Steve Nash: The Best Phoenix Sun Ever?
Yes the offseason here in AZ is boring, the heat is miserable and the Suns news isn't exactly plentiful.
So here goes another one of those, "let's post a little something to keep us from nodding off at work" posts.
If Steve Nash isn't the best Sun of all time, who is?
Consider what Barkley did for the franchise: their latest and second finals appearance occurred after his acqusition. STAT was a good player who made great plays and had some huge playoff games, spending all of his career here until a couple months ago. KJ was nearly a career Sun, led them to many many playoff appearances, he was the heart and soul for years.
Here's a little something to help you out, if you need some help with numbers.
Food for thought:
- Alvan Adams leads the franchise in minutes and games played
- Walter Davis leads the franchise in scoring, field goals made and attempts
- Mark West leads the franchise in field goal percentage (but never took a shot outside the paint as I recall)
- Shawn Marion is second in total rebounds all time and first in defensive rebounds
- Kevin Johnsons is the all time franchise leader in assists
- Steve Nash leads the franchise in free throw percentage and 3-pt field goals and is second in assists
- Charles Barkley is second all time in scoring average
Who else can you think of and let us know what your criteria is for your selection.
153 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lot of great players here to ponder over...
Considering that Nash has only been here six seasons thus far, I’d have to give the edge to KJ or Walter Davis….
Then again Paul Westphal & Nash are great candidates as well…
I guess I will chave to choose KJ for his 10+ great years of service..
1. KJ
2. Walter Davis
3. Steve Nash
4. Paul Westphal
5. Alvin Adams
6. Charles Barkley
7. Shawn Marion
8. Amare Stoudemire
9. Dan Majerele
10. Dick Van Arsdale
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
FWIW
Dick Van Arsdale and Dick Snyder were my 7th grade NCBA basketball coaches…Needless to say we were the Suns. An awful team, no one passed the ball. I’m surprised Van Arsdale’s kid didn’t play more ball, he was awesome in 7th grade…
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
That is a good question...
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/snydedi01.html
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Hello! The burning hot summer arrived, this is the demonstration stature good season,
the retreat winter sincere appearance, lets lithe, the individuality, the fashion,
the sex appeal, mature you start from here! Has a good news to tell everybody: Recently,
every bought full 200 US dollars in this company, then has the present to see off,
Vietnam which buys delivers are more, please do not miss this good opportunity!!!
= http://www.bizboysell.com ====
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Handbags(Coach l v f e n d i d&g) $35
Tshirts (ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,A r m a i n i) $16
New era cap $15
Bikini (Ed hardy) $25
FREE sHIPPING
== http://www.bizboysell.com ====
▍ ★∴
....▍▍....█▍ ☆ ★∵ …./
◥█▅▅██▅▅██▅▅▅▅▅███◤
.◥███████████████◤
~~~~◥█████████████◤~~~~
by itkonlyyou224 on Aug 9, 2010 8:05 PM MDT up reply actions
Its easiest to vote based on the present
and pick Nash. He has defined the team since 2004, and few would disagree that HE makes the Suns who they are more than any other player. Nash is the reason we’ve withstood such turnover, and made 3 conerence finals in 6 years.
As far as star power, as far as “glowing” memories, Barkley and Nash top the list.
But longevity should play a part when you think of all-time Suns favorite. Barkley only had, what, 3 seasons here? And Nash only 6. Chambers started in Seattle and most other all-time Suns only spent a portion of their careers here.
I’d have to say Walter Davis or Alvin Adams, because they really only played for the Suns and had long successful careers here.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Preach on, brother
It’s so easy to forget…And when you see clips of this skinny white guy wearing nut -huggers on playing center, you think, “Christ man how could he get anything done?” But Alvin Adams WAS the Suns interior presence back in the day, for a long time. And Walt Davis was as smooth a SG as you could find. Even his nephew Hubert inherited that shot, although it wasn’t as sweet.
I tend to think if KJ stayed in town he could be a GM type/Partial Owner/or other FO position with the Suns (if he wanted), or he could just hang out at the games and wave to the crowd. His presence around the organization would only help and his legacy would be more easily recalled.
But, he’s a politician now, so, you know, good luck, Kevin.
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
According to b-ref. . . .
Shawn Marion tops the franchise in career Win Shares: http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/PHO/leaders_career.html
It goes
- Marion 93.2
- KJ 90.9
- AA 73.5
- Nash 68.8
- Stoudemire 67.9
- Davis 66.4
- Van Arsdale 63.6
- Nance 53.6
- Majerle 52.0
- Westphal 51.5
To me that seems about right – I’d probably favor KJ over Marion but it’s close. AA is on there because he played for the Suns forever and while he was a very good player, he wasn’t great. Ditto Van Arsdale. Davis was a great scorer but didn’t add much else and the rest (including Barkley & Chambers & Kidd who don’t make this list) just weren’t around long enough to be on that list.
But that’s just one measure. A better measure would combine longevity with peak greatness. It also gets interesting if you just consider shorter periods – who’s the best over 3 years? or 5 years?
