Roleplaying
Once upon a Lakers' loss, Kobe Bryant said, "We need to get on our horse and ride him for a while."
He was, of course, referring to Shaquille "The Big Horse?" O'Neal - the offense needed to run through the big man first. Kobe had just finished shooting the Lakers right out of that playoff game, something he's made a habit of over his career. On this particular night, though, Kobe had clarity - he was not the best player on his team to run an offense through.
And he still isn't. He dominates the ball too much, and creates too little for his teammates while he is creating for himself. He has always been more suited to being a closer, than carrying a team on his back. But enough about Lakers' players. Yech.
All players, even great players, play certain roles on their teams, and are most effective when they play those roles.
And that begs the question, of course:
Who plays what roles on the Suns? and What do the Suns need to get in order to improve?
The Work Horse - this is the guy who the offense revolves around. A work horse is someone who can touch the ball every time down, and either score, or, more often, create a situation where his teammates can score.
This can happen in several ways. He can be a dominant post player, who collapses the defensive and forces double teams. He can be a knock-down shooter who's perpetually in motion, creating cross-matches ever time the opponent has to switch a screen. Or, he can be an undersized, hairy, Canadian whose screen roll superpowers forces opposing teams to constantly trap the 2-man game and leave shooters open.
So, not to put too fine a point on it - Steve is that guy for the Suns.
Steve and a warm body to set picks. And, it's a grind on his body,
habitually creating that situation where it takes the other team 3
players to guard him and his screen-roll buddy. But that's the job
when you're the work-horse of the offense.
The Closer - this is the guy who can take over a game for a short period of time. Closers can flip a switch, take their game up a level, and just in finish off the opponent. Good closers have a killer instinct, and they always do their best work at the end of the game.

I also submit that you can't be a workhorse AND a closer. If you've been grinding all game, chances are, you don't have enough left in the tank to take over for an extended period of time. Here, I foresee problems for the Suns. Steve would obviously be the natural choice, but often times, he doesn't have the stamina by the end of the game to really take over.
So, if not Nash, Who will the Suns' closer be? A certain young Slovenian has shown the ability to flip the switch and go berzerker on foes. Hedo showed the ability to hit big shots in Orlando. It's a question mark.
The Anchor - Let's not ignore the defensive side of the ball. The Anchor is the guy who is there on every defensive play, clogging the middle, showing up to help, and generally stopping the ball from getting to the rim.
It's only taken 20 years, but I can finally say it - we have one of these guys! WOOT! Stay healthy, Robin!
The Stopper - This is the guy whose primary job is to harass the ball all the way up the court, prevent the other team from getting into its sets early, and otherwise keep the opposing teams best perimeter scorer from getting into the paint, or to his spots.
So, who is that guy for the Suns? With apologies to Dudley and Grant, neither of them really has the combination of speed and length to be that dedicated defender. But, in Childress, we have recently acquired a player who fits the bill. Will J-Chill really receive enough minutes to do that job?
Well, that's it from me. I realize, not a ton of new info here, but a few things to cogitate. And, I enjoyed making the post and captioning the pictures. :-P
24 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
not done reading it yet and must rec
"I’ve been in the league 14 years and I don’t think I’ve been called for a carry yet. It’s news to me," "I’ve never heard anyone complain about me carrying the ball. The best coach in the league Gregg Popovich didn’t have a problem with it last week."
ok done reading it
still love it, but got to disagree about nash not being the closer especially if the second unit picks up where they left off last season and 2 time can get some rest while they hold the fort…how many spurs fans do you think kicked thier dogs when nash drained that one eyed 3….if you look at it real close you can see him saying “closing time” as he drains it.
"I’ve been in the league 14 years and I don’t think I’ve been called for a carry yet. It’s news to me," "I’ve never heard anyone complain about me carrying the ball. The best coach in the league Gregg Popovich didn’t have a problem with it last week."
Oh he's a big shot hitter, and the natural choice.
But it’s tough for him to just take over the game near the end for several minutes. He’s done it several times, to be sure.
But they happen less often as the season goes longer and longer…
yeah we don't really have a closer
in terms of putting the ball in the hole at the end of the game. Nash will pass it to the right guy, but that guy has to make the shot.
