Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Does Go-To Scorer + Frontline Help = SuperCool Beaz For Phoenix Suns?

It dawned on me this morning that the writing might just be on the wall. The Suns have become so desperate for talent that, if you piece the recent comments from Gentry and Blanks together, a particular picture is beginning to form.

Per the GM and coach, we've learned this about their thinking:

1) the team needs frontline help

2) the team needs a go-to offensive player for crunch time, to take the load off of Nash

3) the Suns most glaring holes are PF and SG

4) yet, the first two workouts have boasted fringe prospects and SF/SG combo players

5) even Monday's workout and rumored future visitors are preponderately SF, SG and PG prospects

6) Blanks recently scoffed at the notion the Suns would only bring in defense-first players

7) Minnesota has the #2 pick - most reasonably Derrick Williams (redundant with Michael Beasley), Kyrie Irving (unnecessary thanks to Ricky Rubio) or Enes Kanter (redundant, kinda, with Milicic and Love's minutes).

8) Minnesota has been rumored to be shopping either or both the #2 and the oft-shopped Michael Beasley

9) The Suns have been rumored to be talking to Minnesota recently

How do the Suns get a frontline go-to scorer with just the #13 pick in a weak draft?

The above information opens the door for 2 reasonably viable options - take F Michael Beasley off of Minny's hands, or trade Gortat for the #2 pick

Read on, after the jump... or just vote...

Star-divide

I have never been any kind of fan of Michael Beasley. First, Pat Riley agonized over drafting him at #2 a couple years ago. That draft was a two-man draft of Beasley and Derrick Rose. No way could Riley pass on Beasley, and eventually he took the college hotshot with the #2 pick. But Beasley never blossomed and was eventually traded for cap relief to Minnesota for a second round pick. Ouch. And now, after a mini-breakout season on a terrible team, Minny is ready to rid themselves of Beasley for a better culture.

Yet, Beasley is immensely talented on the offensive end. Good enough for multiple all-star teams. Good enough to be a go-to scorer and solid rebounder. Good enough to hit big shots at important moments. Remember the 1-on-4 drive to the basket with seconds left against the Suns for the lead, last spring? (Minny still lost the game though)


Michael Beasley

#8 / Forward / Minnesota Timberwolves

6-10

235

Jan 09, 1989

Kansas State


Draft express actually has him listed at only 6'8", probably explaining why his pro rebounding numbers don't approach his college numbers.


Pts Reb Ast
2010 - Michael Beasley 19.2 5.6 2.2

 

Beasley_medium 

Can Steve Nash and Grant Hill bring Beasley to the promised land of winners? Or would Michael Beasley drag this team further into the doldrums of 20-win hell, as all of his previous teams have done?

 

The expanded Beasley deal in the poll

In looking at the Suns and Minn roster, there's not a lot of swappability there. The Suns have a big contract (Carter) but Minny doesn't have any big ones to dump back. The Suns have some bad contracts (like Childress) but Minny would have no interest in him, I'm pretty sure. They've already got lots of wings to develop, plus Martell Webster.

So, I'm proposing taking Beasley's contract into the Amare TPE, then giving more talent back in a separate deal - Lopez for Flynn, plus a swap of 13/20 picks.

The Minnesota could take Williams or Kanter to fill Beasley's minutes and have a nice core.

And the Suns would have a scorer, a new backup PG failure to groom, and maybe a lucky pick at #20.

 

Or, the Gortat for #2 deal

if you don't like Beasley, do you like the prospect of Derrick Williams or Enes Kanter over Marcin Gortat? It seems that Minnesota would be unlikely to rid themselves of the #2 pick unless they get a real starter in return. There's always a chance that Minny would take less, but it's not likely at this point.

So assume Gortat has to go. Do you like a lineup of Kanter or Williams + Frye/Lopez and Hill/Dudley/Chill?

I'm of the opinion that Kanter or Williams would be good players, but not necessarily at the expense of Gortat.

Poll
Which would you prefer?
In separate deals, absorb Beasley into the remaining TPE from Amare trade, then swap Robin Lopez and #13 for Jonny Flynn and #20, and draft an SG at #20 (Marshawn Brooks? Klay Thompson?)
419 votes
Trade Gortat, Dudley and #13 for #2 and bad contracts (or possibly Beasley) like Webster or Milicic, plus Flynn
63 votes
Find something else. I hate Beasley and don't want to trade Gortat
361 votes

843 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 240 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If I was the Suns GM,

And I was given the ability to release the entire team and hand pick what players(from any team) I want on the Suns (current contracts and rules don’t matter), I would cut every player but Gortat. So there is no chance I would trade Gortat for the number 2 pick. If I was Babby, I’d laugh and throw the audio on YouTube as biggest joke ever.

Beasley though I really like. I wish we had gotten him when the Heat were throwing him away. He can score and is a good rebounder.

by Will Smith on Jun 11, 2011 10:27 AM MST reply actions  

I’ve talked myself into Beasley (with help from Mr. K State, Scott Howard) and I’ve always loved Flynn and think he’s got a ton of upside. If you can get both by giving up the 13 and Lopez, it’s a no-brainer. I think it would take more and I could see a deal hinging on Dudley.

Raising Arizona Sports at SB Nation Arizona twitter: @sethpo

by Seth Pollack on Jun 11, 2011 10:27 AM MST reply actions  

as far as it taking more than Lopez and the 13 for Beasley and Flynn and the 20, then I start waffling on the deal. I really don’t see a lot of upside on Flynn – contrary to many, I’m sure. Both Lopez and Flynn are disappointments, but Lopez far trumps Flynn with a good season (2010) and prototypical attributes while Flynn is undersized and can’t run a 17-win team.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 11:15 AM MST up reply actions  

Yeah I don't really get the Flynn thing either.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 1:07 PM MST up reply actions  

isn't that a classic trade down?

You’ve sometimes got to take back crap to get a player.

Also, would Minny merely want to move up to 13 from 20? Seems a little light.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Flynn has been crushed by the system run in minny

i’m not sure of his upside, but i definitely think you’d see an increase in his numbers running fast-paced with the suns rather than the triangle with the wolves. He’d certainly be a better back up to Nash than brooks is.

As for Beasley i desperately wanted him when a) it looked like we were trading STAT at the deadline in 2010 and b) when it became clear miami wanted to dump him for scraps. I think he’d be a better answer at the 4 than any player we have now, especially when combined with the defensive/rebounding Gortat.

As for adding Dudley to the deal well then i’d get a lot less keen, hopefully if he was included we could pick up an afflalo/young/thornton type to add some pep to the second unit.

by DaveJD on Jun 11, 2011 1:14 PM MST up reply actions  

He’d certainly be a better back up to Nash than brooks is.

I really don’t see how this is possibly true under any circumstances. But that’s just me.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 2:17 PM MST up reply actions  

I suppose I phrased that wrong

I sort of imagine Flynn as more of a passing point then brooks, and therefore less reliant on good shooting to make the second unit tick. He could run the p n r with frye/rolo/Warrick and hopefully provide a more consistent presence than brooks, who as we saw this past season tended to either be hot or cold, and on those cold nights the offense stagnated.

by DaveJD on Jun 11, 2011 3:09 PM MST up reply actions  

Flynn isn't more of a passing PG though.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 6:33 PM MST up reply actions  

I thought that Jonny Flynn

wanted to be Aaron Brooks when he grew up?

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 12, 2011 2:08 AM MST up reply actions  

Right now he’s Brooks-very lite, like Warrick is Amare-very lite

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:16 PM MST up reply actions  

Aaron Brooks is a Sun.

Thanks for reminding me. If you need me, I’ll be playing in traffic.

Twitter: @MikeLisboa

by Mike Lisboa on Jun 14, 2011 11:38 AM MST up reply actions  

Nice job BBB.

Lisboa finally comes back to the site and you send him into traffic.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 15, 2011 1:24 PM MST up reply actions  

I know it's not the be all end all

but when DraftExpress had your best case as Earl Watson… you probably aren’t very good.
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Jonny-Flynn-1245/

Re-sign BAMF.

by brian13 on Jun 11, 2011 1:21 PM MST up reply actions  

But worst case is Omar Cook!

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 1:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Personally, I wouldn’t give up that much. Lopez has a lot more value than Flynn, who is a bust. I have a lot more faith that Lopez can turn it around. The 13 pick will also have several players who could make an impact. The 20 in this draft will likely not. Dropping those 7 spots in this draft is huge. I’d find something else unless they were willing to maybe do one of those two things, but not both.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 10:42 AM MST reply actions  

That's the point

Lopez for Frye (loss), Beasley for 7 spot drop (win – hopefully).

