Phoenix Suns Winning Streaks: A Statistical Analysis
Admit it. You've been laying awake at night wonder what's so different between the Phoenix Suns current winning streak, the mid-season slump, and the early season run.
Now you can finally get some rest. After you read on...
Basic Facts:
- Streak 1 lasted the first 17 games of the season from October 28th to November 29th. The Suns went 14 and 3 which included 11 road games
- The Slump lasted 30 games from December 1st to January 27th. The Suns went 12 and 18 and had 13 road games
- Streak 2 currently has lasted 16 games from January 28th to March 3rd. The Suns have gone 13 and 3 which includes 9 road games.
Here's the fancy chart that you've been waiting for to make your life complete. You are welcome.
And yes, if you click it, it will grow bigger..
Key Findings:
- The Suns pace has dropped during this latest win streak from about 98.5 down to 95.7
- The Suns defensive efficiency was horrible during the slump (111.2) but is now 104.6 which is about 16th in the league
- The Suns opponent FG% has improved steadily throughout the season from 46% during the 1st win streak, to 45.6% during the slump to 45.1% during the current streak
- The 45.1% opponent field goal percentage during the current 16 game streak is good for about 9th in the league
- During the first winning streak the Suns were about even in total rebounds and -2.59 in offensive rebounds
- During the current winning streak the Suns are +6.38 in total rebounds and +.44 in offensive rebound.
- The best rebounding team in the league for the season is Cleveland at +4.40 total rebound differential
- The change in rebounding performance is by far the biggest difference between early in the season and now
- As a result of rebounding better, the Suns have gone from -6.41 in FGA's per game to -2.4
- During the first winning streak the Suns were shooting 44.5% from three. During the slump and current streak they are shooting about 39% from three
- During the first winning streak the Suns were giving up 104.5 ppg and were +7.47 in ppg. During this streak they are giving up 100.1 and are +8.06
- The Suns FG% during the current streak is about 1% less than during the first streak
- During the 1st winning streak the Suns were taking ~7% more of their total shots from behind the arc. Now they are taking about 5% more of their shots withing 10 feet. This the Robin Lopez effect
Conclusions
Out of the gate the Suns were shooting red hot from three and they were one of the fastest teams in the league. The defense during that time was decent and the rebounding good enough. It was a streak fueled by offense.
When the outside shooting cooled off (as it had to) the Suns continue to play fast and they tried to regain their offensive mojo but as a result of more missed shots their defense got worse as their offensive rebounding woes worsened and they gave up more second chance points. The Suns were still improving in their half court field goal percentage defense but as the rebounding got worse they simply couldn't keep up and ended up with a losing record.
Now the Suns are shooting fewer three's but are still very good in the half court and lead the league in offensive efficiency. During the current win streak, the defensive efficiency is now around league average and the rebounding is among the best in the league. The only thing keeping the Suns from being a better defensive team is the high turnover rate combined the very poor turnovers forced.
Now, go get some sleep already!
Special Thanks to Tom Haberstroh from the great site, Hoop Data. Not only did Hoop Data provide a lot of the information used (as did Basketball-reference.com and NBA.com) but Tom responded quickly to a question I had AND showed me a REALLY cool trick for getting and using data from the web. Thanks, Tom. I owe a few beers when you come to town! Or girls. Your choice.
35 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
And yes, if you click it, it will grow bigger..

by underxthebridge on Mar 4, 2010 11:52 AM MST reply actions 5 recs
the rebounds are the key to everything
More erbounds for us = fewer offensive rebounds for them = fewer high-% shot attempts for them (putbacks) = lower shooting % for them = fewer points for them
Amazing. Why didn’t we think of that before?
Its how we beat the jazz as well. Last time they out rebounded us big time and we still had a chance to win.
By the way, we are 28-5 this season when we match or out rebound our opponents. Just thought I might throw that out there.
that's only
33 games?
Blogging Suns Basketball . twitter: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Mar 4, 2010 12:52 PM MST up reply actions
Yup, which means we were out rebounded for the other 30 games. 11-19 is our record when we get out rebounded. Rebounding IS the difference.
If we beat the Jazz tonight we will have equalled our 14-3 stretch to start the season
pretty cool me thinks.
Is this really who we are? I mean the way our team is playing right now. I’m not completely sold. It would take a couple Jazz wins and a win against LA to make me believe this team is a true contender. Gentry says the way we are playing right now is who we are. If so, than any theory as to why our slump lasted 30 games?
About the same actually. Lets just put it this way. We played well in November and February and crappy in December and January.
Also, there were probably about 5-8 games in that awful stretch that we could have won, but didn’t because we gave up big leads. You guys notice how we haven’t given up a big lead in this good stretch, yet? Well, I’m still mentally prepared if our team does give up a big lead with in the next few games.
so to convince you
the Suns have to beat every team from here on out. Cuz if we can beat the Jazz twice and Lakers, then any other loss will be disappointing and cause us to question the Suns’ focus.. which will result in us questioning our contendership… hmmm.
I’d rather just wait to see what happens and how those games play out. But hell, if the Suns win all 3 then I’ll be thrilled.
Amazing how we became one of the best rebounding teams in the league.
This little fact is making me really eager to see what we can do in the Playoffs. It’s not easy to beat a great offensive team that plays decent D and out-rebounds people…I’m pretty optimistic, we can be the surprise of the POs.
by Lorenzo Franceschi Bicchierai on Mar 4, 2010 1:29 PM MST reply actions
Lets not get ahead of ourselves though. The goal is to win 50 games and make the playoffs without having to play LA in the 1st round. Right now we are more than on pace for that, so lets just take this a game out of a time and wait to act surprised until the regular season is over. Then we can judge whether this team is a true contender.
Regardless of how well the team plays
I don’t think they’re a true contender. I just see no way they can beat the Lakers or Cavs in a 7-game series.
I’ll wait until we play LA to judge this team. We are not the same team that got blown out by Cleveland and LA twice, so things could be different.
We didn't have Robin Freaking Lopez in those games.
They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...
RFL - that's his new name.
They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...
we don't need to worry about Tim Donaghy anymore
Robin Lopez would smash Tim Donaghy like a glass door on a practice court.
Great post Seth - I especially enjoyed it (and all posts like this are my favorite)
I would also note that our turnovers during this current streak are at a season low – we are taking better care of the ball.
Tom responded quickly to a question I had AND showed me a REALLY cool trick for getting and using data from the web
I would like to know what the cool trick is! Or is it a secret or something? It would be useful to me because I’m always making my own charts and data tables!
They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...
Right now
We are not a contender for the trophy. I just want to see us go far in the playoff finals, and hopefully that will make the FO want to invest in both the present and the future, by signing a good FA in the offseasons, extending Amar’e, as well as doing everything possible to get Iggy (26), as long as we don’t give up Amare, Nash or any of our under 26 (Griff of course not in the list)
by jatrex4suns on Mar 4, 2010 3:09 PM MST via mobile reply actions
Actually
I think the Sixers will be desperate enough for change that we can get iggy next year for JRich at the deadline. Just so they can move on. but then a year from now, everything could be different.

by 




















