Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Todd Haley Is The Steelers Next Offensive Coordinator

Let's Make A Dream... err, Deal: Josh Smith to the Suns

Ok, I'm just having fun this morning.

In light of Seth's reporting that the Suns may not be done dealing, and admitting their ideal dream of a better PF/rebounding option in the lineup... 

Here are 2 ways that, to me, seem reasonable to get Josh Smith from Atlanta

Star-divide

Hawks fans and management are souring on Josh Smith. He doesn't shoot well enough to be a SF, and isn't as good a PF prospect at Al Horford. At the same time, the Hawks are trotting out a terrible lead guard in Mike Bibby next to Joe Johnson. In the Hawks's perfect world, maybe, they replace Josh Smith with a talented PG and save a bit of money at the same time (or at least don't spend more).

Let's pretend they fall under Shaq's spell and sign him to play C. Then they can move Horford to PF, play Marvin Williams at SF. This gives them the flexibility to move Smith for a viable PG.

What the Hawks DON'T need is Jason Richardson. What the Suns need to trade, to get Josh Smith, is Jason Richardson.

How do we solve this dilemma?  A third team, with an available PG.

 

Like, Golden State's Monta Ellis to Altanta

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2dvl7k4

Altanta gets Ellis, GS gets JRich and Earl Clark, Suns gets Josh Smith and (to make salaries work) the expiring contract of Vlad Radmanovic.

Golden State has Steph Curry for PG duty, but at 6'2" he cannot successfully play with an equally short and defense-deficient SG in Ellis who also needs the ball in his hands. Ellis is a scorer/playmaker extraordinaire. Both players would ideally fit next to a 6'6" or 6'7" strong SG. Their new owner might be wanting to engender fan support, and bringing back a long-time fave in Jason Richardson would do the trick. This also gives GS - over the cap this season already - flexibility next summer.

Of course, Vlad wouldn't play a minute for the Suns but he would help convince GS to do the deal, and he's expiring.

 

Or New Jersey's Devin Harris to Altanta

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=28tyc86

NJ has a new PG in Jordan Farmar (don't laugh). And they have a real playmaker find in 2nd-yr man Terrance Williams. They've already figured out that Devin Harris is not the future in NJ.  So far, they struck out in free agency. Like, bigtime. Like, nothing worth writing home about. And they have a new owner. Lately, the talk has been that they will wait till next summer to make their big splash. So why not give themselves more flexibility now? 

ATL gets Devin Harris and Earl Clark.  NJ gets Jason Richardson.  Suns get Josh Smith.

 

The Skinny on Josh Smith

Either deal works all the way around, netting the Suns a real PF in Josh Smith.  That would allow Chill and Duds to play SG, and Turk and Hill to play SF, and Smith and Warrick to play PF.  More balanced, I admit.

For those you desperate for a "real" PF, he's as good as it gets for this system.  Here's Hollinger's writeup on Smith last year.

Scouting report: A left-hander with explosive leaping ability, Smith came into the pro game straight from high school and his mental game has lagged his physical skills ever since. He still doesn't have a great idea of what a good shot is or understand that his jumper doesn't qualify as one in most situations. Granted, one must also point out that the Hawks' coaching staff constantly leaves him in positions to spot up on the perimeter -- what do they think is going to happen? 

Smith has long arms and great timing for shot blocks, though he was less aggressive about going for blocks last season. His long arms also make him adept at picking up smaller players on switches -- in fact, the Hawks switched virtually every screen last season because of the mobility of Smith and Al Horford. 

Smith is at his best in transition; he can push the ball up court himself, and he sees the floor fairly well. He's also, of course, an outrageous dunker when he's on the business end of transition passes. In half-court settings he takes far too many jump shots with his long, side-shoulder release, which defenses are more than happy to concede. 

He's better at attacking bigger players off the dribble from the high post, or posting up smaller ones straight up from the right block. As he's developed more muscle, the Hawks have called his number on the latter play more often, with Smith able to curl in toward the rim for a lefty shot or spin back to the baseline and shoot. He shot a career-best 60.4 percent in the immediate basket area last season, and those post-ups helped him get there. 

2009-10 outlook: Smith is only 23 years old, and while he hasn't figured things out as quickly as Hawks fans might have hoped, it's easy to forget the considerable progress he's made. Atlanta's addition of more perimeter players may help him focus on sticking to his knitting in the paint, and it would help him further if the Hawks' play calls gave him something to do besides stand 20 feet from the rim waiting for a kickout. 

The fact remains that he's going to be only a third or fourth option for this team. The way he can really make an impact is by dominating defensively with his shot-blocking ability. For whatever reason, that talent was largely AWOL last season, but if it bounces back, Smith can resume his push toward stardom. 

Anyway, this is just having a little fun.  I've already argued that the Suns are plenty fine the way they are.  And these trades will probably also be available at the trade deadline.

But just to give us something to talk about on a Saturday in mid-July...

Poll
Let's make a deal
3-way with Golden State, netting Josh Smith for J-Rich
373 votes
3-way with New Jersey, netting Josh Smith for J-Rich
296 votes
NO TRADE! Keep J-Rich - he was our playoff savior
538 votes
NO TRADE! We can do better than Josh Smith. Just be patient.
344 votes

1551 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 226 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I’m not overly keen on giving up JRich to solve our need for a PF. He was great last season and I fear for the repercussions of doing this i.e. chemistry.

by Toon Army Sun on Jul 17, 2010 9:17 AM MDT reply actions  

true, and I've argued that point

at least wait till trade deadline.

Yet, IF the Suns want a stronger PF, then I think Josh Smith fits our team like a glove.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 9:29 AM MDT up reply actions  

If we're waiting until the trade deadline anyway

Then EVERYBODY is in play, not just JRich. You can package any of the new guys to get to the desired result. Although, JRich’s expiring contract would be the key bargaining chip.

I’m on the fence on this one, too. Worst case: the Suns have the best record in the West, then make an unnecessary “splash” trade (like the Shaq trade a few years ago) and then fail to make the postseason. I can’t deal with that again…

by coasduzaka on Jul 17, 2010 11:28 AM MDT up reply actions  

Id rather do any remaining moves now than at the deadline

JSmith might not be available until then, so it might not be an option.

But if it’s possible, it would be better to have a complete team not change from training camp to the playoffs.

Mid-season big moves are bad for chemistry.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 2:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

I have your solution,

To Phoneix: PF/C Andrea Bargnani, PG Marcus Banks (expiring contract)
To Toronto : JRich.

Good deal.

for Toronto.

by McGateway on Jul 18, 2010 2:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

Phoenix fans would revolt at the mere mention of the name of Marcus Banks...

I also don’t see unloading Bargani for a player in JRich that will bolt at the end of the season…

STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!

by Daryl Ray on Jul 18, 2010 4:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

Open the wardrobe is not yet found love after another the right clothes?
So, also waiting for? Immediate action bar!
Welcome to { http://www.smalltrade.net } sure you will find what you need.
Moreover, the company has a good reputation,product quality standards,
at reasonable prices. Over the years, has been well received by overseas
friends for their support. Therefore, please rest assured purchase.
welcome to :==== http://www.smalltrade.net ===

free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal

Jame shoes $40
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Jordan Spizike shoes $35
Jordan 2010 shoes $40
air max 2010,2009 shoes $37

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35
Tshirts (ed hardy,lacoste) $16
AF tshirt $25

Jean(True Religion,VERSACE,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16
New era cap $15

FREE sHIPPING

== http://www.smalltrade.net =
` ╰—┘ 。 ┅★`_、
│\__╭╭╭╭╭__/│   
│           │  
│           │ 
│ ●       ● │ 
│≡    o    ≡│
│           │ 
╰——┬O◤▽◥O┬——╯
   |  o  |
   |╭---╮| ┌┬┬┬┐ 
╞╧╧╧╧══╧╧╧╧╧╧╧╧╡

by itkonlyyou186 on Jul 19, 2010 8:12 AM MDT up reply actions  

HMM

Dumping JRICH now kind of ruins the whole depth/flexibility thing….i like Smith a lot and I like the deal except it leaves Childress as the starting 2 and forces Hedo to spend significant time there in Rich’s place, since he’s the only other option on the roster. I also like selling high on Rich, although I think his postseason play will carry over to this season and he’ll have a great year.

but i get you’re just having fun with this.

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jul 17, 2010 9:36 AM MDT up reply actions  

Let's say we trade J-rich. Childress plays 32 MPG at SG.