It is almost impossible in the NBA for a team to get either exact value (too few players and minutes) so you’ve got to take you best shot.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:28 PM MST up reply actions  

Picking up Beasley for the TPE

If this is available, this should be done asap. If the deal needs the Lopez and 13 for Flynn and 20 to get done, then I’d do that as well.

Re-sign BAMF.

by brian13 on Jun 11, 2011 11:23 AM MST reply actions  

Beastly over Josh Smith all day long.

I,d love to have him on this team seriously , if we could have a a rebounding C and Beasley on the backcourt , im sure that Nash would produce amazing numbers, he is a solid rebounder, can score consistently and he can even shoot 3s , not really , he,s defense needs to improve and he needs to develop a more stable offensive game, but he is ready to take us somewhere further than 500. next season.

Gortat and Beasley that would superb, imagine the backups, Frye and and Rolo, or Warrick and Frye, either way they,re good backups, i dont mind about SG that much because i really feel like Dudley will take over next season, all we really need them is a consistent 3 point shooter and a decent back up PG and lets begin the season.

Here is how i picture it:

Nash-Brooks, if he comes cheap. if not whatever.
Dudley-MP
Grant Hill-Chilly
Beasley-Warrick/Frye
Gortat -Frye/Rolo
Thats a roster who can shoot the 3 , who has good size and a rebounder roster, give em a solid defense scheme and lets roll.

Do not let Steve Nash and Grant Hill go away, please.
Otherwhise im not buying any tickets from you Saver.

by Lino Canaan on Jun 11, 2011 11:43 AM MST reply actions  

no way. You have only added one player!!

that’s not impact. That’s a simple move. We have to make an impact here. We have to let go somebody else and bring another player who wants to be here.

So we have to get rid of MP or Brooks or Chilly and even maybe Rolo. Then bring two new players. One of them SHOULD BE a SG. The other one should be an F/C. I would love to have Scola here for that. I’m not sure anyone of you like him.

"Steve Nash is more valuable for the Suns than Kobe for the Lakers" - Jared Dudley

by Juac on Jun 11, 2011 11:53 AM MST up reply actions  

19/6/2 in 32 minutes is quite an impact

And he’ll only get better.

Also keep in mind he creates more than a half of those 19 pts per a game by himself. Jonny Flynn ain’t exactly Steve Nash.

by rzyn on Jun 11, 2011 2:18 PM MST up reply actions  

His shooting is very ordinary

Unless he can improve his shot selection, 19 points is a negative if you ask me.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:29 PM MST up reply actions  

45% is actually pretty good

when you consider that he’s playing the two perimeter roles in the triangle. Kobe Bryant, for instance, has about a 43% FG% playing the same role, largely because he ends up shooting against the clock a lot.

What Beas needs to work on is the assist / turnovers. 11% TOV% is baaaaaad, and 2.4 assists last year was a career high. Ech.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 12, 2011 2:13 AM MST up reply actions  

too much change and Nash can’t enjoy the season… one or two impact players at most if we want 2011-2012 success.

As far as Scola, he’s never been available and likely won’t be.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 2:20 PM MST up reply actions  

you mean that he would love another season with this crew?

"Steve Nash is more valuable for the Suns than Kobe for the Lakers" - Jared Dudley

by Juac on Jun 11, 2011 5:23 PM MST up reply actions  

well

Nash does better with continuity.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 8:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I’d far prefer Smith over Beastly.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 12:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 10:40 AM MST up reply actions  

I don’t see B’easy as a 4. I see him as a SF.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 12:48 PM MST up reply actions  

that's what i always thought

"Maybe I’m old school," Nash said, "but I signed a contract to play here and I want to honor it. I feel like I owe it to my teammates and the city and everybody to keep battling until they tell me it’s time to go." STEVE (God of Basketball) NASH

by 2NASHTY on Jun 11, 2011 2:15 PM MST up reply actions  

If we didn’t have so many SF’s, I’d consider this more. As of right now, I’d only consider it if it was the last alternative. A good low-post PF would be better for us than Beasley. I have faith we can find it.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 3:51 PM MST up reply actions  

They tried him at SF last year.

He was better as a PF. He doesn’t have the quickness to defend perimeter players.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 6:43 PM MST up reply actions  

THe problem with Beasley

is that he ends up on the court with Frye for 14 minutes a game. That frontcourt can’t hang. At all. No rebounding.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 12, 2011 2:14 AM MST up reply actions  

What if he played 3 and 4...

And never played with Frye WITHOUT Gortat?

I’m not a huge fan of Beasley AT ALL, but like Jim wrote, its a pretty solid punt if the price is right, because if we can turn him around, he really is super talented. Beasley is a few tweaks away from being REALLY good (get to the line a little more, shoot better from 3), is 22, and 22 is still really young, so he has time to mature.

Odds he reaches hi potential? Lets say 10%. But really, no one on our squad has that much potential (anymore).

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 2:26 AM MST up reply actions  

There's really not much "turning around" left to be done

I’d bump those odds to 20%

He had his head straight on all-season long unless you count him going nuts with his hair every other night as being a headcase.

Only thing stopping him was Rambis’ triangle, Minny have no half-court offense, hell, any sort of offense at all. It’s either pass to Love at the 3pt line or chuck a shot and if it misses hope he gets the offensive rebound and scores off that.

Here’s a nice post @ Canis Hoopus with Beas’ numbers at PF this season:
http://www.canishoopus.com/2011/5/23/2185376/improving-from-within

Per 36 his PF numbers are:
48% FG% 23.5 pts 7.3 rebs 2.5 asts 1 blk

And that’s 7.3 rebounds playing with Love who nets a an absolutely ridiculous 15.6 rebounds per 36 at center. Keep in mind Love at the 5 is when Beas plays the 4.

At the 4 he shoots better, passes better, turns the ball over less, gets more blocks, etc.

by rzyn on Jun 12, 2011 2:58 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

That's a great read

Even at 10%, I’d take a punt on Beasley, and I gotta say, he looks better by the minute!

I’d worry about him paying with Frye, and we still lack another big who can rebound, but I’d rather have Beasley, and the cap space next year, than the 13th pick and Lopez. And I think Minny would love a center, as that is their best chance to keep K Love happy.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 3:22 AM MST up reply actions  

Well, then you have to either keep Lopez

or pray that Siler can hold shit down for 14 minutes a game.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 12, 2011 3:05 AM MST up reply actions  

Agreed

But come on dude, we are the Phoenix Suns – which is NBA for “Centerless” :P

Also, what about Todd Murphy as a free agent? Be a wicked backup 5 who can board and shoot threes (although his D sux). Not awful for the veteran minimum.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 3:17 AM MST up reply actions  

Troy?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 12, 2011 9:23 AM MST up reply actions  

Must be.

Besides, Troy didn’t get any PT when he was on the Celtics.

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 10:42 AM MST up reply actions  

When you shop in the basement

You end up with scraps, and choose the best scraps. We just need a Brian Skinner, big with a pulse who can bang for the regular season.

Todd… TROY Murphy might be the best bet we have.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 5:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Haha yeh

I wet to school with a Todd Murphy, so I always mix ’e, up!

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 5:28 PM MST up reply actions  

we wouldn’t play Siler. We would play Frye at the C those minutes.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:18 PM MST up reply actions  

That whole comment was predicated on the premise

that Beasley would be moved to the 3 when Frye was in the game instead of Gortat. So then you have to either find another 4 or another 5.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 13, 2011 1:29 PM MST up reply actions  

we have too many 3’s already (esp since most of ya’all love Childress and want him on the court). We need a real 4, not Beasley.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Beasley is better as a 4.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 13, 2011 5:02 PM MST up reply actions  

If we can get SuperCoolBeas then yep, him > Smith

Dude is almost everything Smith is except younger.

He might be a little less athletic but his face-up game more than makes up for that. And he can post-up too. Plus, he can take most any PF off the dribble and is long enough to shoot any SF’s not named Kevin Durant.

If he stays in Minny, he’ll probably have a breakout season.

by rzyn on Jun 11, 2011 2:13 PM MST up reply actions  

Beasley is more the opposite of Smith, I think. Beasley can shoot and create his own shot, but not much else. Smith plays defense, passes well and rebounds okay, but can’t shoot or create his own shot.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 2:22 PM MST up reply actions  

Smith's OK Offensively

He’s much better than he was, and he can really pass well.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:30 PM MST up reply actions  

I like Beas ... I think he'd be a great fit next to Nash.

