Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Phoenix Suns Player Evaluations 2010-11: Hakim Not Quite A Dream, But Still A Valuable Player

Hakim_blake_dunk_medium

Welcome to the fifth piece of the 2010-11 Phoenix Suns Player Evaluations. We here at Bright Side of the Sun have assembled somewhat of an All-Star cast of writers to put together alternative views on the players, front office, and coaches. Your favorite and least favorite Suns will no doubt get plenty of attention, and the compliments or criticism they deserve.

In June 2010, the Phoenix Suns were fresh off a miraculous and unpredicted run to the Western Conference Finals. On the strength of Amar'e Stoudemire, the creativity of a healthy Steve Nash, and one of the best bench units I've witnessed in years, the Suns appeared to have it all. Except the right asking price for Amar'e Stoudemire.

In the wake of Stoudemire's departure, the Phoenix Suns desperately pieced together a myriad of players of varying styles of play and prayed for the best. Those players were Hedo Turkoglu, Josh Childress, and last but not least, Hakim Warrick.

There were many that thought Hakim could step into an Amar'e-lite role as Nash's roll man, myself included. His history as a dunker (and not much else) preceded him, so expectations weren't too high. No one expected Warrick to be Amar'e. A few expected him to be a bit better than he was, but as the season progressed, Warrick found himself settling into a nice spot on this Phoenix Suns team.

Some may clamor about his lack of defense and others may whine about his inconsistency. Yet, through all the ups and thunderous downs we've experienced, Hakim has been just what we've needed him to be. Well, almost.

Star-divide

Hakim Warrick has undoubtedly been one of the bigger question marks of the past season. In the first third of the season, Warrick saw consistent minutes as Robin Lopez (again) healed from injury. During a 4-game stretch in one of the closing weeks of November, Hakim averaged 17.3 points and 5.3 rebounds. He also made his way to the free throw line an average of 9.3 times per game, knocking down 83.8% percent of his free tosses. This stellar week of play earned him a spot in the starting lineup against the Denver Nuggets.

The result, however, was disastrous. Shooting just 25% from the field, Hakim managed just 8 points, 9 rebounds and 2 assists. The game was just as ugly as Warrick's trip to the starting lineup, too. The Nuggets out-throttled the Suns in what was one of the worst defensive performances all season, with Denver winning 138-133.

Warrick then returned to the bench, where we all knew he belonged in the first place. This was partly to do with his failure as a starter, but more because playing on the bench caters to his strengths more than playing with the starting unit. Warrick, at his best, is an above average finisher with exceptional athletic ability. His rebounding mechanics are decent, but his mindset is almost never completely focused on chasing down loose balls.

While Warrick certainly has his limitations, he is just what the Suns need on their bench to get back to their volatile bench form of yesteryear. Hakim can come into games and, as we have witnessed on multiple occasions, get opposing bigs into foul trouble by getting to the free throw line. He tends to play better against weaker competition, as the larger, wider bodies of the starting units give him trouble. He also began developing his midrange jumper as the season progressed. While the shot is goofy and looks extremely unnatural, it began to find the bottom of the net with more frequency.

On top of the weaknesses of other teams that Warrick has become surprisingly good at exploiting, he is currently signed to a very reasonable contract. He will be making a modest $13.92 million over the next three seasons. Compared to other bigs in the league that received contracts last summer, Warrick is looking more and more like a steal. Amir Johnson, Linas Kleiza, Darko Milicic and Tyrus Thomas, among others, are all players making more money than Warrick who produced similarly or worse than Warrick.

If Warrick can continue to develop his game with the bench unit, there's no telling what his value to the team can be. It was the inconsistency of the big men of this team that led Warrick to the predicament he's in now. Without a star power forward, the Suns were looking for the best player to step in and be the player they needed. Unfortunately, the Suns never found that player, which led to a irregular rotations and shifting lineups.