Can we fill in those other 16 minutes at SG with: a Nash and Dragic backcourt, Dudley at SG, or some other SG we pick up off the scrap heap? Dudley being able to play some SG would be key. Then again, a high-end backup SG seems like a bit of a luxury when you have Nash, Dragic and Childress in your backcourt, so maybe a guy off the scrap heap would work.

Or, am I just expecting too much from Childress?

by East Bay Ray on Jul 17, 2010 10:27 AM MDT up reply actions  

i don't see how trading a 30 min player for another 30 min player

hurts our depth/flexibility at all.

Childress and Turk filling in at the 2 (along with Hill and Duds) as a rotating/interchangeable 4-some, is not a bad thing. Also, allows for a quicker Dragic to pick up some mins too.

Overall though, I’m completely on the fence on this. Smith would dramatically improve our team defense, while JRich is a perfect SG for this system.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 10:40 AM MDT up reply actions  

It sounds good

but remember we’re making predictions.

The new guys are going to have to learn the system and integrate with the old guys.

It may go swimmingly in which case Rich becomes expendable. But it may not.

Dudz isn’t a 2. He isn’t athletic enough to pull it off for an extended period of time. In a pinch, maybe.

There are a lot of variables here. It’s an interesting question you’ve posed and I suppose this is what the off season is for. Staying out of the f’ng heat and trying to figure out how to configure the Suns.

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jul 17, 2010 10:54 AM MDT up reply actions  

Dudley can't play 2?

But, given the love notes written to him by many here on this site, I understood it that he is capably of bringing peace to the Middle East, curing cancer and then returning home by walking on water. You’re telling me that’s not the case?

by East Bay Ray on Jul 17, 2010 11:22 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Well...

You kinda want a fast and athletic SG because they force opposing teams’ SGs (i.e. Kobe, Wade, Roy, Manu, etc.) to play defense and expend energy. Dudley is usually a spot-up shooter, which means that defenders don’t have to expend as much energy defending him than they do when they have to guard someone like J-Rich because he’s always on the move to get open.

Nash-Dragic backcourt is good but you sacrifice a lot of size so you can’t play that combination for long. We might have to require Grant Hill to come off the bench as the backup 2 or start Hill at the 2 and make Childress come off the bench. We all know Grant’s not as effective coming off the bench, so starting him at the 2 with Turk at the 3 would make sense.

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 17, 2010 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Dudley

would likely spend more time guarding Kobe, Wade, Roy, Manu, etc’s backup. It would be J-Chill starting at two, I’d think, and he’ll make his superstar opponent work to defend him.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 2:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

Don't forget the prospect of Nash/Dragic backcourt combo at times

Dragic is deserving of more minutes. If Gentry is talking about using Nash as a spot-up shooter more often, playing him together with Dragic makes sense. Nash may not play any less minutes, but they’ll be less strenuous since he won’t be working with the ball in his hands as much.

by East Bay Ray on Jul 17, 2010 11:50 AM MDT up reply actions  

If we wait until the deadline, do you see any chance of getting a 'better' PF

without giving up Richardson?
Is there any chance, in your mind, that one of the guys we have – Lawal, Collins, Warrick, or Clark – could develop into someone as good as Smith?
I know you’ve advocated waiting – who would you wait for, ideally?

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 9:34 AM MDT reply actions  

why not?

 Clark has the talent and physical ability to be something pretty dang great. It’s just what’s going on in his head (or lack thereof) that’s limiting him. I don’t think Warrick at his age will “development” more…

Obviously it’s way to early to predict, but Lawal could be a huge beast and a huge 2nd round steal…Obviously one never knows what can happen in a player’s future development.

JRich is a bigger question. He would certainly be a nice deadline trade piece, especially if the Suns have no plans to resign him…If he wants more money, I would think they’d try to get some value for him instead of letting him walk. But if he’s willing to sign a 2-3 year deal for reasonable money, and the Suns are in the thick of the playoff hunt, maybe you hang on to him.

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jul 17, 2010 9:44 AM MDT up reply actions  

I am willing to give Clark till the trade deadline

As a fan, I am willing to let Gentry go out on a limb and play him for some significant minutes, like 20 a night and risk some losses for the first half of the season to see if he can pull it together. If not, then ship him out with Rich at the deadline.

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Jul 17, 2010 11:46 AM MDT up reply actions  

not going to happen. Warrick, Dudley, Chill, Dragic, Frye should all be getting 20+ minutes as it is.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jul 17, 2010 11:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

If you recall, Clark

Did get early minutes last season. Not significant, but Gentry tried him out at 5-10 minute intervals. Of course Clark’s play didn’t warrant any further playing time per stretch than that.

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jul 17, 2010 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

I like the waiting idea

The guys you mention might develop as you hope, but we can also get a better gauge on Childress. My concern is that we’ll be under-utilizing Childress as J-Rich’s backup. Trading J-Rich might be more about the fact that Childress needs more minutes than it is about our PFs failing.

by East Bay Ray on Jul 17, 2010 10:18 AM MDT up reply actions  

Childress

He’s a quality player, but remember he wasn’t in the NBA last year. It may take him a bit to make the adjustment from the Greeks to the best players on the planet.

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jul 17, 2010 10:56 AM MDT up reply actions  

Childress is a very cerebral player...

He had four seasons in the NBA prior to going overseas…He’ll be okay…

STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!

by Daryl Ray on Jul 18, 2010 4:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

We paid Childress a lot of money to be a backup very long.

For the price and his skillset it wuld be nice to play him 25 or more minutes. The problem is, as we are structured there are 25 minutes to go around. Eventually he is going to be a starting wing for us or at least our 6th man. Not saying make a move just so that happens, but this is going to a tough team to “get the most out of” as we currently are. Gentry and other coaches are going to have their hands full utilizing all this talent.

by Suns Fan For Life on Jul 17, 2010 1:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don't like Smith's basketball IQ

What about a young big who’s getting crowded out in Sacramento? Jason Thompson anyone?

by Mike in AZ on Jul 17, 2010 10:00 AM MDT reply actions  

With the way Cousins looked in SL, he is certainly more expendable.

His stats look good – tell us about him, and tell us how we’d get him.

I’m starting to warm to the idea of Josh Smith – I didn’t realize he was only 23. But he’s pretty expensive.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 10:16 AM MDT up reply actions  

Cousins is a C

he would play next to Jason Thompson

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 10:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

I stand corrected.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 10:39 AM MDT up reply actions  

though they've already got

Carl Landry from Houston to play PF, so maybe a Clark for Thompson swap.

But then, we have an even bigger logjam. One more player who needs to play, on top of the 10 already on the roster.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 10:41 AM MDT up reply actions  

True, but Thompson has a 2 year track record, and it's fairly impressive.

He’s tall (6’11") , so he could serve as an emergency backup for Lopez. Seems to be able to score and rebound – how his D?

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 10:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

I love Josh Smith

but I also love JRich, if there was a way to net Josh without losing JRich I would be very happy. That said, if JRich shows no indication of wanting to resign with the Suns for a reasonable amount, a small paycut for 2-3 years, then I think we need to cut our losses and trade him for something like Josh Smith. JRich has been huge for us, but I would like to get something in return if he decides to bolt.

by makiri on Jul 17, 2010 10:20 AM MDT reply actions  

I also took a look at Smith's stats

and wow is he a beast, and only 24. Very few players can put up 15 ppg, 9 rpg, 4, apg, 2 blocks, and 2 steals, I knew he was good but not this good. He would be an amazing fit for us contributing in all aspects of the game, he is young, athletic, plays good defense, I’m still hesitant about giving up JRich unless all signs point to him not resigning, but I would love for Smith to be on the team.

by makiri on Jul 17, 2010 10:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

and, again,

this is on a team where he is the 3rd option in scoring and the second option in rebounding and blocks…

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Jul 17, 2010 11:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

I think being the third option for Smith is a good thing wherever he goes.....

His jump shot is atrocious and asides for dunks off assists or violent putbacks, he really doesn’t create a lot of offense for himself. He does have a few nice pivot moves, but that is about it. Personally, I think he would do well in an uptempo system like PHX especially with the facilatotors we have in Nash, Grant, Goran, and now Hedo.

I would caution everyone that JSmith is a bit of a headcase. People complained a lot about STAT, but for all his shortcomings, he was a good citizen and teammate. Josh SMith has not always been those things. Something we have to keep in mind….

STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!

by Daryl Ray on Jul 18, 2010 4:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

The problem with this is where does he play.

You don’t trade for guys like Turkolgu and Smith and bring them off of the bench. Grant should not come off of the bench. If we can’t find minutes for the guys we already have, how would adding another starter\star solve anything. Someone would have to go for Smith and we should consider perhaps a 2-1 if possible to free up some minutes.

by Suns Fan For Life on Jul 17, 2010 1:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

A starting 5 of

Nash
HIll
Turk
Josh Smith
Fropez

Hill can slide to the SG spot, he is versatile, plays good defense and has good size for a SG. Turk can play in his more natural SF spot where he isn’t that big of a liability on defense and rebounding, and can use his size when the bigs box out for the rebounds. Josh Smith and Fropez can play the paint and because of the versatility of Hill, Turk, and Smith they can all give help on defense and guard each others man on switches. The bench remains the same, and this could be a decent overall team, the 3 point shooting is a tad lacking in the starters, but 3 players that can handle the ball and create for the the others would be pretty awesome.

by makiri on Jul 17, 2010 5:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

If the CBA mess wasn't looming

I might be more inclined but the Suns now have Hedo, Josh, Channing, Hakim locked up long term and will have to pay Robin and Goran in 2012.

With the new CBA coming next season, I would be hesitant to take on any more big contracts this season until that all plays out. I think there will be a lockout and eventually a situation where teams are having to dump players, etc.

I would very much like to do into the lock out year w/ plenty of flexibility to take advantage of possible steals.

The PF I would really like is Kevin Love or Jason Thompson. Both are still on rookie deals and both fit nicely w/ Robin. Neither is perfect and neither is as good as Josh but they are also like to MLE players cheaper

Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Jul 17, 2010 10:29 AM MDT reply actions  

well the salary cap went up

meaning revenue went up, while the MLE went down meaning average salaries are already down.

those 2 things, along with spending spree this summer, kinda kills the whole ‘bleeding money’ argument by the owners.

I do see a long lockout though, but I’m not really seeing forced player dumps happening.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 10:36 AM MDT up reply actions  

no question

the owners are undermining their own case (not to mention the record price for the sale of the Warriors)…

but they sound stubborn and are much more willing and able to take a year off than the players. Anyway, there will be plenty of time for that discussion next summer. In the meantime, the rules are fixing to change to something very different than they are now and maintaining flexibility in the face of uncertainty is always a good plan.

Josh is good – very good – but not a franchise changing guy. Now, if you told me we could get Chris Paul or Kevin Durant – Then you go for it.

Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Jul 17, 2010 12:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

good enough

unless this actually happens, at which time we will convince ourselves it was the best move possible. :)

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Obviously this question comes after the fact, but...

Assuming a lockout takes out all of next year (unlikely right?) and significantly changes the CBA, would you rather have:
A. Josh Smith at $25M for 2 years
B. Turkoglu at $34M over 3 years ($28M guaranteed)
C. Frye and Childress at ~ $50M over 4 years

Banzai!

by Suns' Sensei on Jul 17, 2010 2:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

c.

I think Frye and Childress would bring that kind of money no matter what the CBA was at. I also think that both are worth more than we paid for them – that is, as long as they perform as we expect.

A and B aren’t terrible, though.
I am assuming that a one year lockout wouldn’t count as a contract year, since the contract wasn’t fulfilled. Alex??? Little help, please? (again…)

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

I read recently that agents were trying to get 2011-2012 salary paid

in different years (like deferrals). No idea how that works, but it indicates that players would not be paid during a lockout. That also sounds logical. What would the owners gain in a lockout if they still had to pay ALL their expenses, and what reason would the players have to negotiate at all if they were getting paid anyway.

so yes, the players are NOT paid during a lockout. And I find it very unlikely that the money is still owed in any case at all.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

I was wondering that too. I also assumed that players wouldn’t get paid for a lockout year.

Personally, I think the least risk would come with A, because of the brevity of the contract combined with the youth and “reliability” of the player. (In that he’s played at a pretty high level for a couple of years.)

B and C aren’t horrible options by any means, and I think you could say that C holds the most potential of the three.

Banzai!

by Suns' Sensei on Jul 17, 2010 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

as far as "counting as a contract year"

I definitely think it counts. Contracts would not be extended to make up for lost time (ie. all contracts extended a year in case of 1-yr lockout).

Owners would be saving the money on those salaries.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

big flaw

atlanta doesn’t want shaq anymore.

and it was a sign and trade idea…o’neal to the hawks, marvin williams to the cavs.

..so no?

by billyjohnson on Jul 17, 2010 11:06 AM MDT reply actions  

ruined the whole post.

Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx

by Wil Cantrell on Jul 17, 2010 11:18 AM MDT up reply actions  

but seriously, I thought it was the sign-n-trade that died

meaning ATL didn’t want to give up Williams. But I heard there was still a straight MLE offer out there for Shaq to take. he’s waiting for something higher, but I doubt he gets it.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 11:24 AM MDT up reply actions  

Shaq was only one option

The SNT trade with Williams did fall apart. Cleveland wanted Williams but Atlanta rightly wasn’t prepared to trade one hole for another. They were never really interested in that SNT. The SNT rumors were pretty much one sides, from Cleveland.

However, Atlanta did and do want a center, and they preferred Shaq. The problem is that Shaq is shopping himself around looking for the full MLE (~5+m) which Atlanta soured at.

The ASG (Atlanta Spirit Group, owners) have decided that they want to avoid the luxury tax at all costs all of a sudden, which has the fan base pretty miffed. The ASG and fans do agree that they probably need 2 or 3 pieces still, not just one, and have decided that they have only 3 million or so to spend. A point guard is one of them.

Now, just because Shaq to Atlanta for 5mil isn’t happening, it’s still possible that:

A) Shaq will come to his senses and lower his price to about 1.9m, thereby giving him a choice of about 10 teams instead of approximately zero. San Antonio has 2m, and interest, and is Shaq’s reported first choice. Atlanta has 2m and interest, and is Shaq’s reported second choice.

B) Atlanta will find another inexpensive center, something they’re still hard about. The name Brad Miller has been thrown around.

Josh Smith coming available happens two ways:

One, Hawks find a center they want to start.

Two, around mid-season Hawks realize they need money to resign Al Horford if they want to stay out of the luxury tax.

The dream isn’t over!

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well no Brad Miller for the Hawks

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5388602

It feels weird to be hoping so strongly that another teams finds a piece they need to make them better.

Get your center Hawks. We’ll work out a 3 way deal to get you a PG. And take your PF.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

What about Frye, Goran, and Dudley?

They don’t exactly suck.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 11:17 AM MDT up reply actions  

Sorry - missed the 'starting' part of that.

Commentus prematurus.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 11:18 AM MDT up reply actions  

in the SSOL's first year where the Suns won 62 games

QRich led the league in 3-pters (averaged 8 attempts per game), but only made 35% of them. Shawn marion jacked up 4.2 per game, and only made 33%.

just to put this in perspective.

Turk, Childress, Duds, Dragic, Nash and Frye all average >= 36% for their careers.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 11:30 AM MDT up reply actions  

Nash isn't a good enough 3 point shooter for you?

Wow, what rock did you crawl out from?

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 17, 2010 5:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sorry, that was meant for berecki lol

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 18, 2010 6:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

I have no idea how it ended up being a reply to you.

Could’ve sworn I pressed reply to berecki’s comment.

>_<

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 18, 2010 6:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

Don’t count Nash’s first 4 seasons. The guy was still learning the ropes of the NBA.

I think we will be the best 3-pt shooting team ever next year.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jul 17, 2010 5:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

Personally, I like the bargains.

Lou, Dudley, Goran, Robin, Grant – these guys gave us great value for the money. Even Channing and Childress are very reasonable 5 year contracts, and if they give us what we expect, they will be well worth it. Even Hakim, if he is as good as he has been in the past, is well worth it – and everyone thinks he might have a lot of upside. I’d like to see what our new Analytics dept. comes up with.
     I’d be more hesitant to commit to Smith, mostly because of his large contract. But I have no idea what JRich is going to want – the Knicks would probably bid him sky high. I’ll be curious to see if he remains a ‘barometer’ in the absence of Amar’e – will the 20 point threshold indicate wins?
I do think JRich will be better this year than he was last, and I’m really reluctant to lose him. I’d be more inclined to take more of a chance, and look at someone like Thompson, but if the Suns got Smith, I’d jump on the bandwagon immediately.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 11:16 AM MDT reply actions  

Adding to this...

is the fact that our “bargain” guys are starting to look really enticing to other teams. We can mix and match trade deals a lot because our guys have done well. 2 years ago this was exactly the opposite. We had nothing to trade and no assests that weren’t Nash and STAT. Things are looking up for us in the long run.