I think when its all said and done
in like 10 years-Marion goes to the Ring of Honor. He’ll want someone to remember him, and whoever ownership is at that time will have a sit down like they did with Barkley and clear the air (if that still needs to be done)
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
Matrix was great for the Suns...
Gave us 8 excellent years and he probably does belong in the Ring of Honor…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
I would like Shawn Marion to return to the Suns at the end of his career, whether he has anything left or not. It would be similar to when Dan Majerle returned in the early 2000s. Everybody knew Majerle wasn’t great anymore, but didn’t mind.
It would be nice to bring back all our expatriates as role players later on...
Kinda like that wayward child finely coming home…
Matrix in 2013 as a back-up SF to Clark or whoever else we got..
JJ in 2014 as a mentor/back-up SG to Josh Childress
STAT in 2014 as a backup PF/C to Rolo
& Mike D’ as a towel boy in 2017
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
by Daryl Ray on Aug 4, 2010 11:39 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'd have to go for KJ or AA at 1 & 2.
Then probably WD and Nash. BUT, while I was a big fan of KJ and numerous other Suns, Nash is my favorite all time Sun. I don’t think it’s because he’s playing now (Barkley was my all time until Nash), but I guess we’ll see.
Great article Wil...
Maybe you could spice things up by having a poll…Probably need to add a caveat for fans to do their homework before voting…Don’t need to many votes for Grant Gondrezic
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
was gonna do a poll
but people always yell at me when I do cause I screw it up :(
plus a lot of people just vote and dont comment.
I want interaction, BSOTS blogging, discussion, chemistry, etc!!!!!
For you Sun God, next time I’ll drop in a poll/
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
by Wil Cantrell on Aug 4, 2010 10:20 AM MDT up reply actions
I guess it probably wouln't matter anyways...
People gonna vote Nash because he is at present in the forefront of the Suns players…While I love Nash, I think the contributions of KG, Davis & Adams put them slightly ahead of Steve…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
I pick Nash for one reason...
His personality! He is a great player and also all the player on your list but there is something I know for sure that I don’t about the other players and is what kind of man Steve is. He is an amazing person that is great to have associated with the Suns organization. I REALLY like KJ and I think he is a good guy but nothing compared to Nash.
I was surprised to hear that Marion had such a large win share, but would he had those numbers without Nash? I DO like Marion (as a player) and I think he would have been good regardless but for sure he would have not put the same numbers.
Remember Marion played more seasons for the Suns without Nash than with him...
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
His numbers were pretty much static...
until he left the Suns, that is…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
disagree
I disagree—not that Nash has a great personality, but that personality can make a player a franchise’s best ever. Nash’s accomplishments would be the same if his personality were as horrible as Kobe Bryant’s or if his personality was both good and bad like Charles Barkley’s. Michael Jordan sure wasn’t the Bulls franchise’s greatest player because of his personality; I have the impression his teammates only tolerated his arrogance and ruthlessness because he kept leading them to championships, and his fans ignored his personality either because they didn’t know about it or because they were sycophantic fanboys.
The fans who knew about Jordan’s personality would usually say that Pippen was their favorite player on those teams.
Don't trade Dudley!
Really? I didn’t know anyone except maybe Pippen’s family liked him better than Jordan. Kudos to them for being discerning.
My fave Bull was Cartwright, because he habitually intimidated that punk Patty Ewing. The fact that he’s now an assistant coach here hasn’t hurt my feelings towards him either.
That, and he had the ugliest shot ever, lol. Makes Marion look smooth.
It's Nash.
Hands down. This is the golden age of the Suns orginazation. While there hasn’t been a Finals appearance, since ‘04 this has been the most successful era of the franchise’s history. The memories we will look back on 25 years from now will serve the test of time. In ’06 he dragged a team that started Diaw and Tim Thomas in the frontcourt all the way to the WCF. The comeback from a 3-1 playoff series defecit against the hated Lakers. Finishing off a sweep of the Spurs with his frickin eye sealed shut. This is the brightest prolonged stretch in Suns history, and Steve Nash engineered it.
For further evidence on his impact which will prove very historically significant, look at how many fans we have on this site that started following the team because of Nash and SSOL.
Barkley didn’t stick around long enough and only had one season where he stayed healthy. The old teams of the ‘70s and ’80s were not consistently successful, even with greatly fewer teams in the league, so with respect I can’t single out any of the old timers. I grew to dislike KJ considerably after Barkley came to town and he not-so-graciously took the role of second banana, plus his off-court shenanigans really gave me the creeps, so it’s Nash without a doubt for me.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
The Suns have always been in a Golden age...
One of the most successful franchises in NBA history if we don’t take Championships in consideration…
But the best Suns “era” was the 1988/1989 through the 1994/1995 (seven seasons) Suns teams that averaged 56.3 wins and had a finals apperance plus three Western conference finals. Compare this with our current 6 year run which has average 55.3 wins with no finals appearance…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Your numbers are fancy, Sun God.
But it doesn’t just boil down to wins and losses to me (especially when there is only a one win difference). Consider the following:
The ‘88 to ’95 years consisted of two different teams, Barkley and pre-Barkley. KJ was running the show during the first half, Barkley in the second. The current run, on the other hand, has been all Nash’s, with various second and third fiddles. This makes the comparision a little clumsy. Also, the run that you cited was 7 years long, while the Nash era is in it’s sixth year, so the upcoming ‘10/’11 Suns have another season to work with.