Once the Suns find the big man they can consistently stick in the starting lineup alongside Gortat, Warrick's play will improve. Until then, we Suns fans must have patience with Hakim Warrick. He may not be our dream player, but he has shown the willingness to work on his weaknesses. If he can continue working on his rebounding, defense, and overall game, he could become a very solid option off the bench.

Warrick showed flashes of the player he could be for this team in various stretches during the season, and the Suns would be foolish to give up on a player that could become a valuable asset down the line. Plus, who wants to lose this?

 

 

 

Comment 98 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice piece

There are two essencial things keeping Hak from being what we need here in phoenix:
-He doesnt really play below the rim instead he likes shooting mid range J or just pick and roll, in order to be efficient he must get the ball under the rim and either get a foul or a 2 point, thats they way it works that should happen at least 70 percent of the time.
-He CANT D, but thats no such a big deal, his ceiling is limitied by his body, he is thin and undersized, what can he do agaisnt guys like Lamarcus Ald? i dont really know but he is going to have to figure out this summer.

Do not let Steve Nash and Grant Hill go away, please.
Otherwhise im not buying any tickets from you Saver.

by Lino Canaan on Apr 29, 2011 4:26 AM MST reply actions  

Now the Magic are out

Can we convince Howard to come to Phoenix or get Richardson back? About Warrick, we need size out in the west and his legs are thinner than mine. His contract is not bad i can only see him as a back up forward in a Suns uniform. There were a few games that i did like the way he threw is slim frame around and got to the line. That’s the Warrick i’d like to see more of.

by Sunderstruck on Apr 29, 2011 4:54 AM MST reply actions  

Gortat would swing his Hammer...

in despair and terrible rage and kill the FO, Ali G and the towell boys.
If Howard followed him to PHX to steal his minutes he would probably start crying.
(and that would be a sight!!!!)

Feed the cutter!!!

by Piotr Szczesniak on Apr 29, 2011 7:18 AM MST up reply actions   4 recs

it would be cruel irony

"Maybe I’m old school," Nash said, "but I signed a contract to play here and I want to honor it. I feel like I owe it to my teammates and the city and everybody to keep battling until they tell me it’s time to go." STEVE (God of Basketball) NASH

by 2NASHTY on Apr 29, 2011 5:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Not a chance with Howard...

Although with as poorly as Richardson played for Orlando, I believe we could certainly re-sign him if we wanted to.

The problem is he will likely be too expensive for us, hence the reason we traded him in the first place. The only chance I think of this happening is if he ends up re-signing for less than his prior contract…and regardless of his Orlando slump, I just don’t see it.

I would love if it happened though.

by 7footer on Apr 29, 2011 11:08 AM MST up reply actions  

I'd be UBER excited if J-Rich came back!

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 12:18 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't think it would happen.

He’d want more than the MLE or so, but he will likely be cheaper than he was when he was here. And if he can produce like he did here, that might not be such a bad thing.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 29, 2011 1:59 PM MST up reply actions  

Really?

All of those players that you mentioned are playing better than Warrick (minus Kleiza). Dude totally flopped in my opinion.

"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010

by N8lol on Apr 29, 2011 5:23 AM MST reply actions  

Warrick didn't flop for us because expectations really weren't all that high.

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 12:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Johnson, Thomas, and Milicic all had flashes.

Darko had a good couple of months, but returned to being, well, Darko.

Johnson was inconsistent as well, but he gets a pass for having potential. And Thomas was playing better, but got injured. Hakim was healthy and put up similar numbers to them, all while having a more limited role.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 29, 2011 2:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Well when you put it like this

I can see how Warrick is a nice backup PF player at 15 minutes a game. His inconsistency in effort is what hurts him.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Apr 29, 2011 6:58 AM MST reply actions  

plus

he’s really only on the books for 2 more seasons at a little over $4 mil a year. The third year is a team option.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Apr 29, 2011 6:59 AM MST up reply actions  

It's not like he's not trying.

I agree about the inconsistency in effort. If we’re to compare him to Lou (which so many people here seem to covet more), I suppose one could argue that with Lou, we knew what we were getting and his effort, hustle, and low statline will be there on any given night.