I’d be willing to look at trading anything that wasn’t Gortat. In my opinion, Gortat should be untouchable unless you’re getting a better center, or an all-star power forward in return.

Bloggin' 'bout AZ sports ... SB Nation Arizona

by Justin Burning on Jun 11, 2011 12:03 PM MST reply actions  

One point before my real point
r would Michael Beasley drag this team further into the doldrums of 20-win hell, as all of his previous teams have done?

2 of Beasley’s 3 years in the NBA his teams made the playoffs. So the 20-win hell only really applies to 1 year.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 12:45 PM MST reply actions  

ah good point. I had Miami’s 15-win season in my head, but that’s the one that GOT Miami in position to take Beasley. My bad.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 2:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah, Beasly

I like Beasly but i wonder if we can convince minny of not swapping picks but just flynn for lopez. Flynn was supposedly the best pick-and-roll point guard in his draft so I like the idea. The only bad thing is we’d be losing diversity when the bench comes in. It’d just be pick-and-roll for the same. I want our bench to have a different feel for the game when they come in.

Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't happen.

by Way2Nashty on Jun 11, 2011 12:49 PM MST reply actions  

I wish we had picked him up for a few 2nd rounders last summer

Steve Nash, the league's MVP, is a longhaired Canadian who spoke out against the war in Iraq and reads The Communist Manifesto. Quentin Richardson declared after a game-winning shot that it "was like Hamlet. It was a suspense thriller, and I killed them at the end." Amare Stoudemire, when asked to comment on a 22-point third quarter against the Kings, said, "I've got a tendency to jump over some guys' heads and throw it down."

by rsavaj on Jun 11, 2011 12:50 PM MST reply actions  

More draft problems...

I was looking at an article on bleacher report on the worst draft-day trades. Phx had 2 of like 10 and we could have had a roster such as
Pg- nash/rondo
Sg-barbosa/johnson
SF-iguadola/marion
PF-diaw
C-amare
can someone say CHAMPIONSHIP!?

Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't happen.

by Way2Nashty on Jun 11, 2011 12:55 PM MST reply actions  

If we just had Amare...

We’d probably be in the finals.
But every team can run the what-if scenario.
The team you’re showing would be great but about a million miles over the salary cap.

New York, the other Planet Orange.

by suns68 on Jun 11, 2011 1:47 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Is that you Bill Simmons?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 6:47 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I made this point in the other thread but I'll make it here as well.

Beasley has some seriously unique offensive abilities. I’ve followed him quite closely since his year at K-State and I think while he had some serious trouble adjusting to being in the NBA and hell just being an adult – his maturity/culture issues are overblown. I think once he’s put in a situation with strong veteran leadership and has a defined role as a scorer he’ll excel. The Suns have strong veteran leadership and have a need for a scorer. It really is a great fit.

I think his defense can be passable and his rebounding will be fine (watching him rebound in college I never really thought he was good at it, he just got a lot of them because nobody else was getting them….don’t think his instincts are great). Both of those traits will look better and be covered up a bit being next to Gortat.

Also a fun fact: best point guard he’s played with so far in his career? Take your pick between Mario Chalmers and Luke Ridinour. Think Nash might make scoring a bit easier for him – and when he can’t Beasley has an arsenal capable of creating his own offense.

If he can be had for a decent price then I think the Suns should jump all over it.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 1:06 PM MST reply actions  

Hell of a question.

The one you suggested below with RoLo, #13, and Peaches is ideal. I think the difference between myself and a lot of the rest of you is that I’d give up Dudley. Dudz is a luxury item for a contender. Obviously I’d prefer not to surrender him but if he’s the hold up on getting a potentially elite scorer then that ultimately seems a bit silly to me. Potentially is a key word in that sentence but I’m just having a hard time seeing a lot of upside to the Suns current roster – would be nice to have a guy with some.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 2:42 PM MST up reply actions  

Our roster is already out of balance

Losing Dudley unbalances it even more. Three of our better players (JChill, Beasley and Hill) are SFs.

I am NOT a Beasley fan at all. He’s the classic lots of potential, high ceiling, low production guy. How a guy like him can shoot a career eFG% of only .475 I don’t know.

I’m trying to thin of a guy who underachieved as much as Beasley, and then turned it around. I mean, his College numbers were BETTER than Durant’s, but Beasley has been below average his entire career.

Now, is it worth the risk? Depends how many pieces of spare change we can get him for, but even if we get him, we’d still need another big. If we can get Faried at 20 as well as Beasley, then this trade would be great.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:38 PM MST up reply actions  

I think having a good point guard putting him in a position to score will help his shooting percentages a lot

As I said above a bit….best point guard he’s played with is either Chalmers or Ridnour. That’s awful.

That said I’m surprised his shooting from 2 point range has been as pedestrian as it is.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 5:37 PM MST up reply actions  

That's the scary part

Bad shot selection is really hard to cure sadly, and in Beasley’s case, it has been a combination of too many long 2s and a surprisingly low 3p%, and not enough 3s. I thought he’d shoot .370 at least, but he has shot .349 for his career so far, but even then, one a game seems low for a guy who can shoot the three.

That is maybe Beasley’s biggest benefit to us, because i think he can be a solid 3p shooter, which would make him a matchup nightmare are the 4, and be a nice fit in our offence.

Still, man, he has been pretty ordinary so far in so many areas when I thought he looked like a star coming out who would be, if not quite as good as Durant, certainly only half a notch below. He’s been WAAAYYYY short of that so far.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 9:02 PM MST up reply actions  

That was a good one.

I almost choked on my drink I started laughing so hard.

JChill is one of Phoenix’s better players…..

You are a card MM. What a joker.

Never confuse activity with achievement.

by Jim Coughenour on Jun 11, 2011 7:41 PM MST up reply actions  

He is...

And whatever you think of him, I agree that is scary. But really, he has to be in our top 8, especially with the way everyone has played. But that;s a fun exercise: who are our top players, in order?
Nash
Gortat
Dudley
Hill
Frye
then who?

Chldress, Pietrus, Lopez, Hak, Brooks – they’ve all been pretty crappy. Scary as it is, I’d put Childress after Frye. That makes him 6th best, but really, none of those 5 had a season they’d be be scrapbooking.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 8:56 PM MST up reply actions  

Someone who is a sixth or eighth best player is not “one of our best players.” :)

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 12:04 AM MST up reply actions  

Hey

We’ve gotta have 13 – 6 is better than halfway :P

And I sincerely think he’s good. He can;t help the fact he wasn’t played much, and when he did play, he played well.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 2:27 AM MST up reply actions  

I like him as well.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 12, 2011 9:24 AM MST up reply actions  

As a Wolves fan

the deal I want is 2, Beasley, and Darko (or Flynn if you want) for 13, Gortat, and Dudley. i understand why you all wouldn’t want to do that, but I do think the only way the 2nd pick goes to Phoenix is if Gortat is involved.

Flynn, Beasley, and 20 for 13 and Lopez? I dunno if I would do that one. Probably not.

The Wolves are like the worst meal you've ever had--terrible while you're eating it and even worse later.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 11, 2011 1:13 PM MST reply actions  

I think most people here are just leaning towards taking the risk on Beasley.

But, yea if our FO wants the 2nd pick than we got to give up Gortat.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jun 11, 2011 2:27 PM MST up reply actions  

I highly doubt we trade Gortat for anyone.

Big man C with good D, no injury problems, great rebounder, and could have a break out year in scoring >>> ANY player in this draft

by Will Smith on Jun 11, 2011 4:32 PM MST up reply actions  

Don't forget:

reasonably young and on a great contract!

by Lompe on Jun 12, 2011 1:39 AM MST up reply actions  

I thought getting rid of Beasley was to avoid having Williams and Beasley on the same team.

I assume Minny will hold onto that #2.

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 10:45 AM MST up reply actions  

right. They ain’t tradin’ both.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:19 PM MST up reply actions  

this

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 12, 2011 2:20 AM MST up reply actions  

..... and his contract is AWESOME

He is a FA next summer, and we can either pony up $8 million, or let him walk and have 2 max players of space. There isn’t a hell of a lot of downside.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 2:28 AM MST up reply actions  

the team needs a go-to offensive player for crunch time, to take the load off of Nash

Problem is, if they go after the 2nd pick instead than we end up with no Gortat and no rebounding making things worse and just putting even more pressure on the team as a whole to not only play team defense, but gang rebound too. Getting

Beasley will only work if we keep Gortat. Giving up Gortat isn’t worth the risk.

