Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Todd Haley Is The Steelers Next Offensive Coordinator

How would Andre Iguodala fit with the Phoenix Suns?


So the rumours of a trade between Philly and the Suns with Amar'e and Iggy as the main components have been heating up recently (today was the first mention of it in the national media), and the majority of Phoenix fans on Bright Side of the Sun (including myself) are hailing it as the best possible deal for STAT. However the acquisition of Iguodala (whether or not a deal goes down) won't be smooth sailing and there will be some definite pitfalls to go along with the positive aspects of an Iggy trade.

Important Note: This is NOT a trade post, all i'm doing is looking how Andre Iguodala would fit in with the Suns. Not how we'll look without STAT or any other player who is traded either to us or from us as we don't know who these players will be.

Star-divide

Defense

This is the area Iggy could help us most and one of the reasons i would be most excited to see him in a Suns Uniform. Iggy averages 2.5 combined steals and blocks a game compared to 1.3 for J-Rich and 1.1 for Hill.

If advanced stats are your bag, then Iggy's defensive rating and defensive win shares are also significantly better than our current starting wins (107 and 1.9 respectively for Iggy, 112 and 0.7 for Hill, and 112 and 0.6 for J-Rich).

I wouldn't go so far as to suggest the Iguodala is a Artest or Battier level defender, but he would certainly be an improvement over whichever player he replaced in the starting lineup and i would predict he would actually get better defensively on a team where he isn't also the number one offensive option.

Rebounding

Iguodala averages 6.9 rpg compared to 5.4 for Grant Hill and 5.1 for Richardson. He gets 10% of availiable rebounds when he's on the floor compared to 9.3% for Richardson and 10.3% for Hill.

This is pretty much a wash, there are no stats to suggest that Iggy is any more a proficient a rebounder than ouir current starting wings. However, if either Hill or J-rich moved to the bench to accomodate Iggy, then it is likely we would see an improvement in rebounding from our second unit.

Offense

This is where an Iggy acquisition gets... interesting. Iggy is averaging 17.3 points and 5.7 assists a game this season, surely a good thing. However, Iggy is only a career .323 three-point shooter and is shooting .314% this season. While this isn't terrible for Iggy ( he has a True shooting percentage of .524% so he obviously can find ways to score), it could risk affecting a Suns offense which is predicated on floor-spacing to allow Nash to go to work, especially if Iggy were to replace J-rich in the starting lineup as Hill and Iggy are both pretty poor three point shooters.

One thing Iggy could help to drastically improve in our offense is shot-creation. Currently, Steve Nash is the only player on our team who can consistently create for himself and others (Dragic is improving at this) and Iggy would certainly help.

Other Considerations

Iggys Contract- Iggy is under contract for another 4-5 years at about $12million a year, which is a bargain if he comes in and produces on both ends of the court. However, with rumors of a new CBA which could drastically reduce player salaries do the Suns want to commit to paying Iggy for such a long time?

Earl Clark- Despite Iggy playing at SG this season, his proper position is clearly at the 3. While Earl Clark is nowhere near ready to start at NBA level and be effective, he has the potential to be a serious contributor in a few years. While this wouldn't be a reason to stop a trade with Philly, it is an important consideration that an acquisition of Iggy could affect the long-term development of Clark as they play the same position.

Conclusion

An Amar'e trade which netted us Iggy (and Dalembert) would probably be the best plausible deal for STAT that the Suns could get. Iggy would be a great piece to build around (contract issues aside) and he would bring some much needed wing defense, hopefully providing the role of stopper that we have lacked since Marion/bell were traded and that Hill has tried his best to replicate. On offense, Iggy's poor 3p% could affect our spacing and there would definitely be an adjustment period from the departure of STAT and we would surely see an reduction in the usage/effectiveness of our pick and roll game. Hopefully this adjustment period could allow us to still make the playoffs although either way our ceiling is not all that high this year and an Iggy trade would definitely give us our best wing player since Joe Johnson was sent packing to Atlanta.

I have no idea of the likeliness of this trade (or any Amar'e trade) happening before the deadline but if a trade does happen there a few i like better than this one.

 

Comment 318 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I actually think it makes us a better team immediately.

I think the Suns lineup is now Nash-J-Rich-Iggy-Frye-Dalembert.
J-Rich can handle the increased scoring load – matter of fact, look at the Sun’s record when J-Rich scores over thirty. Iggy’s production would go up playing with Nash. Most importantly, Dalembert would give the Suns their best defensive post presence since . . . . a long, long time. He’s not a great player, but would be a perfect fit in the Suns – an athletic player who can run the floor, and protect the rim (finally!).
The Suns second unit? Dragic-Dudley-Hill-Amundson-Lopez. The suns might become the deepest team in the NBA! Two legit units!
Easily the best defensive team in the Run and Gun era

by UASun on Feb 4, 2010 5:59 PM MST reply actions  

Or Barbosa; I think thats up to the 76ers though.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 4, 2010 6:12 PM MST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t want Dalembert, because who would replace Stoudemire? Not Dalembert—he is the wrong position and wrong type of player for that.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:13 PM MST up reply actions  

In the interim, it'd be Frye.

But they’d have to go get a power forward in free agency or the draft.

by jburning on Feb 4, 2010 7:17 PM MST up reply actions  

No one replaces Stoudemire, that’s not a possibility in any trade. At his position you take a step back in talent, you get younger and better at the 3 and you get a ‘real’ center who blocks shots and rebounds and is good with alley oops.

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:21 PM MST up reply actions  

The problem with that is, we already have such a center.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Freez up lopez to develop his offense, he’s young, he has upside, sam doesn’t, but sam is one of the best defensive centers in the league (and also consistently healthy since a knee injury his first year)

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed this trade makes our team much better defensively. The only problem is that we lose a lot of frontcourt scoring. I can see Nash playing the pick’n’roll with Lopez a lot more. However, how far could this team go without any real inside threat? When Amare was out we had Diaw and Shaq who could score inside. Is Lopez ready for that? Thats my only question.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 4, 2010 6:12 PM MST up reply actions  

He’s a weak free throw shooter – but he also gives you another ‘distributor’ as well. He can run the break really well and Nash might need to rest those old candian legs…Iguodala has great court vision.

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 6:53 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I totally agree Bevis

We would basically be saying “We put all of our future success in Lopez’s development as a scorer” I really hope Lopez can be the player his brother is (and I believe he can) but that’ll be a couple hard faught years for Robin to get there.

If that never happens, we digress into a jump shooting team. And we all know how successful that style of ball is…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 4, 2010 7:20 PM MST up reply actions  

I thought we wanted Lopez to be primarily a defensive specialist, not a scoring threat.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:26 PM MST up reply actions  

But if you obtain Dalembert you have a defensive specialist (who loves his 15 foot jumper, but has no post up moves or dribbling ability, just saying) so lopez can develop his offense

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:29 PM MST up reply actions  

I guess, but I wouldn’t really want Lopez to focus on scoring, because good defenders are much harder to find than scorers. The entire Suns team is proof of that.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:35 PM MST up reply actions  

There’s no reason one can’t be both, but Lopez still has upside that he could develop (on both ends of the court) and you provide nash with the best center (defensive) he’s had in a while – and Nash’s career is ending pretty soon…

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:37 PM MST up reply actions  

You don’t need to give the Suns anyone for Dalembert. The Sixers have been trying for years to dump his contract. The Sixers would hand you Dalembert for about nothing, getting Iggy in the deal is what it is all about.

by EREX21 on Feb 5, 2010 6:32 AM MST up reply actions  

that should say “you don’t need to give the Sixers anyone for Dalembert.”

by EREX21 on Feb 5, 2010 6:32 AM MST up reply actions  

Good point on the 3p%. I think because of this Iggy would start at the 3 with Hill backing him up and Dudley backing up J-Rich. This means less minutes for those guys, but with Iggy’s defensive presence we don’t need to see a lot of Hill or Dudley.

 Dalembert would start in Amare’s place, but he wouldn’t get as many minutes as Amare did. The only person really missing out is Clark, but he hasn’t earned anything yet anyway.

Back to Iggy, his playmaking ability can really help us out, so Nash doesn’t have to do everything. You forgot to mention that he just turned 26 and is very athletic, healthy and is a good finisher on the fast break.

