit Amare gets day in and day out.

"Stoudemire admitted the swirling trade rumors have affected his play. "I feel like the confidence in me is not quite there with them for them to want to shop me around so much," he said."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/chris_mannix/02/01/rankings2/index.html

Amar’e Stoudemire led the Suns with 25 points and 12 rebounds, getting scores on two key trips before Hill’s shots and after four Suns misses. The Suns centers, Channing Frye and Robin Lopez, had 38 points and 12 rebounds.

“I don’t think people are on edge as they were before,” Dudley said. “I don’t know if it was trade rumors or pressure. It’s nice to get back on our feet.”

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2010/02/01/20100201suns-hornets.html

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 4:46 PM MST up reply actions  

Good post...

I’ve been defending Amare for a LONG time now and would hate to see him leave. Fans nowadays are willing to give him up for a PB & J sandwich with banana and the it’s all because of expectations. No, he’s not the greatest defender in the world but he has improved his rebounding and defense…just not as much as some people thought he should’ve by now.

Now, this season he seems to be more turnover prone than in years past, but his offensive production is hard to match, especially with his bounce coming back. It saddens me that so many Suns fans have turned on him but it doesn’t surprise me. Remember when Shawn Marion was here, the Suns were in first place in the West but there was a perception that the Suns would be better off without him around. The failed trade for Shaq was made and here we are with the Suns trying to get back to where they were before the 400 lbs. anchor was brought to the Valley of the Sun. I’ve made my peace with the fact that there is a good chance he will be gone but I fear that in the long run the Suns will look back and realize his value to this particular squad at this particular time much like we do with Marion now.

Staff writer: Bright Side of the Sun Twitter: @dpwatson

by watdogg10 on Jan 29, 2010 2:17 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

+1

I’ll give you an AMEN. Good Stuff.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:47 PM MST up reply actions  

Staff writer: Bright Side of the Sun Twitter: @dpwatson

by watdogg10 on Jan 29, 2010 4:04 PM MST up reply actions   2 recs

Pretty slick man

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 29, 2010 5:53 PM MST up reply actions  

I love this

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 31, 2010 5:54 PM MST up reply actions  

Good post

Interesting metaphor…comparing our relationship with Amare with a lovers relationship. I dont need to say anything else, you said it.

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Jan 29, 2010 2:19 PM MST reply actions  

The comments are just as good as the article, it ‘helps’ deal with the fact that many sixer fans are ready to turn on Iguodala for the sake of a peanut butter sandiwch.

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:19 PM MST reply actions  

Same thing over there eh?

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Yup, but it tended to coincide with his new contract – for some reason when a player gets paid more money – people expect him to somehow step up his game equally which is just impossible – what they don’t get is the sixers had a ‘bargain’ in Iguodala under his rookie contract.

I think Suns funs will like Iguodala if they get him, but like I said, for his sake, if the sixers dump him off, I’d rather he go to cleveland or dallas

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:22 PM MST up reply actions  

However, the problem is compounded by the fact that in terms of ‘long and bad’ contracts, Iguodala is actually the third most difficult to trade – brand and dalembert are MUCH harder to get rid of – and comcast seemingly desperately wants to shed salary to get under the cap.

It makes it more complicated, but the fans have turned on Iguodala (but so has the idiot coach and I think the franchise itself)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:24 PM MST up reply actions  

O’Brien is an idiot? I don’t know much about him except that he didn’t get along with Danny Ainge in Boston.

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:25 PM MST up reply actions  

O’brien coaches the pacers and hasn’t coached the sixers for about 4 years

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Eddie Jordan. And yeah, he is not such an exciting coach.

Doesn’t seem to be many FA Coaches around anymore. The candidates are boring!

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 2, 2010 9:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Two years running Thibodeau has been the hot name – and two years running he hasn’t gotten a job – and you have to start to wonder why.

As fans, there are things we know and thins we don’t, the assistants who would make good coaches (or GMs) aren’t as known to us as the retreads.

Rumors float now that Byron Scott would be the next sixers coach.

A. Still paid by some other team so you can low ball him – check
B. COnnected to GM from time in new jersey – check
C. Over rated coach – check

by jemagee on Feb 3, 2010 2:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Iguodala is pretty much as productive as Amare, offensively

But he’s also a lot more well-rounded and he gets paid right around what I think Amare is worth.

by jburning on Jan 29, 2010 2:25 PM MST up reply actions  

I like Iguadala

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Just don’t call him Iggy – he doesn’t like it – (we don’t have a good nickname for him yet)

And spelling his name is a real pain in the arse :)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:28 PM MST up reply actions  

haha!

To us it seems like a pipe dream at this point if we could land an Iguadala caliber player with all the low-ball offers from other teams hitting the rumor mill.

So I’ll hold off on nicknames for at least 3 weeks.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:29 PM MST up reply actions  

From ‘the source’ that used to be reliable

so what i have gathered tonight is this.
phoenix wants iguodala….but not really brand or dalembert.

some combination of iguodala, smith and kapono has been talked about..as well as all 3 in same deal.

we are trying to concoct a three way to move brand or dalembert for another expiring but as you can expect are having no luck.

phoenix may do jason richardson and amare for brand or dalembert and iguodala but only if we give up a first rounder…which we would ensure would be top 5 protected this year.

lots of variations and nothing imminent…but for what its worth..talks are becoming more substantial.

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:31 PM MST up reply actions  

A 2011 or 2012 first-rounder? I thought we had done this year.

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:32 PM MST up reply actions  

No no – you’d get the sixers 2010 first round (top 5 protected) so it sucks even MORE for the sixers.

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:33 PM MST up reply actions  

Snaps

sounds juicy – should be a fun next couple of weeks

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:36 PM MST up reply actions  

Not if your a sixers fan, it’s just painful

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:40 PM MST up reply actions  

Well there’s a very farfetched rumor out there from a guy who USED to be a good source from the sixers, bu has recently fallen down that says the suns want iguodala in a stoudemire deal but that the sixers wnat the suns to take back dalembert – and the sixers would then take richardson and the suns get a 2010 draft pick (top 5 protected) that’s being discussed – i sent it over to the head of yoru blog for the ‘rumors being tracked thing’

Nothing personal – but I want no part of AMar’e on the sixers

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:29 PM MST up reply actions  

How about Brand?:)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:48 PM MST up reply actions  

I'll pass on that one...

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:49 PM MST up reply actions  

can you say

worst contract in the NBA right now? (Maybe G. Arenas is… idk)

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:49 PM MST up reply actions  

Brands is longer :) But he’s better

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:51 PM MST up reply actions  

I dont think brands is bad

he just doesnt produce this year because He is on a team that he does not fit into, he produced well in LA

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 29, 2010 2:54 PM MST up reply actions  

Even with Lopez I would rather have sam D then Brand.
Lopez and Sam D are do pretty good Centers on your team. Or we can trade him. Fry can play (weak ) PF

"Stop denying the inevitable, the time has come to rebuild"
rgreyslak@gmail.com twitter @rgreyslak

by RGreyslak on Jan 29, 2010 2:56 PM MST up reply actions  

I like

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 3:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Well he is producing now

It has nothing to do with a team he doesn’t fit on – he has a moron for a coach

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:57 PM MST up reply actions  

Sam D puts up good numbers when he get minutes

Lopez and Sam would be a killer center position. I would have igg play a strong SG and eventually move Clark into start at SF. But we need picks for a new pf

"Stop denying the inevitable, the time has come to rebuild"
rgreyslak@gmail.com twitter @rgreyslak

by RGreyslak on Jan 29, 2010 2:59 PM MST up reply actions  

Thats the problem

We play pick and roll ball 75% of the time, whos going to be doing the rolling?

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 29, 2010 3:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Lou showed he could last night

and Lopez is learning

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 3:01 PM MST up reply actions  

why?

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 3:04 PM MST up reply actions  

He can only get better

and his form really is improving. Give him some time.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 3:06 PM MST up reply actions  

If Lou started at PF he would be top 3 in the league avg rebounds. he rips them down like crazy per minute on the floor and never stops on defense

"Stop denying the inevitable, the time has come to rebuild"
rgreyslak@gmail.com twitter @rgreyslak

by RGreyslak on Jan 29, 2010 3:07 PM MST up reply actions  

If Lou started we'd be playing 4 on 5 offense

he can’t score unless he’s right at the basket and he’s a woeful ft shooter. He’s kinda like the anti-amar’e all defense and no offense instead of all offense and no defense.

by DaveJD on Jan 29, 2010 3:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Except for the fact that Bieddrins is a much more skilled basketball player

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 3:28 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree he'd average a ton

But in the top 3 give me a break.. his purpose is to come in the game with intensity for 10-15 min a night, with 30+ min he couldn’t keep up that energy the whole time. So just because he’s averaging a ton when you translate it to real minutes doesn’t mean that is achievable.

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 29, 2010 3:20 PM MST up reply actions  

With Iguodala and Sam D in PHX

Having them both in phx gives the Suns a lineup lookoing like this
PG = Nash/Dragic
SG = Iguodala/LB/Dudley
SF = Hill/Dudley/Clark
PF = Frye/Lou
C = Sam D/Lopez/Collins
This equals solid D in the low post in Sam D, a better defender with Nash in the backcourt and Frye does what he does best; open up the floor in the offense. In short, we retain our offense (may be slightly lower) by having a better scoring guard in Iguodala to compensate for the loss of Amar’e, also, Nash doesn’t have to feed one person all the time. We also get better D as mentioned earlier. With good bargain, we get their first round pick (top 5) and may be another piece. in short, the Suns get better now and prepare for the future…

by jatrex4suns on Jan 30, 2010 8:33 AM MST up reply actions  

Bottom line is

We have nobody to run the pick and roll, so it will probably take the rest of the season to adjust our new offensive scheme

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 30, 2010 9:46 AM MST up reply actions  

Maybe that says something about our offense

sure Nash is a p’n’r wizard but i think we rely on it too much, we have very little chance against teams that can defend it well.

