SB Nation Arizona Editor's Pick
Nash vs. Dragic 3 years in...
Lately on BSotS, the whipping boy du jour has been Goran Dragic. It seems that he's being blamed for the woes of the second team, given that his +/- numbers are the worst among rotation players on the Suns. So how bad is he?
Jump over this...
Goran Dragic is in his third year in the league. Everyone expected big things from him after he famously torched the Spurs in game 3 of the Conference semi-finals last year with 23 points in the quarter and 26 points within 14 minutes. But in 2010-11, he has struggled a bit more that apparently we expected. I'll go into the reasons for that later, but my first thought about this was "How was Nash at this point in his career?"
*******************************************************
Nash came into the league as the 15th overall pick in the 1996 draft - an excellent draft overall.
2) Marcus Camby
5) Ray Allen
8) Kerry Kittles
10) Erick Dampier
11) Todd Fuller
12) Vitaly Potapenko
13) Kobe Bryant
14) Peja Stojakovic
15) Steve Nash
16) Tony Delk
17) Jermaine O'Neal
24) Derek Fisher
**********************************************************
A lot of these guys are still in the league, and have enjoyed a great amount of success, obviously. He came onto the Phoenix team as a backup to Kevin Johnson and Sam Cassell and later, Jason Kidd. In his first year, he put up unspectacular numbers.
Goran Dragic came into the league in 2008 as the 45th overall pick - originally Toronto's pick, it was trade to the Spurs who then traded it to Phoenix. It was a good draft for point guards.
1) Derrick Rose
3) O. J. Mayo
5) Kevin Love
6) Danilo Galinari
7) Erick Gordon
9) D. J. Augustin
10) Brook Lopez
11) Jerryd Bayless
12) Jason Thompson
13) Brandon Rush
14) Anthony Randolph
15) Robin Lopez
16) Mareese Speights
17) Roy Hibbert
18) Javale McGee
19) J. J. Hickson
20) Alexis Ajinca
21) Ryan Anderson
22) Courtney Lee
23) Kosta Koufos
24) Serge Ibaka
25) Nic Batum
26) George Hill
27) Arthur Darrell
28) Donte Greene
29) D. J. White
30) J. R. Giddens
31) Nikola Pekovic
32) Walter Sharpe
33) Joey Dorsey
34) Mario Chalmers
35) DeAndre Jordan
36) Omar Asik
37) Luc Mbah A Moute
38) Kyle Weaver
39) Sonny Weems
41) Nathan Jawal
42) Sean Singletary
43) Patrick Ewing Jr.
44) Ante Tomic
45) Goran Dragic
*************************************************************
YEAR 1 (1996-97) Nash
He played in 65 games, and averaged 10:30 per game, putting up 3.3 points, 1 rebound, and 2.1 assists against 1 turnover per game. He shot 42.3% from the field (74-175) and 41.8% from 3 (23-55). He shot 82.4% from the free throw line (42-51).
That Suns team ended with a 40-42 record under Paul Westphal, exiting in the first round to Seattle 2-3.
YEAR 1 (2008-09) Dragic
Goran played in 55 games in his first year, and averaged 13:11 per game, putting up 4.5 points a game, 1.9 rebounds, and 2 assists against 1.3 turnovers per game. He shot 39.3% from the field (88-224) and 37% from 3 (20-54). He shot 76.9% from the free throw line (50-65). Part of the year was under Terry Porter, who gave way at the All Star break to Alvin Gentry, which was a boon to Goran - he went from 2.9 points per game to 5.9 points under Gentry, his minutes went from 12 to 14:24, shooting percentage went from 31.3% to 44%, 3 point percentage from 14.3% to 45%, and his APG from 1.7 to 2.3. Rebounding stayed the same.
All in all, fairly comparable. However, Nash saw a large reduction in minutes post all star break. Not sure why - perhaps some of the more historically minded here can fill us in.
YEAR 2 (1997-98) Nash
In his second year, Nash's minutes went up considerably, from 10:30 to 21:53 in 76 games. Consequently, his numbers increased, to 9.1 ppg on 45.9% shooting, 3.5 assists against 1.3 turnovers, 2.1 rebounds, and .8 steals per game.