With Warrick, it’s like we’re spinning a roulette and hoping for it to land on something good. If he keeps improving his game however, he’d be a very good backup PF. Would just like some consistency is all. And no, consistently sucking doesn’t count…

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Apr 29, 2011 8:20 AM MST up reply actions  

Except on the Warrick roulette wheel

It’s more like we’re continuously betting on green.

Re-sign BAMF.

by brian13 on Apr 30, 2011 11:25 AM MST up reply actions  

tru'dat.

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 12:20 PM MST up reply actions  

>ouch<

the truth hurts…

i wish you and Scott Howard weren’t so right all the time… sigh…

by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Apr 29, 2011 12:31 PM MST up reply actions  

wow, yes

all but Nash and Gortat, really.

To be fair though, only the top 2-3 teams in the league have 5 guys you would call a clear starter on any team in any situation, though each playoff team has 3 or 4.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Apr 29, 2011 12:47 PM MST up reply actions  

True.

Warrick started the year as a one-trick pony. Yes his dunks were exciting…but his jumpshot was bad and his defense was horrific.

To his credit, he did seem to work on his jumpshot throughout the season, and ended up shooting much more consistently than when the season began. Another area he did better in than most fans give him credit for is his rebounding.

On the other hand, his defense was still atrocious, and although he just doesn’t have the size to ever be very effective at guarding opposing 4’s, his late rotations and poor positioning compound the problem.

If Warrick could work on those aspects of his defense that are within his control, and continue his development as a shooter and a rebounder, then he could be a good player for us. Another thing I would like to see him work on is shot-blocking. With his leaping ability there is no reason he shouldn’t average a block or two a game. If he can just move quickly enough to establish good position on his man and get those long & gangly arms of his up in the air, he may not even have to jump most of the time.

His defensive technique is just very poor all around right now, and I hope it is something he takes serious and works hard on in the off-season.

by 7footer on Apr 29, 2011 11:19 AM MST up reply actions  

Nicely said.

I felt he was a complete bust when early on in the season but towards the end of the season, as with JChill, he appeared more comfortable and more confident which allowed him to play his own game.

Just a shame that ‘his own game’ is trying to dunk everything from any distance.

I’d rather see him as part of the half time entertainment than on the court taking up minutes.

I like writing a lot of basketball related nonsense on twitter at strange hours of the day. Come join me: @keiththejourno

by keiththejourno on Apr 30, 2011 1:47 AM MST up reply actions  

Since the hawks won,

Are we still in the running for josh smith or not?

I'm from Chicago. I like the Phoenix Suns more than the Chicago Bulls

by sunsfanfromchitown on Apr 29, 2011 8:17 AM MST via mobile reply actions  

we want to be blown out big by the bulls and lose in 4 or 5

hopefully Noah will completely shut horford down as well, but al performs well when matched up at the 4 with boozer, to convince atlanta they need to move him to the power forward spot.

Also Marvin Williams needs to emerge as a superb ‘D and 3’ Small Forward to shutdown any hopes of Smith being moved to the 3 spot, hinrich also needs to either suffer a career ending injury or demand a trade. Meaning that the Hawks are in dire need of a defensive center and a point guard who can score, to relieve the pressure on Johnson and complement his passing game.

THEN Babby needs to pick up the phone and offer said defensive minded center (Lopez) and a scoring pg who can complement Johnson (a resigned Aaron Brooks) in return for Smith and picks. Atlanta, whose video co-ordinator accidentally deleted the suns entire 2010-11 season, believe they are getting the late 2010 season vintage of Brooks and Lopez and hastily agree before the Suns take this excellent offer off the table.

So yes, we are in the running for Josh Smith, in fact its only a matter of time.

by DaveJD on Apr 29, 2011 11:05 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

All I have to say is,

OMG

I'm from Chicago. I like the Phoenix Suns more than the Chicago Bulls

by sunsfanfromchitown on Apr 29, 2011 1:09 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Seriously??