Maybe a few new pages should be added to out half-court playbook?

by DaveJD on Jan 29, 2010 3:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Lots of nice PF prospects in the draft this year-if only we had a pick

as for dalembert, i’ve thought for a long time he’d be good on the suns he’s a good defender/rebounder and can hit the mid range J so he won’t clog up the lane on offense.

by DaveJD on Jan 29, 2010 3:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Oh god – you don’t want Dalembert taking mid range jumpers – he’s not good at them…he just likes to take them

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 3:02 PM MST up reply actions  

that is why we need phi pick in the deal

forget this top 5 protected

"Stop denying the inevitable, the time has come to rebuild"
rgreyslak@gmail.com twitter @rgreyslak

by RGreyslak on Jan 29, 2010 3:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Ok, then please trade us the lopez kid and we’ll keep the first round pick.

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 4:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Speights is as close to untouchable a piece as Philly has right now

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 29, 2010 5:53 PM MST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t go that far – he’s a nice offensive piece who hardly ever passes and shows no committment to defense.

The only player I as a sixer fan would consider ‘untouchable’ is Jrue Holiday

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 6:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Amar’e passes doesn’t he?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 6:39 PM MST up reply actions  

I say we keep STAT

And pick up AI to see how long it takes for the whole team to dismantle because of fighting for shots and touches

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 30, 2010 9:49 AM MST up reply actions  

He’s foul prone and has very little fundamental basketball skill

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 3:01 PM MST up reply actions  

He looked pretty productive in the LA philly game

i saw hustle from him that i haven’t seen from Amar’e in a long time.

by DaveJD on Jan 30, 2010 5:55 AM MST up reply actions  

+1

Me too

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Defense

Suns were average defense with Marion and Bell and when we threw them away, we expected Amare to lead the defense..not happening..Lakers have a good body at center and we don’t (RoLo needs to develop fast and a lot)..when Amare doesn’t give his effort (like 1 off rebound in 27min and no effort), I’m forced to say get rid of Amare for a solid center

by KingofTempe on Jan 29, 2010 2:22 PM MST reply actions  

Amare is a terrific offensive player

Terrific. Outstanding. One of the top 10 in the league.

The problem is the Suns are still a phenomenal offensive team even w/o him (as evidenced by the last 30 games last season and 05/06). Nash has proven over the past decade that he can make offensive lemonade out of lemons. If he’s the PG of a team, they’re going to be good offensively. Unfortunately on defense the Suns are toast because of Nash. He just can’t do it. Whether it’s his size, strength, or effort (and I don’t think it’s effort), Nash is not a good defender.

So it makes sense to trade Amare, especially if we get a great defender back who is decent on offense (Iguodala, I’m looking your way). I say, find 4 terrific defenders to surround Nash and he’ll find a way to get some great offensive production out of them.

by atwater on Jan 29, 2010 2:28 PM MST reply actions  

we need big body defenders..can’t think of any though..Tyrus Thomas??

by KingofTempe on Jan 29, 2010 2:30 PM MST up reply actions  

I have the impression that Thomas is sort of the opposite of Stoudemire: a big man who defends but doesn’t score.

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:31 PM MST up reply actions  

i was inclined towards McDyess but I think we are done with experimenting with old guys (and of course no trade with Spurs please)

by KingofTempe on Jan 29, 2010 2:32 PM MST up reply actions  

reading Hollinger's assessments of players

on the ESPN player profiles under their PER stats…. he claims that Tyrus is a decent help defender and shot blocker, but terrible at on the ball defense. He’d certainly be an upgrade over Amare on the defensive end, but I think the Suns already have that player in Lou Amundson.

I think the Iguodalas, Rondos, and Tayshaun Prince’s are the kinds of defenders the Suns need.

by atwater on Jan 29, 2010 2:33 PM MST up reply actions  

What did the Suns get for trading away the pick that become Rajon Rondo again?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:33 PM MST up reply actions  

The pick that became Rudy Fernandez I think

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jan 29, 2010 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

What team is he playing for this year?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Haha

Portland in case you were serious

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:38 PM MST up reply actions  

Just making a point about the perceived cheapness of your owner :)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:39 PM MST up reply actions  

3 million dollars

and they shed Brian Grant’s contract.

Nothing. They got nothing. They could’ve had both Rondo and Iguodala the year before (but the traded that pick to Chicago).

To be fair, there’s no assurances that the Suns would’ve picked Rondo had they kept that draft pick. They picked him on behalf of the Celtics. But still… yeah… terrible.

by atwater on Jan 29, 2010 2:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Isn’t that one of the deals people use to point to Sarver and cheapness?

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:37 PM MST up reply actions  

yes.

yes it is. Sarver sucks. I think everyone on this thread concurs.

by atwater on Jan 29, 2010 2:37 PM MST up reply actions  

oh not to mention

they traded their 1st round pick in 04 to the bulls for like luc longely or somebody. so ya, that turned into loul deng.

by blank_38 on Jan 29, 2010 2:58 PM MST up reply actions  

And as much as i LOVED when the raptors picked Araujo so the sixers could get Iguodala – the Bulls took the better player (at the time, injuries are hard to project) in Luol Deng

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:38 PM MST up reply actions  

We had the chance to draft Iguadala...

That’s another ding on the FO

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:38 PM MST up reply actions  

at #5 deng would have been the better pick though :) Trust me – they were my two hopes for the sixers

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:39 PM MST up reply actions  

in the draft, deng was a better prospect than Iguodala – yes he was – you’re looking at hindight and their careers – 100% healthy – Deng is better than Iguodala because he has better shooting range

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:51 PM MST up reply actions  

thats a load

iggy can create off the dribble, he averages 5+ assists a game

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 29, 2010 2:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Not sure what that has to do with range, i’m a sixers fan, i was pro iguodala on the sixers before he even declared, but he is terrible from the outside – assists aren’t shooting – they’re different things…and you’re looking through the prism of how they played in the NBA and Dengs injury history.

Deng was a consensus BETTER DRAFT PICK than Iguodala at the time…

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:55 PM MST up reply actions  

The point wasn’t now – it was draft night – no one said the bulls made a mistake drafting deng – and iguodala went 4 picks later

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:52 PM MST up reply actions  

You're right.

At the time, I thought Deng was a fantastic prospect. I also really liked Iguodala, but Deng was pretty hyped. It’s too bad about the injuries.

But as for now, I would MUCH rather have Iguodala. Josh Smith, Iguodala, and James Harden are 3 players I would love to see don a Suns uniform.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Jan 30, 2010 1:45 AM MST up reply actions  

I vote for Igg then Deng

"Stop denying the inevitable, the time has come to rebuild"
rgreyslak@gmail.com twitter @rgreyslak

by RGreyslak on Jan 29, 2010 2:57 PM MST up reply actions  

I love reading Hollinger’s player analyses, but I don’t read them anymore, because theyt’re no longer free.

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree that it’s about the money. If Amare Stoudemire were humble enough to accept that a player with his weaknesses is worth probably only $10-15 million a year, I would not want him to go. I don’t very badly want him to go now, because the Dallas game proved that it’s possible for other players to step up and because I’m afraid of the Suns being swindled.

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:30 PM MST reply actions  

He’s worth what the market will pay him.

Lots of teams with cap room are going to miss on lebron and wade and bosh – which means the GM’s will probably over spend on the ‘second tier’ – and guys like Amare and Lee will get contracts bigger than what they’re worth

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:32 PM MST up reply actions  

I haven’t read The Wealth of Nations yet, but doesn’t “he’s worth what the market will pay him” ignore human stupidity? If James Dolan offered Lou Amundson a $100 million contract, would Amundson be worth that much?

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

To the knicks.

And don’t forget the ‘yankees/red sox’ conundrum.

Once you have a second team involved in a bidding war – a player is going to get over paid – because they don’t want the other team to ‘beat them’

The rules of economics don’t really apply to basketball because of the ‘unique commodity’ syndrome…you can’t pay for ANOTHER amar’e or a ANOTHER Nash – there’s only one.

Plus – salary caps violate capitalism anyway

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 2:50 PM MST up reply actions  

Love/Hate

Great piece. I think you nailed it on the head. I know that is alot of how I have been feeling. By knowing that he may be leaving I am looking for more reasons why. I have been a long term Suns fan though, and Suns fans do not like Prima Donnas. I think we can all agree that Amare is one. I hear his comments and his tweets and such and find it hard to believe he will ever be a leader. Not only does a leader not demand max money he is willing to take less so that the team can really succeed. This has never been the case, he has always asked for maximum money, and how much money do you really need. He was signed as a max player a few years ago and has missed 1.5 years does that make his per game pay on par with max players. I want to point out that I would love to have Amare around forever, but not at max money. He is not even playing selfishly in order to have the stats to even ask for that. His numbers are down from his best years. You would think in a contract year he would be tearing it up, but not even close. The Bible says “you hate the sin, but love the sinner”. This sums up my thoughts on Amare. Amazing, amazing player, but doesn’t play the game for the right reasons.

by Suns Fan For Life on Jan 29, 2010 2:32 PM MST reply actions  

I agree with everything you said

nice

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:40 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't hate Amar'e- he is single-handedly the reason i follow the NBA now

I hadn’t followed the NBA for ten years since i moved to the UK and completely by chance i got home from holiday in the middle of the night and caught the 2008 All-star game when amar’e led the west comeback. That got me back into supporting the NBA.

