Earl Clark Shines In His First D-league Game
I can't say I watched Earl Clark's entire D-league debut game, but I did catch the full overtime period. Earl obviously did his work early putting up 27 points on 11/16 shooting. Impressive. As was the 12 rebounds and 5 assists. He got to the line for 8 FTA's as well.
He played a full 45 minutes game which had to have worn him out a bit. He works hard in Phoenix, putting in extra gym time after almost every Suns home game and has earned praise from the coaching staff for his effort. But there's nothing like playing in a real game.
Earl had 25 of his 27 in the first three quarters with only 2 points in the fourth and none in the OT. I tuned in just in time to see him miss a long two and commit a turnover trying to drive the lane. He was striped and may have been fouled. It's hard to tell watching on a computer screen.
Perhaps most surprising and impressive were the comments from Iowa Energy Head Coach Nick Nurse in his post game interview. He said he was impressed by Earl's basketball IQ and his ability to learn the plays and fit into to the team with only one day of practice. He called Clark a good team player and was happy with a few of his "man" rebounds.
According to Nurse, Steve Kerr will be in Iowa this weekend to watch Earl play in his next two games with the Energy. The plan is for him just to play three games with the Energy to hopefully get him some "seasoning" in preparation for the Suns playoff run.
The Energy next play their rival Sioux Falls Skyforce on Friday and Saturday. If Kerr skips the Suns-Jazz game on Friday to watch Earl play in Des Moines you know how serious he is about Clark.
The unanswered question is how many of Earl's shots came in the paint and how many were jump shots. We'll track down an answer to that.
It is also worth pointing out and congratulating the Energy on their D-league leading 33-11 record. Clark is playing for a fine organization and with some solid teammates including Cartier Martin, who hit a big shot to clinch the game; Curtis Stinson, who had 19 points and 21 assists(!); Mark Tyndale, who had 30 points and a few big shots in OT; and Earl Barron, who controlled the paint with 14 and 10.
The Energy, by the way, scored 135 points and were only 3/8 from behind the arc. Nice.
[Note by Seth Pollack, 03/18/10 8:44 AM MST ]
Coach Nurse emailed me this additional report on Earl's play:
He did most of his damage off the bounce and with mid range jumpers. He made great decisions all night as to when to go all the way to the cup and when to pull up or when to pass. He didnt make many mistakes on his decision-making. His tempo was great and he played great team ball. He also worked hard at the defensive end.
Coach said he may have got tired as the game wore on but the other team started doubling him as well.
Here's the quotes from Earl from the local paper:
NBA D-League: Suns rookie gives Energy a boost | desmoinesregister.com | The Des Moines Register
“I got tired a little bit at the end,” Clark said after scoring 27 points and grabbing 12 rebounds. “But it’s good to get out here and play 40 minutes.”
Clark, a 6-foot-10 swing player out of Louisville with a quick first step, was taken with the 14th pick of the NBA Draft by Phoenix. He has played 45 games there this season, averaging 2.7 points, 1.1 rebounds and 7.7 minutes. He was making his NBA Development League debut Wednesday.
“At first, it’s kind of, you don’t know what to think,” Clark said of his demotion. “But it’s a situation in Phoenix where I’m playing behind a lot of hall of famers. I’ve been working real hard. And they want me to get out here and show the things I’ve been working on, stretch out. It’s a good opportunity to play this many minutes.”
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I watched about half of the fourth quarter and all of the OT
As you mentioned, didn’t get to see much of Clark, because he’d already done most of his damage by then. I hate watching TV on my computer. I might check out the D-league action more often, though.
also means that he's overtalented for the D-league
its tough playing on the Suns, an offense-oriented team that thrives on high-percentage shots. he will get settled over the summer and next year will be a great rotation player on the team. Can’t wait – this kid is SO talented.
Twitter: @dahking
Too late to change the stupid twitter name. Did it as a joke to my teenager, but now I'm hooked on the news-feed aspect of twitter.
Overtalented?
While I didn’t see the game, that’s saying quite a bit – both about Clark and the players in the D-League.
I blog at Ridiculous Upside. I know you'll love it.
by Scott Schroeder on Mar 17, 2010 11:44 PM MDT up reply actions
It's strange, but there's a big jump in talent from D-League to NBA
There are very few players in the D league who could make the roster of even a team like the Nets, which is why when 12th men or projects make the transition back to the minors, they generally tend to do very well.
This, of course, suggests that there are too many teams in the NBA, and that the available talent has been so spread out, as to be completely absorbed by teams in the NBA.
This situation is unique to the NBA, as far as I can tell. It doesn’t happen in other sports, such as Baseball or Hockey, where there are many minor leaguers who could easily play on a major league team, or in International soccer.
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Mar 18, 2010 12:03 AM MDT up reply actions
Really?