Ranked 13th in the NBA in 3-point accuracy (.415), connecting on 81-195 with the Suns....Connected on 74-86 (.860) free throws, tops among the Suns....One of the most improved players in the NBA, Nash bettered his rookie numbers by 5.8 points, 1.1 rebounds, and 1.3 assists.
YEAR 2 (2009-10) Dragic
Goran's numbers also went up, to 18:00 per game. In 80 games, his ppg increased to 7.9 on 45.2% shooting, 3 assists against 1.6 turnovers, and .6 steals per game. He shot 39.4% from 3, and 73.6% on free throws.
YEAR 3 (1998-99) Nash
In his 3rd year, Nash was traded to Dallas. He only played 40 games of the strike-shortened 50 game season, and started all 40, playing 31:41 per game. His ppg actually dropped to 7.9 on 36.3% shooting, 5.5 assists to 2.1 turnovers, and .9 steals. Shot 82.6% from the free throw line. Missed the final 10 games of the season due to a lower back strain....Scored in double figures 12 times and dished-out 10-plus assists five times.
YEAR 3 (2010-11) Dragic
Of course, this year is incomplete, but in his 40 games so far, he's putting up 7.9 in 18:36, 3.2 assists to 2 turnovers, and .7 steals per game. He's shooting 41.7 from the field, 30% from 3, and 61.8% from the free throw line.
YEAR 4 (1999-2000) Nash
Another rather pedestrian year for the future 2 time MVP, with a slight reduction in minutes to 27:23, 8.6 points per game, 4.9 assists to 1.8 turnovers, and .7 steals.
1999-2000:
Appeared in 56 games (27 starts) and averaged 8.6 points, 4.9 assists and 2.2 rebounds per game in 27.4 minutes....Played his best at the end of the season after returning from a right ankle tendon strain which cost him 25 games....In the last 10 games he averaged 13.6 ppg, 8.1 apg in 40.1 minutes....Scored in double figures in 15 of the last 20 games and 24 times overall....Had six double-doubles all of which came in the last 19 games....Played a career-high 51 minutes at Denver on 4/6/00....Posted a season-high 11 assists twice - 3/16/00 at San Antonio and 3/27/00 at Utah....Twice went 10-11 from the foul line to post career-highs in both of those categories - 3/27/00 at Utah and 4/18/00 vs. Lakers.
YEAR 5 (2000-01) Nash
Steve played 70 games this year, breaking out in a big way, scoring 15.6 per game, dishing 7.7 assists against 2.3 turnovers, 3.2 rebounds and 1 steal a game.
So what conclusions can we draw from this comparison? What I see is that Dragic is developing in much the same way that Nash did, so far. It remains to be seen whether he will make that quantum jump that Steve did in the future, but I found it very interesting that Nash didn't make that leap until year 5 of his career. Nash got a lot more starts early - he started all his games in the third year - but he definitely wasn't amazing.
Looking at the splits for this year, there is no trend that I can see for Goran's struggles. Dragic actually plays better on the road, and better in our losses. A lot has been made of his +/- stats - it's hard to tell why that has dropped so much, since he's been on the floor with so many different combinations of players. The difference between 30% and 40% from three would be 8 total made shots over 40 games (he's 27 of 90). His free throw percentage has suffered because of a 50% month of November, but since then he's shot over 70% from the line. In October/November, he developed some chemistry with Childress and Warrick - but they aren't playing on the second team recently. If you look at his last 10 games, his averages are improving and in line with his career numbers.
This post isn't a defense of Goran - it's more of a long view. The team this year has been a disorganized mess - we started the season with a much different line-up than we have now. Goran is settling down, getting some consistent people to work with, and I think he'll be fine. Last year, January was pretty much his best month - the return of LB depressed his numbers somewhat. This year, he's been on the floor with so many different players, including Turk, Carter, and Hill (all essentially point forwards) that I think it's messed with his head some.Stats like plus/minus, even when adjusted, are measures of a group of guys, not an individual. Last year, the higher Goran's individual scoring was, the worse his +/- was. This year, it doesn't correlate the same way - but it's improving. For the month of January, he's -6.1, but in the last 10, he's -3.5, all while scoring the same 8 ppg. In legal circles, this would be called "circumstantial evidence".