He has comparisons to Marion and Diaw. I would expect his role would be similar to Marion. The best player to compare him to would be Scottie Pippen. I think the Suns could use a player like that.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 4, 2010 6:08 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

When he came into the league he drew comparisons to Pippen which I think are valid, he just hasn’t had a Jordan.

EVERY team could use a player like Iguodala as long as said franchise (and fan base) understands he is not a primary scorer, he never will be a primary scorer, it’s seemingly not in his nature to be a primary scorer.

He’s pretty much my favorite sixer of recent history and i’ll miss him

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 6:54 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

All I can say is this....

Phoenix is one of several teams that have interest in Iguodala. One of the big teams that want him that I would truly hate to see get Iggy is Cleveland. If the Cavaliers get Iguodala, it’s basically over. It’ll probably be Ilgauskas getting shipped over to Philly with another player for Iggy and possibly Dalembert. I’m just saying that if Philly were to trade Iguodala to the Cavs, you’ll have your Jordan/Pippen combo there. LeBron will be Jordan and Iggy as Pippen. Only Iggy will start at the 2. Either way, Cavaliers acquiring Iggy would be like another Gasol trade since they won’t be offering up much. They’re loaded from head to toe with plenty of shooters and big men. They just need a legit shooting guard. If Phoenix were to pull off a trade, this is the one. Nothing else looks promising.

by NashMV3 on Feb 4, 2010 7:13 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

+1. The Cleveland Have-a-Beers getting Iguodala for Ilgauskas and filler is, in principle, exactly the same as the Pau Gasol swindle.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:22 PM MST up reply actions  

Actually, I’d rather see Iguodala (as a fan of his) go to Cleveland or Dallas than anywhere else – I think taking on Sam and Andre makes Dallas a formidable playoff team as well – but with the cavs, well, supposedly ‘Lebron wants Jamison’ – and Lebron seems to run that franchise – which while I’m sure they want to keep him happy – letting players make personnel decisions always goes well doesn’t it :)

Someone suggested a doozy of a trade, just for fun that had brand iguodala and dalembert going to cleveland for shaq, z, carter and hickson.

It was fun.

Here’s the questoni I keep asking about the cavs…in trying to keep lebron – let’s say that they get jamison as their ‘stretch 4’ (who is vastly over rated and more ‘over paid’ than Iguodala in my opinion….isn’t clevelands biggest problem going forward that they have no center for next season?

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:24 PM MST up reply actions  

I’ve even heard that defensively, Andre Iguodala is like Ron Artest without the stupidity and mental illness.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:23 PM MST reply actions  

Iguodala does many many things very very well – but nothing great – and developed under the shadow of Iguodala, and then Miller and now Brand….I think he’s grossly under appreciated by my fellow sixer fans and I’m going to hate to see him go – but at least he’ll be appreciated when he’s next to lebron dirk or steve

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:25 PM MST up reply actions  

I beg your pardon? You said Iguodala developed under the shadow of Iguodala.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Sorry, meant to be Iverson…

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:30 PM MST up reply actions  

i like that too

Dalembert finished eighth among centers in blocks per minute and fourth in both defensive rebound rate and overall rebound rate.

by Superelkman on Feb 4, 2010 7:28 PM MST reply actions  

Remake the Suns

Into a defensive team. Nash will love that. Too much turmoil in mid season for him.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 12:25 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

They don't have to be purely a defensive team...

what they lose offensively in this deal they definitely gain much more defensively… Nash will be able to create shots for almost anyone on the court with him as he is just that good at the PG position

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 8:05 AM MST up reply actions  

I hear you

that all makes sense in theory…didn’t work last year for him

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 8:39 AM MST up reply actions  

that is because they slowed it down...

with iggy you can still run and probably do it alot better… you lose something on the pick and roll in the half court but some of that is offset by what iggy can do on offense

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 9:45 AM MST up reply actions  

Iggy cant do what Amare can do on offense

I dont care how you slice it, its a huge downgrade on the offensive end.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 9:47 AM MST up reply actions  

He will be able to create JUMP shots for anyone

Without Amare who will be able to run the pick and roll and get to the rim consistently?

Playing Frye at the 4 with Lou as a backup will be dreadful, teams will see no threat in the paint and will be able to load up on double teams and traps on Nash etc…

I would love to see the Suns land Dalembert but not at the cost of 50% of their offense, just by having the threat of Amare on the floor puts so much defensive pressure on the opponent.

You need a big man who can get high %% shots to win, Nash will not be the player he is right now without Amare.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 9:43 AM MST up reply actions  

I would know better than to try that. The model that works is having some individual strong defenders (Bell, Marion) but not making the entire team play Spurs ball.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:06 AM MST up reply actions  

Brand

Everyone seems to like Dalembert, and I suppose I do too; but since his skills would be superfluous on the Suns (duplicated by Robin Lopez), I think Elton Brand should be considered. I’m not sure he belongs on the Suns, but position-wise, he fits in the trade and Dalembert does not.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:33 PM MST reply actions  

The consensus among the print media folks is that Elton Brand has the worst contract in the NBA due to its length and his age…if the sixers could find a taker for Brand they’d happily commit the trade, but all reports indicate that no team in the league has any interest in a contract that long for a guy that old who missed the majority of the two seasons before this one.

It probably wasn’t the smartest signing in a ‘career arc’ kind of way – but the sixers weren’t going to get Josh Smith (which is the meme bitter fans use a lot) and if they didn’t use the cap room then – they wouldn’t have had it next off season – so then fans would have been upset that they didn’t use it :) It was kind of a no win situation…

Funny thing is at the time people thought it was a great move by a relatively new GM :)

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 7:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Kinding, right?

Dalambert is what we HOPE Lopez MAY become. And he can guard a lot of 4/5s. Forget positions, Dalambert is a big, and would guard, say, a Duncan well.

This trade is a nobrainer. A. No. Brainer.

by MMotherwell on Feb 5, 2010 2:38 AM MST up reply actions  

Ehh. If Brand can play, I don’t really care that he’s 31. And I know he makes less a year than Stoudemire.

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 7:53 PM MST reply actions  

worst contract ever...

if we got brand we would need a future first back or something to compensate us for taking on that horrible contract

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 8:07 AM MST up reply actions  

Someone gave Marbury 20 million a year, and t-mac – and you think Brand is the worst contract ever? He may have played for a crap team, but his career was better than both marbury and t-mac

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 8:42 AM MST up reply actions  

Actually my understanding is that

the 6ers are offering the pick to the team that takes Brand’s contract off of their hands.

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Feb 5, 2010 9:53 AM MST up reply actions  

As far as I’ve read there’s only one team that would consider Brand so far and no mention of the pick being involved.

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 10:01 AM MST up reply actions  

Dalembert & Lopez are basically the same player as of now

I don’t see either of them can become a strong offense scorer even if Nash keeps feeding them. So the primary inside scoring will come from JRich when he posts up and Nash when he penetrates. Writing the last sentence puts a chill in my bones.

I seriously have problem figuring out what our rotations would look like.

In this line-up, Nash-JRich-Iggy-Frye-Dalembert, who does pick and roll with Nash? Frye? Is he good enough?

The Dragic-Dudley-Hill-Amundson-Lopez lineup is even weaker scoring-wise.

So as much as I like Iggy’s defense, it’s not enough to replace Amare’s offense.

Therefore, I don’t like this trade.

by sonicking on Feb 4, 2010 8:13 PM MST reply actions  

If you presume that Amare leaving is inevitable now or the end of the season (for nothing) – what is enough to replace Amare that is also realistic?

I hope that the sixers don’t ‘want’ to trade Iguodala but feel they have to because of luxury tax implications. If the options are Iguodala and Dalembert, or nothing, which option do you prefer?

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 8:20 PM MST up reply actions  

What if it could bring the team someone other than Dalembert, someone it actually needed, by being a multi-team trade?

by species8473 on Feb 4, 2010 8:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Multi team trades, with big names, at the trade deadline are more fragile then spun sugar

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 8:35 PM MST up reply actions  

+1

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 4, 2010 9:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Well, what would you rather have?

A seasoned veteran that’s not going up with his career, or a young center who has the potential to be better than said veteran?

I’d go with the latter.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 4, 2010 9:19 PM MST up reply actions  

one, we'd have both in this trade

two, it depends if you are trying to win now….
i want the suns to win now so i’d take the seasoned vet

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 8:07 AM MST up reply actions  

I want the Suns to set themselves up for success down the line.