I said it before, it’s may take Dudley, Lopez and the 13th to get Beasley. I’d like them to take Pietrus instead, but I don’t see it because he’d be just a rental. That would mean that we get our PF, but than were without a capable starting SG, so they better be wiling to overpay Afflalo because that’s what it’s going to take to pry him away from Denver.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jun 11, 2011 2:32 PM MST reply actions  

My first offer obviously would be Pietrus, Lopez and the 13th.

If they want Dudley, I’d try offering them another future 1st rounder instead.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jun 11, 2011 2:34 PM MST up reply actions  

If I can get Dudley, Lopez, and a future first

for Beasley I might do that. Maybe.

The Wolves are like the worst meal you've ever had--terrible while you're eating it and even worse later.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 11, 2011 2:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Shaq didn't really ruin chemistry.

He just wasn’t built for the style of play the rest of our guys were accustomed to. Bit of a difference, Beav.

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 10:46 AM MST up reply actions  

The defense was pretty bad also.

Steve Nash and Shaq trying to defend a P&R? Shudder

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 12, 2011 11:47 AM MST up reply actions  

agreed. It wasn’t quite the right fit, but wasn’t really chemistry. Our offense was fantastic actually, just couldn’t guard anyone.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:19 PM MST up reply actions  

I meant the oncourt chemistry, with Beasley it would be lockerroom chemistry.

Having Shaq forced us to adjust to him and not the other way around. He unintentionally ruined our chemistry or the way we played. That’s why Nash wanted him out. I don’t think there were any hard feelings there. Shaq did all he could and just wasn’t a good fit.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jun 12, 2011 12:18 PM MST up reply actions  

Those are both way more than I would give up for Beasley.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 3:54 PM MST up reply actions  

esp when they got him for a 2nd round pick

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 3:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Not a future first.

Dudley, Lopez and the #13 in this year’s draft. Why would we give up a potentially good pick in a likely better draft class for Beasley and change?

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Jun 11, 2011 3:34 PM MST up reply actions  

ok, i was responding to someone else

i might do that

The Wolves are like the worst meal you've ever had--terrible while you're eating it and even worse later.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 11, 2011 3:56 PM MST up reply actions  

Eric,

you realize you only gave up a second rounder to get Beasley last year right? So that’s turning a second round pick into 2 potential starters plus the 13th pick… Kahn has never done anything like that before, and I wouldn’t expect any GM could do that. Beasley is just not that good.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 3:40 PM MST up reply actions  

ok

I’m not forcing you to do that deal, I’m just saying I don’t think it works without Dudley. I myself am not much of a Beasley guy, so I might do the deal you originally proposed, but I don’t think Kahn does that.

The Wolves are like the worst meal you've ever had--terrible while you're eating it and even worse later.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 11, 2011 3:58 PM MST up reply actions  

And yes, I'm aware of what they traded to get him

I can’t for the life of me figure out why it’s relevant.

The Wolves are like the worst meal you've ever had--terrible while you're eating it and even worse later.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 11, 2011 4:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah I tend to agree with that.....not sure why that would be relevant

Just because you got a sweet deal doesn’t mean you have to pay it forward.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 4:01 PM MST up reply actions  

That is why you need cap space

They gave him away to get Bosh. Beasley + a second rounder for Bosh – who wouldn’t make that trade!

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 9:03 PM MST up reply actions  

That was a salary dump

You can GREAT players in salary dumps (see Gasol, Pau).

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:40 PM MST up reply actions  

Don't like any of the deals suggested in the poll

I hate Flynn because he can’t make a jumpshot. Beasley is severely undersized for a PF. The only solution I can see is that the Suns should let go of Brooks and trade Dudley( + Warrick if possible) for a lottery pick and look to buy another 1st round pick. That would give the Suns 3 first round pick(at least 2 lottery picks). Hopefully the Suns will pick:
1. Biyombo or Motiejunas – Biyombo’s ridiculous wingspan, toughness and non-stop motor would immediately help the Suns against ultra-quick-paint-attacking guards. On the other hand, Motiejunas would give the Suns a legit 7-footer with a well polished post game and would not be entirely be dependent of Nash play-making abilities.
2. Chris Singleton – I love Dudley but if his contract can help the Suns shed the contract of Warrick or Childress I’d trade him for a lottery pick in this draft. In Chris Singleton, we’d get a guy capable and willing to guard anyone.
3. Charles Jenkins – Excellent shooting percentages, physical defender, team player and excellent work ethic all in one body.

I don't care who starts anymore...

by Spit_Fire on Jun 11, 2011 2:52 PM MST reply actions  

Yeah, sort of

He’s basically Marion with a jumper and guard handles

by rzyn on Jun 11, 2011 3:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Except he's not a great defender or rebounder.

So not like Marion at all except for the size.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 7:21 PM MST up reply actions  

They are also both professional basketball players.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 7:27 PM MST up reply actions  

You have a point.

You know who’s also a professional basketball player? LeBron James. So Beasley must be just like Lebron with a jumpshot, roght? Let’s make this deal.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 7:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Bingo.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 12, 2011 3:37 AM MST up reply actions  

Our conclusion was that Beasley is primarily a stretch 4

Because of Love, he had to play 3, but he’s better at the 4. He rebounds at the 4, and he guards much better at the 4; this was actually one of the biggest problems for Beasley. He had a terrible time guarding small forwards, but is OK against 4s.

The Wolves are like the worst meal you've ever had--terrible while you're eating it and even worse later.

by Eric in Madison on Jun 11, 2011 3:05 PM MST up reply actions  

??

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/beaslmi01.html Beasley has NEVER rebounded well at the NBA level., in fact his best per 36 is 7.7. That Channign Frye bad: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/f/fryech01.html

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:42 PM MST up reply actions  

The rest of that post is pretty true though.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 7:22 PM MST up reply actions  

His rebounding #'s were career-lows last year

because he was switched to the 3, and played next to Kevin Love. They would come up if he moved to the 4 on another team.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 12, 2011 2:23 AM MST up reply actions  

Well, we can hope!

He’s certainly not a plus rebounder, but if he never plays with Hak, Frye or Lopez, he’d be great.

If we can scam the 20th pick and take Faried, we’d be set for rebounding with Gortat and him, and we can live with Frye and Beasey, because we’d always have one rebounder on the court.

In any case, I don’t think his rebounding is a killer concern – especially if he plays mostly with Gortat or, conversely, we get another big who can rebound.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 2:31 AM MST up reply actions  

you think Duds, Warrick and 3 mil will buy the Suns 2 lottery picks – and that those guys will be better than the guys already on the roster? I know all about potential and whimzy cuz I do it all the time, but all you’re saying here is that the shiny penny on the street is worth more than the the slightly grimy one in your pocket. A penny’s still a penny.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 3:44 PM MST up reply actions  

I thought he said one pick and just suggested two different players.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 3:56 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed

Completely. Beasley is like a hot woman with Herpes. She might not get an outbreak while you date her, and the upside is huge, but the risk is massive as well. (that’s my best analogy EVAR).

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 4:43 PM MST up reply actions  

What I mean is

We package Duds + Warrick to get another lottery pick. Including our pick at 13th, we’d have 2 lottery picks and the Suns must look to buy another pick for in the 1st round.

I don't care who starts anymore...

by Spit_Fire on Jun 12, 2011 12:11 AM MST up reply actions  

ok, I got it. Still, I don’t think anyone’s giving the Suns a lottery pick for Duds and Warrick (except Washington did that a few years ago, didn’t they?). So, maybe…

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 12, 2011 7:25 AM MST up reply actions  

Here's my take on the situation.

I agree completely with Scott. I loved Beasley’s game in college and I think it’s a combination of lack of proper training and the natural growing pains that a 19-year-old will go through when joining the NBA. He’s got a lot of versatility and could very well be the scorer we need.

As far as Flynn goes, I’m with Seth on this one. I like his potential and I honestly think the whole Kurt Rambis/triangle offense stunted his growth. He had a decent first season and was nailed to the bench last season due to a lack of production, which I think stemmed from a lack of confidence. Put him on the Suns, playing behind Nash? He’ll get his mojo back and will prove to be a solid backup and perhaps a decent starter when Nash retires.

To me, there are two different scenarios:

Trade scenario #1: the Wolves aren’t hellbent on getting Gortat and will settle for getting Lopez, Dudley and the #13 for Beasley, Flynn and the #2. I’d prefer throwing Pietrus in there, but with one year left on his contract, he might be gone after that. Then again, I’m not sure what Pietrus’ value will be in the open market after the CBA change.