As of right now? Amar’e is great as a fan favourite and fantastic offensive player (other than the turnovers). BUT he thinks he is a max contract/franchise player and therefore he needs to be considered and compared against other max-contract guys like Tim Duncan (and to a lesser extent Pau Gasol). Timmy and Pau both aren’t as physically gifted as Amar’e but both are much better post defenders (Pau’s defensive rating doesn’t convince me, look at his defense of Dwight Howard in the finals and tell me that STAT could do that). They are both also much better rebounders than STAT, Pau might average the same number of boards as Amar’e but he plays fewer minutes and Andrew Bynum is a much better rebounder than Frye so that will also make a difference.

So there we go, as for Amar’e becoming a scapegoat for our recent troubles i will admit that i have become dissillusioned with his effort in the last few games (only one rebound in 3 quaters last night) but i will also admit that he was our best player for much of december when he was averaging 20-10, and that also showed me that he CAN rebound double digits consistently when he puts his mind to it.

I do think he should be traded but not because i blame him for our struggles but because i don’t think he’s worth $20million a year, i think its too late to be gambling on potential, and i definitely don’t want to be stuck with a huge contract for an underperforming player like Philly are with Elton Brand.

by DaveJD on Jan 29, 2010 2:36 PM MST reply actions  

You see this is what I'm talking about

Level-headed criticism where we recognize his value.

I like this because we can all agree that we don’t think he’s Max money @ 20 Mil (which I don’t think he is either) but at the same time we can respect the player and not point every negative finger we hold in his direction.

With regards to the STAT v. Howard comment – I think STAT has more than on one occasion held his own quite well against Howard. What Amare can do is get Howard into foul trouble too – he can do that better than Pau.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:44 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah but foul trouble works both ways

when amar’e gets in fould trouble he becomes even more passive on defense.

by DaveJD on Jan 29, 2010 2:58 PM MST up reply actions  

I now think there will be no trade…

by species8473 on Jan 29, 2010 2:43 PM MST reply actions  

haha +1

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 2:44 PM MST up reply actions  

If anything that defensive stat just proves how poor a defender Gasol is

Where do you find that and where does he rate against other players in defensive efficiency

by Superelkman on Jan 29, 2010 2:54 PM MST reply actions  

Basketball-Reference.com

It’s in the ‘advanced statistics’ category. You can run the comparisons yourself – it takes a little work.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 29, 2010 3:04 PM MST up reply actions  

did everyone know that?

amar’e has been in 2 transactions?

we traded his 9h overall pick to orlando for anfernee hardaway, and then got him back for bo outlaw and vinny del negro. geez that couldve been scary…

by blank_38 on Jan 29, 2010 3:05 PM MST reply actions  

According to Ric Bucher today on twitter the Cavs are out of Iguodala because they can’t offer enough which I found fascinating. He mentioned three teams that could offer more than the Cavs, Mavericks, Suns and Portland (which is a new suitor I never heard mentioned before today)

It’s Ric Bucher – but I guess there’s a demand for Iguodala

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 6:27 PM MST reply actions  

would the 76ers

take JRich for him for salary relief?

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Jan 29, 2010 6:35 PM MST up reply actions  

The sixers are currently over the projected luxury tax number for 2011 – Richardson doesn’t help that number all that much.

And the talent exchange isn’t fairt either I don’t think…if I have to watch Jason Richardson on the sixers for 18 months I’d rather they keep Iguodala and continue to suck :)

A sixers suns deal starts with Iguodala and Amar’e

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 6:38 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah but he won’t get them under trhe tax for 2011 – which is the immediatre need – they want under the tax for 2011 – they only offered andre miller a one year deal cause of the 2011 luxury tax.

Plus – Iguodala is worth more than just J-Rich :)

And you know it :)

by jemagee on Jan 29, 2010 6:43 PM MST up reply actions  

A great way to frame the discussion

I think that in this time of uncertainty regarding Amare, it is important to remember that Amare is in fact a great basketball player. We can certainly discuss ad nauseum his weaknesses, but I agree with your basic premise of reflection on his positives.

To that end, I submit, Amare is a great basketball player, and an excellent person. He is an excellent role-model, has struggled throughout his childhood and endured worse hardships than likely many of us here, and has excelled as both a player and person. I admire his ability to work hard enough to recover from devastating injuries, his desire to help others (remember his charitable efforts both domestically and in war-ravaged regions such as Sierra Leone), and his overall demeanor throughout this whole process.

I understand his frustration and can certainly empathize with him. He has never been in trouble, has certainly proven his resiliance, and overall, has handled himself with class.

I know that his desire to be a ‘max’ player is likely untenable. I do not want to pay him $20 million a year, either. However, certainly worse people have been paid as such.

If Amare is traded, I will forever wish him well, and continue to root for him, both as a player and person. Trading Amare may be the benefit of the Suns in either the short and long term, but I will always treasure his value to the Suns and to my basketball fandom.

by ArizonaCactus on Jan 29, 2010 8:37 PM MST reply actions  

Great comment

I feel the same way

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Jan 31, 2010 6:07 PM MST up reply actions  

Really wished that Amare critics can take note of the following points:

1] Why should Amare play hard for Kerr and Sarver who are not interested in making the play-offs? Why else would they be indulging on trade offers mid-season during a time when the Suns are slumping because other teams have adjusted to Gentry’s playbook?

2] Amare averaged 20-10 for a stretch of 10 games until talks began to stall with his contract and news about him being shopped by the Suns around the league became public news. Why would Amare play his heart out for Kerr or Sarver who have clearly turned their backs on him, and it’s not for the first time?

3] Amare played great even after his recent injury and after being almost traded to Golden States, with a better showing of defense than before this season.

4] While Amare’s critics have chosen to make hay about his defense for wanting to be a franchise player, they have opted to refrain from mentioning that the Sun’s franchise player plays no defense and is hailed for being a savior for purely his offensive abilities.

I also want to say that If the Suns want to develop younger players, don’t expect every game will be won as if they are played by Suns veterans who are no longer on the team. A youth movement normally implies a lottery season and this season is one we cannot tank because we lack a pick.

Trying to trade our best offensive weapon clearly meant we have given up on this season and you still expect every Suns players to play their best? And from what I can see, none of the so-called veterans seem to be bringing their A-games these days. They look tired, old and dispirited with all the nonsense the management is indulging.

And the trade mongers are just making things worse.

by magenta on Jan 30, 2010 6:28 AM MST reply actions  

Not that I agree with teh critics but

4] While Amare’s critics have chosen to make hay about his defense for wanting to be a franchise player, they have opted to refrain from mentioning that the Sun’s franchise player plays no defense and is hailed for being a savior for purely his offensive abilities.

But the Sun’s franchise player isn’t paid as much and makes everyone better, most especially Amare.

I also don’t think it’s fair to compare Amare and Gasol’s numbers especially for these two reasons: (1) latter isn’t the primary banana of the Lakers; whereas, Amare should be for the Suns given Steve’s age; and (2) Steve has something to do with Amare’s numbers.

I agree with the article that it’s about expectations. I remember the days when Amare would go for 40 and a minimum of 25/30. With our recent problems, I think it’s because Amare fails to compensate for his lacking in defense with his offense. He turns the ballover at crucial and clutch situations.

by Azrael on Jan 30, 2010 8:37 AM MST up reply actions  

Come on be reasonable

You only remember 1 or 2 times when Amare turned the ball over in crucial situations, I can recall Nash doing it 20+ times and most of those were this season.

You will be eating your words when Amare’s numbers are up on a different team, Nash runs the pick and roll perfectly but dont think for a second with all of the PG position in the NBA there isn’t another suiting PG that could run it as effectively as Nash. Amare will still get his numbers and I guarantee with some help in the lane rebounding his numbers will be up there as well!

Amare may not be the best defensive PF in the league but who cares because even against Tim Duncan Amare put up bigger point totals than him every game, thus more than neutralizing Timmy’s production. So is Tim Duncan a bad ball defender because Amare beat the piss out of him every single game? Now I will give you the argument that his help D should be better and rotations quicker, but to say he is an overall bad defender is crazy who is a better defensive PF that puts up better numbers night in and night out than Amare?

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 30, 2010 10:00 AM MST up reply actions  

Its not just defense against your own man thats important.

Sure, every player should be accountable for defending their own man but guys like Tim Duncan, Dwight Howard, Kevin Garnett/Kendrick Perkins, Pau Gasol/Andrew Bynum, also serve as a last line of defense for when opposing players get by their own man. Basketball is a team game and your teamates have to make up for your deficiencies. Amar’e might outscore his opposing PF every game but does he outrebound them? those rebounds give the other team extra scoring opportunites. What about blocking/altering shots on help D? Amar’e gets less than a block a game so other teams aren’t worried about driving the lane against him. All these things add up and does amar’e get more points than that?

by DaveJD on Jan 30, 2010 10:20 AM MST up reply actions  

Get real

Amare is a PF playing C his entire career. He is not a shot blocker, not many PF are, Timmy is not a PF either. My point was and apparently you overlooked it, that Amare gives the Suns a bettter + than Timmy does for SA, sure I would love him to give me a frontline presence but bottom line is he is a skinny kid and ultimately we have to beat the Spurs in the playoffs, and Amare gives me a better + than Timmy does. Give me a decent center LIKE TIMMMY HAS COUPLED WITH HIM and then talk to me DaveJD and stop hating, I can give you a list of starting on the ball defenders at PF that are worse than Amare giving you 10 points a game.