We’ll see on Hedo. He took all the big shots for Orlando a couple yrs ago (though he didn’t make a high percentage of them).
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Wha?
Nash is the definition of a “closer.” How many of those off-balance dagger 3-pointers has he drained to put a team away in the final minute? The comeback game against Dallas, the playoff game against Dallas in ’05, the epic shootout vs. Kidd in New Jersey, last year vs. San Antonio… etc etc
Maybe I am not understanding the criteria, but there is no one in the league that I would rather have taking a clutch shot than Steve, and that’s not a biased statement.
"We didn’t go for coffee and this kind of stuff."
-El Dragon on his relationship with Sasha Vujacic
Oh and I would be remiss
not to mention the “old white guy at the YMCA shot” against the Clips in last year’s opener.
"We didn’t go for coffee and this kind of stuff."
-El Dragon on his relationship with Sasha Vujacic
It's not just clutch shots
It’s the ability to take over. Like what Manu did to the Suns several times over the years.
He took over...
by hitting clutch shots, no? Oh well, nice post jc.
"We didn’t go for coffee and this kind of stuff."
-El Dragon on his relationship with Sasha Vujacic
lol could have used printscreen or alt shift 4 :P
nice read.
"I don't lift weights because they are heavy, and I don't run because it makes me tired." - Charles Barkley
TURRIBLE!
This is a very good and interesting article. However, I’m not sure I agree with everything.
Let me just say that the Suns aren’t like any ordinary team. Last year we overachieved. We had great chemistry which to me means-“the extent by which a group of individuals outplay their individual performances” that is, the sum being greater than the parts. We rely on team play to win a game. This is why losing Amar’e ain’t so depressing to the majority of us. We don’t really have a stopper or an anchor, or a closer. Somebody different steps up each night. In the playoffs somebody different would step up and have a huge game. When it comes to having an anchor, Lopez isn’t that player yet. He, Dudley and Hill together lead the defense of the team. The Suns success is based off of group performance more than individual performances.
Don't trade Dudley!
by Beavis 25 on Aug 26, 2010 6:37 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
+1 - for sheer entertainment value
Love the captions.
True – all good teams have key roleplayers. We just add the mystery of who will fall into several of the roles to each game. I can see where this team will have one of several players step up on any given night.
That adds to the mystique – and possible probable inconsistency too… With team chemistry such an important part of our Suns, I am not overly confident since we have several key lineup changes.
That said, we have a great core of guys already working out together – much like last year… how fast can they sync with the Nashmaster?
reminds me of the old pistons
hamilton (rasheed?) workhorse
Billups- closer
Ben Wallace- anchor
Prince- Stopper
by dontTradeAaronNelson! on Aug 27, 2010 12:20 PM MDT reply actions
Kobe is not a closer!
it drives me nuts when people say hes a good closer. he shots a career 25% for game winning shots. He just shoots so many and people tend to ignore or forget the misses.
Also his shot % in the last 5 minutes of each game tends to always be lower then his average shooting % for the year.
Sorry just had to rant …..
by dontTradeAaronNelson! on Aug 27, 2010 12:30 PM MDT reply actions
If you're taking game winning shots, you're a closer. It doesn't mean you're a GOOD closer, but you are a closer.
Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy
I know I love Nash.
But Nash is not the closer for this team.
Yes, Nash has had great moments where he drains the last shot to put a team on the mat, FOR GOOD.
But a Closer is the Guy who, stands up to be counted for a stretch of 4-12 Minutes of the game, where he is almost unstoppable. Reason for him to be able to do so only for a minor stretch is because of the intense workload he has during that stretch. Adrenaline / Talent will only take you that far.
Manu – In this regard HE DA MAN.
LA – Kobe is the closer for his team.
LeChoke – He can be a monster closer. I remember his game against the Pistons where he scored 28 of the last 31 points for his team.
B.Davis – Mavs Playoffs victory.
For the Suns, our Closer/S would be
Goran – Against Spurs Playoffs Game 3 – A Closer Performance.
J-Rich – There were stretches in the Portland Series where he scored 70-75% of the points for the team in the final quarter.
Anchor/s – Childress / Dudley
Work horse – Nash.
Stoppers - Childress / Dudz / Hill
Anchor – ROLO

by 



