Trade scenario #2: the Wolves will not make the deal without Gortat, and we offer Gortat, Warrick and the #13 for Beasley, Flynn and the #2. We rid ourselves of a bad contract in Warrick and we pick up Beas and Flynn. With the #2, we could pick up someone to replace Warrick. Maybe someone like Williams or Valanciunas or Biyombo (might be reaching a bit for the other two) or we pick Williams and trade him for a valuable backup PF. There are a few options there.

Overall, I’m for this. If the deal is right, I say we pull the trigger.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Jun 11, 2011 3:49 PM MST reply actions  

I don't like losing Gortat

We’d pretty much be in the same scenario as last year before we made the trade. We would become weak at the C position immediately and still need to grab a SG. C’s are hard to come by.

Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't happen.

by Way2Nashty on Jun 11, 2011 3:54 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree.

I mean, maybe with the #2 you could draft Valanciunas and just pray he’s effective, but otherwise you’re looking at more of Robin, which is frustrating enough to us Suns fans.

And maybe Afflalo could be had? He’s a free agent this year. Might be a little expensive, but if we’ve got our scorer at the 4, we could have Afflalo play the Raja Bell role that Amar’e had?

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Jun 11, 2011 4:07 PM MST up reply actions  

I like Afflalo.

There’s also a lot of good SG’s and PF’s to be had. I say we lay low for draft unless an amazing opportunity comes up. We draft T. Thompson, Alec Burks (love this guy) or Jimmer. Then in FA get humphries, glen davis, or landry for about $5 and look for afflalo, crawford, maybe michael redd, or even get j-rich back.

Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't happen.

by Way2Nashty on Jun 11, 2011 4:12 PM MST up reply actions  

Redd is done.

That knee is weaker than he’d like to have everyone believe. Crawford is going to want a lot of money (with good cause, he’s a solid 6th man) and I don’t know how wild I am about JRich coming back. I love the guy, he knows the system, and would put fans in the seats, but I think I’d rather pick up a defensive 2, in the mold of Afflalo, Dahntay Jones, Thabo Sefolosha, etc.

Blogging Phoenix Suns basketball at Bright Side of the Sun twitter: @iamtrevorpaxton

by Trevor Paxton on Jun 11, 2011 4:20 PM MST up reply actions  

I guess...

How much money would we have to spare after getting rid of Carter? If its like $12-16 mil then we can get one of the PF’s as back ups and just draft a defense-minded SG possibly from trading down.

Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't happen.

by Way2Nashty on Jun 11, 2011 4:22 PM MST up reply actions  

Valanciunas seems to be good

if we are willing to be patient. because he may not come to NBA for 2 years. He has 2 years left on his EURP contract and does not have a NBA buyout clause.

I like the Lopez + Pietrus + Hakim Warrick for Beasley + Flynn + Anthony Randolph.

As much as everyone is saying that Pietrus is a rental, so is Beasley. His salary id $6.2M next year and has player option with $8.17M the year after and still could be gone. So, he is also a rental.

From Minnesota perspective, they get rid of Flynn who does not fit in their system and is completely redundant with Rubio signing. So they save $3.4M next year on him. Plus, Beasley is spoiling the locker room atmosphere. With almost their entire team being so young, they will really like some experience and maturity plus the defense of Pietrus. And it could be a sign and trade for Pietrus (to extend his contract) if Minny is interested.

by az_kevin on Jun 11, 2011 9:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Can;t trade Pietrus

Unless he agrees, before July 1st, to accept the player option.

In other words, Pietrus can scuttle any trade and, if I was him, screw playing in Minny – too flippin’ cold and too depressing a team.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 2:32 AM MST up reply actions  

There’s no way they’d do the first one. That’s the only deal I’d consider on this whole thread, and I don’t want Beas. But I’d consider that one. I don’t think they’d even do the 2nd one. We’d have to have Dudley in there or not have the 2 in there.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 3:58 PM MST up reply actions  

I think the #2 pick is the reason Beasley is theoretically available

So scenario 1 doesn’t work.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 4:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Kahn

I’m just hoping Kahn has another mental lapse and screws the T-Wolves over by doing the first deal.

Just because something hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't happen.

by Way2Nashty on Jun 11, 2011 4:01 PM MST reply actions  

I picked the 3rd option despite not agreeing with it

I don’t hate Beasley, but I really don’t want to see the Suns give up Gortat and am not interested at all in Flynn

If there was a trade option for beasley without Gortat I’d have picked that one

by Adi C on Jun 11, 2011 4:09 PM MST reply actions  

oh and I wouldn’t want to give up too much for beasley either. He’s not a very efficient shooter or rebounder

Compare him to Frye for example

Beasley 47.4 EFG%, Frye 53.5 EFG%
Beasley 9.6 TRB%, Frye 11.7 TRB%

etc

by Adi C on Jun 11, 2011 4:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Not a big fan of Carmelo Anthony.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 7:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Agree

Everybody calls a great scorer. That is partially true but he is also a volume shooter. Imagine if Nash took as many shots and Melo. He would average about 5 more points per game.

by Suns Fan For Life on Jun 11, 2011 9:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah, Melo is extremely talented and probably the most complete scorer in the game.

It’s a shame he doesn’t have his head on straight. He could be a lot more efficient than he is just by adjusting his mindset.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 9:33 PM MST up reply actions  

Especially playing with someone like Billups

who could have set him up for so many better shots. And look at his playoff percentages. 37% all the while taking 10 more shots per game than Amare who shoots over 50%. Don’t understand that, but New York wanted him. They are going to sacrifice so much efficiency letting melo be “melo” and not getting the ball to their best shooters

by Suns Fan For Life on Jun 11, 2011 9:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m not a fan of Billups’ style either. Billups, Melo, and Smith are probably 3 of the biggest shot-jackers at their respective positions in the league.

But he also had a big like Nene who is a a great finisher but also a willing passer. He did have shooters like Smith and Billups, and didn’t have to take many of the shots he did.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 9:40 PM MST up reply actions  

Billups is a perfect compliment to Melo

They’re both iso players who rely on getting to the FT line to make their scoring efficient. More guys drawing fouls means they get to the penalty quicker, which means more efficient offense.

However, you can’t win in the playoffs wiht that strategy, because the officials don’t award fouls in the playoffs the same way they do in the regular season.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 12, 2011 2:28 AM MST up reply actions  

sure. If the Suns could upgrade the C position, I’d trade him too. But then again, is Nene twice as good as Gortat? Cuz he already makes twice the money.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 12, 2011 11:28 AM MST up reply actions  

No, he’s not. And he’s on the downside of his career.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:21 PM MST up reply actions  

hmm

well no1 keep Nash Gortat Frye Dudley and hill everyone else is tradeable.
You either go we want to win now or build for the future.
to be honest i think we are targeting the wrong player from Minnesota i would go after
A.Randolph personally.

SG and PF are our 2 needs. for PF target A.Randolph, L.Scola or A.Bargani and for SG target A.Aaffalo, C.Lee and someone from the draft like A.Burks, M.Brooks or whoever

"SIR ALEX FERGUSON" Greatest Manager of all time

by phxuk: Ap on Jun 11, 2011 6:17 PM MST reply actions  

Well Suns would be stupid to get Andrea and Aaffalo I can’t see going anywhere if Denver has a say it it

I mean sure bargnani had 21 ppg but he takes lots of bad shots spending most of his time around the 3 pt line and not getting close to the basket. Plus he’s a terrible defender and rebounder. I mean his TRB% was 8.6. That’s pretty much the same as Hedo Turkoglu…

by Adi C on Jun 11, 2011 6:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Assuming that Randolph is somewhat cheaper to get than Beasley, I’d rather have Randolph as well.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 11, 2011 6:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Iguodala>Beasley

Acquire Scola and Iguodala somehow. Get Carter out and see how that goes.

by Humongous on Jun 11, 2011 7:18 PM MST reply actions  

Iguodala isn't worth near what he's paid (3 more years on his 6 year 80 mill deal)

And Scola signed last summer through 2015.

But hey we’ll get rid of Carter!

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 11, 2011 7:23 PM MST up reply actions  

I'd much rather get Beasley and keep Gortat than get D-Will and have to give up Gortat.

If we’re gonna have a PF who is a scorer but not necessarily much of a defender or rebounder, as both Beasley and D-Will are, it makes Gortat that much more important.