Reading is good...

by N8lol on Jul 17, 2010 11:50 AM MDT up reply actions  

I know. Its amazing what a diff a yr makes

now the team is full of valuable assets

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 12:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

A funny note

I’ve been watching the Hawks blogs recently, looking for whispers of Josh Smith availability.

It’s there, but they fans (understandably) want to trade him for talent, not money.

Guess what names excite a team missing a decent point guard and center?

Dragic and Lopez.

They’re trying to figure out if we’ll part with them for Josh Smith in the same way we’re trying to figure out if they’ll part with Smith for J-Rich.

No.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

agreed. no way.

Hawks are a perfect example of a team missing talent at C and PG and unable to get past 1-2 rounds in the playoffs despite top-level talent on the wings.

Suns are prepped for the future with Dragic and Lopez

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

The Dragon and Fropez

are quietly some of the most talked about young potential out there. There are some teams that would give their left nut for either of them. Think about what NY would give for someone like Dragic. Not saying they would be a contender next with him but they would make the playoffs. And their was interest for lopez even back at the deadline so we know he is in demand. Glad we have such great talent and on the cheap as well.

by Suns Fan For Life on Jul 17, 2010 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

yep thats the key to a quality, sustainable team

young talent on rookie contracts to offset the expensive ones.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

j-rich is going to be our number one scorer now…that’s what i think

by billyjohnson on Jul 17, 2010 5:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

Keep Jrich

In the name of chemistry and an athletic SG that I think will become more of a force next year. I agree with others that he’ll build on last year’s playoff performance. And assuming we don’t pick up a strong PF, think JRich becomes more aggressive going to the basket and posting up.

We don’t need to ransom what we have in the name of what sounds like a “premier” PF. We may have enough pieces at the other positions such that PF becomes more of a role player, until or unless we fall into someone without having to give up anything, or with someone already on the roster.

by FunInTheSun on Jul 17, 2010 11:55 AM MDT reply actions  

the only chance this has of happening is if shaq goes to Atlanta..J-Rich would have to play the 3 since Joe Johnson and Jamal Crawford are making well over 20mil per combined…

by marques m on Jul 17, 2010 12:18 PM MDT reply actions  

or

if Atlanta gets another center

and/or

if/when Atlanta wants money to keep Al Horford

A three team that gives Atlanta a center or PG (or both) would make Atlanta fans happier though.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

actually...

Joe Johnson is making close to 20 mil on his own…

by Gildo on Jul 21, 2010 11:53 AM MDT up reply actions  

Except the fact that Atlanta won't give away Josh Smith this easily,

I think the only way to get this deal to work is Atlanta also getting Lou in a S&T, since they need depth in the front court and Lou is fairly wanted in the market these days.
But back to reality, Hawks won’t give away Smith, who is a one-of-a-kind player in the NBA.

by Lompe on Jul 17, 2010 12:22 PM MDT reply actions  

Fans in Atlanta think they will

They like Al Horford better as a PF (and they should), and Smith doesn’t do SF or C well.

Smith’s contract is excessive for a backup, and Atlanta needs money, thanks to JJ.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 1:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

i think stay the same until mid season

and if Sarvar has a trigger finger ready now i got a deal

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=26smklv

Indiana upgrade thier backcourt with a PG and a SG
Phoenix get a PF and a SG (well backup)
Atlanta get 1 year expiring contracts and indiana and Phoenix each give Atlanta 1st round picks

i kinda think ATL get the worst end of the deal what do you think ?

"Da Suns’ Bench. Call them Victoria’s Secret — all kinds of wonderful support."

by phxuk: Ap on Jul 17, 2010 12:25 PM MDT reply actions  

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=27acxw3

thats the upgraded one i dont think Indiana want to pay the Luxury Tax

"Da Suns’ Bench. Call them Victoria’s Secret — all kinds of wonderful support."

by phxuk: Ap on Jul 17, 2010 12:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah I don't think ATL goes for that

its either top-level talent or total salary relief

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 1:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

One major problem with all of this...

ATL has already said that they do not intend on playing Horford at the 4. If they did get Shaq, he would come off the bench. If I can find the link I will post it later, but that is what was said.

Stoudemire to the 10th floor will soon be Warrick to the 10th floor!

by SunsFanForever on Jul 17, 2010 12:40 PM MDT reply actions  

Yeah, post it

Because from all I read, Atlanta absolutely intends on playing Horford at the 4 as soon as they get a true center and move Josh Smith for value.

PF is a more natural position for Horford, and they think (correctly) that he’ll excel there even more.

That’s like the time when we were playing Amare at C. It’s true that we wouldn’t move him to a 4, but only for as long as we had only options for replacing him at the 5. Once that went away, he wen’t to the 4 quickly.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

I've heard them say that too

but I think its just like when the Suns said they wanted Amare at the 5. you say that till you have a better option.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 1:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

Atlant looks to be about 66 mil with 10 players under contract.

They probably need to do something – Horford is a RFA next year. JJ is already max, Horford will probably be max, Crawford is expiring, and even their role players are expensive.

You know, the more we play this game, the more respect I gain for Sarver.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 12:43 PM MDT reply actions  

yeah but Dragic and Dudley are up for new contracts next summer too

so Sarver is hedging his bets with Childress, just in case Duds wants too much money or someone frontloads a huge contract offer. Also gives Suns some leverage in extension talks this fall.

Dragic on the other hand… Suns have a team option for 2011-2012, so he’s really not at risk until the summer after. but the longer we wait, the more we pay, I think.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 1:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm really happy to see this thread today

Alex already knows what I’d vote.

1. Nash/Dragic
2. Childress/Dudley
3. Turkoglu/Hill
4. Smith/Warrick
5. Lopez/Frye
11. Extra
12. Extra
13. Extra

Read all about it. Lot of mixing and matching can be done with this lineup.

Only danger I see is the all powerful Chemistry. It’s already at risk with all of the changes we’ve made, and it gets more at risk with each additional move. Of course, they may all love each other.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 1:08 PM MDT reply actions  

What is all this talk of getting rid of jrich!?

Did you guys not see him go full beast mode in the playoffs?!

by Migonads on Jul 17, 2010 1:45 PM MDT via mobile reply actions  

Predicated on him not coming back, and being a high value trade asset.

Like with Amar’e – better to get something than nothing. I don’t think anyone here actually has the authority to trade him – but I could be wrong. Alex?

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 1:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ideally we keep him

but as haremoor says below, it would be nice to get something for him. Plus there is a kernel of truth to the rebounding fear.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 1:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Michael Redd?

How about if we don’t make any trades until trade deadline, and we get a Smith without trading J-Rich, also if J-Rich wants too much money why not make a move for Michael Redd of the Bucks?

by Lyken84 on Jul 17, 2010 1:51 PM MDT reply actions  

i'd rather have JRich than Redd

because jRich does a lot more, IMO.

I’d only move JRich for a true, starting-caliber PF.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Forgot about what he can do better then Redd, and just remembered how he performed in the playoffs. we should resign him.

by Lyken84 on Jul 17, 2010 1:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

Michael Redd?

Screwed knees… really screwed kness.,…

sex is like math: you add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs and pray you dont multiply!

by Spit_Fire on Jul 17, 2010 1:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

Our miracle workers

His name just came to me and forgot about his knee problems, also maybe our med staff can do what they do best and help him. but Nah keep J-Rich.

by Lyken84 on Jul 17, 2010 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

Resign J-Rich

I think he will take less money to stay with us because he fits perfectly with the Suns and he is one of the primary options on this team, also he has resurrected his career with Phoenix, and he might take us farther them Amare who knows.

by Lyken84 on Jul 17, 2010 1:54 PM MDT reply actions  

Sadly

He will probably take money over us.