This group (especially after an Iggy + Dalembert for Stoudemire + whatever else) isn’t going to win a championship. No matter what way you slice it, it just won’t happen.

So…while we’re not in contending status, I would still love to see us make the playoffs. If Nash loses his best scoring mate and has to be forced into integrating Iguodala into the system, I think we miss the playoffs. Nash gets upset, we still have Dalembert for another year (unless some team wants him as an expiring/someone who can still contribute). So…that leaves us back where we were before. Needing young talent that can be developed into a solid player on the cheap. Lopez can be just that.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 5, 2010 3:17 PM MST up reply actions  

i think nash and frye pick n roll is awesome. frye can be tough if you give him the task and over the summer i expect him to get better. i don’t really like dalembert though

by kuato lives on Feb 4, 2010 9:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Frye can't roll

Nash said this the other day when asked about playing w frye or lopez. Robin can roll thouugh

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 12:29 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

roll?

What does that mean? Is it the “roll” in “pick and roll”?

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:08 AM MST up reply actions  

yep

it could refer to fryes footwork and spacing on the pick and roll, but more likely his inability to finish very well when he attacks the basket.

Banzai!

by Suns' Sensei on Feb 5, 2010 1:17 PM MST up reply actions  

First rounder is probably more likely than Speights or Young

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 4, 2010 9:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Young is probably more likely than speights or first round pick – you can have him if you want him probably :)

Speights isn’t going much of anywhere and the sixers are on pace for a top 5 pick :)

by jemagee on Feb 4, 2010 9:14 PM MST up reply actions  

I stand corrected then

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 4, 2010 9:34 PM MST up reply actions  

If we could land Speights + Iggy, sans Dalembert, I'd freak out.

That would be fantastic. But the Sixers wouldn’t part with both of those unless we took back one of their big contracts.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 4, 2010 9:40 PM MST up reply actions  

According to all reports, there’s no way you can do that without sending back some quality youth in return. :)

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 8:43 AM MST up reply actions  

Mm...I'm wary on Brand.

He’s an injury risk with a terrible contract.

Also, he’d make the team about as slow as Shaq did. He just doesn’t operate well in a fast tempo. And, if you take Brand AND Speights, where does that leave minutes for Lopez/Amundson/Frye? Lopez has shown that he’s deserving of the minutes. Frye is an integral part to the team, when he’s got his hot shooting hand. Amundson is as much of a game changer as anyone on the team due to his energy and heart. So…throw in Brand (and his bloated contract) and Speights, another young big that needs minutes to develop, and we have ourselves a bonafide logjam.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 5, 2010 3:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Throw Brand on the bench

And give him minutes that Nash is out we do settle for bad jumpers when Nashty is out this would give us a scorer in the post who plays d with our second unit..

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 4:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Well we have to remember that the main pieces of this deal are Amar’e and Iggy. Barbosa and Sam would be the throw in’s. Sam won’t be in our long term plans. He’d be here for the rest of the season and possibly half of next. We’d try to replace him with an inside scoring PF. I see that where he fits in our rotation is kind of iffy and may even cause us a log jam and hurt us offensively, but it would only be for a while. The main part of this deal is Iggy.

 If we let Amar’e walk than we get nothing and won’t be able to get a good free agent in return. We have to get good value back and out of all the players Iggy is that guy. He’s the best possible player we could get back for Amar’e. He would be with us for long term, but thats the plan. He would replace Hill in the rotation when he’s gone and he could take pressure off of Nash on both the offensive and defensive ends. I can see him fitting in very well with this team.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 4, 2010 11:55 PM MST reply actions  

We CAN get a good FA

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tKclQktDfyiViXOePtJkldg&output=html check it out. We’d have ~$14 million.

This is the myth people feed on: lose Amar’e get nothing. It ain’t true :)

by MMotherwell on Feb 5, 2010 2:42 AM MST up reply actions  

Man I love the effort

but $14m is way off

1st – most experts are pegging the salary cap at around $53m (you used $57m for your $14m number) so now we are down to $10m.

That $10m is with only 10 players under contract and assumes both Grant and Frye opt out (they have player options so that ball is in their court). Even if they do opt out those roster spots need to be replaced so you basically are leaving $10m (which is really more likely to be closer to $6m) for three open spots.

The Suns will have room under the lux tax to sign use the full MLE however which would about another $6m (that can’t be combined with their other cap space).

So basically they have the MLE plus about $6m to spend on two other players IF Frye and Hill don’t pick up their options.

All of that btw also leaves Lou as a free agent that would have to be resigned in there somewhere if the Suns want to keep him. Based on what Birdman got – we can assume Lou will get a deal around $2m.

So – if Amare opts out there’s money to keep Frye and Hill and Lou (if the Suns want him) and then sign a free agent with the MLE but after that there’s maybe (maybe) $5m left.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 7:36 AM MST up reply actions  

If however

they did a deal with say…the Nets…they would hopefully have a 1st round pick that they can sign even if they are over the cap and they would hopefully get one young rotation player who is still on a rookie contract AND they would still have room for Lou, Grant, Frye and a FA at the MLE

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 7:40 AM MST up reply actions  

Nope

probably not but you also aren’t going to make that kind of money / contract commitment to an MLE guy.

It’s not always about getting the “best available player”. The Suns need to take the long view and consider who the best available players might be a year or two down the road and retain the flexibility to get them.

Too many teams have fallen into the trap of signing the wrong guy b/c he happened to be available when the team was able to get him.

Now, I am not say AI2 is the “wrong guy” but I am certainly not sold on paying him $15m in 2014 either. You are basically saying that he’s the best option for your #2 paid player for the next 4 years.

I just don’t love him enough to do that.

Remember how much everyone LOVED JRich when he came over? Now it turns out he’s playing poorly and people can’t wait to get rid of him.

With Nash on the down side the Suns need to think long and hard about where they are going to find core players to rebuild the team with and not just jump on the first guy available.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 9:26 AM MST up reply actions  

along those lines

there are going to be a lot of teams seeking to dump long term contracts like AI2’s next year and the Suns could position themselves to be a buyer in that market instead of just taking home and marrying the first girl that says yes

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 9:27 AM MST up reply actions  

I really wish

More people understood this.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 9:30 AM MST up reply actions  

It’s understood but there’s a whole lot of what if.

You don’t know who is going to be available, who will be retained as a restricted FA by their own franchise, who will be traded between now and then and what the new CBA is going to look like.

For a prime example, look at the knicks. They are terrible, god awful, and they cleared all that cap space for the 2010 off season, and in my estimation they’ll be LUCKY if they sign Joe Johnson to a long term deal. I don’t see them landing any of the coveted names they banked on (and sold to fans).

Predicting the future (with CBA negotiations upcoming) is an almost impossible task for a well run organization with a quality GM and an owner whose primary motivation is winning.

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 9:34 AM MST up reply actions  

In my opinion

It’s ALWAYS better to have financial flexibility and not have exactly what you want than to have a long-term contract and STILL not have exactly what you want

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 9:36 AM MST up reply actions  

Does anyone think...

If we use your $53 million figure, That amounts to a:
1. A $10 million player.
2. A $5 million dollar player (If we use a sign and trade for the space, we can use the MLE ).
3. A couple veteran minimums – and these tend to be OK players, like Matt Barnes or Amundson (doubt anyone pays him above the minimum).

Hardly anyone will have cap space next year, and most teams are in cost cutting mode, massively. We might even get a star with cap space for free, like the clippers got Camby for cap space a few years back, or OKC got our two first rounders for taking Kurt Thomas off our hands.

Cap space == options, and in this NBA, where everyone has stopped spending, we are in a good spot with ANY cap space at all.

Again, why panic? The Iguodala trade is awesome, because we get better, but short of a trade that makes us better, the cap space is worth more.

by MMotherwell on Feb 5, 2010 7:59 PM MST up reply actions  

I hope this trade gets done.

For those who think there won’t be space for Nash to operate (crowded post), they are wrong; Frye at PF Dal at Center just spaces the floor as before.
As for the bench, Dragic-Lopez have been creating their own version of Nash-Amar’e pick & roll.
Seriously, i don’t really see a down side, yes we lose 21 points from Amare and replaces it with probably 16-18 from Iggy and may be 13-14 from Dalembert, we get better D. rebound, and steals. I say “FREAKING DO THE TRADE NOW”

by jatrex4suns on Feb 5, 2010 4:04 AM MST reply actions  

This trade doesn't make any sense to me...