I didn’t chime in on the previous Gortat discussion since I was out of town and it’s a pain to post from my phone, but here goes. When assessing a player’s value, it’s important to consider how hard it would be to replace the things he does, and how expensive it would be to replace him. If we trade Gortat, where are we going to find another dependable rebounder, strong defensive player, and high energy, great work ethic, near-7 footer like Gortat is? Forget upgrading from him. I’m asking how you even find another who does what he does at the very reasonable roughly $7M a year he makes? And what would you have to give up in picks or other players to get such a guy?

Yeah, I know, I’ve made comments here that are over the top in Gortat love, but I think most understand that I’m flippantly exaggerating for effect. I appreciate the hell out of the kind of player he is, but I would absolutely trade him. It’s just that we damn well better get a stud in return, and have some sort of plan B at center. And, as for the conversation about Gortat’s athletic ability or supposed lack of it, I don’t get that at all. He runs the floor all game long on a Suns team that is still pretty fast-paced. He sets pick after pick and continues to have the energy to go after rebounds and dive for the basket on feeds from Nash. He doesn’t jump “high enough” and throw down monster jams? And sometimes he even (gasp!) lays it in instead of dunking it? OK, so he won’t up on ESPN plays of the night very often and I couldn’t care less. Advanced stats win share and 82games.com’s simple rating had him as our second most effective player and he showed continuous improvement in his time in Phoenix. If you want to nitpick on the things he can’t do, fine. But I guarantee you’ll miss him if we ship him away.

by East Bay Ray on Jun 11, 2011 7:33 PM MST reply actions   2 recs

But I guarantee you’ll miss him if we ship him away.

I already miss him.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jun 11, 2011 7:36 PM MST up reply actions  

As for Beasley himself

I lean more towards Scott’s view of giving him a pass for his character issues but there’s still definitely cause for concern. It looks to me more like immaturity than a case of him being a bad guy, but if it’s now two teams who are eager to dump him, what’s up with that? Still, how else are we going to get a young player with supreme scoring ability from the 4 spot like Beasley is? Probably a risk worth taking if the price is right.

And nice work, Alex. Rec’d.

by East Bay Ray on Jun 11, 2011 7:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Beasley's still only 22.

The Suns have helped a lot of players older than that come into their own. Frye, Gortat, and Dudley have all risen from relative obscurity.

He’s exactly the type of player that the Suns should be looking for. There’s risk with any trade, but the last time I looked there aren’t a whole lot of young (under 25) talented players on the Suns roster.

I would be fine with bringing in Flynn. If the Suns brass feels the draft is weak and doesn’t like their options at #13, I would definitely suggest trying to acquire any combination of Beasley, Flynn, and/or Randolph.

If a deal for these players is available without sacrificing core members all the better.

The roster needs to be infused with a little more vitality and youth. Minnesota’s youngsters might not be the answer, but the Suns better come up with something to usher in a new era soon because the clock is ticking on Nash and Hill.

Never confuse activity with achievement.

by Jim Coughenour on Jun 11, 2011 8:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Agree with most of that.

And definitely that the Suns need an infusion of young talent. The Frye, Gortat and Dudley comparisons don’t work for me, though. None of them were seen as character issues, and none of them posted a message that could be construed as a suicide note on Twitter. Beasley’s a bigger risk than the standard “there’s risk with any trade.” Yet I still think it’s a risk worth taking but, again, only if the price is right.

by East Bay Ray on Jun 11, 2011 8:16 PM MST up reply actions  

To clarify, I don't consider depression to be a "character issue".

It just indicates that the person needs help, and I’m 100% in favor of helping such a person as long as they are serious about helping themselves.

by East Bay Ray on Jun 11, 2011 8:24 PM MST up reply actions  

That's a really good argument

He’s exactly the type of player that the Suns should be looking for. There’s risk with any trade, but the last time I looked there aren’t a whole lot of young (under 25) talented players on the Suns roster.

Very good argument. When the risk is low – Beasley has $6,262,347 owed next year and $8,172,363 is his QO, and the POTENTIAL upside is massive (he has all-NBA talent), why not roll the dice? It just comes down to cost. If we can trade non-assets (draft picks and nothing players), the worst that can happen is we let Beasley walk next year, and use the cap space wisely (God i hope).

Looking at it, maybe we can engineer a really good salary dump, and go all in for the 2012 FA Bonanza, with a side bet on Beasley?

Martell Webster has only $600K guaranteed next year. What about Martell Webster + Beasley for Pietrus, Lopez, Hak and the 13th pick? If they need a sweetener, next years (top 20) protected 1st. Heck, I’ll even throw in a bucket of KFC.

No, scratch that because, and this bares noting: we can’t trade Pietrus at all, . As Pietrus he holds a player exception, we can’t trade him until July 1st, when the CBA expires. ARGHGHG. Just to be clear:

The Sun’s can not trade Pietrus until after July 1st – when the new CBA is approved.

I triple checked this, and:

http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q88
When the trading deadline has passed. Teams are free to make trades again once their season has ended, but cannot trade players whose contracts are ending or could end due to an option or ETO.

(Emphasis mine)

So there goes that brilliant idea.

by MMotherwell on Jun 11, 2011 9:23 PM MST up reply actions  

true.

Suns also cannot trade Brooks because he hasn’t signed for next year. Hill is UFA. Everyone else is fair game.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 10:18 PM MST up reply actions  

Haha, I said the same thing below.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 10:19 PM MST up reply actions  

OK, I'm going to dump all my thoughts here instead of replying to individual posts.

Note: I check Canis Hoopus daily, so a lot of what I’m going to say is influenced heavily by the people that have seen thes eplayers the most.

Jonny Flynn: I really liked Jonny in college. That triple OT game was one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever seen. He was a great college player. But the NBA is another story. He is more of a streetball kind of player, a guy that has relied heavily on his athleticism to dominate. He’s very quick and and can jump out of the gym. But he’s short, turnover-prone, has poor shot-selection, and is not a great shooter. He has a long way to go to be a good NBA player. He was one of the worst players in the NBA last year (similar to Robin in that regard).

But that being said, he was in the worse possible situation. Many say he did not fit into the triangle. But what Minnesota ran wasn’t even a traditional triangle. It was a complete mess of an offense, and it would be difficult for anyone to succeed in those conditions. Jonny had surgery in the offseason, and never really got back to where he was. And it sounds like Rambis didn’t like him at all.

I really think (and CH agrees with me) that PHX would be the perfect environment for him to succeed in. I would not be averse to bringing him back in a trade, and Minny does want to move him. But we need to understand he is a serious risk and could easily bust like every other back-up PG we’ve had. Just don’t expect too much.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 8:52 PM MST reply actions  

Michael Beasley:

I haven’t seen a bunch of Beasley, but what I have seen has been impressive at times, and not so much at others. He has a ton of talent, but I really don’t like the way he plays the game. Terrible shot-selection and an unwillingness to move the ball. I really don’t like those kinds of players. But as I said above, Minny’s offense was horrid. He also looked disinterested on the defensive end to say the least.

But even so, there was a stretch where he played tremendous ball. He does have a unique ability for someone his size to put the ball in the hoop. Some good coaching and veteran leadership could really get him to harness his abilities and make him a star.

But there are the character questions, and there have been a lot of me-first, shoot-shoot-shoot guys in this league. How many of them have turned it around and became positive players? It is a risk.

I originally wanted no piece of Beasley. I really didn’t like some of the things I saw. As I said, I don’t like these kinds of players. But the more I read from the likes of Scott Howard, etc. and the more I thought about it, I came to some of the same conclusions as Alex did. Beasley really can be the guy we need, and this really could be the best situation for him.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 9:27 PM MST reply actions  

I’m still not really sold on bringing in Beasley, but the recent quotes from the Suns seem to lean in a direction like that.

I do think that Beasley could be good with the Suns, but the chance is low.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 10:20 PM MST up reply actions  

In summary:

Both of these players are huge risks but could also be just what we need. I wouldn’t break the bank for either one, but if we can get a good deal jump on it. Anything involving Nash, Gortat, Frye, and probably Dudley is too much for me.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 9:41 PM MST reply actions  

agree.

Same thinking about risk and rewards for both teams.

So, Lopez + Pietrus + Hakim Warrick for Beasley + Flynn + Anthony Randolph

by az_kevin on Jun 11, 2011 10:01 PM MST up reply actions  

forgot to mention

that should Aaron Brooks take the QO, SUNS could use him along with Nash as a SG since he can shoot well. And he would be available as a PG/SG after Nash retires.

by az_kevin on Jun 11, 2011 10:03 PM MST up reply actions  

A few problems:

As MM said, Peaches can’t be traded. He’s technically not part of the team until he picks up his option.