Also I propose to you that the ‘05 and ’07 playoff teams were as good or better than the ’93 Finals team, the difference being that in ’93 the power was in the East (CHI) which allowed the team to get all the way to the Finals, while during Nash’s era the best teams played in the West (LA, SA), which in turn created a roadblock within the conference. This also makes the Nash era’s win/loss and playoff record more impressive than the KJ/Barkley era’s track record.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
Our 07 team was great...albeit not built for the playoffs...
However, pretty much everyone agrees that our 2005 team was more heart than anything else…The Western conference was down that year with some injuries to key players and San Antonio knocked out of the playoffs early by Dallas.
The Suns teams of that era had a constant in KJ even though they had players come and go, just as our current Suns have had players come and go…I don’t buy the disparity in comparisons. A couple of those those Suns teams were great..the 1994/1995 team and the 1988/1989 through 1992/1993 teams…They were juggernauts that simply had an injury to a key player (Barkley, Manning, KG, Majerele) that kept them from going all the way…very similar to our current crop of Suns…
Also in 1993, the powers in the East were 1) NY Knicks 62 – 21, 2) Bulls – 57-25 3) Cavs 54- 28..The line was just slightly for the Suns in the series…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Long time fans know how good the 90's were
You’re right on the money Sun God, the Suns were a powerhouse from 89-96, and an upper 2nd tier team the rest of the decade until Marbury replaced Kidd. When MJ’s Bulls were running roughshod and going 72-10, the Suns were one of those 10. I think the consecutive playoff appearances streak got up to 14 straight there, again ending when Kidd departed. No question the Nash years have been stellar, but the 90’s Suns were legit.
welll
I’ve been a fan since Kyle Macy was running the show
The 89-92 Suns were not a powerhouse any more than this recent Suns team. They were perennially bumped from the playoffs because they weren’t tough enough and couldn’t get the rebounds. After the 92 ousting, someone (can’t remember who, JC or Cotton?) said “we need a Barkley”… and they went out and got him.
Then the 93-95 Suns were a powerhouse in terms of regualr season wins and difference-maker Barkley, but still not overly big as a team and only once went to the Finals.
So powerhouse is a relative term, and there’s really not a big distinction between the “powerhouse-ity” of the 89-95 Suns vs. the 04-10 Suns.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
I'm also a long time fan
That doesn’t mean I overvalue nostalgia.
I’m not taking anything away from the ‘90s Suns, I’m saying that no single player in Suns history owned an era like Nash has the last six (and counting) years.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
iWe'll have to agree to disagree..
Nash is a great player..but I do not consider him the penultimate Sun…If he players a couple more seasons at this level, maybe yes..Until then the honor should go to KJ, Davis, Adams or Westplal…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Pretty sure penultimate is not the right word there.
It means “second to last.”
As in, “The Suns swept the Spurs in their penultimate series of the 09-10 playoffs.”
by iwasneveryoung on Aug 4, 2010 4:14 PM MDT up reply actions
Uh...Actually I meant to say "ultimate pen" instead "penultimate"
I am dyslexic and I love great writing instruments…I’m sure you understand…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Yes, 2005 should have been the year.
With a healthy Amare, the Suns probably wouldn’t have taken 7 games each to dispatch the Lakers and Clippers and wouldn’t have run out of gas against the Mavs, who took out the Spurs for us.
As for this…
Also in 1993, the powers in the East were 1) NY Knicks 62 – 21, 2) Bulls – 57-25 3) Cavs 54- 28..The line was just slightly for the Suns in the series…
I’m not sure what that is supposed to mean, but all numbers and stats and footnotes aside, and despite whatever the line was at the start of the PHX/CHI series, I think it was made pretty obvious who owned the throne.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
actually I disagree
the Spurs outclassed the Suns in 05. The Suns didn’t deserve to make the Finals that year. The series was over in 5, and the suns only won 1 game because the Spurs let their foot off the gas.
2006 was the season of woulda-coulda, IMO. Suns made the WCF against a very beatable Mavs team. And only when the rotation got down to 5.5 players did the Suns wilt away. And who would have been the next opponent: Miami. The team the Suns BLEW OUT twice that year, running Shaq off the floor entirel. IMO, that was the best chance at a ring.
Second-closest was 2007. No need to discuss why, I don’t think. But if the Suns had beaten SA, the next opponents were over-achieving Utah, and overachieving Cavs. easy win-out, IMO.
2005 comes in a distant third.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Whoops, I meant 2006
Really, I did.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
of course
the rest of your post should have made that obvious to me.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
I disagree. The Suns won that one game because of Amare’s block on Tim Duncan. You really think that the Spurs would let their foot off the gas with a chance to sweep us on their own homecourt? I guarantee they didn’t feel like coming back to a game 5 in Phoenix, but they had to anyway. Also, like Q-Rich said, “we were just a healthy Joe Johnson away from competing with them”. I believe if JJ didn’t get hurt we probably would’ve beaten the Mavs in 5 instead of 6 and than lost to the Spurs in 6.