Yeah, Warrick’s inconsistency is an issue, but the much larger problem is that he may just be the very worst defensive big man in the league. He’s sometimes exciting on offense but he’s usually infuriating on defense. He doesn’t have a clue how to position himself and most of the time he doesn’t appear to care anyway. Personally, I think he’s an embarrassment and he’d be the first Suns player I’d trade if I had the chance.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 8:26 AM MST reply actions  

Some of the best Suns dunks of all time...

were from Warrick this season. I don’t think he held the Suns back. He’s paid backup money and plays as such. I’d take him over most backup PFs. he should get more blocks/rebounds with those hops. His salary doesn’t hold the team back so only trade him if there is a chance at a major upgrade. A package of Warrick/Pietrus could potentially bring the Suns an upper tier player.

by oLLiE Boombayay on Apr 29, 2011 9:02 AM MST reply actions  

Hak and Peaches might return us an upper-tier player...

But only if we can get Luca Brazzi to hold a gun to another team’s GM’s head.

I smell like the vault. I'm so PAID.

by RMason on Apr 29, 2011 12:53 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Warrick's not really Paid backup money

The MLE is the average pay a player in the NBA recieves – roughly $5.5 million. ~$4, that means Warrick is paid close to average, and that is either 6th man or starter money.

by MMotherwell on Apr 29, 2011 6:36 PM MST up reply actions  

What valuable sixth men or starters are making that much?

Unless they’re signed to a rookie contract, which nullifies them from consideration.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 30, 2011 2:12 AM MST up reply actions  

5.5 = 4?

Nice math. Thats 37.5% difference.

by oLLiE Boombayay on May 1, 2011 3:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Warrick and Childress are actually kind of similar in a way.

Both of them are essentially small forwards that can’t shoot threes.

Warrick is stuck as a tweener 3-4 and doesn’t really fit into a well defined role on the team. Being south of 220 lbs makes him ineffective as a true 4 and his lack of longe range shooting makes him ineffective as a 3.

In essence, Childress poses the same dilemma. He definitely can’t play the 4 and he isn’t a legitimate threat from long distance at the 3.

The Suns have two of the same (albeit very different) players coming off the bench and neither really fits the Steve Nash style of play. This is problematic. I don’t think the Suns can afford to have 2 small forwards that don’t shoot threes coming off the bench.

I think that one of these players needs to go. Warrick seems like he would be easier to package in a trade. His contract is very reasonable. If Warrick wasn’t possessed of his deficiencies relating to size, shooting, and defense (wow, that makes him sound like a real prize) he would fetch more than what Phoenix is giving him. I would rather see Childress go, though, if the Suns could find some trusting rube to hoodwink into taking his burdensome contract.

And…… In a way Warrick is like a travesty (grotesque imitation or debased likeness) of Amare. If Amare’s size, strength, aggresiveness, and mid range game were all taken from him….. he would be Warrick.

Kind of like in Twins. The embryo did split in two, but… it didn’t split equally. All the purity and strength went into Amare. All the crap that was left over…

Well, you know.

Never confuse activity with achievement.

by Jim Coughenour on Apr 29, 2011 9:06 AM MST reply actions   2 recs

Warrick plays like Stromile Swift

Who plays like Amare as a senior in high school.

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Apr 29, 2011 9:22 AM MST up reply actions  

Ambiguous.

Please expound.

Never confuse activity with achievement.

by Jim Coughenour on Apr 29, 2011 12:03 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree with everything you said right there, but I will add

I would like to see Warrick go and be replaced with Lou Amundon who has a player option this summer. It’s not because I love Lou or miss him (well, actually I do), it’s mainly because I want Frye back on the bench and I’d rather have the better defender and rebounder playing next to him instead of Warrick. I believe that if Frye is starting next season we’re not going to be a good team because that likely means that our starting lineup will be decent and the bench will suck. That’s even considering they bring back J-Rich.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Apr 29, 2011 12:13 PM MST up reply actions  

JimCo, neither Warrick nor Childress should go anywhere.