Athletic Big Man that can finish consistently don’t come cheap…I’d rather try to sign Amare to a long term at fair market value than get less than equal value. Options I’d like to explore are a three team deal for Amare & JRich that would net us Carl Landry or J.J. Hickson and AI2.

Much as people don’t wan’t to believe it.. Channing Frye is not a consistent starting player (Complimentary player, yes, but not a quality starting 4 or 5). We will need a young big to plug in at the 4 if Amare goes, not more ad hoc stuff that the Suns keep trying…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 5:55 AM MST reply actions  

true...

Frye has a really unique skill set but I am not comfortable with him in anything more than a 6th man role

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 8:10 AM MST up reply actions  

Totally

or even a starter sometimes given opposition’s lineups and if he is playing well…

but there’s just no way for us to compete without a big man who can score, and that goes for ANY NBA team

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 9:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Big Man

How many teams do you know that are truly competitive without a big man who plays defense? That sure isn’t Amare or Frye.

by azdavid on Feb 5, 2010 5:20 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare and J-Rich

Amare and J-Rich together account for HALF of the Suns player payroll and neither can be depended upon as consistent all-around players. That just doesn’t make sense to me. If the Suns could get Hickson and AI2 in return for those two guys I’d be delighted. It would be fun to see a starting five who showed up for work every night.

Gotta agree on Frye as well. He can shoot from outside and he can sometimes rebound/defend when the ball comes right to him. For just about everything else, I’ve seen YMCA guys play better.

by azdavid on Feb 5, 2010 5:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Not Feelin' This Deal

I guess I’ll preface this by saying I’m a huge STAT fan and want the Suns to retain him, so I’m biased against almost any deal. That said, trading him for Iggy & S.D. isn’t in PHX’s favor, IMO. With RoLo’s continued improvement I’d hate for Sam to come in and take away some of him minutes…stunting his growth in the process. We’d have no real frontcourt scoring as Lopez would be our best option on the block (not exactly inciting fear in our opponents) and Frye seems scared to occupy the paint. We could use Iggy’s perimeter d and his slashing ability on offense but I think we’d lose more than we’ll gain…

I need a ring, DAMMIT!!

by Sunny_N_DC on Feb 5, 2010 7:23 AM MST reply actions  

Not sure if this helps you stop caring or not but a rumor floating today has the mavs willing to take on Elton Brand to get Iguodala – if the sixers can shed Brand over Dalembert with Iguodala, I personally feel it’s a deal they HAVE to make…that brand contract is just a killer for the roster…bad or not is irrelevant, his age and career arc will not fit the rest of the roster if Iguodala is gone, and he lasts a lot longer on the books than Sam (obviously) in my opinion.

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 8:44 AM MST reply actions  

What I don't understand

Is why people keep calling Amare a “post scorer” or bemoaning this trade because we lose “post scoring”.
How often does Amare really operate out of the block? He is the most effective at the elbow, where he can drive or shoot, or on the pick and roll with Nash.
He is not some huge post presence we will miss, he’s not legit “frontcourt” scoring. We’ve seen Lopez finish on these pick and rolls. Frye is every bit the shooter Amare is. And Igoudala actually finishes (statistically) waaaaay better around the rim than Amare.
I don’t understand this objection at all

by UASun on Feb 5, 2010 9:19 AM MST reply actions  

Hey if you fans want a post scorer, Elton Brand is a good post up player :)

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 9:20 AM MST up reply actions  

I think the thing we'll miss about Amare

Is how powerfully he attacks the rim. He’s one of the best at going up strong, taking lots of contact, and still finishing the hoop for an “and 1”. But yeah, he’s not a post player at all.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 9:24 AM MST up reply actions  

Aside from that finishing thing, Andre Iguodala is pretty good at going up strong taking contact and drawing the foul, he’s just not a great finisher :)

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 9:26 AM MST up reply actions  

Lets think about it...

Not only is Amare a very good finisher, but a very good free throw shooter…Do we just want to throw that away???

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 9:37 AM MST up reply actions  

Maybe not Max...!

Max money no, but he is worth CB4 Money…Like I said Athletic 6’10" players with Amare’s abilities don’t come along all that often..Offer him 4 years@ 66 Million and see what he says…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 9:40 AM MST up reply actions  

Mayhap...Mayhap not..

I guess everyone is entitled to their own opinions..

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 9:54 AM MST up reply actions  

+1

Bosh is way better at getting his own buckets and moves around without the ball a lot better

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:04 AM MST up reply actions  

Bosh isn't perfect, though

He floats when he gets moody (often) and he has turnover problems himself…I have watched both of them a lot and personally I like Amare better (More athletic, better shooter). Phoenix’s system has created the offensive mentality in Amare. .Reverse roles and you would get similar results

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:09 AM MST up reply actions  

Only "perfect" players, or closest to it

Are Kobe, LeBron, and Wade, which is why they’re the only ones I consider “max” players.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:13 AM MST up reply actions  

I think wade gets put in the atmosphere or Lebron and Kobe but doesn’t belong there…his injury history, and the fact that I think he’s more of an inefficient ‘ball hog’ than the other two.

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 10:17 AM MST up reply actions  

He's not quite as complete of a player

But his drive/passion/talent gets him right at the cusp.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:18 AM MST up reply actions  

passion?

I like him, but I’m skeptical of whether he’s passionate. I actually find him fairly cool.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:19 AM MST up reply actions  

Eh? To whom are you referring?

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:21 AM MST up reply actions  

How has wade done with out Shaq?

Lebron has carried a team of non stars to the nba finals..before pau gasol got to LA the lakers were still making the playoffs.

Wade to me is over rated, injury prone, and his career will end much sooner than Lebrons due to injury.

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 10:48 AM MST up reply actions  

He hasn't been injured at all last year and not at all this year.

He WAS injury prone, think Baron Davis, but not in the last few years….

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:52 AM MST up reply actions  

How have the heat been all last year and this year when Fat Shaq was gone?

Mediocre is what I see – Wade NOT making people around him better.

GREAT players make those around him better – elevate the games of their team mates

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 11:14 AM MST up reply actions  

I live in South Florida I see them play all the time

Wade has NO talent around him… other than Wade the Heat have the least talented roster in the NBA. Beasley is young and Oneal can only play 20 min a game.

And they are still at 500 and wade is averaging 7 dimes a game, with 1.8 steals and 1.1 blocks for a SG.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 11:16 AM MST up reply actions  

Is this the ‘he wants to win’ argument? It’s not an argument I ever buy

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 10:47 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm sorry but this year there is no comparison...

in the past you may have had an argument there but Bosh has really stepped his game up to elite level…

Bosh is a way better rebounder, better scorer, and does not have the luxury of playing with the best passing point guard in the game…

This is no knock on Stat he is a great finisher, good mid-range game, and fits into our system superbly but Bosh is nearing that max level with his play this year.

24.2ppg, 11.4rpg(18.5% rebound rate!!), 1.1 bpg, 52% from the field

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:18 AM MST up reply actions  

Bosh looks good in Toronto

He will get a max contract in the offseason and he will laugh at the world. Playing in Toronto has been awesome for him. He puts his numbers up and people ignore that he has ZERO success in the postseason. They will also find out that he is very soft.

we are having a rough time in NY, but one of the few uniting things we have is our hope that NY DOESN’T bite on Cowboy Bosh. He’s fool’s gold.

And the argument that one might give Bosh a max contract but not Dwyane Wade is really really really foolish. only a true sausagehead would believe that. Wade’s competitive fire, all-around toughness and ability, and his leadership have single-handedly carried the Heat to the playoffs. When Shaq was around, he knew that too. He called it Wade’s team.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 10, 2010 1:27 PM MST up reply actions  

He scores

61.5% of his points inside 10 feet. He does back guys down w/ his back to the basket but he faces up and gets to the rims as well as anyone in the league and he’s shooting a very high percentage from close in.

Doesn’t matter how he does it, he’s a low post scorer.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 9:31 AM MST up reply actions  

ok maybe not

a “low post scorer” in that he doesn’t catch the ball in the low post. He’s a “high post scorer” which is the same result. His ability to stretch the floor and knock down open mid-range J’s just makes him all the more dangerous b/c teams can’t just sag off and pack it in the paint.