Don't trade Dudley!
"and then lost to the Spurs in 6"
so you believe the Spurs outclassed us that year, too?
I do believe the Spurs let their foot off the gas in Game 4. Sure Amare won it with a block, but it was only that close (IMO) because they didn’t play as hard as the prior 3 games or game 5. It’s tough the sweep an opponent. I’m still shocked the Suns did it to the Spurs this past year. All thanks to Stevie and his one-eyed shooting.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
I don’t know what you mean by “outclassed”. I always thought the Spurs were the better team that year. However, I felt we could have put up a better fight with a healthy JJ. Him being hurt kept it from being a good series.
Don't trade Dudley!
agreed
outclassed was poor word choice. I hate that word too. Not sure why I used it.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
True, 05/06 was our closest shot at the ring
And 06/07 was our strongest team
by beastattack3000 on Aug 4, 2010 3:44 PM MDT up reply actions
I felt like last year’s team was our best team of the Nash era and the 2nd best to the 1992-93 team. When they started playing to their potential they went 28-7 down the stretch. That is a dominate record. That team was a powerhouse with a healthy Lopez. We just lost to Kobe like Barkley lost to Jordan.
Don't trade Dudley!
He gets my vote...
And it took me less than 15 sec to come to that conclusion…that’s how far ahead Nash is in my mind from the list of players he was compared to.
In all fairness, I didn’t really see, or at least appreciate seeing the older players like Alvin Adams, Dick Van Arsdale, or Paul Westphal…but compared to any of the newer players such as KJ, Barkley, Majerle, etc…Nash is at the top by a long shot.
Nash also won two back-to-back MVP awards, something never before done by any Suns player. This is yet another feat which lends credence to his legendary status as a Phoenix Sun.
I know you're devastated, Scott, but you're going to have to come to terms with it.
Taylor is gone.
Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy
Nash for me
The Nash era has been hugely successful and entertaining. Look at all the stats, records, career highs etc that have been set during it. It’s all because of Nash and the way he runs the system.
Two MVPs, two Conference Finals appearances…for a franchise that has no titles, this is pretty much the best (moreso than 1 MVP and 1 Finals I’d say).
Not only that but the fact the Suns actually drafted Nash and he began his career with the franchise gives him more of a legendary status to me.
And I say that
With a signed and framed Barkley jersey hanging on the wall above me. I loved Barkley, I thought he’d be my all time favourite player forever, but you just can’t ignore what Nash has done. He surpassed Charles.
by Toon Army Sun on Aug 4, 2010 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions
3 WCF appearances...
I do not abide wrongness
"Somebody hits me, I'm going to hit him back. Even if it does look like he hasn't eaten in a while." - Sir Charles
by round_mound_of_rebound on Aug 4, 2010 9:43 PM MDT up reply actions
I really wonder how KJ would do if he played in today's no hand-checking era
I think he would have tore ish up!
by beastattack3000 on Aug 4, 2010 11:23 AM MDT reply actions
Considering that the Suns averaged 110.4 ppg during his years as a starter...
compared to the current regime’s 109.8 from 2004/2005 to present, I think he would do pretty good…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Those stats are flawed though because of the run with Shaq and Porter. Take them out and the pace would probably be even.
Don't trade Dudley!
That is not simply not true...
The 2005/2006 squad only scored 108.4 ppg compared to 2008/2009’s debacle team that averaged 109.4…Discounting the Shaq/Porter year, it averages out to 109.9
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
I've never bought into the 'best' argument - apples and oranges, and all that.
It’s Nash for me – but that’s easy, because I’m a Suns fan because of Nash. I don’t have the years of watching the Suns that others do, although I was a Barkley fan when he was in Philly, and consequently, when he was a Sun.
However, it’s his personality and what he stands for that make him head and shoulders above other candidates, and makes me say Nash is the best ever. I’d rather root for a classy guy without a ring than have to compromise my principles and support a total jerk, even if he’s talented.
Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas, taking the dog.
Dorothy
Is this a serious question?
It’s Nash and it isn’t even close.
And no memory fog, I saw all these guys play.
Alvan Adams was a great player but never in MVP consideration. Nash won it twice.
Barkley parachuted in and gave us a magical season. But sadly, he broke down from age and injuries pretty quickly.
Walter Davis would have been a contender for greatest Sun ever, except for his tragic addiction issues and the fact that he was the central figure in a drug scandal that almost cost us the entire franchise.
You can make a case for KJ on productivity/longevity, and he gets extra points from me for bravely coming out of retirement for the playoffs when Backcourt 2000 broke down. But while he was probably Nash’s equal as a pure point guard, he never shot 90-50-40, which Nash has done I think five times now.
by suns68 on Aug 4, 2010 12:06 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
Except for the part about Walter Davis.
That whole scandal has since been recognized as nothing more than a witch hunt.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
I was just thinking that. I heard that the whole damn thing was a fishing expedition by the state attorney general (or a prosecutor at some level, can’t remember what) and no one was ever charged. It means that, although something better came of it, the Suns franchise was destroyed for nothing.