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 31, 2010 12:06 AM MST up reply actions  

+ 1

Please take a look at Z Bo and Al Jefferson who average almost 20-10. Then ask yourself whether they play D and whether they can also run with the suns while averaging the same stats

>>The Suns play at an abnormally fast pace and asking Amare to play offense and defence for the entire game with or without rehabbing from an injury is asking a bit too much <<

by magenta on Jan 31, 2010 8:20 AM MST up reply actions  

I can't count the number of Nash heroics

1.) Nash isn’t asking for a max contract. The dude is 36 and is still carrying Phoenix. Nash has also been effective in clutch situations because of his reputation and is options. With Amare, his offense hasn’t been as effective this season as his post-micro fracture surgery averages.

2.) Funny you give so much weight to “bigger points” than Timmy every game. This is not reasonable at all because SAS runs a different system and a good post-game with Duncan.

Remember the 06-07 playoffs? Where Duncan’s postgame neutralised Kurt Thomas (and has been killing Amare every year)? The Suns needed to double team and this gave big games to all the other SAS players. Sure, Amare can put up big numbers against Duncan (04-05 most especially) but what is the overall team effect? Has it been good? Has it translated to more wins vs the Spurs? Duncan makes everyone better in assist, passing, scoring, and rebounding. I don’t think there should be a comparison between the two at all. And btw, Amare has been stoppable this year (But sure, he came from an injury).

Again, every position is tentative until new evidences are found. I will wait and hope for Amare to give big numbers. Until then, it is reasonable to doubt him.

by Azrael on Jan 31, 2010 10:39 AM MST up reply actions  

You also need to count a few things against Nash

Kindly give your Nash idolatry a rest. Or remember how Nash mailed it in in the must-win last game against Dallas. His lack of effort and defence affected everybody on the Suns. Count that time against Nash, if you at least want to appear to be fair.

Nash does not ask for a max contract because he knows he won’t get it because of his health and age issues. In this respect, he’s smarter than Amare. In return, Nash is the face of this franchise and is the player with the most control over personnel issues. This team is constructed to please Nash and his preferred way of playing i.e. all offense and no defence. If this team does not work out, it’s on Nash who’s the face of this franchise.

Whatever issues you have against Amare, it’s the same with Nash i.e. no defence, health issues etc.

The fact that you do not count these issues against Nash seems to imply your wish or desire to scapegoat or blame Amare for the team’s less than stellar performance.

by magenta on Jan 31, 2010 4:50 PM MST up reply actions  

Do remember to count the number of Amare heroics at least for this year

To be really fair, remember to count these points as well. And I don’t expect your to remember Amare’s heroics in past season.

1] Amare makes everyone else on the team better i.e. more assists for Nash as Amare is a hyper efficient scoring machine, draws attention at the post or the rim to provide spacing for our 3-pointers, does help out in defense this season and is still showing his rebounding ability until the trade talks became public.

2] Amare has came back from injury and played better defence than before, until Suns management and fans started talking about trading him.

3] Amare has averaged 20-10 for over 10 games before Suns tried to shop him and he even made it to the All-Stars game as the starting centre in the stacked West.

4] Amare is the most efficient scoring machine in the Suns team and his scoring is the only thing standing between a blow-out and a win when our 3-balls don’t fall the way we want.

by magenta on Jan 31, 2010 4:51 PM MST up reply actions  

First is you have an incomplete take on Amare’s hyperefficient scoring.

1.) How does Amare make everyone better if you’re a hyperefficient scorer? Does giving Nash more assist makes everyone better?

Spacing for 3-point shooters? I agree to this. But I think this has something to do more with Nash than Amare. My explanation is below.

2.) You can’t take a look at these things as if it’s one sided (i.e. Amare is a hyperefficient scorer). Nash also has contributed to this by being a very good passer. This is a dialectic relationship between the two players and not as one sided as you said it is (i.e. Amare is a hyper efficient scorer). To prove your point, you need some statistics to show that Amare is a very efficient scorer even WITHOUT Nash. Now, I’m not sure about the numbers, but I’m open to mistakes. Nash, on the other hand, has proven from time to time that he can make people better—Diaw, Marion, R. Lopez, Dragic, Barbosa.

So in the debate of who contributes more to the hyperefficient scoring, I think Nash deserves more credit because of the evidences laid out. Now, unless you show that Amare can be hyperefficient even without Nash (other point guards), then I’m more inclined to say that Nash has more to do with this than Amare. Note that I’m not discouting Amare’s skills, but break the vague analysis (Amare makes Nash better, vice versa) of their dynamics.

by Azrael on Jan 31, 2010 5:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Please read what I wrote carefully on how Amare helps the team

as compared to the ridiculous view that he didn’t.

Kindly refer to the few games that Nash missed after Gentry took over last season. Stat remains a monster offensively. Please also take note of the season where Diaw took over Nash becos of his injury in his second MVP run. Stat still played like Stat.

1] Nash gets his high assists numbers not just because of the fast pace but because of Amare’s hyper efficient scoring around the rim or the mid-jumper. If you think Nash can keep to the same level of assists without Amare on the team, you must love the fact that our team will have to gamble on the 3 ball every night.

2] Because Amare is so hyper-efficient near the rim or the middle range, he helps provide spacing for our 3-point shooters. Without him, I seriously do not think that Frye or Louis will get the space or opportunities to make as many 3-point shots.

3] In terms of efficiency, I really prefer not to dwell on Nash’s turnovers as well as his defence because it’s a lot worse than Amare and Nash is the face of this team.

If you can’t accept these points, let’s just leave it as that.

by magenta on Jan 31, 2010 10:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Stat put up the same offensive numbers in terms of points, but his efficiency went down dramatically

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 12:28 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t blame Nash for focusing on his kind of offense. I think this has something more to do with personnel issues—the inability or unavailability of reasonable scorers but good defenders, such as Bell, Marion, and Diaw.

Just because Nash does not ask for a max contract (and just because he knew he wasn’t going to get it) does not discount the effect of the money. You can’t take a look at intentions alone, but also the implications on the team and the monetary issues.

by Azrael on Jan 31, 2010 5:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Don't forget Nash held our team ransom in the offseason, not Amare.

… Unless they made the personnel changes he wanted i.e. trade Shaq.

He was also the team member who had the most say in personel decisions like trading Marion.

You can’t look at the money along to criticise a player.

You need to look at where he’s taking the team.

We are a glass cannon by Nash’s demands in the off season. Don’t blame Amare for the way our team is losing, man.

by magenta on Jan 31, 2010 10:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Nash had the most say in trading Marion?

Come on man…at least try to back this stuff up.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 12:27 PM MST up reply actions  

I already did that here last year. It was all over the papers that Nash...

was tired of managing Marion’s ego and he was one of 2 players consulted on trading Marion. The other was Amare.

Nash was also holding our team ransom until they made personnel changes to suit his game and demands in our off-season.

Kindly read my posts from last year on this issue.

Btw, I remember when I do bring out stats, I got confronted from conspiracy theories from columnists on how the stats are distorted lol

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 4:55 PM MST up reply actions  

You can google for more proof that Nash approved the Marion trade

This was illustrated when Amare Stoudemire phoned his owner saying that he wanted Shaq in a Suns uniform. Nash, who benefited the most from Shawn’s presence, approved the trade.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/19827-suns-spurs-steve-nashs-weaknesses-amplified-without-shawn-marion

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 4:59 PM MST up reply actions  

"1] Why should Amare play hard for Kerr and Sarver who are not interested in making the play-offs?"

Umm…because we’re paying him 10+ million dollars to do so? It’s his JOB!

4) We “make hay” about Amare’s defense because he tooted his own horn about his defense! You can’t say that you want to be like Ron Artest on defense and then not expect to get any flak when you don’t really improve much at all.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 12:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare was discouraged by the Suns intention to blow things up and tank the season.

Remember to back up your points too

My points are reflected with these quotes from Amare and Dudley that the trade talks are affecting the team performance:

"I know about the rumors. I know what teams are looking. I know what teams want me," Stoudemire said. "I pretty much know everything — I know what’s going on. I’m definitely in the loop on what’s happening."

For outside observers, what’s happening is very confusing. The Suns have clearly taken a step back, but if shaking up the roster is the solution as opposed to riding things out, shouldn’t moving the 26-year-old franchise cornerstone be the absolute last resort?

You’d think so, but as Stoudemire sees it, the Suns are motivated as much by their bottom-line as they are putting the best team on the floor. "I think it’s all about what they want to do and what they’re trying to do financially," he said. "I think their main focus is their financial intake."

http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/09/stoudemire-speaks-out-about-trade-rumors/

"Stoudemire admitted the swirling trade rumors have affected his play. "I feel like the confidence in me is not quite there with them for them to want to shop me around so much," he said."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/chris_mannix/02/01/rankings2/index.html

Amar’e Stoudemire led the Suns with 25 points and 12 rebounds, getting scores on two key trips before Hill’s shots and after four Suns misses. The Suns centers, Channing Frye and Robin Lopez, had 38 points and 12 rebounds.

“I don’t think people are on edge as they were before,” Dudley said. “I don’t know if it was trade rumors or pressure. It’s nice to get back on our feet.”

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2010/02/01/20100201suns-hornets.html

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:12 PM MST up reply actions  

This is really

one of the best discussions I’ve seen about Amare….fantastic example of smart, fan generated conversation.