Golden State beat the Hornets by 10 points tonight, led by D-League call-up Anthony Tolliver (30 points, 11-19 FG, 4-8 3pt, 4 steals and a block). Fellow D-League call-ups Reggie Williams (22 points on 8-11 shooting, 4 rebs, 4 asts) and Chris Hunter (17 pts, 8 rebs and a block) also contributed quite a bit in the comeback win.
Conversely, Marcus Landry, on assignment from the Boston Celtics, is averaging 7 points in 5 games in the D-League while shooting 32% from the field.
I think you may be overlooking the D-League.
I blog at Ridiculous Upside. I know you'll love it.
by Scott Schroeder on Mar 18, 2010 12:12 AM MDT up reply actions
Lou Amundson, Matt Barnes
You may have heard of them. D-League alumni.
Twitter: @MikeLisboa
by Mike Lisboa on Mar 18, 2010 12:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Ok I stand corrected.
I was going to say, you can’t tell anything about the league as a whole, based on what the Warriors do, because that org is dysfunctional and crazy. But the Warriors do have a bunch of D league talent on their roster, and while they’re 19 & 48, they’re not the worst team in the league, by some margin.
I’ll accept both of those guys you mentioned, but point out that Lou was the D-league ROY, so he does fall into that very few players category, and Matt was drafted, so he was on the cusp too.
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Mar 18, 2010 1:05 AM MDT up reply actions
"The Warriors are dysfunctional and crazy"
I’ll give you that, but I don’t know what that says about the D-League players.
They’re getting a lot of minutes and playing as well, or better some nights, than their NBA counterparts.
Also, Amundson averaged just 11.1 points, 7.6 rebounds and 2.5 blocks in the D-League – doesn’t seem he was “overtalented,” based on those numbers.
I blog at Ridiculous Upside. I know you'll love it.
by Scott Schroeder on Mar 18, 2010 1:32 AM MDT up reply actions
Lou won the NDBL rookie of the year award..
which, given the short average D league career, of two or three years, it meant he was amongst the best players in the NDBL that year. Clearly, he won the award based on something other than a box score stat line, and his value to us is not based on any box score line, either.
wrt Warriors, I’m kind of agreeing with you. The Warriors aren’t good, but they aren’t the worst team in the NBA, either, and they have something like 6 former NDBL players on their roster, right now, a couple of whom have been around for a while.
Now, I don’t think any other organization would have been that creative wrt their roster, with maybe only a couple of d leaguers on their teams, and generally preferring players who were on a roster the previous season, but since Don Nelson is the Warrior’s coach, mad science is going to ensue.
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Mar 18, 2010 2:19 AM MDT up reply actions
ever heard of chris anderson or shannon brown mate? both hold down solid bench spots in 2 very very talented teams. Either of those 2 players would be starting on a lesser team
I honestly don't believe
that Shannon Brown would start on any lesser team. He couldn’t even play in Charlotte, and that’s with a coach in Larry Brown who values size and defense at the PG position. In fact, Brown is the perfect PG for the Lakers.
I DO agree that he might sniff more playing time on a team with a worse PG than Fisher. Let’s see, there’s… umm…. no that guy’s better… well… oh yeah, what about… no, not them either… oh well. can’t think of any…
basically, Shannon Brown is the #2 or #3 PG on a team with the worst starting PG in the league (though he hits cold-blooded shots to win critical games at least 4-5 times a year, but he could do that off the bench too)
Twitter: @dahking
Too late to change the stupid twitter name. Did it as a joke to my teenager, but now I'm hooked on the news-feed aspect of twitter.
Andersen played in three D-League games
And didn’t play particularly well and Brown was never a call-up – he played on assignment.
I don’t think either helps my argument because they played a combined 15 games in the D-League.
I think it’s a lot easier to give the D-League credit looking at guys that were completely off the radar, called-up and performed well rather than guys that were assigned for a few games.
I blog at Ridiculous Upside. I know you'll love it.
by Scott Schroeder on Mar 20, 2010 1:09 AM MDT up reply actions
Scott, I just logged back on this morning
and saw your response. Thanks to Pliny for carrying the torch last night on my point.
When I wrote that Clark is “overtalented” for the D-League, I meant that he more belongs in the NBA than in the D-League. I probably should have used a different word, like “overskilled” or “over-destined”. Oh never mind. Those sound arrogant too.
I just think Clark is too good to be a D-Leaguer. For the same reason you wouldn’t put Tyreke Evans in the D-league, or Steph Curry, or DeJuan Blair. The only difference between them and Earl Clark is playing time. They each filled a niche, or had a big role waiting for them on day 1. Earl didn’t.
I like seeing him get some burn, but he won’t improve his game in Iowa. He’ll just knock off some rust from the game he already has.