I’m not sure about this part, but I thought I heard that Walter Davis fingered other players in order to stay out of trouble.
Here’s a link.
For those who don’t fell like clicking on it, consider this little nugget:
While the players involved in the drug scandal “faced the possibility of permanent banishment from the NBA,” all tested negative. They also avoided punishment by plea bargaining, as none of the defendants went to trial.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
Not exactly a witch hunt ...
I say this more in sorrow than anger, but Walter Davis did go through cocaine rehab twice, and did testify against his teammates in exchange for immunity.
Several players were charged by the grand jury and admitted to using cocaine and/or marijuana. The cases didn’t go to trial because they qualified for a prosecutorial diversion program that I’m pretty sure allowed the charges to be dropped after they served a term of supervised probation and drug testing.
The big concern at the time was that the NBA would force the sale of the team and move it out of Phoenix to escape the stench.
yep thats how I remember it too
thanks for jogging my memory. I think.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Drugs in the '80s (NBA)
Coke in the 80’s in the NBA was like pot in the 90’s and now…Name me someone you absolutely know positively beyond a reasonable doubt wasn’t playing around with coke in the NBA in the 70’s-mid 80’s (besides John Stockton).
Everyone in the 70’s and early 80’s was doing coke, so why should high paid, high profile athletes be any different?
I don’t hold any grudge against any of the Suns and personally that past scandal means nothing to me.
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
"Everyone in the 70’s and early 80’s was doing coke"
speak for yourself, Wil.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Bird..
but only because Bird was a boozer, and crystal meth hadn’t been discovered yet..
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Aug 4, 2010 5:05 PM MDT up reply actions
Wouldn't say it was a "problem"
but he liked to drink the same way most red-blooded, midwestern redneck farmboys like to drink, especially during the early years, when Rick Robey was his drinking buddy (btw, the season Robey was traded, Bird won the 1st of his 3 consecutive MVPs)
Moreover, Bird was well known for getting into bar fights, and the bar fight with Mike Harlow is considered by many Boston fans to have contributed to the Celtics losing the 85 finals against the Lakers.
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Aug 4, 2010 11:47 PM MDT up reply actions
Wow
Two classic fallacies in one argument:
First, I guess I’m supposed to try to prove the negative by coming up with players who didn’t use coke. Sorry, I can only document those that did and got caught.
Second, the “lots of people were doing it” argument. Lots of people in the 80’s drove drunk, beat their wives and stole car stereos. Doesn’t mean I have to approve.
It was a witchhunt by the state attorney
in that he thought he had some grand cocaine ring that he was going to get credit for busting up. A stepping stone to greater things in his career. Turned out it was just players getting high like they did on every team in the 80s. The fact that there was a federal investigation was ridiculous waste of time and money.
One aspect of this whole “scandal” that I have never seen addressed is how Jerry Colangelo, the GM, was able to get the former owner to sell the Suns to Jerry + investors right after it went down. This was at time when getting an NBA team was impossible and the explosion of the NBA (MJ era) was upon us.
Here is my conspiracy theory. Jerry dumps talent for PR sake. Then when Suns are at their perceived lowest point he convinces owner to sell to him in a market that he would otherwise have zero chance of buying into. See what I am driving at?
by oLLiE Boombayay on Aug 4, 2010 4:45 PM MDT up reply actions
disagree about the golden age
RMason, I understand that when a franchise hasn’t won any championships yet, you can’t use them to say whether a franchise is in a golden age. But I respectfully disagree that this is the only golden age of the Suns. I would call it the Second Golden Age. The first three years of the Charles Barkley have just as much right to be called the First Golden Age.
You also said that the ‘07 and ’05 teams were as good as the ’93 Finals team. I disagree, because 1993 in the NBA—that entire era—offered much, much better competition and more teams that the Charles Barkley Suns struggled with. I also think Barkley and his teammates had more desire to win than any of the recent Suns except Steve Nash and Grant Hill. Nash and Hill and probably Kurt Thomas are worthy of theat team and the eighties before it, but Amare Stoudemire, Shawn Marion, Joe Johnson, Quentin Richardson, Barbosa, and Diaw aren’t worthy. They didn’t have the ruthlessness or the willingness to control their egos and their greed.
A slight misunderstanding perhaps.
I didn’t say this was the only golden age, and I’ll probably never use that term again (haha).
I understand the rest of points, except how do figure that there was much, much better competition in the Barkley era than now?
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
Two things: more players who were ruthless and made their teams that way, and more great centers. There almost aren’t any great centers now, especially if you accept that Tim Duncan is really a power forward (I don’t, really). David Robinson may have lacked toughness, but he could cover Charles Barkley alone except that one time when he failed to (and even then he didn’t fail that much—Barkley later said Robinson wouldn’t let him drive to the hoop); and Hakeem Olajuwon destroyed the Suns singlehandledly and led mediocre teams to championships twice in a row. And Patrick Ewing: if Michael Jordan and Hakeem Olajuwon hadn’t kept stopping him, he and his Knicks would have won at least onechampionship.