Still, he has some time - the other, more prominent pg's (like Rose, Gordon, and Westbrook) were thrown into the fire immediately, and are now prospering in their third year. I'm glad we didn't have to do that with Dragic, because that would mean we didn't have Nash. Other guys who were drafted ahead of Dragic (Augustin, Bayless, Courtney Lee, George Hill, and Mario Chalmers) haven't fared as well.
Dragic is still on pace to duplicate Nash's performance - although I still hope that he's behind Nash for a few years to come.
68 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
this is awesome analysis
dragic seems to be emotional / mental on the floor. he lets things get to him. sometimes it’s good, but most of the time it disrupts him from playing his game. i think this year, he’ll continue playing mediocre – decent, with some well above average games thrown in, and next year is when we see the break out in his game.
Thanks!
Dragic is obviously emotional, but it’s also a matter of experience. For instance, in his 3 years, he still doesn’t have as many minutes on the floor that Derrick Rose got in his first year – 3000 for Rose compared to 2914 to date with Dragic.
Perspective is an important thing. In this age of instant gratification, the pitchforks come out within 5 minutes. I just wanted to give a longer view of Goran’s career. I still think he’s a future star, and I’m excited for the Dragic era. But Not until the Nash era is finished.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
agree 100%
once he gets some more experience, he’ll get over that mental part.
I know we have a logjam at the 2-spot
but I say play Dragic close to 30 minutes a night with him taking the majority of both the back-up PG and SG duties. Dragic will get his confidence going by playing the 2 next to Steve Nash early in the 1st quarter, then he can slide over to the 1 and VC will come back in to close out the quarter, provide a scoring punch for the 2nd unit. We need Dragic to develop a little faster than what he is doing now; as a realist, I say 2 more years max before Steve Nash retires due to age or loss of interest, and we’ll need Dragic to fill Captain Canada’s enormous shoes. We have to remind ourselves that we’re not raising a 19-year-old kid who has 6 years left before he reaches his prime; this is a 24-year-old we’re talking about, and unconfident to boot. We need to see a lot more improvement from him in the next 2 seasons if we want to stay competitive after Nash’s retirement, and the only way to do so is to increase his minutes so he can play out all his mistakes.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 22, 2011 12:29 AM MST up reply actions
Of course, this entire idea is moot if my Dragic theory (posted below) is correct.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 22, 2011 12:46 AM MST up reply actions
1 thing bothers me about Dragic and here's 2 examples
1. Noone punched Kenyon Martin in the throat when he picked The Dragon off the floor, leaving Dragic to stick up for himself, which was nothing more than a measley kick. Head butt the shit out of him man! Do something other than get pissed. The following posession, Goran was right by the Nuggets bench, ball in hand. At least throw the ball in Kenyon’s face…
2. If Sasha Vuja-can’t-say-this-name-correctly-cic can get under your skin, with his silly pre-pubescant ‘bob’ hair due thing, then Scorin’ Goran doesn’t have his head in the game… I’m including the WCF from last year. I don’t condone violence, especially against women, but Goran should have slapped that silly bitch at least once so far.
I think you're confusing basketball and hockey
or 2011 baketball with 1930s basketball. And I think you kind of are condoning violence, not that I really care.
Real name no gimmicks
That Nuggets blowout was tough to watch
I took 2 things away from that game:
1) I hate the Nuggets more than ever. I hope Carmelo and Billups leave and the team dwells in the depths for years to come. That bitch move that Kenyon pulled was KG-league.
2) If the Suns want to get respect from the rest of the league, they need a Raja Bell guy. Someone who plays tough defense and doesn’t take any shit when a teammate gets disrespected like Goran did.
Bo Baggins!
by ajotanelsona on Jan 21, 2011 2:54 PM MST up reply actions
This:
If Sasha… can get under your skin… then Scorin’ Goran doesn’t have his head in the game
Doesn’t belong in the same comment as this:
Goran should have slapped that silly bitch at least once so far.
I smell like the vault. I'm so PAID.