When his mid-range shot is on, he’s virtually undefensible.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 9:33 AM MST up reply actions  

It’s more of the fact that Amar’e actually goes to the rim and gives PHX a threat-be it at the elbow, on the block, or from the baseline…something no other player they currently have (or would receive in this trade) gives them. Frye cannot do what he does. Dalembert cannot. Lopez cannot. Having an athletic, scoring big man who can get to the rack and draw the opposing defenses attention is a luxury I’d rather not have the Suns lose…

I need a ring, DAMMIT!!

by Sunny_N_DC on Feb 5, 2010 9:34 AM MST up reply actions  

Say what????

What factiod are you basing this off or is this just a personal observation?

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 9:35 AM MST up reply actions  

Sorry about this comment

I thought I replied to UA Sun above

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 9:44 AM MST up reply actions  

No post

Amare is for sure NOT a reliable low post player and the fans who think is don’t know much about the game. Amare makes most of his points after being fed on the move, and in a static situation near the basket he is likely to get stripped or make a bad decision. He can’t make more than one dribble while trying to get position, and he can’t even get started while facing the basket. The one thing that Amare is a beast at is finishing at the rim on the pick and roll, but I wonder how much we’d see of that if he was playing for a team with a weak point guard.

by azdavid on Feb 5, 2010 5:36 PM MST up reply actions  

It is going to be very very

interesting to find out what the Suns actually end up offering Amare to stay….

Really, until we learn that we can’t know if the Suns never really wanted him to stay or if Amare was simply determined to try and get more than most people think he deserves.

Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Feb 5, 2010 9:42 AM MST reply actions  

How much does everyone feel he should get??

Like I said…4 years for 66 million is about right for a guy of his skillsets and what he brings to the Suns…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 9:47 AM MST up reply actions  

ideally it would be a little less than that but I wouldn't be rioting if he got that...

Amare does bring a lot offensively and in an ideal world we could trade J-Rich for an wing stopper or beast on the glass and keep our core in tact for a few more years… I’d rather overpay him a LITTLE bit instead of getting not getting enough back for him.

I really enjoy watching this team but they can be so frustrating because I really think they are a minor piece or two from really being contenders. A really good wing defender would make me cream all over the place.

I would gladly ship Barbosa off for a wing stopper as I think Dragic(and Frye) has more than proven they can score off the bench for us.

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 9:58 AM MST up reply actions  

A Wing Stopper would be nice..

But that is what JRich was supposed to be…How about this…Send JRich and LB to philly for AI2…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:05 AM MST up reply actions  

+1

I was thinking the same, but I doubt Philly wants to move Iggy that bad…

I need a ring, DAMMIT!!

by Sunny_N_DC on Feb 5, 2010 10:07 AM MST up reply actions  

So Philly could shed his contract, they could give LB a cheap buyout and the Suns could resign, LB wouldn’t loose anything….

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:13 AM MST up reply actions  

I see what you mean.

Still seems like kind of a strange transaction, though.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Spurs did it with Bowen last season

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:15 AM MST up reply actions  

And Brent Barry earlier.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:15 AM MST up reply actions  

Usually teams

Don’t sign them back to their old salary. It’s usually to trade away a larger salary, then they let the other team buy them out and the orignal team re-signs them for cheap.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:19 AM MST up reply actions  

in a perfect world but how does Philly benefit from that...

i’m talking about adding someone like julian wright, rasual butler, jared jeffries(more of a 4 but really good help defender), nic batum, quinton ross, etc…

guys that would come relatively cheap(except maybe batum) but really add a lot to our defense without sacrificing anything offensively

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:09 AM MST up reply actions  

5 years 70 would be ideal for me

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 10:22 AM MST up reply actions  

My gut feeling

Is that Sarver wants him around, because he’s exciting and puts people in the seats, but Kerr realizes he’s not a player this team should build around going forward.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 9:48 AM MST up reply actions  

The Jury is still out on Kerr...

Steve Kerr has made about as many boneheaded moves as good decisions…I don’t have absolute faith in him…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 9:50 AM MST up reply actions  

At least he's made some good moves recently

Before Steve Kerr made the apparently excellent decisions to draft Dragic and Lopez and to trade Boris Diaw, he didn’t have any good accomplishments.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:12 AM MST up reply actions  

Tell me where you got that piece of biast info jb?

Kerr would be a complete moron if he didn’t realize the team should build around Amare going forward.

Just because he doesn’t want to give him a max deal does NOT mean he does not want to build around Amare for the future….

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:04 AM MST up reply actions  

Amare is better served as a #2 guy on a team...

he can’t be the centerpiece of a team… not good enough at creating for himself or others

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:11 AM MST up reply actions  

Unfortunately, he doesn’t think that.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:13 AM MST up reply actions  

I do think he realizes it..

I believe a lot of what Amare is saying right now is posturing to try to manipulate himself the most amount of contract…

If Amare could have his way, he would get a max or near max deal and stay right in Phoenix…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:23 AM MST up reply actions  

Although

He’s never had to with Nash around….

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Build around…maybe not. But he’s definitely a player you can build WITH!

I need a ring, DAMMIT!!

by Sunny_N_DC on Feb 5, 2010 10:05 AM MST up reply actions  

We are going to be sorry if we throw away Amare

I think we can do a lot worse that giving him 16 to 17 a year for 4-5 years.. Great to have a big man that can finish around the rim

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:14 AM MST up reply actions  

+1

I need a ring, DAMMIT!!

by Sunny_N_DC on Feb 5, 2010 10:15 AM MST up reply actions  

Seriously if it is his health

Give him a bigger contract with some team options in it, 4 years with team option 2

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:16 AM MST up reply actions  

i'd be ok with going a little higher on the salary number for a short term deal...

but i would not ever give him a huge 5 year deal… way too much risk involved

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:23 AM MST up reply actions  

Agreed

His health issues ought to preclude anything longer than 4 years

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:24 AM MST up reply actions  

I guess we are all pretty close...

I suspect Amare and his agent realize this too..just trying to posture to get as much as they can.

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 11:40 AM MST up reply actions  

Although I don’t particularly want Stoudemire to go, I thought that any talk of keeping him was moot as long as he wants too much money.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:17 AM MST reply actions  

Once again what is Amare worth?

I believe Amare is worth as much to the Suns as Gasol is to the Lakers…Difference is that Sarver is operating off a tighter budget…We have to factor that in as well

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:20 AM MST reply actions  

14-16 M, IMO

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 10:23 AM MST up reply actions  

Maybe Nash should take the pay cut...

Amare is worth way more than only 2 million more than an old Nash…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:24 AM MST up reply actions  

But is he still worth 12-13??

And pay Amare only 14… no way man with that logic either Nash’s salary goes down or Amare’s goes up, Amare is more valuable and more talented than Nash

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:26 AM MST up reply actions  

If you took one away right now

We’d do better with Amare than Nash.

I truely believe that, Nash is replaceable, there are 20 point guards in the NBA that we could succeed with. LA is looking to rid themselves of Davis’s contract, we pick him up and we are at where we left off.

Not a lot of big men that can score like that.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:29 AM MST up reply actions  

Lol I dont think that many people would argue this...

There are a plethora of solid NBA point guards in the league right now that can produce what Nash does, there are only about 3 big men who produce what Amare does…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:45 AM MST up reply actions  

that may be true but...

would anyone not under the influence of drugs argue this is the real question

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:47 AM MST up reply actions  

Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Rajon Rondo

is that a plethora? Those are the only 3 players that if we swapped straight up for nash our team would be equally or more successful.

by DaveJD on Feb 5, 2010 10:48 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I didn't say AS successful

I said better off….

If we lost Amare we couldn’t find an available replacement. Nobody shops big men

If we lost Nash we could find a point guard who could produce still… maybe not at Nash’s level but we’d be better off doing that than loosing Amare

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:54 AM MST up reply actions  

Big Men are much more plentiful these days

go ahead and look at the upcoming FA list, and see the difference.