There may be numerically more very skilled and talented players now, but they are less mature, less self-centered and less obsessed with winning.
that's an opinion
the era’s are different. The rules are different. And the stars are different. not necessarily better or worse.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Sure, it’s an opinion, and I respectfully stand by it. While noting that until the mid-nineties, the amounts money that players get thrown at them now didn’t exist, and it’s impossible to be sure that a 1980s player couldn’t have been seduced into leaving a good team and even a contender for a pile of money. But I’m skeptical of whether Larry Bird would have left the Celtics for $20 million. (I won’t bother considering Magic Johnson, because the Lakers were probably rich enough to have given him $30 million a year if he wanted it.)
I think the 1980s players, in their obsession with winning, would have understood that the more money they demanded, the less there was to attract the best teammates, and therefore the less chance of winning a championship.
Does that really have anything to do with level of competition tho?
I agree that some players of said eras were (for the money reasons you just outlined) possibly more admirable athletes, better roles models, had better attitudes, etc., but that doesn’t really have anything to do with how good they are on the basketball court. Times are just different now.
by iwasneveryoung on Aug 4, 2010 4:22 PM MDT up reply actions
I’m going to pick Steve Nash. We still got about two more years in this era. The 07-08 and 08-09 seasons were just flukes. Let Nash play his game and we will be in the playoffs. Also, I feel like our current team still has the potential to be a contender. I don’t think Turk is a bad backup plan for losing Amar’e. Sarver has always wanted him and he’s finally gotten him. The thing I most like about Turk is his ability to lead a team, not take plays off, be consistent and clutch. He just needs to buy into the “gang rebound” mentality. I want to see him hustle and not settle for too many out-side shots.
Also, I feel like Lopez will improve considerably next year if he can just stay healthy for at least 60 games. One thing I really like about this Suns team is that Nash, Turk, Hill, J-Rich, Dudley, Dragic and I believe Lopez are all built for the playoffs. Unlike Marion, JJ, Q… who would not show up when it mattered most.
The Nash era ain’t over till its over. We still got a chance to make a run for a Championship. I’m not going to listen to anyone who says we can’t including Suns fans. I did that last year throughout the majority of the season while inside I really knew that if the team played to their potential they were a contender. They only proved me right.
Don't trade Dudley!
I agree we're not out of it yet
Nash probably could win 40 games with three randomly selected girl scouts and a Labrador retriever.
And while we don’t have the star power we did, we do have a lot of quality players and the human wave attack to tire other teams out with constant supply of fresh legs.
My fear is that the new front office will be consumed by “shiny new toy” syndrome and go back to that revolving-door roster stuff that kept us out of contention two years ago.
by suns68 on Aug 4, 2010 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
As long as they don’t trade J-Rich and Dudley for those “shin new toys” than we should be fine. The most expendable player and 2nd most trade-able player on our team is Warrick. J-Rich is the most trade-able player because of his contract, but I think we only trade him if it becomes clear that the trade will make us better.
Don't trade Dudley!
I think you’re absolutely right about the human-wave attack and about fearing the “shiny new toy” syndrome. If everybody contributes next season, playing against the Suns will be like fighting the Chinese army or the Borg. Get some of the Suns in foul trouble, and they can immediately pop others in to replace them without missing a beat. And I’m quite worried that in the near future, the Suns will throw all their money at some carpetbagging superstar whose loyalty might be only to himself.
Like the old Oakland Warriors?
Anybody else remember when ran that team that was 11 deep and ran full-court press and backcourt traps for THE WHOLE FREAKIN GAME every night?
That would be sweet. Do it Gentry!
Hey,
don’t mock the potential threat of a Labrador retriever on the basketball court. We’ve all seen Air Bud, we all know what sharp shooters they can become…
by iwasneveryoung on Aug 4, 2010 4:24 PM MDT up reply actions
I'm sad ...
I don/t know who Alvin Adams or Walter Davis are (I have never seen them play) …
I remember KJ from the Barkley days (and I think I heard that his best years were before that) but he is one of my favorite player ever …
So if I had to vote I would say Nash and maybe KJ …
Still iI hope that someone will ask me this same question in 10 years and I will answer
GORAN DRAGIC !!!
Side note:
Not to be nitpicky, but if so many people are going to give credit to Alvan Adams, let’s keep in mind that his name is Alvan, not Alvin.
Sorry, I’m done now.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
You can always count on me to be "that guy."
If only I could turn it into a career somehow.
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
by RMason on Aug 4, 2010 1:49 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
My Bad
Guess I started that.
FTW the spelling of Alvan/in is regional. In Oklahoma Alvan, in AZ Alvin.
Just to clarify.
Carry on, gents
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
Huh?
He has a name that changes spelling with the region he’s in? What a pain in the ass that must be.
“Hi, I’d like to book a room please. My name is Alvin Adams… wait, shit I’m in Oklahoma. Alvan Adams, I mean.”
"I make my case against a stack full of comics. Here comes the line.... I'm loaded with rocket fuel!!"
- Mike Watt, The Minutemen
can I call you Betty?
I'd reply, but it'd only make you think I care.
by JeHa on Aug 5, 2010 12:03 PM MDT up reply actions
gee i wonder who 2nashty will pick
guess I’ll wait and see what nashty nash and nashmv3 do first
"I’ve been in the league 14 years and I don’t think I’ve been called for a carry yet. It’s news to me," "I’ve never heard anyone complain about me carrying the ball. The best coach in the league Gregg Popovich didn’t have a problem with it last week."