He’s not rich enough or old enough to start valuing rings and legacy over dolla dolla bills, y’all.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

We got pretty close

We did get 2 wins away from going to the finals, but this year its without Amare, I still think it will be a re-match for the West finals with the LA, if things work out with our picks and trades we might be able to beat La.

by Lyken84 on Jul 17, 2010 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think he goes back to GS after this

He still loves it there. Still lives there offseason, works out with GS players and such. I was disenchanted with him last fall because he was practicing with GS players while the rest of the Suns were in Phoenix doing voluntary workouts as a team. he was the very last one to show up.

And then the 2-month slump in the middle of the season – JRich contributed to that with averaging terrible numbers. Remember he was benched for LB for a few games.

Of course, the way he absolutely delivered in the playoffs, my perception of him completely changed.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

I motion for the Suns to stand pat, even through the trade deadline.

Their hand was forced by the Amare situation – they had to make changes, i.e. Hedo and Chill. Anything beyond that would just be excessive tinkering.
We might have lost to Portland in round one without Rich; it certainly could have gone to a game 7 in the least. He’s detrimental to the makeup of the team. Playoff heroes should never be underestimated.
Here’s hoping that Rich sticks around for the long haul.

"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen

by RMason on Jul 17, 2010 1:55 PM MDT via mobile reply actions  

Actually

I meant that his loss would be detrimental. Words are hard.

"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen

by RMason on Jul 17, 2010 4:02 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

I mostly agree, except if we can move a player who will probably walk for a starting PF

This move assumes that the difference (probable loss) between J-Rich and J-Chill is less than the difference (probable gain) between Warrick and whatever “real” PF we could pick up.

I’m also assuming that Turkoglu gets moved to a SF, which should increase his productivity, and Hill moves to backup, which I hope he won’t hate us for.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 2:03 PM MDT reply actions  

If we do end up getting Smith or any other PF

We will probably have to include J-Rich we can move Turk to SF and Hill to SG, that would be Nash,Hill,Turk,Warrick,Lopez, with a bench of Dragic, Childress, Dudley/Clark, Frye/Collins, Frye

by Lyken84 on Jul 17, 2010 2:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

well

Nash/Chill/Hill/Smith/Lopez starting. bench of Dragic/Duds/Turk/Warrick/Frye

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 3:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah

Maybe Turk starting for Hill though, depending on which one of them would have their ego hurt less by coming off the bench.

But if they were both ego-less, I’d do it your way. Help Dragic out a bit by giving the second unit another option to run plays through where he can spot up and knock down shots.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 3:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

And

We’ll get valuable party-time dance minutes from Turk when he is on the sideline.

Can’t put a price on that.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

The Suns should stay put 'till the next summer

I doubt the Hawks can sign Horford to a max and I also doubt Horford wants to stay there. There will be competition for his services next summer and the Suns should participate. Why do I like Horford this much? He hasn’t suffered any injury, a player that can already be a starter to any teams and still has a lot potential to tap into.

sex is like math: you add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs and pray you dont multiply!

by Spit_Fire on Jul 17, 2010 2:04 PM MDT reply actions  

Everyone will want Horford, but the problem is

he will be a restricted free agent, if I remember correctly, and Atlanta would (and should) move mountains to match any offer sheet.

But sure, if Horford is available? He’s generally even better than Josh Smith. Problem is, everyone with money knows this already.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 2:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

It might be possible to front-load an offer so the Hawks couldn't possibly match it. (because of luxury tax)

Whoever wants Horford is going to have to be very, very aggressive.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 17, 2010 2:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

you can only front-load if you've got the sal cap space

Suns won’t now with the Chill/Hedo contracts. They can only have MLE next summer, and Amares 6.5 mil TPE. (no combining)

However, Hawks may be more interested in moving him (or Josh Smith) once they hear Horford’s market. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if a Nets or Knicks team (with max space next summer) decides to frontload an offer of max to him. Then they either match and dump Josh Smith to the highest bidder, or let him go for nothing.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 3:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm a little confused with the voters who think we can do better than Josh Smith.

Either they have a limited understanding who Josh Smith is, or they think Oklahoma City is going to trade Kevin Durant. (Ok, he’s a small forward.)

So who are those possibly attainable power forwards out there that people want more than Smith?

More importantly, can you show a little evidence that we’d have a chance at landing them?

Remember, “that promising rookie who’s name escapes me on that one team” is probably going to be kept by that one team who used a high draft pick on him.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 3:39 PM MDT reply actions  

trade exception

remember we still have a 7 mil trade exception that we could trade to the hornets along with clark for david west

by light45 on Jul 17, 2010 4:00 PM MDT reply actions  

right true

but who’s minutes would taht player take? we already have 10 guys who deserve 20+ minutes a night and there are only 240 minutes in a game.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 11:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

No to David West

sex is like math: you add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs and pray you dont multiply!

by Spit_Fire on Jul 18, 2010 6:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

Found this linked on another blog

A list of what appears to be all of this years free agents.

Who’s still available, who’s signed to who for how much, etc.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0As0_otNfpMkldDdCaTNSMDRHUWJrOXVpeEhyZkZuSEE&hl=en&chrome=false&gid=0

Can’t vouch for it’s accuracy, but it looks pretty good.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 4:14 PM MDT reply actions  

Well, as long as we don’t trade Dudley.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jul 17, 2010 4:37 PM MDT reply actions  

We still need points

I know that worrying about offense here in the valley is out of style (and merited so) but we do need a primary scorer not named Nash. We’re not going to be all that great defensively so were gonna need 105+, all i’m saying is that if we’re going to trade Jason Richardson, can we get some offense back, just some. I know Smith is a hell of an athlete, we’d be a little better defensively, and of course the boards, those damned boards, but I dont like this scenario. In my opinion it leaves us weaker

by helldamnguy on Jul 17, 2010 5:25 PM MDT reply actions  

Smith and Richardson had identical points per game last season, 15.7 ppg

And that was without Nash feeding him in a pick and roll.

And with a center that was more of a go to big than he was, in Al Horford.

Obviously there are problems with direct comparison of their numbers, but don’t be alarmed.

Josh Smith can score.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 6:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

Alex... please come up with something next time without so many holes.

A trade must actually make sense based on current rosters… NOT “let’s pretend Shaq sings with Atlanta” =/

by ap3604 on Jul 17, 2010 5:33 PM MDT via mobile reply actions  

Shaq to Atlanta was not a stretch

There was a SnT offer from Cleveland, and an unofficial offer for a straight up FA signing by Atlanta for the MLE, before they backed out over luxury concerns.

Atlanta is still searching for a center. This isn’t all about Shaq.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 6:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

By the time he wrote this Shaq to Hawks was already toast so this hole fanpost is irrelevant...

If they do trade J. Smith its going to be for a Center so they can move Horford to the PF position, not a point guard like Alex talks about.

People who come up with trade proposals need to do their homework and make sure the trade works out for both teams based on their CURRENT rosters.

Saying “well hey if this team signs this player and then that team signs that player THEN we can make this trade” is a waste of time…

by ap3604 on Jul 17, 2010 7:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

I disagree

Properly doing your homework would include considering both their current roster and their projected roster.

If a team is actively looking for a center, then saying that there’s a chance they might find one is less crazy than you make it sound. Lots of news posts made it clear that the Hawks were serious about finding a center, and looking hard at Shaq.

Shaq to Atlanta wasn’t dead this morning, only Shaq to Atlanta in a Marvin Williams sign and trade. If you notice, in his post he talked about having Shaq at the 5 with Williams at the 3. Not a sign and trade.

Don’t forget that trading Smith for a center isn’t the only possibility. They could sign a free agent center, as they’re looking to do right now, and trade for a point guard, which they also desperately want.

And last, I don’t think Alex Laugan counts as a “fan post” anymore, even when he says he’s “just having fun.”
http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2010/7/6/1555608/welcome-alex-laugan-our-newest

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 8:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

seriously??!?

16 points and 8 rebounds aka Josh Smith, is really what we want to trade JRich for?? I definitely say keep the team as is going into the season. Smith is a good player, but not a true PF, and definitely no rebounding improvement over STAT. which is what 90% of suns fan complain about.

the suns have a lot higher BBIQ now with Turk and Childress. let’s calm down for two seconds and see how this team works out!

by Drew Grisham on Jul 17, 2010 6:00 PM MDT reply actions  

Ridulous re Harris

your suppositions re the Nets are all 180 degrees off.

Avery Johnson and Devin Harris have publicly praised each other and are excited about working together again.

Johnson on the other hand has had two mostly one-sided “vibrant conversations” with Terrence Williams.