Some of the best moments those two had were when they were on the court together. Correct, they cannot play the Steve Nash way, but we almost all agree these 2 are backups, so it isn’t that much of an issue. If the bench can come together around the way those two play together, they could be quite an exciting unit. Of course, and it’s a huge of course, that will depend on what other 3 people are on the bench with them, (Aaron Brooks probably wouldn’t work).

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 12:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Love the split embryo comparison

And I agree with all of that, except I’d rather see Warrick go than Childress.

Both players are limited, but JChill does 1 thing well on the offensive end (slashing and cleaning up garbage) AND he plays some defense. Warrick does 1 thing well on the offensive end (rolling off P&R) but plays zero D.

Re-sign BAMF.

by brian13 on Apr 30, 2011 11:59 AM MST up reply actions  

I [we] have to admit

During the last 15-20 games he started hitting that 14-17 foot jumper that makes him more effective.I dont think we can look down on hak too hard given the production he gives in just around 17 min a game.

Lover,Poet,Suns fan,All around damn good guy.

by stevedavis_ on Apr 29, 2011 9:24 AM MST reply actions  

Warrick is horrible and I can’t believe you’re higher on Warrick than Chill. He doesn’t deserve to start on any roster in the league.

by mrg80 on Apr 29, 2011 9:52 AM MST reply actions  

Not even the Wizards or the Cavs?

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 12:27 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm not higher on Warrick than Childress.

Anyone that has read any comments by me, basically ever, knows that. I’m just saying, for the money we’re paying him, he didn’t do too poorly.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 29, 2011 2:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Is it you or Wil who has the hugemantic mancrush on J-Chill?

Or is it a tricycle?

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Apr 29, 2011 2:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Ha! Tricycle!

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 4:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Well feel free to include me :)

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Apr 29, 2011 4:58 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes!

If Scott can create the CTLVCOF, I can create the JCMC. The Josh Childress Mancrush Club. Or maybe we could make it “crew” instead of “club?”

Who’s with me?!

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 29, 2011 5:04 PM MST up reply actions  

"Crew" sounds waaaay more macho than "club".

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Apr 29, 2011 5:45 PM MST up reply actions  

how bout caucus…it’s not macho but i just like saying it

…caucus

"Maybe I’m old school," Nash said, "but I signed a contract to play here and I want to honor it. I feel like I owe it to my teammates and the city and everybody to keep battling until they tell me it’s time to go." STEVE (God of Basketball) NASH

by 2NASHTY on Apr 29, 2011 5:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Cockles is fun to say.

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Apr 29, 2011 7:13 PM MST up reply actions  

aw yes

can’t forget the cockles

"Maybe I’m old school," Nash said, "but I signed a contract to play here and I want to honor it. I feel like I owe it to my teammates and the city and everybody to keep battling until they tell me it’s time to go." STEVE (God of Basketball) NASH

by 2NASHTY on Apr 29, 2011 7:18 PM MST up reply actions  

My take

Is they better both be working on that jumpshot all summer. Cuz if you cant hit your shots you cant play!

Insert epic quote here: "I got nothin'"

by The_Knife on Apr 29, 2011 9:59 AM MST reply actions  

Since so many are pining for the return of Louuuuuu.

I did a quick compare of Lou from 09-10 vs. Warrick this year. Full data can be seen here.
Some key stats:

  • Warrick shot more and scored more, but at a lower%, though Warrick’s .511 FG% is nothing to be ashamed of.
  • Warrick went to the line twice as often as Amundson, and shot better when he got there.
  • Amundson rebounded better, by both simple and advanced measures.
  • Amundson’s defense was better, as much as that can be accurately quantified.
  • The sum of all this, win shares per 48 minutes, as calculated by Basketball Reference, has Amundson at .118 and Warrick at .116. Can’t get much closer than that.

None of that is earth-shattering. We essentially traded some defense and rebounding for additional offense. Unfortunately, our second unit this year was short on both offense and defense. I don’t think keeping Louuuu and not signing Warrick would have made a hill of beans of difference in the Suns this season.

by East Bay Ray on Apr 29, 2011 10:18 AM MST reply actions  

Warrick vs Lou

“I don’t think keeping Louuuu and not signing Warrick would have made a hill of beans of difference in the Suns this season.”