Card-carrying member of the CTLVCOF, however I'm starting to think it's a bit extreme...
by RMason on Jan 21, 2011 4:03 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
I'm too young to really remember what Nash's game was like early in his career.
How does his game then compare to his now, apart from his mental and leadership capacities? Did he transform as a player, or did he just get better?
Real name no gimmicks
The easiest way to sum it up
His game was faster, but less polished. On that Dallas team, he wanted to be a leader, but everyone was so young that it didn’t work so well.
Bo Baggins!
by ajotanelsona on Jan 21, 2011 2:55 PM MST up reply actions
very big difference...
he was playing with 2 guys, as the main options, who were softer (then particularly) and more perimeter oriented. So his whole pick and roll game was much less developed/apparent. Nonetheless, he was still a key cog, in a very sucessful team.
The big difference when he came here, was that between the new coach and the more well rounded and slashing oriented players, he began to go much further with the PNR.
by HarvMel on Jan 22, 2011 3:14 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
He was also required to be more of a scorer
His assist numbers were not as, because as someone mentioned he did not have the same abundance of slashing players. He still honed his pick and roll skills with Dirk though, and Nellie-ball laid the groundwork for him coming here.
One thing about Steve when he was there for the first few seasons, Dallas fans booed him. He broke down on the floor multiple times in the first two years I believe because they would boo him. It took a while for him to develop into that leader he became. He was the leader of that team in the early 2000s, far more then Dirk I feel.
Goran still has plenty of time to develop. Best thing he can do is learn from Nash, and just work to improve. Just needs to not be so hard on himself.
I agree with this.
Dragic is in his third year, backing up one of the greatest point guards of all time, and there have been a lot of changes since he began. I still think he’ll be great.
Although you said you’re glad Dragic didn’t get thrown into the fire immediately (like Rose, Westbrook, etc.), I can’t help but wonder where his game would be at right now if he had. I highly doubt he’d be comparable to Rose or Westbrook, but I think he’d probably be a lot further along than he is now.
Those guys also have had quite a bit of consistency with teammates (there hasn’t be much roster/lineup shake up at all on either the Bulls or the Thunder since they’ve arrived). You touched on this, but I think having that would help Goran’s game a lot.
I really hope we still have this guy when Steve retires. I think at that point, Goran will be more than ready for a starting role, and although it may take a season or two (like it did with Nash), I think he has the potential to be really great.
On another note – Hibbert, Mcgee, or Ibaka > Lopez. Damn hindsight…
Yeah, they were both excellent drafts.
I love to look at this stuff in hindsight – to compare this guy to that guy – but it’s informative to realize Dragic is very young and inexperienced. I don’t see any reason he can’t be as good in a few years as some of these other guys – he certainly has the skills. Whether he does or not will all depend on the mental aspect of his game. What took Rose or Westbrook a month or two to learn is taking Goran a half a season to learn. It’s going to be fun to watch!
It’s kind of the same story with Lopez – I know people are frustrated by what seems to be slow development, but in NBA terms, he’s doing well. He’ll keep getting better (as will Frye, Dudley, Childress, and Gortat) and they will be a formidable force in the future. I feel much better about this team in the future than I do right now. I still think the upside is through the roof, and I think Gentry is the right guy to get it out of them.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
yeah
i think this team has a really great future.
by iwasneveryoung on Jan 22, 2011 3:38 AM MST up reply actions
A rec for the analysis
rec whore… eat it up
Trade Warrick!!!
by jc79 on Jan 21, 2011 3:40 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
Thanks!
Although I do it for the money, not the recs.
Send money.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Good stuff hairmore.
It’s good for us to remember such things as Nash once being so bad that he was booed by him home crowd, to remind us that for the most part we don’t know what the hell we’re talking about.
I smell like the vault. I'm so PAID.
Card-carrying member of the CTLVCOF, however I'm starting to think it's a bit extreme...
by RMason on Jan 21, 2011 4:07 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
*his home crowd
I smell like the vault. I'm so PAID.
Card-carrying member of the CTLVCOF, however I'm starting to think it's a bit extreme...
and booed when drafted
"It's nice to feel good at 32. I don't feel old. I don't feel like this is getting harder. I feel like this is getting easier, if anything." Steve Nash
I wasn't that familiar with his early career.