"you're the Rod Thorn in my Chris Bosh side."

by Chris Child's Fist on Feb 10, 2010 1:38 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't see how that's true

You took Amare away from this team in 05/06 and the team barely missed a beat. Diaw came in and did his thing and we went one game further in the playoffs.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 10:45 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm not saying we don't NEED Amare

I’m just saying that we really, really, really need Nash.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 10:45 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

But you saw the talent level of that 05/06 season it was bad

We almost lost to the crappy Lakers who only had Kobe and remember we lost the first 3 games… and then we almost lost to the Clippers who have always sucked. We weren’t that good we just got lucky with seeding.

Now and I am speaking in today’s terms… if you take the 36 year old out of Phoenix and replace him with another productive point guard (remember there are many more in the NBA than productive big men) we would be better off than taking Amare out of the equation and replacing him with who???

 I don’t even know who would be avilable to replace Amare right now because teams dont look to shop their big men!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:51 AM MST up reply actions  

The Clippers though were actually very good that season

They were better than us IMO.

I understand your mindset but I think even at his age, Nash is the motor. Everyone else is a series of revolving parts.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 10:52 AM MST up reply actions  

I do not disagree man

The argument was based on if Nash should take a pay cut to land Amare because Amare is more valuable at this point in both of their careers than Nash

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:55 AM MST up reply actions  

“remember there are many more in the NBA than productive big men”

I don’t know about that assertion… it may be true or may not be I haven’t really researched this but Nash is the cog that makes our offense go… he is the player this offense is tailor-made for and he IS the absolute best shooter in the league and the best passer

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:54 AM MST up reply actions  

Who would you replace Amare with

That’s available… right now??

I can think of a ton of different teams we could score a very good point guard from who would minimize the damage of loosing Nash

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:56 AM MST up reply actions  

It is more complicated than that...

Amare and Nash both have really unique skill sets and I don’t think there are players in the league exactly like either of them but as far as production is concerned you could replace Amare with Bosh, Kevin Love, Pau Gasol, Dirk Nowitzski, Zach Randolph, Carl Landry, Josh Smith, Carlos Boozer, Keving Garnett, and Anthony Randolph.

You could replace Nash with only Chris Paul, Chauncey Billups, Deron Williams, and Rajon Rondo if you look at all the players PERs.

Actually there are a lot more PF in the league with comparable production to Amare. And only about 5 top tier PGs.

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 11:03 AM MST up reply actions  

I said available.

None of those PF’s are available, my point being is that teams generally see value in a really good big man.. and they don’t ship him off for spare parts.

There are however really are some good available point guards.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 11:06 AM MST up reply actions  

like who...

none of those PGs are available either

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 11:08 AM MST up reply actions  

plus this draft is stacked with good PFs...

which means the NBA will only get more flooded with talented PFs and they will be easier to acquire…

a good PG is and always will be a hotter commodity than a good PF

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 11:10 AM MST up reply actions  

Of course

We’d need a pick first

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 11:13 AM MST up reply actions  

wasn't my point.... please read

the point we were arguing is what is more replacable…. and PFs clearly are…

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 11:29 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree with that

They always say, the hardest things to get are a good point guard and a good center.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 12:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Look at the success rate of PF's or C's in the league

from draft day compared to PG’s… It is undoubtedly a lot higher for PG’s look at the numbers now… almost every team has a quality pg and only a handful has a quality PF or C.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 11:13 AM MST up reply actions  

dude your stupid...

you keep making these assertions despite me proving you wrong… where did you look up the success rate of PF’s and C’s vs. PG’s… also and again, there are clearly only 5 elite pg’s and about twice as many elite pf’s plus the fact there are going to be many more entering the league after this draft…. Ed Davis, Greg Monroe, Cousins, that dude from Wake Forest, Al-Aminu i think his name his, Craig Brackens… plsu you got young guys in the league already who are going to be good at that spot in Randolph, Wright, Ryan Andersen(debateable but I like his chances), some would say Yi, and a bunch more… the only good promising young PGs are Jennings and Flynn, Evans isnt a pg so you can’t include him

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 11:32 AM MST up reply actions  

his stupid what?

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 11:33 AM MST up reply actions  

thats funny he didn't use the correct "you're"

Superelkman you can say there are 5 elite point guards, but then you have to only include the elite PF’s in the league, you can’t include every PF that is good. So your comparison is elite PG’s to good PF’s and of course there are more good PF’s than elite PG’s.

Amare, Bosh, Dirk, Jefferson, Lee, those are the elite PF’s in the league now, you can’t include Duncan who’s a C or Garnett who is really old and injured last season and this season and who doesn’t produce much anymore something like 14/7 this year….

Its pretty obvious to be an elite big man in the NBA takes a lot more talent than an elite PG, and furthermore it takes a bit of luck to be able to draft one of these elite big men, the list you gave me of college big men isn’t an argument, we will take a look at those kids 3 years into the league and I can guarantee you only 1/4 will be producing at a good level.

Once again to develop into a great PG takes determination (steve nash) to develop into a great big man takes a whole lot of talent, and even more determination, big men get eaten alive in this league.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 11:54 AM MST up reply actions  

Funnier because his attempt to call someone stupid.

If he wrote looser it just would have been elite

by jemagee on Feb 5, 2010 12:08 PM MST up reply actions  

Well thank you for finally making a point... you just kept making assertions without any backing...

i am typing this quickly and thus do not care if this is grammatically or syntactically incorrect as long as my point gets across so misspelling you’re is no big deal…

but again you are entering your subjective opinion with very little backing… the guys i listed had PERs as good if not better than Amare… that is my basis for measuring their production

NAsh was 1st or 2nd in PER, Amare was like 9th

of course you include Duncan because he is a natural pf

“Its pretty obvious to be an elite big man in the NBA takes a lot more talent than an elite PG”

That is false… PGs handle the ball on nearly every possession and are the most skilled players on the court… how come in the NBA Skills competition there are only Gs.

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 12:09 PM MST up reply actions  

I use statistics ever day of my life, but I dont let any of Hollinger’s ratings factor into my arguments, sorry man I know the game better than that.

Duncan is a natural Center, this my friend is not something that can be argued, in Popovich world he goes big with his lineups, which is the only reason Duncan plays PF there’s usually a 400 pound fat monster playing at the C

Take a look at every NBA champion in the last decade, which of those champions had an elite PG and not an elite big man?

Boston- elite big men, progressing PG
Miami- elite big man with complement half PG/ half SG
San Antonio- elite big man, good PG
Recent Lakers- Elite big MEN non existant pg
early 2000’s lakers- Elite big MAN progressing Kobe

To win a championship you need an elite big man you do not need an elite PG considering no one on that list is an elite PG (maybe Wade)

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 12:16 PM MST up reply actions  

i will give you that talented big men are in general more valuable but also more abundant....

we are talking about the current supply and demand of each position and you are claiming it would be easier to replace a top 3 pg then a top 10 pf… i guess i just disagree

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 2:30 PM MST up reply actions  

“PGs handle the ball on nearly every possession and are the most skilled players on the court”

a golf player may have skill but i dont call him an athlete, a pg may have skill but I dont confuse that with talent

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 12:19 PM MST up reply actions  

not even close to the same type of skill...

PGs are skilled and athletic… golfers have a skill and are most definitely not athletic… it is much harder to dribble into the teeth of the defense, make a read on where to go with the ball, and then execute a usually difficult pass or shot

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 2:32 PM MST up reply actions  

you can find mid-tier PGs easier but in the league currently there are an abundance of good PFs and only a handful of elite PGs

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 12:14 PM MST up reply actions  

you are comparing ferrari's to mercedes man

of course there are more quality big men than elite PG’s elite by definition means the best of breed, there can only be a few best of breed. that doesnt make your argument stronger to mis-compare players…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 12:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Teams who would ship talented PG’s today:

Davis, Ellis, Harris, Minnesota (maybe not fair because they have about 5), Kirk Heinrich, Calderon.

Not to mention a ton of other producing PG’s who could manage (maybe nothing special) a team and not hurt you, think Rafer Alston in Orlando last season.

Thus meaning a good big man (Amare) is more valuable to a team’s success than a good old PG (Nash)

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 12:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Nash is a better Player then Amare is this year so Amare should get less then Nash per year if we were realistic

"Stop denying the inevitable, the time has come to rebuild"
rgreyslak@gmail.com twitter @rgreyslak

by RGreyslak on Feb 5, 2010 3:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed.