I agree as far as the win/loss record goes, but at least with Lou we never had to see half the lane left unguarded while he stood around picking his nose. The Suns needed better defense, rebounding, and dependable post offense this season … with Lou we had at least one of those.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 10:32 AM MST up reply actions  

My initial thought is

if they are essentially the same player (in terms of the almighty win share #), then why didn’t the Suns just keep Amundson.

Sometimes it seems like the Suns make moves just for the sake of making moves. Sideways transition. It seems like I’ve heard something relevant to this type of behavior before, but I can’t pinpoint quite where…..

Never confuse activity with achievement.

by Jim Coughenour on Apr 29, 2011 12:02 PM MST up reply actions  

really?

If Lou was still on the team, had a bad back/finger most of the year and a second unit really struggled with scoring, you wouldn’t pine just a little for a good scoring 4?

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Apr 29, 2011 12:48 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Rec.

A player like Lou is only a fan favorite if the team is good, or at least on the upswing. When the team is struggling, fans will jump on all the things the player can’t do. Had Lou been here this past season, the comments would have been “our second unit is having problems scoring, and it doesn’t help that they have a PF who has no offensive game at all besides putbacks on offensive rebounds. We have to upgrade from Lou!” Guaranteed.

by East Bay Ray on Apr 29, 2011 1:04 PM MST up reply actions  

Why, I never! (Southern Belle accent)

EBR, I totally have to disagree with you. With how much hustle, heart, and scrappiness that kid has, no one would be calling for an upgrade from Lou (with the sole exception that he was our regular starter).

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 1:14 PM MST up reply actions  

"Hustle, heart and scrappiness" only get a player so far.

Maybe not from you, but the comments would have been something like, “love the way Amundson works, but it sure would be nice if he could put the ball through the basket every once in awhile.”

by East Bay Ray on Apr 29, 2011 1:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Correct, some would say that.

But then I look at a huge chunk of our team and say the same thing.

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 4:02 PM MST up reply actions  

I'll take the solid D everyday, and twice on Tuesdays.

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 1:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Trouble is ...

… you can’t count on Warrick to score either, and you definitely can’t count on him to put up points of his own creation. He’s not a classic 4. He’s there some games but more often is not. He actually has a kind of nice midrange jumper but I don’t think anyone would say that’s his niche. So if you’re a coach, are you better able to build your team strategy around ability … or dependability? I suppose opinions vary on that, but I’d rather know what I was going to get each time.

You can usually count on a good defensive player being there every night. Not quite so much with a primarily offensive player, and certainly not with Warrick.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 2:02 PM MST up reply actions  

hindsight is 20/20

is all I’m saying. Today, Gentry knows this (Warrick is undependable). A year ago, he didn’t.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Apr 29, 2011 2:48 PM MST up reply actions  

No one knew we'd suck this bad a year ago.

That being said… did anyone else watch Fast Five? It honestly was pretty good. Best movie of the series. I’m a glutton for fast cars and bikini babes. What can I say?

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Apr 29, 2011 3:13 PM MST up reply actions  

"Because The Rock Says So!"

This movie franchise isn’t terrible, but God damn do I hope this is the last one.

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 4:03 PM MST up reply actions  

the next one fasterest and furiousserestes

"Maybe I’m old school," Nash said, "but I signed a contract to play here and I want to honor it. I feel like I owe it to my teammates and the city and everybody to keep battling until they tell me it’s time to go." STEVE (God of Basketball) NASH

by 2NASHTY on Apr 29, 2011 5:56 PM MST up reply actions  

This is now, though.

Hindsight really isn’t the point. I think it was ridiculous for Sarver to bring in Warrick as a replacement for Amare, but not knowing any better even I expected Warrick to be a decent player. I don’t claim to have any more right than anyone else to criticize the original signing.