Nash+Brooks would be the worst defensive backcourt in the league. And Brooks isn’t technically on the team either. He’s a RFA. If we bring in Flynn, there’s a very slim chance we bring Brooks back.

I’m not sure Minnesota would want to include Randolph. He did some good things for them and could still turn into a player.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 10:18 PM MST up reply actions  

You would be correct.

At least judging by the fans and my own observations.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 12, 2011 9:26 AM MST up reply actions  

when you say “these 2 players”, I assume you mean Beasley and Flynn.

To me, the big difference between Beas and Flynn is that Flynn has very little talent and fewer tangibles, so the upside is really, really low.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 11, 2011 10:22 PM MST up reply actions  

Eh,

I think he could still be a good NBA PG. Will he get there? Certainly not in the situation he’s in now. In PHX? Maybe. But if he’s needed to bring in Beasley I’m fine with seeing what he can do.

Like you, I’m still iffy on Beasley, but I like him better than the #2 pick all things considered.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 11, 2011 10:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Lopez has huge upside and he has shown what he can do. Particularly with a dominant PF like Amare or Kevin Love.

So, Beasley > Lopez (bnit Lopez has lots of hope, good attititude vs. not good attittitude of Beasley)
Flynn < Pietrus
Anthony Randolph <= Hakim Warrick

Hence I think trading these 3 makes sense.

Suns line up would be:
Nash/Flynn/Dowdell
FA/Dudley
Nash/Childress
Frye/Beasley/Lawal
Gortat/Randolph/Siler

by az_kevin on Jun 11, 2011 11:28 PM MST up reply actions  

All things considered, I’d much rather have the second pick.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 12:11 AM MST up reply actions  

Not for Gortat.

The more I read, the less interested I am in Kanter or Williams.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 12, 2011 12:17 AM MST up reply actions  

oh I think Kanter could be very, very good. In fact, I brazenly predict 16 and 8 in his first season, barring injury. He just hasn’t played basketball in a while. I also think he’s more low-post p-n-r PF than C.

But then that’s just me blowing him up in my mind, like everyone does with one player or another in the draft.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 12, 2011 7:29 AM MST up reply actions  

I think Kanter is going to be the best guy in this draft.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:22 PM MST up reply actions  

No, I meant rather than Beasley. I’d rather have Gortat too.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:22 PM MST up reply actions  

If it's any consolation,

Beasley was a former #2 pick. Feel any better?

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 10:54 AM MST up reply actions  

Then you, good sir, require a chill pill.

I think I’ve got something here.

What color would you like?

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 3:47 PM MST up reply actions  

Nice read Alex

To get Beasley i’d give up Lopez and throw in Brooks or Warrick. If the Wolves wanted Gortat for the number 2 pick i’d do that. What i would like to see is the Suns to see how desperate the Pistons are to get rid of Hamiltons contract. Give them Caters buy out deal and see if we could get Monroe or there 1st rounder, i think it’s pick 7. That would give us pick 2,7 and 13 to build around. For arguments sake we could draft Williams, Walker and Jimmer. Our problems at PF, SG and back up PG are now solved. So maybe we would have a starting line up look a little like this. Lopez, Williams, Hill, Hamilton, Nash. Walker and Jimmer can come of the bench at both guard positions with Frye and Dudley. It would be a waste if we couldn’t get one of the bigs off the Wolves hands.

by Sunderstruck on Jun 11, 2011 11:54 PM MST reply actions  

We can’t start Lopez after the season he just had. That would be a disaster. I have hopes for him still, but he needs to be a backup next year and work his way back. If he is our starting C, we’re probably in trouble. And I don’t want that many rookies. We’d be lucky to win 20 games. I’d rather get some established peeps.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 12:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Pick 8.

And they are not going to give up their best young player just to get rid of Hamilton. There’s going to be a new coach, so who says they want to dump him that badly anyway?

We also can’t trade Brooks, as he’s a RFA.

Minny has no need for Warrick. They already have the guy we should have signed instead of Hak (Tolliver).

Why would we draft Walker and Jimmer?

The only Wolves bigs available would likely be the ones that suck.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 12, 2011 12:21 AM MST up reply actions  

BTW guys,

If Pietrus exercises his option, would you ship him to Boston for their 1. rounder + filler? They are obviously trading out of this draft. It’s a little much to give them, but we don’t really need Pietrus anyway, even though he is a good player.

by Lompe on Jun 12, 2011 1:55 AM MST reply actions  

Yeah. Depends who they gave us lol

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:23 PM MST up reply actions  

http://www.shamsports.com/content/pages/data/salaries/celtics.jsp

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine the numbers don’t work, really, unless we take Jermaine O’Neal, which wouldn;t be TERRIBLE (expiring contract and he is a big with a pulse).

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 5:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes!

I don't care who starts anymore...

by Spit_Fire on Jun 12, 2011 9:00 AM MST up reply actions  

Wouldnt trade Gortat,

but if dudley was needed to pull the trigger on the beas deal, in a heartbeat. Love both of em, but id miss gortats defense and rebounding more than dudleys glue ability. I think it would take one or the other to get it done. Beas may be a headcase, but i honestly think all he needs is good coaching and leadership. Can you imagine if we drafted him in place of Amare, would they be that different now?? And even if it doesnt work, whats the harm, still good enough to win 40 games, and our trade assets stay the same. You dont get better in this league by holding onto your role players when a stud could be had

by spinifecs on Jun 12, 2011 2:21 AM MST reply actions  

Can somebody please explain exactly why everybody but me seems to hate Brooks so much?

Other than just that he’s not the second coming of Steve Nash.
I happen to think he’s a good, scrappy little player who did remarkably well (led team in scoring per minutes played) despite having very little time to learn the offense. He certainly outperformed Dragic in the backup PG role.
I think given some time to learn the system and his teammates, he’ll be a real weapon on this team and I’d hate to jettison him because he didn’t come in right away and turn around an already lost season, that was marked by epic fails at several positions and a reserve unit with very limited scoring ability.

New York, the other Planet Orange.

by suns68 on Jun 12, 2011 8:34 AM MST via mobile reply actions   3 recs

Because Dragic managed to looked better after the trade and Brook is just the opposite, nevermind the draft pick included to get him

No one is mistaking him for the second coming of Nash but with Nash on the floor you get two things: an excellent shooter and a play making wiz. Dragic also bring two things defense and streaky shooting. Brooks on the other hand, offers only streaky shooting.

I don't care who starts anymore...

by Spit_Fire on Jun 12, 2011 9:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Dragic had like 2 good games after the trade.

They just happened to be the last 2 games of the season.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 12, 2011 9:48 AM MST up reply actions  

*Dragic managed to appear to look better to Suns fans

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 12, 2011 10:22 AM MST up reply actions  

He actually did play much better for Houston.

His shooting improved a lot, although it was a small sample size of 22 games he played for them.

Talk of the supposed improvement of Earl Clark with the Magic was comical to me. He had a grand total of 2 points and 4 rebounds in 6 minutes of play in their 6 playoff games.

by East Bay Ray on Jun 12, 2011 10:43 AM MST up reply actions  

Whoa...

Those are LeBron’s 4th quarter numbers. For all we know, Earl Clark is still waiting to be unleashed.

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 3:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Wow, it happened. Agreed with Scott!

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:24 PM MST up reply actions  

I feel good about this. Look at us agreeing.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 12, 2011 3:06 PM MST up reply actions  

We agree with everything you say.

You just happen to take things the wrong way.

Grant Hill: where making MVPs look like wannabes happens.

by NashMV3 on Jun 12, 2011 3:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't get this.

Not ashamed to admit I have no clue what you’re talking about.

Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent

by Scott Howard on Jun 12, 2011 4:33 PM MST up reply actions  

agree

Brooks will look a lot better next season. Many players look better in their second season – Duds, JRich come to mind.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 12, 2011 11:29 AM MST up reply actions  

I think he will too. Obviously, he’s no Nash, but he can meet realistic expectations.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:25 PM MST up reply actions  

I hope we play him in a better role

He’s a GREAT shooting mini-2, and Eddie House-small (not light, small).

If we can run a second team offence where Brooks brings the ball upcourt and then goes and stands in the corner while (INSERT PLAYERS HERE) run the PnR, he can be really effective.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 5:39 PM MST up reply actions  

I think our backup offense is going to be

bringing Dudley or Frye off a screen for a catch and shoot, and if that doesn’t work, then 4 guys stand around the 3 point line while Brooks goes one on one.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 13, 2011 1:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Because he was suppose to push us into the playoffs, but didn't.