Well done

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Jan 30, 2010 10:07 AM MST reply actions  

Talking to Suns fans who play the double d with Nash and Amare

@ SSOHOWARD

Thanks for bringing up the double standard that I absolutely hate about some of the fans here with their scapegoat mentality towards this team.

1] Nash has more turnovers, plays worse defense and is more of a health risk than Amare. However, he gets free pass from most of the fans here who keeps raising the very same issues about Amare.

2] Nash is the leader of our team, not Amare, and he sets the example for the team. I will never forget how Nash mailed it in in the must-win game against Dallas (last game they played) last season and how it affected everyone else like LB who stopped chasing loose balls.

2] Nash is the face of this franchise and has power than any other player on the team on personnel decisions. Whether he takes less money than Marion and Amare does not not change this fact.

3] Properly motivated, Amare brings it to the court. However, most Suns fans and management only knows how to rain on his parade. No one in their right mind wants to play for an unappreciative fan base and a penny pinching management

Many Suns fans here just throw in the towel when the going’s back, find scape goats and petition to trade them. Kindly take note of how fans from other teams like Celtics stick with their players through thick and thin.

Those are fans worth playing hard for. Suns fans not so much…

by magenta on Jan 30, 2010 9:36 PM MST reply actions  

I love what you have to say magenta

My post to ungrateful Suns fans:

First and foremost Amare IS a leader, that kid does more for Phoenix than most players can conceive possible. Great example… I live in Tampa Florida and AMARE made it a point to MEET and GREET every single one of us Suns fans in Orlando when they played in Orlando, Nash had us taken care of but AMARE made sure we were comfortable and appreciated. He loves us and loves it in Phoenix (and I am very glad).

now I know I will get the same argument about him being loved conditionally only if he rebounds………… blah blah blah I hope those of you who have actually played this game (and who are presenc-ses in the lane) realize (and I know you do) how hard AMARE has it; being beat the F up being the only dude who has a presense on the glass on the entire Suns team. Lou and Hill might crash occasionally but my boy Amare is taking a beating (3 asses on him) every time a shot is put up. Ouch maybe he needs some McDonalds on a daily basis like Sir Charles did to get that fat great rebounding ass.

Yes he has been slaking the last 5 games, if I was UNDERAPPRECIATED I would too, but give him a buddy in the paint on D and I guarantee we can do damage come playoffs.

by SSOHOWARD on Jan 31, 2010 12:25 AM MST up reply actions  

Do you have any stats to back up your "nash plays worse defense" than Amare claim?

2) What Dallas game are you referring to?
3) Okay…?
4)“When properly motivated”…he’s a 27 year old grown-@ss man. Do we need to coddle his ego constantly for him to play well? That’s not a max player.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 12:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Why play hard for the team if we want to blow it up and risk tanking the season?

I’m going to try to explain this to you again. You won’t get players playing their best when the team’s management is shopping him publicly and talking about blowing up the team, instead of talking about making the play-offs.

You’d think so, but as Stoudemire sees it, the Suns are motivated as much by their bottom-line as they are putting the best team on the floor. “I think it’s all about what they want to do and what they’re trying to do financially,” he said. “I think their main focus is their financial intake.”

http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/09/stoudemire-speaks-out-about-trade-rumors/

“Stoudemire admitted the swirling trade rumors have affected his play. “I feel like the confidence in me is not quite there with them for them to want to shop me around so much,” he said."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/chris_mannix/02/01/rankings2/index.html

Last game in the regular season against Dallas when Jason Kidd has a career night. No one here was pleased with Nash’s lack of effort.

Google it because iyou need to back up your points as well : >

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:16 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare makes our players better too, including Nash

1] Nash gets his high assists numbers not just because of the fast pace but because of Amare’s hyper efficient scoring around the rim or the mid-jumper. If you think Nash can keep to the same level of assists without Amare on the team, you must love the fact that our team will have to gamble on the 3 ball every night.

2] Because Amare is so hyper-efficient near the rim or the middle range, he helps provide spacing for our 3-point shooters. Without him, I seriously do not think that Frye or Louis will get the space or opportunities to make as many 3-point shots.

3] Playing our young talent for the 3rd quarter or the 4th is a lot less risky than playing them for all 4 quarters. Subbing them in when starters on both teams are tired makes sense. However, that does not mean Dragic can replace Nash on any night or Lous replace Amare for one entire game. Veteran teams will make an adjustment to rookies playing with just energy and enthusiasm if they have all 4 quarters to make adjustments.

4] We need a trade that will bring us someone who rebounds and scores at will at the 4 or the 5. Kindly take note that people who fit that bill like Z-bo or Al Jefferson does not play better D than Amare, simply because no one has the energy to do everything. Dwight is known for for his defense and rebounding but he doesn’t put up big numbers offensive every night. But does that mean Dwight is a bad offensive player?

5] Amare is playing after a major surgery and he showed he could play well until the trade rumours started, which definitely affected his passion to play hard every night. Compare his performance and speed of recovery to people like Garnett and Al Jefferson and you can tell that Amare peaks and recovers faster than they do.

Seriously do you all really know the value of the person you are scapegoating, discouraging and wanting to trade?

I kept wondering why I even bother following what the Suns do these days because it’s bloody rerun for the last 3 seasons which feature rabid irrational trade mongering and scapegoating, management with no balls or long term strategy and a team concept that will live or die with Nash who is 35.

Did you all seriously think this season will end well?

We will not make the play-offs without Amare and we have no picks for this season even if we intentionally tank.

If you are a real Suns fan, you should support this team even if they don’t make it past he first round simply because the team tried their best. That’s what fans do.

Anything else, you are not a real Suns fan. You are a just bloody big disappointment.

For people with brains, they will know that Kerr and Sarver clearly do not want Amare to “opt-in” to his last year and stay with the Suns, which is why they are making it clear they want him to leave. This so-called trade is a salary dump, nothing more.

So keep championing stupid trade rumours or ideas, because you are dancing and hopping to the 2 great geniuses running the Suns.

Oh yeah, I forgot that most of us here consider ourselves geniuses. That excludes morons like myself who still remains a fan of the Suns even with the rampant stupidity that passes for Suns’ culture these days.

by magenta on Jan 30, 2010 9:52 PM MST reply actions  

Amares Defensive Value + Offensive Value this year

http://basketballvalue.com/teamplayers.php?year=2009-2010&team=PHX

If you look at how many points the Suns give up per 100 possessions with Amare on the the court vs. with him off the court it will show you how poor of a defender Amare is.

The Suns give up 4.27 more points per 100 possessions with Amare on the court. Worst on the team. This is what everyone knew that he is a liability as a defender.

BUT… even more shocking is that the Suns are better on offense with him on the bench this year. They average .05 more points per 100 possessions with him on the bench then when he is playing. Very interesting stuff.

by Superelkman on Jan 31, 2010 6:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare's value lies in the 10-game stretch where he averaged 20-10

Before the Suns let him know they don’t want him by shopping him openly and the fans started throwing him under the bus.

His offensive and defensive impact on the team are a lot more illuminating than what Amare’s critics are able to acknowledge

Let’s not do cherrypicking of stats, shall we?

by magenta on Jan 31, 2010 10:05 PM MST reply actions  

You clearly do not know what cherrypicking means then…

I agree that you can’t judge a player completely through objective means because that doesn’t tell the whole story but come on man those stats do tell something about his game and prove my point that he is a guy who gets his numbers and doesn’t make his teammates better.

by Superelkman on Feb 1, 2010 8:14 AM MST up reply actions  

If you follow the games, you know Amare makes our team better in at least 2 ways

1] Nash gets his high assists numbers not just because of the fast pace but because of Amare’s hyper efficient scoring around the rim or the mid-jumper. If you think Nash can keep to the same level of assists without Amare on the team, you must love the fact that our team will have to gamble on the 3 ball every night.

2] Because Amare is so hyper-efficient near the rim or the middle range, he helps provide spacing for our 3-point shooters. Without him, I seriously do not think that Frye or Louis will get the space or opportunities to make as many 3-point shots.

by magenta on Feb 1, 2010 4:52 PM MST up reply actions  

1) Nash gets assists because he is the best offensive point guard in the game. Start Earl Clark and run the pick and roll with him and Nash 10 times a game and even he is putting up Amare like numbers. All it takes it athleticism and Nash to put up good numbers in this offense.

2) Yes. Nash penetrates and kicks to these guys way more often then Stat finds them. Stat rarely sets up guys for 3’s. He either catches off the pick and roll and attacks right away or faces up and looks to score.

by Superelkman on Feb 2, 2010 12:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Nash had similar assist numbers in 05/06 without Amare

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 12:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Nash is still getting high assists numbers due to Amare's hyper efficient scoring

Kindly take note of how streaky our shooters are in our games lately but Nash’s assists have not gone down much. That’s due to Amare.

Amare is often double or triple teamed – that’s how he provides spacing.

Without Amare, we have no presence in the paint and none of our shooters will be left open.

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:20 PM MST up reply actions  

w/o Amare we won't have a post presence

I agree with you, but the entire 05/06 season showed that Nash doesn’t need Amare for his assist totals.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 9:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare is keeping Nash assists numbers consistent this season

Even though J Rich and LB is not shooting well, That’s my point.

Kindly let me know whether Nash needed Amare in the other seasons, instead of just 2005/2006.

Be fair. Don’t cherry pick or play favourites, ok?

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 10:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I have no idea why we're even talking about this?

In what way does the amount of assists Steve Nash gets matter to how important Amare Stoudemire is to this franchise?

His “hyper efficient” scoring doesn’t make Steve Nash a better passer. Sure, it ensures that Nash gets the assist (more often than not), but how does it matter if Steve Nash gets the assist or if JRich throws a lob to Amare and he throws it down? Heck, what if Robin throws a sneaky pass into the post and Amare scores?