It’s hard to imagine that now, isn’t it?
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
++++trade++++
lemme start by sayin i love nash, but nashs kinda ggetiing old and we need a GOOD power forward… I say we trade nash and some1 else for glen davis and nate robinson, nates a good bak up for dragon and davis will start, boston would do it bc davis is being a FA and hes prob guna want cash, wat u think?
by 81bos on Jan 21, 2011 4:58 PM MST via mobile reply actions
NONONONONONO
are you trolling?
Real name no gimmicks
Somebody needs a hug.

"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
by haremoor on Jan 21, 2011 6:19 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I think you shouldn't be allowed on the internet ever again.
Last year's Phoenix Suns team was like the show "Deadwood." A great thing that ended way too early.
BANNED
From the internet!
Peyton Manning= Better.
by JesusNinja13 on Jan 21, 2011 9:09 PM MST up reply actions
Just found this. Am keeping for future reference.

Peyton Manning= Better.
by JesusNinja13 on Jan 21, 2011 9:11 PM MST up reply actions 5 recs
Give us KG, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce and Rondo
and MAYBE we’ll think about it.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 22, 2011 12:17 AM MST up reply actions
Good Analysis...
Recced!
STAT may be gone but the Suns will rise....! BTW, If positivity is a crime, I plead guilty by reason of T-Bird...!
Good perspective
They say "don't swim with the sharks", but I'm faster than sharks so it's not a big deal...
Yeah, I Twitter - @Eutychus12
I don't want to burst the Dragic bubble...
but I think we can reasonably conclude that Dragic, as he is now, is fully developed. And that isn’t near enough the amount of development we need from him. The reason I say he is fully developed is because in truth, he isn’t really in his third year; he’s been playing pro ball since 2003 (I think a lot of people are forgetting his stint in Europe). Eight years from his debut, I’m pretty sure he kind of knows who he is as a player, and in all likelihood he isn’t really going to change his habits now, as an eight-year veteran. Now I know Euro-ball isn’t NBA-ball, but if you look at past European players who came into the NBA, they didn’t develop much or learn new skills. Andrea Bargnani is still a soft, jump-shooting 7-footer who never learned to bang with the big boys. All Danilo Gallinari knows how to do is shoot the three. And there are plenty of other examples that I can’t seem to remember off the top of my head (probably because they haven’t made a significant enough impact on the NBA for me to remember them).
Of course I may be wrong, Dragic might actually fulfill his promise and become the next Steve Nash/Manu Ginobili hybrid. But for the most part, I’m sticking with my theory that what the Suns see right now in Dragic is what they’re gonna get in three years.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 22, 2011 12:44 AM MST reply actions
I think we can reasonably conclude that Dragic, as he is now, is fully developed
I don’t agree with this at all. We won’t know that until he’s actually running a team, game in game out.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Well, Dragic is a year younger than Nash was in his third year.
Using that logic, Nash shouldn’t have developed at all – but thank heaven’s that Nash didn’t listen to anyone like you, because he never would have gotten those MVP’s if he had.
Hill has developed a new and different game since he’s been here in Phoenix. Gortat has been in the league 4 years already, is European, and is obviously still developing. That’s a pretty off the wall statement.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
by haremoor on Jan 22, 2011 8:50 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I get your point.
And I guess I shouldn’t have said that Dragic is “fully” developed, I just wanted to point out that he doesn’t have as high of a ceiling as everybody seems to think. But I totally love/agree with your signature and I’m gonna keep hoping and believing that he does.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 23, 2011 5:42 PM MST up reply actions
Euroball is much different than NBA ball.
I know a lot of people say that, but it’s true. I watched a lot of FIBA during the summer, jonesing for some basketball action, and I was pretty surprised at the difference in the games.
I think your point about not really developing their games too much after coming is true, but like we’ve mentioned before, Dragic is a mental player. It’s tough to get into the “I’m going to run this team” mindset we need from him when the rotations are changing, Gentry pulls him for Nash in a “we need to win this game” basis, etc.