However, this article (the one we’re all supposedly discussing in this thread) tries to make a case that Warrick is worth keeping. I quote … “the Suns would be foolish to give up on a player that could become a valuable asset down the line”. I just don’t happen to think that makes any sense at all, and if anything hindsight should support dumping his inconsistent ass.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 4:10 PM MST up reply actions  

While I would agree with that

Who else are we going to bring in? We are familiar with Warrick and are now able to play to his strengths, utilizing him to his full capacity. Will he be just as inconsistent next season? Maybe.

But wouldn’t dumping him in a trade and getting back yet another unknown, likely underperforming power forward (either via trade or free agency) put us back at square one?

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 29, 2011 4:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Two points.

1) Warrick was signed to be a reserve. He was paid like a reserve. He was never, ever intended by the front office to be a replacement for Amare.

2) As the header to this article states, we’re doing both a positive and negative article for each and every Suns player… except VC. The Warrick-bashing thread is coming soon, promise.

I smell like the vault. I'm so PAID.

by RMason on Apr 29, 2011 6:32 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

bravo on point 1

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 6:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed on #1.

Although we can probably agree that a good amount of us deluded ourselves into believing he’s Amare’s replacement…

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Apr 29, 2011 7:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Damn ..

I owe some of you folks an apology. I’ve rabidly followed the Suns for most of four decades, but I’m rather new to this particular forum and I simply missed the part about a pro/con series. If I had been observant enough to notice that, I would have made my counter points and left it at that.

RMason, thanks for setting me straight.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 9:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Hey, no worries!

It’s what we’re here for, right? To evoke some sort of quality discussion (which this definitely is) about our team’s players?

You haven’t been like, “OMG if you don’t think Warrick should leave this offseason you should probably go jump off a bridge” All arguments have been well laid out and courteous.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 30, 2011 2:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Thanks, guys ...

… for cutting me some slack.

It might also be interesting for someone to do a pro/con on Gentry, and another on the Suns collective front office. Not because either are likely to change, but simply for the same kind of perspective that it gives us on the players … especially with the draft on the horizon.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 30, 2011 9:40 AM MST up reply actions  

already in the works

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Apr 30, 2011 9:48 AM MST up reply actions  

Dunks ...

By the way, the last phrase of this article pretty much proves my point that way too many fans value flash over substance. If I had saved all of the games I TiVo’d during the season I bet I could generate three video clips showing Warrick single handedly giving away an easy interior basket for every clip of him dunking. And not because he got beat, but because he wasn’t even in the same zip code of where he was supposed to be.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 4:18 PM MST up reply actions  

Read the above comment.

There’s simply not that much substance out there as far as backup bigs go. For what Warrick is, he’s a fine player for a bench in need of scoring. If Lopez can flourish in a bench role next season (if he’s still with the team), then Warrick’s flash and scoring might be a welcome addition.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Apr 29, 2011 4:50 PM MST up reply actions  

True, but ...

… which do you think the Suns needed more this season? Other than a dependable low post scorer, which neither of them are. I say they needed better defense more than they needed better offense. Besides, when Gentry put Lou in the game he knew what he was going to get. Can’t even begin to say the same about Warrick.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 12:47 PM MST up reply actions  

Agree with everything and this,

I don’t think keeping Louuuu and not signing Warrick would have made a hill of beans
of difference in the Suns this season.

True, however it would have made a huge difference for the fans.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Apr 29, 2011 11:56 AM MST up reply actions  

Exactly how many beans does it take

to constitute a hill anyway?

Does it matter what kind of beans they are?

My daughter really likes green beans, but I’m a little more of a ranch style type of guy.

Never confuse activity with achievement.

by Jim Coughenour on Apr 29, 2011 11:58 AM MST up reply actions  

It takes a few million beans, but you need something to bind them together.

And you might want to poison them so they won’t be eaten as you build this thing.

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 12:30 PM MST up reply actions  

A friend of mine took today off to take his daughter to the Jelly Belly factory. I'll ask him.