And also on a shorter deal, or a longer deal with team options in the last year or two.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:24 AM MST up reply actions  

I’d give a player a maximum contract in this situation—if he would let me put a team option on every year so I could get out of the contract if I had to.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:23 AM MST reply actions  

That'd be sweet.

That might be the type of thing that happens under a new CBA … non-guaranteed contracts.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:25 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm hoping

The new CBA more resembles the NFL. I don’t mind the soft salary cap still, but lower salary limits and non-guaranteed contracts are a must.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:28 AM MST up reply actions  

it a lot of the time is their own fault for overpaying for a guy but...

these players no longer have to earn it after they sign a big deal if they dont want to give a ton of effort

the NFL has it right… a portion of the deal is guaranteed(the signing bonus) and the rest must be earned….

i really hope to see this in the next CBA….

any word if this has been discussed?

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:28 AM MST up reply actions  

it would serve a dual purpose...

1) to protect teams as you mentioned AND
2) to increase the intensity level…. there is no doubt that if contracts we’re not fully guaranteed that players would play a little harder

Why is NBA playoff basketball the very best event in all of sport(subjective opinion of course)? Because you have the most supremely talented athletes in the world giving near max effort. NBA basketball is so great to watch when both teams are super intense.

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:33 AM MST up reply actions  

It does help ensure that the best teams win the championship

But it’s less interesting. However, it does mean the regular season is more valid than in other sports.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:36 AM MST up reply actions  

yeah i think a lot of people would say something to that effect

they usually are predictable but how exciting was the suns-clippers series, or suns-lakers when we won, or when denver upset seattle, or last year when boston and chicago went to 7

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:35 AM MST up reply actions  

true...

it can go both ways…. i would say out of all the major sports though the NBA is the one where the best team wins it all 90% of the time

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:39 AM MST up reply actions  

I can’t figure out how to get into college basketball, but am willing to be taught how. The players on your favorite teams keep changing every year, especially because the best of them go to the NBA.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:36 AM MST up reply actions  

You really only have to watch March Madness.

And this is why the NFL regular season is kind of weird, too. Even a lower seeded team that slips into the playoffs can win one game against an opponent and make it the Super Bowl (e.g. The cardinals).

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 10:38 AM MST up reply actions  

True

But how do you measure a player’s level of play relative to the contract?

There would be too many ways to get out of contracts for teams it would provide the player’s with no stability.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:36 AM MST up reply actions  

it is like in the nfl

you negotiate your guaranteed(signing bonus) and non-guaranteed portion of your contract… so if 25 million of the 50 mill deal was a signing bonus then yes they would receive that 25 million prorated over the duration of the deal regardless of whether or not they are cut

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:42 AM MST up reply actions  

Not a bad idea...

The union would’nt go for it though…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:59 AM MST up reply actions  

Neither side can ever get all it wants, because if the players go on strike or the NBA locks them out, the fans get angry and stop showing up after the lockout or strike ends.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:30 AM MST up reply actions  

No doubt the players’ union would fight that as much as it would fight increased drug testing.

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:28 AM MST up reply actions  

You can’t fight the players too hard on salary, they will just bolt to Europe, where the Euro to dollar is strong and they can make a killing.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:33 AM MST reply actions  

i think that is more myth than anything

just because a few fringe nba players left doesnt mean anything… plus you hear about how they are bad with paying their peopel alot of the time and that the conditions are uncomfortable compared to nba standards

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:34 AM MST up reply actions  

I’d be willing to test that, because how many players wouldn’t mind leaving home?

by species8473 on Feb 5, 2010 10:35 AM MST up reply actions  

If Lebron wanted to play for lets say the London team

You don’t think they would pay him more than the NBA and accommodate and cater to him? He will be traveling 6 mos out of the year, the same as in the US and they could hold practices in Cleavland over the Summer… I don’t think that he would have to sacrifice that much…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:39 AM MST up reply actions  

If they cut salary by 40%

So now the max was 12 Million….?

You dont think we’d have a flocking of NBA talent to Europe??? Every single agent would push their client to go to Europe and realistically the NBA player would be stupid not to go considering they have to live on this money for the rest of their lives…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:42 AM MST up reply actions  

that seems drastic...

what are they really looking to cut salary by

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:43 AM MST up reply actions  

wow...

that would be drastic…

i would rather have the cap be higher but have non-fully-guaranteed deals… this would distribute the money to the players who contribute better

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:45 AM MST up reply actions  

40%...!!!!!

Geez…We would lose some talent to other countries for sure..

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 11:00 AM MST up reply actions  

Dats what I’m saying, its not like the NBA would be impossible for an entrepreneur to replicate in the wealthier parts of Europe….

5-10 years down the line we are playing our D league rosters as starters…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 11:02 AM MST up reply actions  

that is definitely an overexaggeration...

there would still be more money to go around here than in any league in europe… we would lose some mid-level players but our stars would still be here if that is the case…

also that is just what the owners are proposing and of course they are going to conceed a little bit to the players U and it will probably be only cut by 10-20%.

these owners are smart guys… they aren’t going to let their biggest assets leave for other countries

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 11:06 AM MST up reply actions  

America still has drawing power, though...

Something that would always work in our favor is our tax and corporate laws. Bad as they seem to many of us, they are way better than most countries around the world

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 11:08 AM MST up reply actions  

considering they have to live on this money for the rest of their lives…

lawl i’d take 2 mill for 2 years and i’d be set… its only when your stupid with your money does really needing 17mill become needed

by Will Smith on Feb 5, 2010 10:44 AM MST up reply actions  

alright off the soapbox

we live in a capitalist society(thank God) and of course they are going to maximize their earning potential… sure it is very excessive… we all know that

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:46 AM MST up reply actions  

you couldnt live on 4 million your entire life

you’d be taxed 40 %% so you’d be down to 2.4 million, with inflation by the time you are 50 your spending power would have been cut in half, so you’d probably have to go back to work…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 10:47 AM MST up reply actions  

Probably true

But a few people out there could figure out how to translate that 2.4 million into a lot more…

Problem is most Americans ain’t that smart…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 11:02 AM MST up reply actions  

I could do it

But you can’t really put yourself into risky holdings if you have to use that money to generate income year after year to live on…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 11:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Low and slow

Conservative investments for sure…Takes discipline but it can be done..

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 11:04 AM MST up reply actions  

i agree...

just budget yourself….

i swear we have become a country of impulse… no one lives within their means anymore

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 11:07 AM MST up reply actions  

Reminds me...

Got to go out and buy another 46" LCD TV for my bathroom…

Dang discipline level!!!!

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 11:10 AM MST up reply actions  

Yes you need to keep holdings in fixed income securities

But that will net you 5-6% interest max. Leaving you with 120-144K a year to live on before taxes. After taxes you are at about 95 K and this number is not adjusted for inflation, you are looking to have your spending power cut in half every 30 years (probably a lot sooner now given all of this current excessive debt) so that means by the time you are 60 you will have to live on around 50k. 2.4M aint dat much money these days.

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 11:11 AM MST up reply actions  

IF we get Iggy+Sam

What about starting both?
Nash-Rich-Iggy-Lopez-Sam…
Other teams can start 2 7footers why cant we? Granted your going to say because of the lack of scoring, but I would put money down if we tried that we wouldnt have a issue scoring. Lopez is young and has upside… he just isn’t needed to score or has never been asked. Will be as good as Amare? NO but would do ehough

by Will Smith on Feb 5, 2010 10:36 AM MST reply actions  

I don't really like Lopez at PF though

I like Frye next to Lopez since it spreads the floor

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 10:46 AM MST up reply actions  

yeah that lineup is not ideal....

if that trade went down what would you think of Nash-Rich-Iggy-Clark-Lopez

I know Clark is a little raw but he has the athleticism to be a good finisher off the pick and roll

by Superelkman on Feb 5, 2010 10:50 AM MST up reply actions  

Yeah

i like Clark alot. I also like Lopez to start

by Will Smith on Feb 5, 2010 10:56 AM MST up reply actions  

This will not work

Lopez and Daly replicate each other…No versality and no consistent 10-15 foot jumper from the 4 or 5

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 10:54 AM MST up reply actions  

Wouldn't it be nice if we could drug the Sixers GM and swap Richardson for Iggy?

And just when he realizes that he’s getting screwed, we pull some “But now you’ll have Rich and Dalmbert coming off your books in 2011” nonsense, get him to agree, then run away cackling with joy?