And why would the Nets who are rebuilding and cutting salaries take on Richardson’s salary?

by Net Income on Jul 17, 2010 6:55 PM MDT reply actions  

I agree that a 3-way trade involving Harris the Nets is unlikely, but if they are cutting salaries, swapping Harris for Richardson is one way to do it. Harris has $27M left over 3 years, while Richardson’s $14M contract expires this year.

Banzai!

by Suns' Sensei on Jul 17, 2010 9:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

exactly, sensei. thanks.

Net Income, please read the first line of the post again. However, I do still think that Harris will be traded away in the next year, one way or another. Check back next July 17 and we’ll see.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 11:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sell High

He played amazing in the playoffs. So we sell high. Remember we basically got him for Raja Bell and a croisant. Buy Low Sell High. His stock right now is awesome, because of his playoff performance. We are in the same situation with him this offseason that we were in with Amare lst offseason. Keep him and possibly loose him for nothing, or trade him and get talent for him. I say trade him.

Plus Josh Smith could put up the same or maybe better numbers than Amare did in this sysytem.

by Jamin88 on Jul 17, 2010 7:32 PM MDT reply actions  

Lets see what we have

I feel that what we have done so far in free agency and trades are at least a B or B+ in grading them. Sure they are not equal to Amare but points by committee can work here and I feel our Young rookies can help in the hustle and on the boards. Lets give this a try, I think Alvin can get this group playing as a team in no time. Look at what he did last year, we were not even picked to go to the play offs and we almost went to the Championship game. Lets try it out and maybe we can get a trade later in the year if need be.

by moose1967 on Jul 17, 2010 7:41 PM MDT reply actions  

Richardson walking next year is a big concern

I wouldn’t be surprised if other teams, including teams that lost in this years free agent bonanza, offer J-Rich more than we are able/willing to offer.

If that happens, especially if it’s a city he’d rather live in for more money (not everyone loves Phoenix), I suspect he’ll take it in a heartbeat and we’ll be left lucky to have a trade exception.

I could see the Knicks, the Nets, the Clippers, the Warriors and probably others all having cash and interest.

by waxmonkey on Jul 17, 2010 8:10 PM MDT reply actions  

I think he'd take a major paycut to play in GS again

but that’s just a guess, based on his tweets and stuff from last summer. he’s changed a lot since then and become a major part of this team.

I’m okay either way. I’d only trade him for a bona-fide PF. otherwise, stick with what we got.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 17, 2010 11:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

It would be much wiser to wait

because we know relatively nothing about Childress and how well he fits into the Suns’ system. We don’t know if he can really be our starting 2. So give him a trial run and if his performance is good and we feel we can move on without J-Rich, we can trade him near the trade deadline for Josh Smith.

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 17, 2010 9:41 PM MDT reply actions  

Hey Alex

Can you think of any trade possibilities where we can acquire David West from the Hornets or Troy Murphy from Indiana? Since both are on losing teams, maybe we can strike a deal if their teams are desperate for wins or wish to save money for 2011-2012.

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 18, 2010 4:19 AM MDT reply actions  

sure there are ways to get these guys

using JRich and/or a combo of players at the trade deadline, but I’m not really excited about either. If the Suns acquired those guys, I’d find a way to get excited. but until then, I’m not.

Murphy is a tree on defense. We thought Shaq was bad…

West is somehow 94 yrs old. I don’t know what it is, but he seems like a product of his system more than a talent.

Sorry, those are irrational opinions.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 7:42 AM MDT up reply actions  

While I Agee Wholheartedly

with your assertion that Josh Smith is as good a pf as it gets for the Phoenix system, I wonder whether there is actually any legs to your assertion that Hawks fans and management are souring on Josh Smith. The reasons given for this apparent souring is that he doesn’t shoot well enough to play SF and he isn’t quite the PF prospect that Horford is. Both true, but not nearly actual evidence of fan/management souring. Certainly Hawks fans and management have soured on the idea of getting blasted in the playoffs and falling short of what might be, unreasonable expectationsfor that team as currently constructed, but that is not on Josh Smith really. If I am not privy to some reports that are already out there then I digress. Personally I can’t imagine how the fans or management could possibly have increasingly negative feelings towards such a young, explosive player who is a monster on defense. I believe Smith will be 24 going into this next season, and while his jump shot is crap his immense god given talents coupled with the improvements I have seen in his game since he jumped from high school lead me to believe that most of the Atlanta talent evaluators know quite well that Josh Smith has not reached his ceiling.That is likely why we are all salivating over the idea of Smith in a Suns uniform.

by Pick1Team on Jul 18, 2010 5:11 AM MDT reply actions  

I don't think they've soured on him at all

I just think they are being pragmatic. A championship team has Horford at the PF position. He could be one of the very best in the game at PF. Conversely, their PG play is terrible, and you can’t go far without a good PG running the show and creating opportunities for the rest of the squad.

Add in the fact that Horford is a restricted free agent next year, do they really want to Josh Smith and Horford 10+ mil for several years starting in 2011, knowing that one of them is out of position? Their salaries, along with Joe Johnson’s max deal, would preclude the hawks from dramatic upgrades at the C and PG spots for several years unless they got lucky in the draft.

So if you’re Atlanta, you might starting thinking about ways level out your roster/rotation. Just as the Suns need to consider their overload at SF.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 7:32 AM MDT up reply actions  

BTW

Anyone looking for a Dragic/Lopez like improvement from Earl Clark in year 2 should quit holding their breath. It is not going to happen. Am I saying that Clark isn’t possibly going to turn into a good-great player? No. In fact, I think Clark could end up being the best of the three, but he’s going to take 3 full years before he starts paying dividends. Saying you are going to give Clark until the Allstar break of this year and give up if he doesn’t show you anything is ridiculous. I’ve tivo watched every VSL game and Clark is the EXACT same player he was during the regular season. I’ll give him that he’s reworked his jumper a tad (brought in his shooting elbow), but his release is still Richard Jefferson slow and his decision making skills are slow and poor. I would imagine that Clark will take 3-4 years to come into his known, similar to Jermaine O’Neal. Have some patience people. With our deep roster, Clark is just NOT going to get the minutes he needs. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him get some more burn in the D-League again this year, in fact, I would bet on it. And when that happens don’t think of it as a negative thing because even though Clark is not going to wow anyone this upcoming year that doesn’t mean that he doesn’t have productive minutes to play throughout his 5 year contract.

by Pick1Team on Jul 18, 2010 5:32 AM MDT reply actions  

well said

I agree that Clark will take a bit longer. he’s a guy whose “light” needs to come on one day.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 7:33 AM MDT up reply actions  

I agree, except that I'm not holding my breath for Clark to ever be more than a bit player

He’s one of those guys who tantalizes you with his athleticism, but then lets you down because he doesn’t have the mental part. 3 years of big-time college basketball under Rick Pitino and a year-plus on the Suns and he’s still a fundamentally poor player who looks lost on the floor? WTF? Guys come out of HS and are less raw than he is after all that coaching. The best case projection for Clark is a Lamar Odom type, but Odom was a productive 20-year old NBA rookie, scoring 17 PPG. Clark is 22, and can’t even produce that in the summer league! Maybe he’s a late bloomer, but my eyes tell me he just doesn’t have it.

by East Bay Ray on Jul 18, 2010 10:39 AM MDT up reply actions  

Whoever said if the Hawks got Shaq that Horford would come off the bench is sorely mistaken.

Horford is NOT coming off the bench for Atlanta regardless of who they pick up at Center. I saw an interview with Al Horford on NBA TV and he discussed his strong desire to play the 4. In fact, the underlying tone coming from Horford was that he would consider signing a 1yr deal and work his way to unrestricted free agency if the Hawks planned on keeping him at the 5. Furthermore, the Hawks are definitely looking to fill the 5 position and want to accomodate Horford’s wishes. The situation in Atlanta is not one in which they plan on stringing Horford along for years getting him to play the 5. It definitely would lead to an unhappy Horford, and the last thing the Hawks need is another Josh Childress situation.

by Pick1Team on Jul 18, 2010 6:06 AM MDT reply actions  

Right!

and there you just supported my theory that Josh Smith will be moved for a better talent at the 1 or 5 position.

Another option with GS in the middle of a 3-way is Andris Biedrins instead of Monta Ellis.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 7:35 AM MDT up reply actions  

How about this PF?