Those are some pricey jelly beans, so a hill of them might be more valuable than I gave credit for.

by East Bay Ray on Apr 29, 2011 1:05 PM MST up reply actions  

I loved those Harry Potter jelly beans with ear wax tasting like what I imagine ear wax would taste like.

I was dumb enough to eat several vomit flavored ones. I don’t recommend you do it. But if you can get a friend to, it’s a good time.

"If the Devil walks the Earth, he probably wears a Spurs uniform." - Me

by Zentrified on Apr 29, 2011 1:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Question

Who do any of you think gave coach and team mates the most fits this season? Lopez may have been the most disappointing, but Warrick was hands down the guy who played the laziest, most indifferently, most carelessly, and most inconsistently. I swear I saw Gentry quivering in anger more times with Warrick than everyone else on the team combined. Why anyone thinks he’s salvageable is a mystery to me, unless occasionally flashy offense is all some care about.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 10:41 AM MST reply actions  

I do not think Warrick is lazy

Or careless. Inconsistent, yes, but he may need time to get more comfortable. People are looking for a guy to replace Amare and will judge Hak based on that criteria. It really isn’t fair to do so, especially considering his entire contract is worth one year of Amare’s.

Follow me on Twitter @RedBirdRevival

by Tyler Nickel on Apr 29, 2011 10:56 AM MST up reply actions  

Not a comparison

The only person who was clueless enough to think that Warrick could replace Amare was Robert Sarver … I am not in any way judging Warrick as a replacement for Amare. This is a different team, Warrick can’t even spell “power forward”, and nobody expect him to play like one. That doesn’t mean that Warrick couldn’t be making a decent contribution to the second unit, but he needs WAY more than to just become comfortable. He needs to play basic basketball. I’d even settle for his here-one-game-gone-the-next-five-games offense if he at least tried to pay attention on defense, but he doesn’t. Most of the times that Warrick is on either end of the court he is doing nothing other than standing around waiting for his next chance to get fed for a dunk. He doesn’t even set screens or block out, and that doesn’t require getting used to the team or its system. I’m pleasantly surprised when he puts up some points, but I still cringe every time he gets put into the game because l know I’m going to see some really ugly stuff.

If I was a high school or college coach I would prohibit any of my front court players from watching Warrick play.

by BenchSplinters on Apr 29, 2011 12:08 PM MST up reply actions  

Some players are just meant to be role players off the bench

Warrick is one of those guys. It just fits better with our personnel. He can’t match up against most starting 4s in the league because of his lack of size and lower body strength. However, he had the quickness to beat his man which led him being an asset off the bench. One thing I thought he improved on was his confidence on his mid-range jumper. At first I was like “Whoa, what the hell are you doing?” But then he started draining them somewhat consistently toward the end of the season. He knows that he can’t bang all night against those bigs so he helped spread the floor much like when STAT increased his range to the outside. As long as he has the hands of Amare and not Robin, the PnR could still be a threat with Nash resting. His jumper is improving, and could turn into a pick and pop situation. Still think he’s underdeveloped, and there’s definitely room to grow. Flashes of Amare came to mind when he had those thunderous slams over helpless defenders. There’s still upside with Hakeem, but like with most players on the team there needs to be a defined role so that he sees the floor consistently.

by daflash26 on May 1, 2011 10:46 AM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

417645_122115147913687_122115027913699_63363_1431084468_n_small
Phoenix Suns Jerseys

Recent FanPosts

L_small
How to win a championship...
Phxchip_small
More 2012-2013 Ideas: Power Forward Spot
Small
What kind of one-sided trade can you envision?
Phxchip_small
What Free Agents to Go After???
Cat-s_1__small
How was kobe not ejected after going for Faried's head?!?
Phxchip_small
Possible Plan to Help Thin Out Our Roster Needs
1300861821-62_small
Thank You BSOTS. Thank You Phoenix Suns.
Cat-s_1__small
The Quest for the Ring...
Raja_small
NBA Draft 2012

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Gortat_1_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_small 7footer