We Suns fans put high expectations on players and when they don’t meet them we flip out.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jun 12, 2011 12:22 PM MST up reply actions  

he’s not the reason we missed the playoffs.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I sort of agree with you. His failings are a bit overstated. This guy still has a chance to be a very good player for us.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:24 PM MST up reply actions  

He'd be a great player

In the triangle, or with a massive PG like Magic. He’ll need a really specific offense (and defence) to be effective for us, but there are roles he can play.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 5:41 PM MST up reply actions  

I totally agree.

I think he’s exactly what our bench needs, and I think next year he’ll prove that he’s much better than the Brooks we saw last year.

by iwasneveryoung on Jun 12, 2011 11:05 PM MST up reply actions  

If I were a betting man

I wouyld say the only way dudley gets dealt is if the other team takes on hak or chills deal,Both jd and gortats freindly cap #s are real values,I hope we dont trade either.

Lover,Poet,Suns fan,All around damn good guy.

by stevedavis_ on Jun 12, 2011 10:51 AM MST reply actions  

Flynn ? what the fword

C,mon we got Nash, we dont need an useless not proven PG , we cant expect someone to be good, we need someone already good to help us go somewhere, if not, why would you keep Nash ? there is no time to hope for someone that was projected as the best pick and roll player, we cant afford to wait, we need to file the holes, we got how, i mean it just like it sounds, fuck the future, the present is now, and our present is Nash, a 37 pg who still is among the top PG in this league, give him a scoring SG and Scoring PF and he,ll take you to WCF, see 2009-2010 for more info, but if we had those pieces, with the experience Dudz and Frye had gained+Gortat+ a new defensive scheme, im pretty damm sure Nash would have been a NBA champion by now.

Do not let Steve Nash and Grant Hill go away, please.
Otherwhise im not buying any tickets from you Saver.

by Lino Canaan on Jun 12, 2011 11:22 AM MST reply actions  

Realisticly

I think it would take Lopez, #13, Chill or Warrick and either Dudley or next season’s first rounder for Beasley. We could probably get back either Flynn or the #20 pick from them too. Who would you rather give up? Dudley or next season’s 1st rounder in a good draft?

Getting Beasley and giving up either Dudley or next season’s first rounder is a high risk/high reward kind of deal no matter what we choose really.

Maybe I’m actually being unrealistic and we could probably get Beas for less? I don’t know. I mean it’s hard determining his true value.

Don't trade Dudley!

by Beavis 25 on Jun 12, 2011 12:31 PM MST reply actions  

It is hard. But I do think we can get him for less. They certainly got him for a lot less. If they valued Lopez or Chill enough to trade for them, I think your deal would be just fine without Dudz or the extra pick. If we did have to include all that, I’d say it’s way too much. We can get someone better for that.

by BringBackBarkley17 on Jun 12, 2011 2:28 PM MST up reply actions  

Lopez is the key

If Minny value him, we have a shot. If not, I’m not sure we can make a trade at all.

by MMotherwell on Jun 12, 2011 5:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Late to the party on this...

But if we can get Beasley, Flynn, and the 20th pick for Lopez and the 13th pick then that would be a no-brainer in my opinion. There’s no way I see Minn giving Beaz up for that though, and like others have noted I think either Dudley or Gortat would likely have to be involved…and unless they would also include the 2nd round pick in the deal, I think it would be too high a price for us to pay.

If we can somehow swing it, I think acquiring Beasley would be a good move. He’s still young, still improving, and I think most of his issues with immaturity are in the past. I don’t have anything against Beasley personally, and I think he would be a very good pick up that could possibly help turn our team around. We need to take a gamble like this if we are to have any hope of resurrecting our chances at contending anytime soon…What do we have to lose at this point?

by 7footer on Jun 12, 2011 8:38 PM MST reply actions  

So

Does anyone actually think that we will be better NEXT YEAR if we trade Gortat for the second rounder? I shouldn’t have to say what Gortat brings to the table for our team. Williams might end up being a better player but he is not going to lead us into the playoffs his first year in the league. Especially if we have this massive gaping whole in the center position.

My point is that the suns want to get better fast. You know this because they are keeping their old stars and hoping for the best. Rookies dont push their teams into the playoffs. If they traded Gortat for the number 2 I hope to god they trade Nash for some assets in order to rebuild. It would be a full rebuild project because we just traded away our chances of making any splash in the post season.

Beasley on the other hand could be had for less and has exactly what the suns are said to be looking for. Just do not expect us to get rid of Warrick or childless through a trade with minni. They have no value and rightfully so.

I will admit that a team with derrick Williams is really tempting with the potential match up possibilities. A 3 that wants to play against 4s that are larger/slower.That style of play could make some nasty match-ups with Fry and Chilldress. Both players that prefer to match up against the smaller body. This could lead up to a very interesting set of offensive positions and defensive assignments.

Just think of the match-up nightmare. Playing a team with a small power forward on the court.
on offence
1)nash
2) Fry
3) Derek Williams
4) Childress
5) Gortat

While reverting to their normal positions of defense.

With a Large power forward.

On offense

1)nash
2)Fry
3)Grant hill
4)Derek williams
5)Gortat

Just trying to make a point on how nasty these match-ups on offense could be. I am not saying they are our best match-ups or anything like that

by meeeh on Jun 12, 2011 9:38 PM MST reply actions  

Screw it...get rid of Gortat...he is not going to take us anywhere

Trade Gortat and whatever to Atlanta for Josh Smith, so they can finally play Horford at the 4. Trade Frye, the #13, and whatever Minny wants for the #2 and pick up Williams.

Starters are now Nash, HIll, Smith, Williams, and…who knows after we gut the roster (I like Chilly)

I think the above trades are actually “doable” and could happen, and the suns should attempt to sweeten the pot with cash or picks if they need to. If we are sticking with Steve at the helm, then we might as well wipe the slate clean and try something different. I’m glad Gortat played well this past season so that we can trade him for someone better.

"He's very cerebral when he plays out there"--Hubie

by Snowbird on Jun 12, 2011 10:14 PM MST reply actions  

Why do we need two undersized PF's in the starting lineup?

That doesn’t make much sense.

Suns v Spurs in the 1st round. Make this happen.

by jc79 on Jun 13, 2011 1:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Pietrus just exercised his option today

according to his agent. Of course he had to do it by June 30 to guarantee income next season, but the timing is somewhat interesting. He could have waited till June 30 and made sure the Suns had no time to trade him.

Since he’s opted in already, the Suns now have 2 weeks to find him a new home if they want to.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 13, 2011 2:46 PM MST reply actions  

Did he sign the documents?

Seems insane to do that – why not hold the bargaining chip until the last moment?

Maybe he knows the second he exercises it he’ll be gone no matter what.

by MMotherwell on Jun 13, 2011 6:49 PM MST up reply actions  

cuz he wants to make 5.3 mil next year – no way he gets that on the free market with a new more-restrictive CBA. And, he most likely knows he’s going to be traded and is okay with getting minutes somewhere else. He wasn’t getting them here.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 14, 2011 7:42 AM MST up reply actions  

Interesting...

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 13, 2011 5:10 PM MST up reply actions  

and Paul Coro posted a blog with a quote from the agent that he’s expecting a draft-day trade with Pietrus in it. I just linked to it in a fanpost.

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 13, 2011 6:47 PM MST up reply actions  

I see a FanShot,

but where’s the FanPost?

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 13, 2011 6:56 PM MST up reply actions  

I meant fanshot

Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun

by Alex Laugan on Jun 14, 2011 7:40 AM MST up reply actions  

Psshhh.

Nobody looks at FanShots.

Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!

Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!

I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.

by Omaha Sun on Jun 15, 2011 1:24 PM MST up reply actions  

OMG best wuot EVAR

Why would the chicken cross the road if the chicken doesn’t know what’s on the other side?

by MMotherwell on Jun 13, 2011 6:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

417645_122115147913687_122115027913699_63363_1431084468_n_small
Phoenix Suns Jerseys

Recent FanPosts

L_small
How to win a championship...
Phxchip_small
More 2012-2013 Ideas: Power Forward Spot
Small
What kind of one-sided trade can you envision?
Phxchip_small
What Free Agents to Go After???
Cat-s_1__small
How was kobe not ejected after going for Faried's head?!?
Phxchip_small
Possible Plan to Help Thin Out Our Roster Needs
1300861821-62_small
Thank You BSOTS. Thank You Phoenix Suns.
Cat-s_1__small
The Quest for the Ring...
Raja_small
NBA Draft 2012

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Gortat_1_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_small 7footer