Of course, this is just my opinion.
Twitter: @dahking
Too late to change the stupid twitter name. Did it as a joke to my teenager, but now I'm hooked on the news-feed aspect of twitter.
If I’m right in supposing that you can’t develop much when playing a few minutes a game, Clark should have spent the entire season in the D-league. Unless that’s not allowed.
He's better off, imho, being with the main team
To improve, one needs to be playing against players who are better than oneself. And team practice is by far the major contributor to improvement.
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Mar 18, 2010 12:05 AM MDT up reply actions
Or...
He may have been better served playing extended minutes for us instead. I think you have it right hen you mentioned that Earl is struggling to develop with limited minutes. Some players are able to jump off the bench and make an impact right away, while others need to establish themselves into some sort of rhythm before making their mark…Obviously, I would say Earl falls into the latter category.
I know it’s tough to find playing time with such a talented group of starters, and even one of the most talented benches in the league as well. However, I saw many opportunities where Earl could’ve been inserted with minimal impact to the game, where he may have actually helped some as well. Earl is a long, lean player who is a natural at defending. His body style at SF is exactly what we have been missing against some of the larger 3’s in the league, such as Maggette and Lebron (Who Earl did extremely well against).
I think this 3-game stint will be good for him, sine his confidence was shaken and he was noticeably jittery when finally getting the opportunity to play; but I don’t think it necessarily had to come to this point either. With just a little more consistency with playing time and a few more minutes here and there, I have a feeling Earl would start coming on rather quickly playing with the big boys as well.
by 7footer on Mar 18, 2010 1:14 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
the Suns are a rhythm team
and I think Gentry just didn’t like the overall rhythm when Clark was in the game. Same happened a year ago with Lopez and Dragic. Take Lopez – do you think he has really improved THAT much in the past year? Or is it just that he was more prepared for his role this season compared to last year, which translated into better overall team performance when he is on the floor this season compared to last.
Twitter: @dahking
Too late to change the stupid twitter name. Did it as a joke to my teenager, but now I'm hooked on the news-feed aspect of twitter.
Clark on James?
Really? Clark did a good job defending LeBron James? That is impressive.
by 8472species on Mar 18, 2010 10:57 AM MDT up reply actions
Agree
I think they’ve done the right thing with Clark. As a first round pick, he should be with the main team, learning their sets and their system.
Twitter: @MikeLisboa
I said this in the past post about it, but it looks like this article replaced it..
“Hopefully this is a good sign… but Tucker’s rookie season, he got sent to the DLeague for 21 games and averaged almost 28 pts and 6 boards.”
Its obviously a good thing that Earl did well in his first game, but until we see him get a chance to prove himself consistently in the real thing, we wont know.
The thing I never got about Tucker
was why we insisted on molding him into a 2-guard. Tucker used to play PF in college and was very good at that. This is like asking Chuck Hayes or DeJuan Blair to learn to play 2-guard, just because they’re not tall enough.
Would Tucker be better served to go the Ryan Gomes or Carl Landry route? I really don’t know.
And I wonder how DJ Strawberry is doing. Such a waste of a cool name.
Grant Hill is totally the next MJ!!
Tucker was never tough enough, or agressive enough
to be a Landry or Gomes. Gomes shoots better, and is 6-8". Those 2 inches make a huge difference. Landry is 6-8" or 6-9".
Alando would have been fine under the basket if he had a mean streak, like Blair. But he didn’t.
Twitter: @dahking
Too late to change the stupid twitter name. Did it as a joke to my teenager, but now I'm hooked on the news-feed aspect of twitter.
Tucker also
isn’t nearly wide enough to play in the paint at the NBA level like Blair. That dude is huge…just not tall. Although he has REALLY long arms and big hands and incredible touch. Chuck Hayes is the exception to everything.
Tucker’s only shot at the NBA was at the 2/3.
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Mar 18, 2010 8:38 AM MDT up reply actions
I agree....Tucker is a good guy and teammate, but...
He was actually a little undersized for the three, especially in relation to guys like Anthony and Butler…He does’nt shoot well enoguh to be a two so he really would have to struggle to find a team that would give the right situation…Nice guy, but it’s tough making it at the NBA level..
"I especially liked the part where I dunked on the McDonalds All-American dude..."
Anonymous high-school player after a Virginia basketball state championship game...
I'm also glad to hear that Clark is handling his "demotion" maturely
He seems to understand the situation he’s in, and is being patient about it.
good idea
maybe after his final Iowa game on Saturday
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Mar 18, 2010 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions
yeah!
Twitter: @dahking
Too late to change the stupid twitter name. Did it as a joke to my teenager, but now I'm hooked on the news-feed aspect of twitter.

by 





