So, I don’t agree that what we’re seeing is what we get. If Nash gets traded and Dragic gets promoted, maybe halfway through next season, we can make that assumption. But for now, I don’t think he’s fully developed.
Bright Side of the Sun, for all things Phoenix Suns. Twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton
by Trevor Paxton on Jan 25, 2011 1:25 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I swear I posted a comment on here...
That isn’t here.
Last year's Phoenix Suns team was like the show "Deadwood." A great thing that ended way too early.
that troll up there
got ahold of it somehow.
by iwasneveryoung on Jan 22, 2011 1:30 PM MST up reply actions
I remember Nash and Dragic is no Nash.
You could see from the get go that Nash had something. I remember thinking that I wouldn’t have minded letting Kidd or KJ go at the time because I really liked Nash’s game, and Kidd and KJ were old [or always injured – BTW, lets not forget how GREAT KJ was]. At that time, he reminded me of Hornacek. A great shooting, unselfish player that seemed to know how to make plays.
Dragic is a pretty decent guard and may well develop more as a starter. But I think that all he will ever be is a decent run-of-the-mill point guard, like Hinrich, Ridenour, and Steve Blake. [not trying to point out white guys, but just seemed to end up that way.] I hope I am wrong. But hey, that is pretty good for a 2nd rd pick. So I like him, but don’t expect that he will be the answer when Nash retires.
all those guys are fairly good
but none of the them have anywhere near the speed and athleticism Dragic has. whether or not Dragic reaches his full potential is debatable, but to assert his ceiling is equivalent to the PG’s you mentioned…?
"It's nice to feel good at 32. I don't feel old. I don't feel like this is getting harder. I feel like this is getting easier, if anything." Steve Nash
Yeah, I agree.
Athletically, Dragic is in the elite category. He’s still developing an arsenal, showing a nice Tony Parker type floater last night as he’s done a couple of other times this season. That floater, and driving effectively to his right (probably 1-2 years away) will give him as many weapons as any of the other young, elite PG’s out there.
Mentally? Who can say? But I think he’s driven, he’s smart, and he has a killer instinct – maybe more than Nash. And I think Gentry is the right guy to coach him. He’ll lose his fagility, I think, and he’ll develop into a great replacement for Nash.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
*fragility. I caught something from you, 2Nashty.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
nice embarrassing one to
"It's nice to feel good at 32. I don't feel old. I don't feel like this is getting harder. I feel like this is getting easier, if anything." Steve Nash
Yeah, fagility. I'll probably be banned for homophobia.
The Royal disease.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
I agree with the part about his athletic ability...
but I’m not so sure Dragic is smart. Crafty, sure, but not smart like Nash is smart. It seems to me like Dragic acts on instinct more, rather than actually knowing what he wants to do beforehand and making the defense give him what he wants. And even though Dragic is more athletic than Nash and can therefore afford to get by on instinct more than Nash can, he’s still not explosive or athletic enough to be successful without being able to manipulate the defense with smart play-making.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 23, 2011 5:25 PM MST up reply actions
Well, very few have been as smart as Nash is - but it obviously took him a few years to get it.
Dragic has been learning from him, and I’d say he is a third to half of the way there. To a certain extent, I think we’ll see some development, but if he totally ‘gets’ it, that will probably happen all at once. And probably not until his second year starting.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
the positive side
Dragic is developing and will be ready to sign his extention in a year. If he was far ahead in terms of his game, his demands would be enormous. Atleast now the Suns will be able to lock him for a longer period (depending on the new CBA rules) leaving more moeny for other players.
And as for Lopez and Childress: I like them (Childress more than Lopez). he has high BBIQ and great attititude. Had he been like some of the players he would have started tantrums to be traded. He was injured and played because the SUNS needed that and understandably his numbers suffered (particularly his shooting percentage and his 3 point shot). In another post, I had suggested trade him along with Pietrus (his expiring contract) and Warrick for Favors… Was because I believe Childress is pretty good and might appeal to NJ who has so many picks to pick another rookie and use a well developed player like Childress right away.