The point I’m trying to make is: yes, Amare is a hyper efficient scorer, but no, chalking the assist up to Steve Nash doesn’t matter. It’s still two points on the board, and then we still have to travel down to the other end of the floor and play defense, where Amare has been a bit lackadaisical for just about his whole career.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 4, 2010 4:35 PM MST up reply actions  

So, you pick out a 10 game stretch where he averaged 20-10...

…and then you say “let’s not do cherrypicking of stats, shall we?”

What?

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 12:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Not to mention

he’s averaged 20-10 the last two games, when the trade talk has been at its peak.

But you know, “distorted numbers.”

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 4:59 PM MST up reply actions  

I picked the 10 game stretch when he was not bothered by trade rumours

Read for yourself the comments from our players lol

"Stoudemire admitted the swirling trade rumors have affected his play. "I feel like the confidence in me is not quite there with them for them to want to shop me around so much," he said."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/chris_mannix/02/01/rankings2/index.html

Amar’e Stoudemire led the Suns with 25 points and 12 rebounds, getting scores on two key trips before Hill’s shots and after four Suns misses. The Suns centers, Channing Frye and Robin Lopez, had 38 points and 12 rebounds.

“I don’t think people are on edge as they were before,” Dudley said. “I don’t know if it was trade rumors or pressure. It’s nice to get back on our feet.”

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2010/02/01/20100201suns-hornets.html

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes, yes.

You’ve posted the comments about 15 times. I’ve seen them. Repeatedly. There’s a larger point beyond them that has to be addressed at some point.

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 7:52 PM MST up reply actions  

Actually,

let me go ahead and spell that out to avoid confusion. Despite these swirling trade rumors you’ve been so keen to point out, Amare has picked it up the past two games with a couple of his best outings on the year. It’s not like the trade rumors have gone away, so what other explanations are there? Might it be that he was benched for an entire fourth quarter just before that because of his shoddy play?

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 7:56 PM MST up reply actions  

He may be auditioning for other teams as he has gotten over trade rumours

… as Dudley implies in this quote after their last game:

Amar’e Stoudemire led the Suns with 25 points and 12 rebounds, getting scores on two key trips before Hill’s shots and after four Suns misses. The Suns centers, Channing Frye and Robin Lopez, had 38 points and 12 rebounds.

"I don’t think people are on edge as they were before," Dudley said. "I don’t know if it was trade rumors or pressure. It’s nice to get back on our feet."

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/suns/articles/2010/02/01/20100201suns-hornets.html

Sorry for posting the same links but I’m trying to rebut the same comments that comes with zero proof and 100% bias.

Kindly pass the same judgement on Nash as on Amare and bear in mind that Nash is the face of our team and he is the player with most say over the personnel and make-up of the team.

I have provided proof for this statement. I only ask my critics to do the same.

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 8:37 PM MST up reply actions  

So...

Your interpretation of a Jared Dudley quote is more proof than anything else? You understand the psyche of Amare Stoudemire?

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 10:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Dudley's quote shows us that trade talks are affecting the team.

It does not motivate our players to play better at all. And it is a cop-out to keep criticising them for bad play if they are the subject of relentless trade rumour mongering or shopping in the league.

by magenta on Feb 3, 2010 1:34 AM MST up reply actions  

But you just said

Amare was over those trade talks.

by Azreous on Feb 3, 2010 10:43 AM MST up reply actions  

I'M SO CONFUSED

To use your “fact checking” and no-bias technique, I’ll also point out that Jared Dudley said

“I don’t know if it was trade rumors or pressure. It’s nice to get back on our feet.”

He doesn’t know. He threw out the trade rumors thing as a possibility because that’s simply what’s going on in the news, regarding Phoenix. Before this road trip, it was losing, and because of the losing, it escalated to trade talks. Now that the team is winning again, the trade talks are beginning to subside (if only a minute amount).

It’s one quote, and it may be taken a bit out of context.

Now…can we get back to talking about Amare and what we think he’s worth/what we think we should do with him? All this “hyper efficient” this and “providing proof” that has got me confused.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 4, 2010 4:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Of course Amare's figures are distorted because he's not perfect like Nash...

… who gets a free pass on his health issues and crap defence from supporting fans.

Even after Nash held our team ransom in the off-season until we built the team to his personnel demands lol. Such idolatory from Nash fans, which I hesitate to call Suns fans, is truly breathtaking.

Other fans on teams support their star players even when they are in a slump or recovering from injuries.

Suns fans unfortunately only pick up on players who performed badly for a few games due to crap from the management and insists on scapegoating and trading them away as the cause of the team’s woes.

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:26 PM MST up reply actions  

A free pass?

Nash hasn’t missed the better part of two seasons with his “health issues.” He’s missed like 20 games as a Sun. Now, Amare is certainly less fragile than Nash (and his injuries are due to more freakish circumstances), but Nash doesn’t get as much grief for his health because he, you know, plays a lot still. Stunning concept, I know.

And Nash, one of the worst defensive point guards in the league, gets a “free pass” from fans for his defense? Not most of the reasonable ones around here.

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 7:54 PM MST up reply actions  

Not just health issues, but also super high turnover and defense issues

You can tell Nash gets a free pass every time his defence is not picked apart after every game like any other player in any Sun’s game.

Kindly do the “how’s playing hard on defence” analysis on every player for every Suns game from now on.

To Nash fans, stop comparing Jose Calderon to Nash, who is playing on a plus .500 team, won 2 MVPs and is the face of the franchise.

That’s a flimsy basis for defending Nash’s defense lol

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 8:41 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm not defending Nash's defense.

Which I already said. It’s terrible. One more time: Nash is a terrible defender. But apparently your reading comprehension precludes that point.

All I said was that your point about Nash being the worst defensive PG in the game is wrong. Period. And it is.

I’m done with this. Others can entertain this circular reasoning if they feel they have nothing else to do with their time.

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 10:32 PM MST up reply actions  

I only asked you not to use Jose as a knock-down strawman argument

Btw, Jose has also been badly injured in the last 2 seasons, if you truly have been following the raptors. Hence they got Jarret Jack for his position this season.

My argument is this Nash is an all-star, 2 times mvp and the face of our franchise. Why not compare him to a great PG instead, instead of an injured and broken down PG for the last 2 seasons?

Circular argument? Nah, I’m just calling out a strawman argument…

by magenta on Feb 3, 2010 1:37 AM MST up reply actions  

If you handled the ball as much as Nash does, you'd turn it over at a high rate too.

Want to know what the top ten of the “Most Likely to Commit at Turnover in the NBA (This Season)” superlative?

1. Monta Ellis, 4.1
2. Steve Nash, 3.9
3. Kevin Durant, 3.8
4. Gilbert Arenas, 3.7
5. LeBron James, 3.6
6. Dwight Howard, 3.6
7. Deron Williams, 3.3
8. Dwyane Wade, 3.2
9. Russell Westbrook, 3.2
10. Carmelo Anthony, 3.1

I did you a favor and bolded the ones who are All-Stars (aside from Nash) and there’s even an MVP sighting in there, too.

And want to know what? Their high turnover rates come from having the ball in their hands so much. It’s just what happens. The more possessions you run, the more chances there are to turn it over. It’s as simple as that.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 4, 2010 4:47 PM MST up reply actions  

Counter Argument

Only 2 of these folk are actual point guards (gilbert arenas is not)

And Monta Ellis is a very pretty ‘numbers’ fella – but he’s a detriment to his team

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 5:03 PM MST up reply actions  

What is a point guard, anyway?

LeBron started at the point for the first time since his rookie year in the last game. By my definition, a point guard is someone who handles and distributes the ball with regularity. Looks to set up other teammates, etc. You get the idea.

By that definition, Nash, Gilbert, LeBron, Deron, D-Wade, and Westbrook fit the bill. While some may look for their shot before others’ (like Monta, Gilbert, Melo…that just means they’re scoring first guards/wing players), that still doesn’t change the fact that they’re turnover prone.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 6, 2010 12:51 PM MST up reply actions  

You ignore my reply was to people who cherry pick his bad games during the trade rumous

That’s what I meant by not cherry picking stats.

Amare is also playing his way back from a major surgery

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Amar'e is BACK from major surgery

if you’ve been watching all season, you could literally see his improvement game to game towards the end of december. He averaged 20-10 in december, thats back. All he really had to do was get used to his goggles and restore his strength and conditioning. It wasn’t an injury like Al Jeffersons (ACL) which takes longer to return from.

by DaveJD on Feb 3, 2010 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

+1

The gradual improvement this year really has been great to see.

On that note – we still can’t figure out why Amare’s hands (turnovers) have taken 20 steps backwards… they used to be one of his best skills, now they are the bane of his complete rejuvenation and maybe the answer to his rebounding discrepancies. He’s just not securing the ball off the glass or down low in the post on offense.

Just evaluating STAT here from my couch.. I see a few things that contribute to his turnover woes.