Tom Chambers...? Alvin Scott...? Please tell me...
The suspense is killing me…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Sawa story on Alvin several years ago.
He was working for APS reading meters.
It made me sad.
Blogging Suns Basketball. Twitter: @willcantrellphx
That is sad
The 79 team losing to Seattle 4 to 3. Suns lose the first two games of the series, only to comeback and win the next 3. Suns lose at home 106-105 that would of put them in the finals. I remember Walter Davis turning the ball over twice in the last minute in that game. That was a good team.
MARCUS!!!!!! BANKS!!!!!....foo
"I’ve been in the league 14 years and I don’t think I’ve been called for a carry yet. It’s news to me," "I’ve never heard anyone complain about me carrying the ball. The best coach in the league Gregg Popovich didn’t have a problem with it last week."
Suns just signed Matt Jenning to multi yr contract.
Doesn’t exactly “blow my skirt up”, but oh well.
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/68532/20100804/phoenix_signs_matt_janning/
Better than getting constipated, I guess..
I’m just not that enthused…
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
Gotta go with Nash.
I don’t think I need to explain what he’s done for this team on the court. We all know, and it’s been outlined on this page many times, in a much better fashion than I could do myself.
But I also have to credit Nash’s off-court contributions. You can say all of his off-court qualities are irrelevant, but I strongly disagree. Being “the best” is about more than what you do on the court, IMO. I know most people disagree, and you don’t become an MVP for having a great attitude (granted, Nash did it twice for being the best on the court and having a great attitude).
Steve Nash is an extremely smart dude. He has a great personality, he has a great attitude, he’s loyal, he’s humble, he’s admirable, he’s a great role model, he’s hilarious, he’s involved in the Phoenix community, he travels around the world promoting what he believes in, he skateboards and plays soccer and makes short films (sorry, I had to throw those in there, cause I love skateboarding and soccer and making short films). I could go on and on.
He’s a class A renaissance man, and I think everything he does, both on the court and off the court, contributes to him being the greatest Phoenix Sun of all time.
So basically, yeah,
I’d go gay for Steve Nash.
by iwasneveryoung on Aug 4, 2010 4:49 PM MDT up reply actions
Yeah,
he looks like the ‘firm but gentle’ type.
"Somebody hits me, I'm going to hit him back. Even if it does look like he hasn't eaten in a while." - Sir Charles
by round_mound_of_rebound on Aug 4, 2010 10:03 PM MDT up reply actions
I would have to go with Nash
Even though I am a old school guy.
1. Nash
2. Alvan Adams
3. KJ
4. Sweet “D”
5. Barkley
6. Westphal
7. Thunder Dan
8. Amare
Gotta throw mine in...
I was born in 1981 so I don’t have as much experience as some of the vets here on the site but I have enough to state my opinion. I followed the Suns as soon they got Kevin Johnson.
I was young… Don’t remember what got me watching (parents didn’t watch basketball) but before I knew it I was watching every game of that 1987 – 88 season. He was my hero as a little kid and was the first thing I can remember getting me into basketball. From then forward it’s been a life long basketball / Suns fan obsession which lead me here a couple year ago.
So gotta give my vote to the one and only KJ
rgreyslak@gmail.com ____ twitter @rgreyslak
Elliot Perry!
And I know you guys don’t want to hear it, but Shaq’s lone full season here was impressive, even if they team didn’t play well around him….lol
It's Steve. I think people are trying to hard to not be homers
My dad talks about Alvan Adams and Walter Davis like they were God and Jesus Christ, respectively.
I was a Suns fan because of KJ. Wore #7 through high school. The highlight of my life may be KJ’s dunk over Hakeem. Most underrated dunk ever.
But Nash is better. Some numbers:
In KJ’s 10 seasons as a Sun, he was a 3 time all star, 5 time All-NBA, playoffs in all ten years. Also led the Association in turnovers twice. Best shooting season: .495, .440, .850
In Nash’s EIGHT years as a Sun, he was a 5 time all star, 5 time All-NBA. playofffs in 7 of eight years. Led the association in assists 4 times. Has shot 50-40-90 4 times.
Pretty even, right? Also, Nash is a two time MVP, possibly the best shooter in the history of the game. His best teammate has been Amare, who you could make a pretty good case has had the same level career as Tom Chambers. KJ also had Majerle and a guy name Chuck.
Through in KJ’s choke job in 93, and Nash’s consistent playoff heroics . . . why is everyone so desperate to say someone besides Nash?
KJ got hurt
a lot late in his career. KJ was so much better physically, but Nash knows the angles and is a much better shooter. I take Nash.
From the field, KJ actually shot better for his career (.493 to .489)
Nash was just a better three point threat (.432 to .309).
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
KJ shot 0.4% better from the field while Nash shot 12.7% better from three and 6.2% better from the line.
But KJ has more steals, less turnovers
and was a better defender than Nash..