I actually like his game and he is a 7-Foot PF- Yi Jianlian, I think he would fit well with the Suns and we can get him without giving up J-Rich, he’s also cheaper then Smithtoo.

by Lyken84 on Jul 18, 2010 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think that Biedrins is a much more likely option for GS to give up for an expiring than Monta

but why would the Hawks take biedrins for smith, it doesn’t cut them salary as they make nearly the same amount and Biedrins isn’ the sort of defensive mined center who would be ideal alongside horford.

by DaveJD on Jul 19, 2010 7:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

Biedrins

has a very high rebound and block rate. He’s a good defender.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 19, 2010 7:57 AM MDT up reply actions  

Hear me out and let me know what you think.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=3xvafu9
This is a big time move. Wont happen but one can dream right. I think that we sell Richardson high (buy low, sell high concept).
       Phx gets: Josh Smith
       NJN gets: Richardson, Mike Bibby
       CHA gets: Devin Harris
       ATL gets: Dampier (more importantly cap space)
Team breakdown:
    Phx gets a young super athletic power forward that will explode in our offense with Steve Nash. We also protect ourselves from Richardson leaving next offseason for nothing
     NJN gets a big time scorer in Richardson since they missed out on all the big names this off season. They also get Bibby who can either start or back up Farmar and provide veteran leadership on an otherwise young team.
     CHA gets Harris. They just lost Felton to NYK for nothing and need someone to run the team. I don’t hink that Augustin is the answer.
     ATL gets Dampier. Before you say Im crazy hear me out. All indications point towards ATL moving Smith for either a point guard or center. While I don’t think that Dampier is the answer he has a huge UNguaranteed contract if cut before opening night. This puts ATL at about $48.8 million. That’s enough room to sign a center and point guard. There are still some decent options out there that would help them out at those positions: Shaq, Jason Williams, Earl Boykins, Rafer Alston.
I know that it is unlikely but what do you think? I think it helps ever team involved.

by Jamin88 on Jul 18, 2010 1:28 PM MDT reply actions  

How about this PF?

I actually like his game and he is a 7-Foot PF- Yi Jianlian, I think he would fit well with the Suns and we can get him without giving up J-Rich, he is cheaper then Smith too.

by Lyken84 on Jul 18, 2010 1:50 PM MDT reply actions  

I'm not a fan of Yi

He seems too methodical, lumbering

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 2:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

There is a reason why he keeps getting traded...

He comes across as uninspired in his play….Maybe that would change on the Suns, but I just see a guy that has difficulty adjusting to the American game…Sometimes he just seems like he is always a half second slow on every play, offensively and defensively…

STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!

by Daryl Ray on Jul 18, 2010 5:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

If it would happen

With Yi that would give us two seven footers and a line up of Nash, J-Rich, Hill/Hedo, Yi,Lopez and a bench of Dragic,Chill, Dudley,Lawal/Collins, Frye.

by Lyken84 on Jul 18, 2010 1:56 PM MDT reply actions  

How about we trade J-Rich for Amar’e; wait what?

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jul 18, 2010 2:25 PM MDT reply actions  

Excellent.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 18, 2010 5:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah, lets see

we’re looking for a highly paid PF with a too-long contract on a bad team that wants to dump him to start over. By Feb… makes me a bit sad… for Amare… that he fits the description so well

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 6:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

i like our roster but....

im kind of scared of starting hedo at the 4. lopez dosnt play huge minutes with frye backing him up. were going to get 0 boards with hedo at the 4 and frye at the 5. I think we have to start warrick at the 4, at least like jerron collins type minutes to give us a chance. that means either hedo is comming off the bench, or hill is going to have to. I am not a fan of trading Rich for a 4 because then we have no SGs who are reliable 3 point threats. I dont think Dragic is going to get 30 mpg to be the backup 2 and 1

by Berecki on Jul 18, 2010 2:43 PM MDT reply actions  

you replying to someone?

hit the reply button below their comment, and you’ll see an indented comment box appear.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 6:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ya Ray

Realistically speaking Clark is never going to be shit. He’s one of those guys whose likely cool with making a few mil and saying he made the league. He has no desire or will to be the man and get the most out of his talents. He reminds me of this guy Joe Forte who came out of UNC a few years back.

by Pick1Team on Jul 18, 2010 3:27 PM MDT reply actions  

New idea

The Timberwolves, being flooded with point guards, are looking to move Ramon Sessions for cap relief. They’d prefer an immediate contract that they can waive like Delonte West, but they might take an expiring one too.

http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=16853

They also, for some reason, have lots of faith in Darko Milicic, and they have Kevin Love. Their current roster shows six players listed as either C or F/C. Six.

Minnesota is hoarding point guards and centers. Maybe they plan to put them all at the bottom of a grain silo and dive into them like Scrooge McDuck swimming in gold.

Anyway, they might be willing to move a center, say Ryan Hollins, along with Ramon Sessions.

So here’s something thrown out there. So Hollins and Sessions to Atlanta, Smith to Phx, Richardson to Minnesota.

Not sure if this is good enough for Atlanta to be happy, but I can dream.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=3xuz4gr

by waxmonkey on Jul 18, 2010 4:50 PM MDT reply actions  

Quoted from that news story
Considering that the Timberwolves are seeking little beyond cap relief in return, don’t be surprised to see Sessions moved soon.

In Related

Another player who seems to be the odd man out in Minnesota is center Ryan Hollins. He had his moments last season, playing especially well during the team’s season-long five-game winning streak, but with the re-signing of Darko Milicic and the addition of Nikola Pekovic it seems likely Hollins will be moved.

Sounds like the Timberwolves might be on board with something like this.

by waxmonkey on Jul 18, 2010 4:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

agreed

from the “not sure that’s enough for Atlanta” part of it

I’d be very surprised if that’s enough

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 6:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

It does give them the 5mil+ they might need to keep Horford though

Eventually, they might have to take a less than stellar deal if they want him to stay.

I bet the fans wouldn’t be thrilled.

by waxmonkey on Jul 18, 2010 6:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

That looks like a decent deal.

I’m sure Atlanta’s begging to ship out Mike Bibby and give Sessions the starting PG spot while leaving Crawford as the 6th man.

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 18, 2010 6:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yes, we have too many PFs

If you consider 2 unproven low draft pick rookies (Lawal and Collins), a career journeyman (Warrick) and a guy playing out of position (Hedo) making the position “stocked”.

by East Bay Ray on Jul 18, 2010 7:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Wow, his faceup dribble drive looks as good as Amar'e's, if not better.

Plus he’s got a great postgame. Seriously this looks like a huge steal by the Suns. A projected first round pick managing to drop to the 2nd round and getting scooped up by us. It’s our version of DeJuan Blair.

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 18, 2010 6:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

except taller

but thats prob his ceiling. Millsap, Blair… great change of pace, not quite good enough to start. But I would take that in a second and love every minute he plays.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 6:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah, or a fanshot

I didn’t watch enough of him to make my own post and/or take credit for any evaluation

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 8:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

Horford is will solve all our problem at PF not Smith

Smith’s second position is SF while Horford’s is a C. Horford sliding to the 5 if Robin goes down will effectively put Frye at 4 his natural position. We don’t have any back up center who can run the floor like Horford does on a fast break. Don’t tell me Dwayne Collins because no matter how long he is, he’s still 6’8 compared to a 6’10 banger like Horford. I believe this the best team that can offer Horford a supporting cast.

sex is like math: you add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs and pray you dont multiply!

by Spit_Fire on Jul 18, 2010 6:55 PM MDT reply actions  

Well, let's take up a collection to send you to Atlanta to convince them.

I think Horford is the guy I’d like more than anybody in the league – but if he’s their franchise player, we probably won’t get him.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 18, 2010 7:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

I thought JJ was their franchise guy, didn't they sign him to a 119 mil?

sex is like math: you add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs and pray you dont multiply!

by Spit_Fire on Jul 19, 2010 7:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

No way the Hawks won't lock up Horford

They can’t go to rebuilding mode after JJ’s giant contract, so resigning Al Horford must be a priority for them.

They are able, willing, and likely will offer more money than anyone else, even if they have to dump another player (like they did Childress) to find the money, and Horford will gladly accept. Young players chase money first, and Horford is just coming out of his rookie contract.

If they let Horford go in order to avoid luxury tax after signing Johnson to that insane contract, then already angry Atlanta fans will burn their management at the stake. They’ll trade for expiring contracts before paying the luxury tax, and they’ll pay the luxury tax before losing Horford to free agency.