  • Staying high with the ball: Just compare Amare and the last few weeks of Robin Lopez in the paint. When Lopez catches the ball 90% of the time he stays high – keeps the ball up and shoots or passes it. Amare will almost always bring the ball down to his waist or lower – this allows the D to slap at the ball with more strength.
  • His face-up Offense: Maybe this is related to the first point… but one of Amare’s strengths is to face up on bigger defenders and take them to the rim – but in doing this he once again brings the ball low and has it stripped and poked away an awful lot. I can only imagine what his shooting percentage and scoring numbers would be if could keep his turnover probs in check.
  • His Goggles? Is he really still adjusting? I don’t know if that’s it.
  • Is he really as recovered from his Eye injury as he says? Or is he masking a serious issue with his vision because of the money that is at stake in this his contract year?
  • Last – My conspiracy that really has no substance but I think is interesting: Does anyone else notice how STAT is constantly tugging at his fingers? And he has more tape on them then I’ve seen in recent years? Does he have a nagging injury that nobody knows about? Maybe I just didn’t notice his fidgets and habits before – but it seems like he’s messing with his hands more than usual after shots/dunks/fouls, etc.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Feb 3, 2010 3:03 PM MST up reply actions  

amare and nash

another way to think about this…amare and nash are very similar in that they both are offense first guys. they are the teams two most important players, and both are much better offensively than defensively. that puts the starters at a major defensive disadvantage and compounds the soft perception. either one of them alone and you might not notice it…but they are the two stars. although, you don’t typically hear anyone saying trade nash because he’s soft.

by unclebp on Feb 1, 2010 10:00 AM MST reply actions  

Offensively he is the best point guard in the league...

Amare is not even close to the top big in the league offensively. He just isn’t that great at creating his own shot. Also, that is a good point. Both of those two should probably not be on the court together because it is such a huge defensive disadvantage unless we can get a wing and post stopper to pair with them.

by Superelkman on Feb 1, 2010 1:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Also...

If you look at those stats the Suns are only a slight bit worse defensively with Nash on the floor. It is much bigger of a difference when Amare is on the floor.

by Superelkman on Feb 1, 2010 1:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Note that Nash assists remains high because of Amare, not our streaky shooters

Kindly also note that opposing guards tend to get career highs scoring against Suns and Nash last season i.e. B Roy’s 52.

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 8:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Right, because Nash was guarding Brandon Roy....

come on man

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 9:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Nash defense drags down our team - you forgot about the guards' career nights

I see double standard again.

So why can’t Amare play badly when Suns started shopping him openly this season?

Let’s not play favourites, shall we?

If we condemn Amare for defence after every game, makes sure every player gets it to let them know they are accountable. As the face of our franchise, Nash cannot be discounted with his crap D and turnover issues.

Fair?

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 10:29 PM MST up reply actions  

not if you are a max-worthy player

And if he is triple teamed that means he has two wide open guys to pass to so if that is the case he must also be the worst passing big man in the league

by Superelkman on Feb 3, 2010 3:24 PM MST up reply actions  

Nash handles the ball every posession... of course he is going to have a higher number of turnovers

Nashs TO% 13.1
Amares TO% 12.8

Nash is way better at taking care of the ball considering he touches every position he is in the game.

Plus if you look at the Suns adjusted defensive +/- when Stat and Nash are on the floor you will see Stat is our worst defender based on that stat and while Nash is bad he is not nearly as bad as Stat or as bad as people think he is. Seriously, I think people think he is a bad defender because one, they play at a high pace and thus more points are scored in general and two he is white.

by Superelkman on Feb 3, 2010 3:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare is among the top big offensively while Nash is the worst PG defensively

Amare also plays average or above average defence when motivated as he has been in the first 2 months of this season before trade talks started. There is ZERO upside to Nash’s health and defensive games in comparison

Amare also shoots the ball almost as well as Dirk and finishes around the rim as good as anyone else. If you can’t admit that, you don’t follow the games closely.

The problem with Amare right now is contained in this quote:

“I know about the rumors. I know what teams are looking. I know what teams want me,” Stoudemire said. “I pretty much know everything — I know what’s going on. I’m definitely in the loop on what’s happening.”

For outside observers, what’s happening is very confusing. The Suns have clearly taken a step back, but if shaking up the roster is the solution as opposed to riding things out, shouldn’t moving the 26-year-old franchise cornerstone be the absolute last resort?

You’d think so, but as Stoudemire sees it, the Suns are motivated as much by their bottom-line as they are putting the best team on the floor. “I think it’s all about what they want to do and what they’re trying to do financially,” he said. “I think their main focus is their financial intake.”

===

If you were Amare, would you be motivated to play well for the last few games?

by magenta on Feb 1, 2010 5:02 PM MST reply actions  

Again man, you're just spouting your subjective opinion without any sort of statistical basis

Nash is the worst PG defensively—proof?
Amare shoots almost as well as Dirk—proof?

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 12:31 PM MST up reply actions  

I have provided proof but he never seem to back up your points

I have a simply way ot providing proof i.e. last year’s guards were having career nights when they play against Suns when matched up against Nash i.e. Brandon Roy 52 points.

As for Amare, read for yourself.

Amare is shooting 57.1% from the field which ranks 10th among all NBA power forwards but is by far the best percentage of any player that averages over 30 minutes per game. No offense to Trey Gilder, but I don’t think his 100% shooting percentage is relevant here.

The second most efficient (relevant) scorer is Kevin Garnet at 54.7%, then comes Carlos Boozer at 53.6%, and Chris Bosh at 51.7%. That translates to an extra 1.7 points per game if Bosh shot as well as Amare.

Amare benefits from getting to the rim more than Bosh and shooting almost as good as the great Dirk Nowitzki from outside.

Checking in with 82games.com we learn that both Amare and Bosh average 49% of their points as “Inside” but there’s a big difference when it come to “Dunks” (Amare, 17% / Bosh, 9%) that accounts for their overall efficiency gap. Amare’s athleticism advantage over Bosh translates to the numbers.

So there you have it, Amare is the most athletic power forward in the game that is playing starters’ minutes (and will remain so until/if Blake Griffin begins his NBA career).

As for the outside shots, Amare is shooting 46.9% compared to 48% for Dirk (who only scores 18% of his points inside the paint and as a result only has an overall FG% of .477). That’s a gap of only 1.1% between Dirk and Amare when it comes to Dirk’s single most important weapon. Put that in your bratwurst and eat it with some sauerkraut.

Just for fun, consider that Amare is also a better outside shooter than LeBron James (44.5%), LaMarcus Aldridge (42%) and far better than Pau Gasol (26.7%).

Amare’s biggest weakness on the offensive end are low post moves and decision-making.

Rebounding:

Amare takes a lot of flack for his rebounding but consider that his 10.2 rebounds per game in December puts him behind only Camby, Boozer, Zach Randolph and Bosh and he’s within 1.2 rpg of all of those guys.

After a slow start to the season where his timing and athleticism were still recovering, Amare is now putting up big rebounding numbers on a consistent basis. He had 21 boards against the Spurs and had a five game stretch last month where he averaged 13 per game.

Most importantly, he’s bringing the effort on the glass almost every night. You’d be hard pressed to find 3 games this season where Amare’s effort hasn’t been 100%.

It isn’t comparable to look at a specialist like Lou Amundson who in limited minutes puts up gaudy rebounds on a per 40 minute basis. Lou has a great nose for the ball and puts in a ton of effort but I seriously doubt that if he were playing 35+ minutes per game every night that he would be able to sustain it. And let’s not even talk about free throw shooting.

While I won’t go as far to say that Amare is an elite rebounder he clearly ranks at the top of the class when it comes to power forwards that play big minutes and are also counted on to score the ball. His reputation here is far worse than his reality.

Defense:

Defense has always been a struggle for Amare but he has benefited this season from a much simplified defensive game plan that has him showing hard on each and every screen. He’s done a good job using his quicks to disrupt the ball handler and then recovery rapidly to his man.

His post defense is decent and like many of the league’s players in that he struggles with guys that have great back-to-the-basket footwork (Al Jefferson, Pau Gasol, Zach Randolph). He gets into trouble when he’s in help rotation especially against teams like Toronto and Orlando that run funky stuff like a 2/3 high pick and roll where his assignment changes to being a help defender instead of being involved directly in the play. He simply doesn’t have the instincts of the league’s top defensive players like KG and Duncan and doesn’t make good, timely decisions when teams force him to think fast.

Most importantly for the Suns, the days of teams abusing Amare in the pick and roll game are gone. Credit to him and the Suns coaching staff for cleaning up that glaring weakness in his game.

http://www.ktar.com/?nid=112&sid=1249193

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:04 PM MST up reply actions  

You Amare lovers can ignore this all you want but..

the BEST indicator of a players rebounding prowess is rebound rate. The percentage of available rebounds a player grabs. Please stop telling me Amares rebounding numbers because for as much as he plays and at the pace the Suns play at he should be getting many more. Now of course stats do not tell it all but this is the absolute best stat regarding rebounds that there is.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/statistics?sort=reb&qual=true&pos=pf&seasonType=2

Read that and you will see Stat is BARELY better than old man Juwan Howard at rebounding the basketball. 38TH among PFs. Not very good.

by Superelkman on Feb 3, 2010 3:30 PM MST up reply actions  

You can get those numbers in places you don’t have to pay to use – plus i hate john hollinger :)

I look at on off rates at 82games.com those are nice too…

problem with rebounding rate is that it doesn’t take into account (cause it can’t) proximity…if amare is at half court and he misses a rebound – he missed the rebound – :)

by jemagee on Feb 3, 2010 3:52 PM MST up reply actions  

most of the time he is in position being a frontcourt player

if he isn’t that is another problem with him… he should make it a priority to get up and down the court

by Superelkman on Feb 3, 2010 5:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Let’s say Amare is guarding dirk – dirk tends to be around the perimeter – shot goes up – Amare won’t be there.