I agree with all that -
But I think we need to keep Childress, since we will most likely be losing Carter and maybe Pietrus. I hope we will also be extending Hill for a couple of years, as well, which leaves us with Childress, Hill, and Dudley at the wing, with Dragic as an option. We need to keep Childress – he brings too much to this team once he’s integrated.
We also need to keep Robin – I don’t care who starts, but we need the big men to compete in the West.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
I agree..
When I put Childress in that trade, I was hoping to keep Carter for the “super trade” next year knowing his contracts expires around Dec 2011 to leave us the flexibility to suck the most out of another team that is desperate to dump salary.
NJ will be looking to somehow sign up a marquee player to showcase their start in the new arena and no one will join them unless they have a decent record the remaining portion of this year and next year. I was figuring to take advantage of that sentiment. So, I guess another trade would be: Carter to Nets and, Favors and Murphy to SUNS. Now that would be cool.
Yeah, I think people forget that without Carter, we no longer have an excess of wings.
With the current rotations, however, we aren’t using either Pietrus or Childress – Carter is filling the minutes on the second team (with some help from Hill). Still, I think Pietrus is the most expendable, since he’s 29 and has a pretty big contract that is an expiring next year.
Honestly, I’m not sure where the right deal is – it may take until 2012 to get the piece we need. I’m willing to wait that long, if it means that we get a star – we need one. We could still mount a run with Nash and Hill, who I think are viable until 2013 – maybe 2014. If they aren’t we need a star all that much more.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
I am hoping the SUNS resign Grant Hill. He is phenomenal bargain, esp for the salary. He is a very good player (offense and defense), very intelligent and a great leader without bad attititude.
And hope they resign Nash atleast for a year beyond his 2012 year if he is healthy (perhaps he can come off the bench and provide that spark). He is another great leader.
I see all the comments to trade so many players and not value our own. Its a matter of opportunity and fit and the attititude of the player that counts so much.
As for the deal, the players I would like to trade (now or before the end of the year) are Carter, Pietrus and upgrade by trading Warrick if we can. If we can get another big (like Jason Thompson by trading Pietrus) then we keep teh best of the bigs and trade one of them.
A question
So when we are left with Dudley, Hill, and Childress at the wings, who do you think should start at the 2? In my opinion, I love Childress but I think Dudley needs to start – I’ve noticed that, without Amar’e, we need to keep at least two 3-point shooters (besides Nash himself) next to Nash most of the time to maximize our success. Dudley can be our new Raja Bell, a smart, hardnosed defensive player who can also run to the corner and just be deadly knocking down threes. Of course, if we start Dudley, that leaves no 3-point shooters on the second team…
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 23, 2011 5:34 PM MST up reply actions
Well, Childress is a pretty good three point shooter. So is Dragic.
Frye plays so many minutes that he crosses over some, and we’d probably get someone else to help out.
Personally, though, I think Dudley is much more effective on the second team. His lack of athleticism shows up more against elite players, but it rarely does against a second team. I’d like to keep him as the backup 3, and Chill as the backup 2, and get a great SG.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Stephen Jackson
How about getting Stepehen Jackson from Charlotte? They are looking to clear their roster. he has 3 years left on his contract including this and at a respectable $8.5M salary,
Between Vince Carter and Pietrus, I think we could trade and get a decent PF and Jackson.
Wishful thinking:
Carter + Lopez to Nets
Favors + Murphy + S. Jackson to SUNS
Pietrus + Petro to Charlotte. Thus they dump about $17M in salary over the 2 years after this season.
I can see this trade happening.
It seems as if New Jersey is perfectly willing to dump Favors if they can get a name their owner actually recognizes (Carter). Plus they will be enticed by the possibility of a Brook/Robin pairing.
Charlotte at this point would probably be willing to trade anybody on that roster if they can substantially dump salary.
The only thing I see stopping this trade from happening would be the Suns being reluctant to let go of Lopez; actually having 2 decent true centers on the roster seems to be working well for us right now.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 23, 2011 6:04 PM MST up reply actions
Rosterbation breaking out everywhere.