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 11:57 AM MST reply actions  

It's always good to dream...

But if this happened, I would wonder if they secretly poisoned Iggy before they sent him over…

"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."

Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...

by Daryl Ray on Feb 5, 2010 12:00 PM MST up reply actions  

That was what I thought too.

J-Rich for Iggy straight up.

Sure it would never happen, but it’s fun to think about.

by Azreous on Feb 5, 2010 1:12 PM MST up reply actions  

Iggy is based on athleticism as he gets older he will start to loose a step once he does he will be useless…he shoots 31.4 percent from 3…

by marques m on Feb 5, 2010 3:40 PM MST up reply actions  

Well, we have a while before that happens.

He barely turned 26 and he’s just entering his prime, if he’s even in it yet. His contract will be up when he starts to downturn.

by jburning on Feb 5, 2010 3:46 PM MST up reply actions  

by making dumb trades like this we will end up trying to get rid of him and will later have to sacrifice a good player to get rid of his contract.. the same way philly is getting rid of him to get rid of dalenbert because somebody signed him not realizing he had a good season and a limited skill set.

by marques m on Feb 5, 2010 3:52 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree to a certain extent

I agree, half of what makes Iguodala so exciting is his athleticism, but that dude is a very cerebral player. He can see the court very well, doesn’t have a bad looking jumper, and can get to the rim/free throw line with consistency.

That natural instinct to get to the line, coupled with his court awareness, bodes well for him.

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 5, 2010 8:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah plus i think we could improve his three-point shot

Majerle helped Dragic and Dudley both significantly improve their shot this offseason, whats to stop iggy doing the same.

by DaveJD on Feb 6, 2010 5:25 AM MST up reply actions  

Ya know...

This is the trade I like most.. but I really think we need to take the gamble and extend Amare to a near max deal.

by bangbang240 on Feb 5, 2010 12:24 PM MST reply actions  

 Iggys Contract- 12.3 mil next season
13.5mil 2011-2012
14.7mil in 2012-13
player option for 15.9 the season after
Do you still want him..If he was a free agent would you sign him to this type of contract…Hell No.. he is a good player but not worth that for the next four years we talk about loosing amare for nothing if he opts in that gives us another yr. Next yr almost every suns player contract is up..As far as Dalenbert he is Robin Lopez with a huge contract
I rather keep amare unless we get a better trade financially or we will keep making dumb trades and I wish we would quit trying to build this team around Nash…he is my favorite player in the world but we talk about him like he will play the next couple of years hes only looking at 3 more yrs..If you trade amare trade nash and hill out of respect..
P.S I hate this trade with philly

by marques m on Feb 5, 2010 3:37 PM MST reply actions  

Neither were Marion and Amare, but we gave them a deal similar to that and than they started to ask for more. Thing is with Iggy that he would be 31 at the time his contract expires and would be near the end of his prime, so we wouldn’t even bother to keep him.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 3:44 PM MST up reply actions  

but with both amare and marion we knew nash would still be around…by trading amare and giving iggy that contract we would be basically building around him for the next four yrs…hes athletic and can dunk but I would rather let dudley and clark get more playing time at a cheaper price and see what they can do because i think they have more upside

by marques m on Feb 5, 2010 3:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Isn’t Nash’s last season with us the 2012-13 season. We’re not rebuilding until we have no choice according to Kerr. I think Iggy will fit with Nash nicely.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 4:20 PM MST up reply actions  

I heard that why the Philly\Suns deal hasn’t happened yet is because of two reasons.

1. Amare’s recent comments have caused the 76ers to hesitate.

2. The Suns want them to take J-Rich over Barbosa and it is believed the 76ers don’t want to do that because if Amare stays than that breaks what they are trying to financial wise. That means that they are stuck with huge contracts in Amare and J-Rich.

Now from what Marc Stein said it sounded like the 76ers would still do this deal for Amare if they got Barbosa instead.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 3:40 PM MST reply actions  

Whats going to happen? The chances of Amare being traded this deadline are starting to decrease all because of his comments saying that he’s leaning towards staying the final year. If so than we can trade him in the summer when we could get better value.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 3:42 PM MST up reply actions  

The problem is if we don’t trade Amare now and he says he will not opt out; whats to stop him from changing his mind in the summer and walking before we can trade him? This is a risky situation.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 3:47 PM MST up reply actions  

you all may hate him because he may not play defense but also he’s not a complete scum bag to leave us high and dry like that

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 4:24 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t hate him; we just have to consider all risks.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 4:25 PM MST up reply actions  

i know, and i know boozer did it, but amare has class man, we drafted this kid and gave him his success today, i think he appreciates that…

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 4:26 PM MST up reply actions  

In fact I will miss Amare when he’s gone. Iggy is just the guy I want back for him. I’ve always wanted him on this team. Gosh a J-Rich for Iggy trade would be great.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 4:27 PM MST up reply actions  

It's not about hating him

I don’t think anybody hates him, he’s a good dude. The thing is that it’s in his best interests to opt out and sign a new contract, so we should be wary of going into this summer and relying on the fact that at this time he says he MIGHT opt-in.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 7:24 PM MST up reply actions  

  plus over the last few months since trade rumors have picked up amare has said nothing about wanting to leave phx infact he said steve nash is his point guard all he wants is fair compensation I think amare is starting to realize he is not worth a max deal which is part of the reason he is talking about opting in which should help us in negotating

by marques m on Feb 5, 2010 3:55 PM MST reply actions  

Well, I guess there is a chance we can negotiate a reasonable deal with Amar’e. If not than I think Amar’e should just tell the 76ers front office that he will opt out, so they would take J-Rich off our hands.

by Beavis 25 on Feb 5, 2010 4:22 PM MST up reply actions  

I'd rathar keep JRich than Barbosa

That is a nice big duo of guards, plus with JRich and Dalemberts expiring contracts we can score something nice this offseason….

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 5, 2010 4:25 PM MST up reply actions  

No this offseason through next years trade deadline

Teams would love either one of those players for 1 year who are trying to shed salaries… plus you aren’t getting some way overpaid player you are getting a guy who can produce as well for 1 year for your team….

by SSOHOWARD on Feb 6, 2010 10:13 AM MST up reply actions  

opposite bro they was saying that cleveland wants him to opt out they are trying to save money..I dont want to get rid of barbosa but I would do Barbosa and J-rich for iggy.. then dudley can relieve him off the bench

by marques m on Feb 5, 2010 8:24 PM MST up reply actions  

NO AMARE TRADE!!!

STOP ALREADY WITH THIS. YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LOSE HIM TO GET NO INSIDE OFFENSE PRESENCE FOR IT. THAT’S JUST PLAIN STUPID. DALEMBERT HAS NO OFFENSE AND PLAYS DEFENSE, THAT SOUNDS LIKE LOPEZ TO ME (LOPEZ IMPROVING OFF.). YOU WANT IGUA, THEN LET GO JASON AND GRIFFIN AND COLLINS. THOSE ARE THE ONLY PIECES WORTH LETTING GO.(JASON BECAUSE OF CONTRACT ONLY)

by Diawfan on Feb 5, 2010 7:44 PM MST reply actions  

OMG CAPSLOCK

Bright Side of the Sun, where Suns basketball never looked so good.

by Trevor Paxton on Feb 5, 2010 8:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Feb 5, 2010 11:25 PM MST up reply actions  

I’d love to somehow get Speights in the trade. He could make up for some of the ppg Amar’e puts up.

by perep on Feb 6, 2010 10:19 AM MST reply actions  

Not

Going

To

Happen

by jemagee on Feb 6, 2010 10:40 AM MST up reply actions  

What about this?

We trade Amare & j rich 4 iggy and dalembert (and green/ kapono i guess). Now stat would be gone for the year, but he was willing to not opt out w/ phx recently. so, I propose that we resign amare to that contract we were gonna give him. that way, phx would have amare back, with the addition of iggy. So the line-up for the rest of the season would be: Nash-Andre-Hill-Frye-Dalembert. And the 10-11 season would then be: Nash-Andre-Hill-Amare-Lopez. This, in my opinion, would be a steal for PHX and would make them contenders again! : ]

by J.Y.D. on Feb 10, 2010 10:40 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Gortat_nash_dudley_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Divinginlevanto_small PHXgp

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_3111433_9952_1451357_main_small 7footer