I like the stat BETTER than gross rebounds I just think that the NBA has a long way to go in maximizing analysis of the game

by jemagee on Feb 3, 2010 6:45 PM MST up reply actions  

true...

but it much better than everyones subjective opinions of his rebounding prowess

by Superelkman on Feb 4, 2010 9:18 AM MST up reply actions  

There’s also this

http://www.82games.com/0910/09PHO11.HTM

The suns are a better defensive reboudning team when he’s on the floor (but worse offensive) – and let me just say – I thought the sixers were bad at defensive rebounding…Phoenix is the worst defense rebounding team but one (GSW) in the league…so that seems ‘designed’ – how much of Amare’s ‘poor rebounding’ is just because of the system Phoenix runs?

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 10:31 AM MST up reply actions  

none...

it’s effort and his 31 inch waist

by Superelkman on Feb 4, 2010 1:13 PM MST up reply actions  

So it has nothing to do with the fact that aside from the warriors the suns are the worst defensive rebounding team in the league?

I’m curios for the explanation that he’s such a bad rebounder that the Suns are better on the defensive glass when he’s on the floor?

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 1:48 PM MST up reply actions  

They aren't better overall

Total Rebounding
Amare on the court 47.8%
Amare off the court 49.3%
-1.5%

Defensive rebounding is slighty better but come on… Amare is an OK rebounder but last night proved he can be really good…. he needs to do that every night… if he does the Suns are a legit contender… sadly he chooses not to show up some nights and can get bullied and outworked by other 4’s

by Superelkman on Feb 4, 2010 2:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Well I can’t argue with your psychological analysis of Amare…I’m assuming you meet with him regularly and are an expert at diagnosing players who want to win versus those who don’t?

I know they aren’t better over all – offensive rebounding is much better when Amare is off the court (which is just weird)

But complaining about Amares rebounding when the SUNS suck at rebounding (not just amare – but the entire team) on the defensive glass (which is hella more important in my opinion) is like calling out the secretary of education when you want to blame an entire administration.

The suns are a terrible defensiver reboudning team – period
they are better when amare is on the floor than when off it

I understand that we are now diagnosing his psyche, but i never trust the social sciences

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 2:18 PM MST up reply actions  

“I know they aren’t better over all – offensive rebounding is much better when Amare is off the court (which is just weird)”

read the 82games stats please

by Superelkman on Feb 4, 2010 9:20 PM MST up reply actions  

Puleeze

Even Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan don’t show up every night… If you’ve ever played a sport competitively in your life you’d understand that a lot of times you just don’t have “it” and it’s a bad night.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Feb 4, 2010 2:59 PM MST up reply actions  

Bull.

Jose Calderon is the worst defensive PG in the league. No contest. Nash certainly isn’t good or even average, but he’s nowhere near as bad as Calderon.

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 4:59 PM MST up reply actions  

Back at you: Jose is not a 2-time MVP nor is he the face of our franchise rofl

The ability of Nash fans to defend his inability to defend while castigating the rest of the Suns players on their lack of defence is simply breathtaking.

Marion and Bell is no longer here to cover Nash’s ass but it’s good to see fans doing it for him

Our current team is built based on what Nash wants in terms of personnel decisions i.e. all offense and no defence after Nash held our team ransom by postponing his signing until the right players got moved or signed.

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:07 PM MST up reply actions  

You're just repeating the same thing. Again.

It doesn’t matter if Nash is a two-time MVP or the face of the franchise. Calderon is worse defensively by just about every metric, which directly calls out your allegation that Nash is the worst defensive PG in the league. And my post calls Steve out as a pretty bad one, probably in the bottom three.

Let me save you the trouble of responding with retreads of earlier posts in this thread by summing up your points, wrong as they may be:
- Nash can’t defend
- Nash controls the franchise and what direction it goes in
- Amare is wrongfully hated by Suns fans

But hey, keep spouting the same rhetoric. I’m sure one or two people might be swayed eventually.

by Azreous on Feb 2, 2010 8:00 PM MST up reply actions  

I keep repeating my points because people keep repeating theirs with no proof

I’m not swaying people like you. I just want to let people know just how flimsy Amare critics can be with their hate mongering when Amare has played better defensively this season even after surgey and has reduced his demands from a Kobe 5-year deal to a Gasol “second fiddle” 3-year deal

My aim is just to expose Amare critics for who they are i.e. playing favourites and quitters on the team i.e. wanting to trade Amare and risk tanking the season.

That’s all.

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 8:46 PM MST up reply actions  

You keep asking me to back up "my points" even though "my points" are just questions directed at you...

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 2, 2010 9:49 PM MST up reply actions  

“Amare also shoots the ball almost as well as Dirk and finishes around the rim as good as anyone else. If you can’t admit that, you don’t follow the games closely.”

That is just f@#king stupid to say. Dirk is 10 times the shot that Amare is. Amare is a really good mid-range guy but Dirk is in a whole other league. Come on man, get real.

Yes, Nash isn’t great on defense but he is servicable. I don’t know where he gets this rep as a terrible defender. On a lot of nights he really is just there. You don’t see him getting consistently burned or doing anything great on D. He is just a filler in that way.

“Amare also plays average or above average defence when motivated”
Which is exactly why he doesn’t deserve max money. He isn’t a very motivated player a lot of the time.

by Superelkman on Feb 2, 2010 12:06 PM MST reply actions  

Stats this season back up my point that Amare is playing as well as Dirk

Try to lay off the Amare hatred and give me some proof. He’s not the reason why our team is playing badly, especially since this team is as much a creation of Nash and Kerr

Take a look at this article which clearly shows how well Amare is shooting this season:

http://www.ktar.com/?nid=112&sid=1249193

by magenta on Feb 2, 2010 5:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Amar'e might hit the same percentage of shots as Nowitzki

but he’s nowhere near as proficient at creating his own shot, nor does he have anywhere near the same offensive arsenal.

by DaveJD on Feb 3, 2010 2:38 PM MST up reply actions  

I’d like to echo something a few people have stated earlier, but if SBNation has an ‘award’ for ‘thread’ of the year, this should get nominated, not just for the content but the prolonged civil discourse in a discussion about a player, whereas I’m used to seeing people be accused of haters, or blindfolds for their favorite players…glad I checked this place out to get some other ‘views’ on the upcoming trade deadline.

I’m also looking for good sports radio that talks basketball and I gave KTAR a try for like 30 minutes, it made me sad.

by jemagee on Feb 3, 2010 2:07 PM MST reply actions  

KTAR... I share your disappointment

Phoenix has been deemed a ‘basketball city’ because of the Suns for a long time… but the recent success of the Cardinals has really flipped that generalization pretty hard – and KTAR has tried their hardest to jump into the football scene and grab their piece of the money-pie that is the NFL. Their day is basically broken into 3 parts -

In the morning you have Doug and Wolf: They talk a lot more about sports through a philosophical lense (which I like in some ways)… and Ron Wolfley (Wolf) is an ex-Cardinal so naturally football usually dominates the conversation.

Mid-Day: the station airs ESPN radio, usually Colin Cowherd. I never listen to him.

Then in the afternoon you have Gambo and Ash: The biggest disappointment on KTAR in my opinion. They are (as someone else here on BSotS dubbed them) the TMZ of sports radio. They really only talk about ESPN ticker news and then Gambo sensationalizes everything because he’s from New York and thinks his opinion is the ultimate truth, always – without fail.

So for basketball KTAR isn’t very great at all (aside from the player/coach/GM interviews, especially ‘Twitter-Talk Thursday’s with Jared Dudley) and since the topics usually revolve around the popular, when the Suns didn’t make the playoffs last year bball has been a back burner time filler.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Feb 3, 2010 2:47 PM MST up reply actions  

Philadlephia sports radio is god awful, no matter what anybody says, trust me, the NBA is FOURTH (fifth actually if you count college ball) in terms of fan interest…the phillies and eagles are year round topics and the flyers, yes the NHL Flyers, have a more dedicated fan base.

Of course the second more over riding problem is that Philly SPorts radio plays to the LCD of the ‘worst fans in sports’ – it’s god awful – it’s offensive – it’s borderline racist – and the hosts are absolute IDIOTS who even in their areas of expertise are stil in the 50s in terms of analysis (and none of them have NBA as expertise)

I tried houston, dallas, phoenix, (teams that are making moves, might work with the sixers) , i looked at chicago…and in the end, the best NBA radio coverage I could find is in my own back yard with mason and ireland on espn 710…i’m hesitant to try KNBR (which on a good night I can pick up from SF to SB, heck one night I actually picked up KTAR here in santa barbara), because they allow tom tolbert to have a radio show

by jemagee on Feb 3, 2010 2:55 PM MST up reply actions  

SBNation should have a radio station for each sport...

Seth… You’re the boss now right? Get on that!

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Feb 3, 2010 3:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Latest rumor is...

Suns, Pistons, and Philly in a 3 team deal that nets us Iggy and Chris Wilcox…

That is ok if he is going to walk anyway but not ideal…

Wilcox can rebound a little better than Stat and is good off the high pick and roll because of his athleticism….

Iggy is amazing as we all know…

What do you guys think of this deal?

by Superelkman on Feb 9, 2010 2:36 PM MST reply actions  

If we have to make a move

Those are the two deals that I’d be “okay” (as in not thrilled but sadly accepting) with, the Iguadala/Wilcox or Iguadala/Speights.

They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...

by Eutychus on Feb 9, 2010 2:55 PM MST up reply actions  

12 Team Trade

I say we get a dozen teams together all who have players or a combination of players worth Amares salary. Each team’s players then is assigned a number. Each team picks a number and has to keep that combination of players.

by Superelkman on Feb 9, 2010 4:03 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Nash_3_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Divinginlevanto_small PHXgp

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_3111433_9952_1451357_main_small 7footer