While Robin may not be highly regarded here on BSotS, he’s a 22 year old 7 footer who was the starting center for a team that went 28-7 last year at the end of the regular season. (Thanks, Alex) Believe me, he has a lot of trade value, and I think we need to keep him – and Gortat. They both fit our system, and I think are great components to build around. Centers are harder to come by than PF’s, and we have two very good ones. I’d like for them to just improve and play well, and we’d be fine. We can get a PF – Murphy will be a FA at the end of the year – he may even get bought out before the trade deadline. We shouldn’t jump through hoops to get him. And JRich will be a FA, too – so why go nuts trying to make a trade? Even if we finish the season really, really well, what are we going to achieve? And we’d be crippled in the future, unable to make any moves or adjustments.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
I agree that we should keep Lopez.
The only thing I see stopping this trade from happening would be the Suns being reluctant to let go of Lopez; actually having 2 decent true centers on the roster seems to be working well for us right now.
And we should definitely pick up J.Rich as an FA.
The Blake Show > The Lake Show
by PHXSunsRunNGun on Jan 23, 2011 6:38 PM MST up reply actions
J Rich
is not going to be an option. His price next year definitely had something to do with management’s willingness to ship their best scorer out.
Real name no gimmicks
by Will Slaven on Jan 23, 2011 10:52 PM MST up reply actions
reason why I like the idea of
haremoor, I hear you and have been reluctant to look at trading Lopez, but then I see if we can get: Derrick Favors who can be a good PF and a Center.
Plus I am a little weary of Robin’s back. Another feed going into teh consideration. Plus we get Murphy who we can try and see if he fits into teh system before we go with a contract to him next year.
what if we get Jason Thompson from Sacramento for Pietrus?
Then does it make sense to trade Lopez?
Carter + Lopez to Nets
Favors + Murphy + S. Jackson + Jason Thompson to SUNS
Pietrus + Petro to Charlotte.
Pietrus to Sacramento (they will have shed $2M more to adjust the numbers).
I screwed up here
I guess, as I copied part of the trade from my posting couple hours or so ago. I added that and another trade i was thinking with Scaramento.
So, I traded PIetrus twice by mistake!!
One thing I wish Dragic would pick up from practicing against Nash
Is better court vision. I do not expect him to be able to pass as good as Nash, but he seems to get caught up in his one on one battles too often. This causes him to pick up his dribble and give the offense less options.
I can see Dragic still improving. He is a hard worker and the PG position in the NBA takes the longest to learn.
His free throws just look awful this year and the coaching staff needs to get on top of that. As a player who can get to the rim often he is going to need to improve his FT% to 80% or higher to be effective.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Jan 24, 2011 3:48 PM MST reply actions
Court vision will be the last thing he will get.
It’s something that is kind of there, or it isn’t – you don’t get better, and better, and better, so much as you have it for longer, and longer, and longer in a game. He has shown great vision, making some great passes. Then, as he’s been in the league longer, they are taking some of those things away, so he’s having to develop new lanes and alleys to work with. With the clusterf#%k that the second team roster has been this year, it’s made him look pretty bad – but remember how good he looked early in the year? He’ll get there again, as the rotations solidify.
As far as the free throws go, I think it’s a matter of getting all of his motion going towards the hoop – he’s falling to the side on his follow through. I think he needs to learn this from Nash, too – Dragic doesn’t bend his knees like Nash does, but everybody has to do what’s comfortable, but it’s definitely something he can and should improve.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
I'm late to the party but here's your rec, you freakin rec whore.
Busy as I am with school, I’ve been out for a little over a week and cannot agree more with the analysis. What the freak is up with the 3-game losing streak, though?
They said I had A.D.—something. Can we have class outside?!
And wtf is a Twitter?? - @NashMV3, Eutychus please teach me how to use this s**t.
Monumental collapse in the 4th quarter against a sleeping Detroit team that was obviously having a wet dream.
After that, just general malaise.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
In other words... "the ushe".
I hate being that guy.
They said I had A.D.—something. Can we have class outside?!
And wtf is a Twitter?? - @NashMV3, Eutychus please teach me how to use this s**t.
Great article
This was a good piece that compared them two. I hope Dragic has a great off season during the lock out and comes back with that jump in his career Nash did in his 5th year. Its all a waiting game now for us suns fans.

by 


