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
In no way did KJ have less turnovers
Led the NBA once, was 2nd another year, and 3 another, Nash has never been in the top 5. He gambled more defensively, so he got more steals, but Nash takes way more charges. And really, whats the difference? A charge is a turnover for the offense just like a steal
taking a charge is better..
because it results in possession and a foul.
"True glory consists of doing what deserves to be written, and writing what deserves to be read".
by Pliny the Elder on Aug 4, 2010 11:48 PM MDT up reply actions
Yeah, I was just remarking on the shooting.
Not pulling for one or the other as an all time favorite.
yes, but
Nash shot a better FT%, but as a Sun he never shot more than 279 for the entire season, averaging about 250 attempts each year. So roughly 3 FT attempts per game. KJ had a couple seasons of 600 FT attempts. He killed the other team by consistently putting them in the penalty. That shouldn’t be overlooked if you’re trying to cite FT% as a Nash win over KJ.
I'd reply, but it'd only make you think I care.
by JeHa on Aug 5, 2010 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions
I guess we'll all have to have our own opinions on the matter...
I think you shortchange KJ a little…
He averaged 9.5 APG while as a Sun…The highest average for any Suns player. From 188/1989 t0 1996/1997 he averaged 20 (19.5) ppg while dishing out 10 assists per game
He is is one of only four players in NBA history to have averaged at least 20.0 points and 10.0 assists per game in three different seasons, one of six players to have averaged at least 15.0 points and 10.0 assists per game over the course of a season while shooting at least .500 from the field and one of only two players (the other is Magic Johnson) to have twice averaged at least 20.0 points and 10.0 assists per game over the course of a season while shooting at least .500.
You mention KJ purported choke job in 93 but you neglect the great performances he had in the playoffs like playing 62 minutes in Game 3 of the 1994 Finals (a 129-121 triple OT victory) vs. the Bulls.
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....!
I definitely don't want to shortchange KJ
He was amazing. Super underrated career. Would have thrived in the current rules.
My point is only that Nash matches up (at least) statistically, and he did it with a lot less around him.
has any1 else topped 2 mvps?
im only 22 so i havnt seen a lot of the geezers with my own eyes. So i have to go with nash, they were pretty aweful the year before nash came, and every year since they have had a winning record, and many times 50+ wins.
Off the subject,i have spent many hours thinking to myself and speculating how our rotation will work out to be next year given the players we have. is Hedo really going to play big minutes at the 4, any chance grant hill goes to the bench? how do childress and warrick fit in; what do u guys think, maybe BSOTS ppl can post a topic about how the rotations for next year might look like.
This deserves a new post somewhere.
Does one already exist? Can somebody link it?
"Somebody hits me, I'm going to hit him back. Even if it does look like he hasn't eaten in a while." - Sir Charles
by round_mound_of_rebound on Aug 4, 2010 10:09 PM MDT up reply actions
I don't know if there's a post devoted to it
but there’s definitely a few hundred comments discussing rotations in detail over the last three weeks.
I'll admit that I pick Nash simply because he's my favorite player and he made me become a Suns fan.
I only truly started to follow basketball around 2005 and that was when Steve Nash joined the Suns. After being amazed by him on TV, I followed the Suns and became a fan ever since. I’m still not completely edumacated in the Suns’ history so I’m not in any place to decide. So I’ll stick with what I know and choose my mancrush Steve Nash.
Steve Nash is my mancrush. But Goran Dragic is the 2nd coming of Manu Ginobili, which makes him just as tasty.
I agree with the people who have talked about KJ vs Nash and rule changes.
I go with KJ because he did what he did in a league that allowed much rougher defense. Nash in KJ’s era is still great but not truly awesome like now. KJ in Nash’s era is just hard to fathom. Switch these 2 great PGs, and KJ’s 20/10 seasons turn into 25/13, easily. And Nash’s 50/90/40 seasons just don’t happen.
I'd reply, but it'd only make you think I care.
by JeHa on Aug 5, 2010 12:18 AM MDT reply actions
The greatest Phoenix Sun
Kevin Johnson gets my vote.
All kinds of world brand shoes,jeans,t-shirts ,bikini,beach pants,handbags,walle ts,sunglasses,belt,c aps,watches etc..Nike
shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL 2,TL3) $35,Sunglasses(Oakey ,coach,gucci,Armaini ) $16,Sunglasses(Oakey ,coach,gucci,Armaini ) $16
New era cap $15
have some cheap things …————————- - have some good gift …———————— - -——— free shipping!
our website: http://www.etradinglife.com/
┬┴┬/ ̄\_/ ̄\
┬┴┬┴▏ ▏▔▔▔▔\
┴┬┴/\ / ﹨
┬┴∕ / )
┴┬▏ ● ▏
┬┴▏ ▔█◤
┴◢██◣ \__/
┬█████◣ /
┴█████████████◣
◢██████████████▆▄
◢██████████████▆▄
█◤◢██◣◥█████████◤\
◥◢████ ████████◤ \
┴█████ ██████◤ ﹨
┬│ │█████◤ ▏
┴│ │ ▏
┬∕ ∕ /▔▔▔\ ∕

by 



