But sure, if he’s available, he’s generally better than Smith.

The only problem is, he just won’t be.

Getting Josh Smith is within the realm of possibility. Trying now, instead of at the trade deadline, will give the Suns more time to become a cohesive team and prepare for the post season. With few exceptions, big trades mid season usually hurt in the short term.

Unless the Hawks completely whiff on finding a center by the trade deadline, I doubt Smith is staying in Atlanta for all of next season. It would be nice if we were the ones who found a way to hit that small jackpot while it was available.

by waxmonkey on Jul 18, 2010 9:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

Josh Smith

Let me ask you this Spit! Why would Atlanta trade Horford when he has 2 years left on his rookie deal and he’s a 4-5?

by Session33 on Jul 19, 2010 12:09 AM MDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying Atlanta would trade Horford but should wait for the moment to try and offer something to Horford if he doesn't sign any extension and is somehow planning to bolt out of Atlanta

All I’m saying is that I prefer Horford rather than Smith also because of his ability to play secondary position which is center.

sex is like math: you add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs and pray you dont multiply!

by Spit_Fire on Jul 19, 2010 7:25 AM MDT up reply actions  

Then, stand pat for now and let's see what this group can do before making another major move

But, here’s the problem with that approach: I have no doubts that, as presently constructed, this will be a very good regular season team. Playoff basketball is another matter. In the regular season, teams won’t be able to prepare for our unconventional approach, and we’ll run them out of the building. In a playoff series, teams will attack our inside weakness relentlessly, and what will our answer be?

So, if we play the “wait and see” game, this team might not give us reason to feel the need for a change by its regular season play. Why would you rock the boat when the team is in the top 4 in the West and on a 50-win pace by the trade deadline? Yet, still, I think that’s what we should do. It might take some brass balls to make that move at that time, but Sarver has shown he has those.

by East Bay Ray on Jul 18, 2010 7:48 PM MDT reply actions  

very good point

its hard to make a trade midseason and have it work all the way to the Finals. Though, the Lakers did it 3 Finals ago. We need our “Gasol” moment.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 8:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yes!

If, by “Gasol moment”, you mean we can trade a couple of scrubs and a couple of draft picks for a potential future HOF-er, I’m all for that! :-)

by East Bay Ray on Jul 18, 2010 8:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

thats what I mean!

of course, that would have been easier with a 12 mil TPE, because now it’s forcing us to trade JRich to get that great Gasol pickup.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 18, 2010 8:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

Still think J-Rich is gonna walk though

With the Dudley doing well and the Childress pick up, the potential trade gains feel like they greatly outweigh the potential losses.

I wish he’d stay for medium money and playoff shots… but I’m skeptical. It would be nice to get more than a trade exception so moving him early is attractive. The pickings are getting slimmer.

Of course, even if we stick with this lineup, I’m still more excited than I was at the beginning of last year.

by waxmonkey on Jul 18, 2010 9:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

Who knows?

Maybe Memphis might consider giving us the other Gasol brother for Warrick or something.

In Nash I Trust!
Steve Nash DOES play defense, foo!

by NashMV3 on Jul 18, 2010 11:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

Then we need Zoran.

Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy

by haremoor on Jul 19, 2010 7:46 AM MDT up reply actions  

Josh Smith

I’m glad this is a topic because I brought this up last week before the Barbosa trade. I said Josh would be a great fit with his talent. He has less than 36 million and 3 years left on his deal. He plays better defense and rebounds better than Amare. His offense is not as good as Amare, but playing along side Nash that can be a easy 5-6 point spike. We know Nash can make people like Marion look like an allstar, JJohnson/QRicharson shoot 5-7% from 3pt land. I think Nash can make Kurt Rambis look good and he’s retired. But back to Josh. I feel the Suns could have gave part of there exception and a 2nd rnd pick and could have had him. Joe Johnson has gave that team a poison pill by maxing out. Crawford is a free agent next year and Marvin/Hortford will need new deals in2 years. If the Suns can pull a Turk or Rich deal for Josh. They should make it happen in a heart beat.

by Session33 on Jul 18, 2010 11:41 PM MDT reply actions  

A few comments to clear some individuals misconceptions...

*Gani Lawal’s face up dribble drive game is nowhere near Amare’s, and won’t ever be. One baseline move past a weak defender where he barely snuck the ball over the rim, pales in comparison to the multitude of dribble drives I could find on film of Amare. I’m sure of the fact that Lawal was a great value pick at #46 as I’ve said in previous posts. Let’s keep the Lawal comparisons at vintage Chris Wilcox levels for now.
*Josh Smith does not rebound better than Amare and the stats bear that out.
*We do not want Yi or Murphy in a Suns uniform. If something bad like that were to happen then so be it. Let’s not pine for it though.

by Pick1Team on Jul 19, 2010 12:09 AM MDT reply actions  

Pick 1 comment about Josh

Ok Josh career rebound average is 7.6 and he averaged 8.8 last year. Amare career average is 8.9 and that’s what he averaged last year. Do you know if your team shoot more you have more opportunities to grab more rbs. He would have more. You didn’t mention his 1 more block per game and his .6 steals per game more than Amare. Do you agree his average and shooting percentage would go up as well playing with Nash.

by Session33 on Jul 19, 2010 12:36 AM MDT up reply actions  

*Josh Smith does not rebound better than Amare and the stats bear that out.

He was two tenths of a rebound less than Amare per game last year (8.9 vs 8.7rpg).

That was while playing behind Horford at center, who averaged 10 rebounds in 35 minutes, while, by comparison, both of our centers together took 48 minutes to combine for 10. Amare probably had quite a few more opportunities per game.

What’s important is that he rebounds almost twice as well as Turkoglu and Warrick. Literally.

by waxmonkey on Jul 19, 2010 12:37 AM MDT up reply actions  

@ Waxmonkey

Well would you want to trade Rich or Turk for Smith?

by Session33 on Jul 19, 2010 12:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

Richardson

His expiring contract is more valuable and it is likely we will lose him to free agency if we don’t trade it before it ends.

A lot of things would need to fall into place for this to happen, so this is really just a wishing thread. But it’s based in reality, so it’s fun too.

I can’t find a better power forward that we also have a somewhat reasonable chance of acquiring. I wish I could. This thread would be more varied and exciting.

by waxmonkey on Jul 19, 2010 1:12 AM MDT up reply actions  

Remember when Amare used to talk about wanting to be a lockdown defender?

He said he wanted opposing teams to be afraid of his defense. That, my friends, is what Josh Smith already is. A defensive maniac who picks up steals and blocks like he’s James Woods on Family Guy. “Ooh! A piece of candy. Ooh! A piece of candy…”

by JeHa on Jul 19, 2010 12:54 AM MDT reply actions  

@ JeHa

I agree. Some of these people talking about this subject remind me of Sarver or the LA Clippers front office. They don’t know what the %@ll there talking about. :-)

by Session33 on Jul 19, 2010 1:02 AM MDT up reply actions  

Sarver's come out looking pretty smart now though :)

And without a formal GM, although Kerr might have done some preliminary legwork on these deals before he left

Read.

by jog on Jul 19, 2010 1:35 AM MDT up reply actions  

Also to remember

Smith has a $6mil dollar trade kicker on his contract, after all Sarver has spent this summer will he really be wiling to fork over another $6million to aquire smith.

by DaveJD on Jul 19, 2010 8:02 AM MDT reply actions  

How about this

Golden state gets: J-Rich
Phoenix gets: Josh Smith, Charlie Bell
Atlanta gets: Raymond Felton
New York gets: monta ellis

Atlanta get their PG, the Knicks get ellis who they were supposedly trying to get from a David Lee s+t, the Warriors get a fan favourite back and cap flexibility and we get smith

by DaveJD on Jul 20, 2010 10:07 AM MDT reply actions  

thats actually not a bad trade at all

does it actually work under the cap? did you try the espn trade machine? If so, bravo.

the only (big) problem is getting 4 different teams to agree at the same time that they aren’t the one getting screwed over.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jul 20, 2010 11:59 AM MDT up reply actions  

well it would work under the cap but

bell can’t be traded with other players for a while because he was just traded to GS.

by DaveJD on Jul 20, 2010 12:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Gortat_nash_dudley_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Divinginlevanto_small PHXgp

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_3111433_9952_1451357_main_small 7footer