Suns Front Office Has No Plans To 'Blow It Up', Claims 8 to 10 Year Process Too Long
The biggest debate on Planet Orange this season hasn't been about the relative merits of the various back up point guard options available to the Phoenix Suns. The discussion this year, once the lockout ended, has been all about keeping Steve Nash versus trading him and the larger issue of how to rebuild this team to it's past glory.
Outside of U.S. Airways Center everyone has an opinion. National pundits and analysts. Local radio jocks. Even those damn "bloggers" with their "blogs" and internets.
It's the primary topic of conversation for every Suns fans -- blow it up and rebuild through the draft or stay the course and trust the front office to make wise decisions with trades, free agent signings and the draft. Needless to say, "trusting the front office" is not something that's going to come easily given the history of Robert Sarver's decisions from selling draft picks to overpaying the wrong guys in the summer of 2010.
Inside of U.S. Airways Center, there's been only silence from the normally visible Robert Sarver and his new media adverse team of Lon Babby and Lance Blanks. Until now.
Sarver and Babby decided to share their plans with respected columnist Paola Boivin of the Arizona Republic. Here's the meat of it:
Phoenix Suns owner Robert Sarver says plan in place to quickly get the team back on competitive level
Blowing up the team is not the direction the Suns want to go. They look at a franchise such as Chicago. The Bulls won six NBA titles -- 1991-93 and 1996-98 -- then posted losing records and missed the playoffs six consecutive seasons. The team didn't return to the conference finals for 13 years."Bottom line: There is no tried-and-true formula," Babby said.
Personally, I tend to agree with Babby and Sarver. I've not been a fan of blowing up the Suns, trading Steve Nash, and generally rolling the dice that comes with a rebuild through the draft strategy.
Many of you, however, are passionate advocates for that plan and are rooting for losses so I have a challenge for you to do the research yourself and present a counter to the Suns assertion that "research shows that (blow it up) process can take from eight to 10 years."
We know that it took Sonics/Thunder two seasons between the time they traded their remaining stars (Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis) in the summer of 2007 until they were back in the playoffs in 2009-10 with Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and James Harden.
I would argue that nearly everything went right for that team, including Durant "falling" to the second pick and that the more normal course is the Sacramento Kings. They started to re-tool in 2005 when they traded Chris Webber but held off a full "blow it up" until 2008 when they dumped Ron Artest.
Sacramento had made the playoffs for eight-straight seasons before re-tooling for two seasons (06-08) when they were about a .400 win team and then for the last three years they've been horrible with no more than 25 wins in any one season. They are on the upswing now, but it's hard to argue they are very close to being a contender although they could be a playoff team again in a year or two...maybe.
Then again, the Kings stadium and ownership situation has been unique and that perhaps played a roll as well.
The bottom line, as I've said many times before, I'm no fan of "blowing it up" and don't believe that you can win by trying to lose.
I do, however, think that the Suns' assertion that it's an eight to 10 year process is a bit off but I would love to see someone do the leg work of going back through every team over the last 15 years and showing us the data. Any volunteers? Maybe it's a group project with a couple of people work on it at once? Let me know.
265 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
welcome to mediocrity
we are already on 4 years and counting now.
one fluke year
missed the playoffs 3 times in the last 4 seasons counthing this season, all you need to know
by TruthTelling on Feb 16, 2012 8:43 AM MST up reply actions
Whats your definition of mediocrity?
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
missing the playoffs?
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
I think it's Year 2 of mediocrity.
Amar’e Stoudemire having his eye poked out is pretty fluky otherwise that 46-36 08-09 team probably becomes a 50-52 win set and makes the playoffs.
No longer trying to light Vince Carter on fire.
by Scott Howard on Feb 16, 2012 10:40 AM MST up reply actions 5 recs
Probably.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
yep
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
this
its year 2
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
by Alex Laugan on Feb 16, 2012 12:09 PM MST up reply actions
You don't consider a conference finalist to be "mediocre"?
Such a homer, Alex.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 2:26 PM MST up reply actions
lol
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
8 - 10 years ...shame on you babby..the only way it takes 8-10 years is if the owner and or front office is deplorable..basically they are saying they dont trust themselves
big lie
by good like a-1 beer on Feb 16, 2012 2:26 PM MST up reply actions
Well ... do YOU trust them not to be deplorable?
I don’t. I’m not sure why anyone would think that the same dolts who were dumb enough to create this mess are going to be smart enough to clean it up.
by BenchSplinters on Feb 17, 2012 12:10 PM MST up reply actions
Definitely not 4 years
Hey man, only 1 team can win a championship every year. It is not an easy thing to do.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
"research shows that (blow it up) process can take from eight to 10 years."
I already countered that in my blog but lets clarify something:
What means blowing it up exactly?
What if someone presented some facts and research about teams that rbuild their teams without at least one great draft pick?
I think the “blowing it up” line is winning less than 30 games for at least two seasons and getting at least two, top 5 draft picks
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 9:00 AM MST up reply actions
I'll put something up later today.
It was only called the mildly irritated house on McDowell until I showed up.
by Jim Coughenour on Feb 16, 2012 9:25 AM MST up reply actions
Can carry a team
All-star or borderline all-start every year
Fan of the TEAM not a player.
by Suns Fan For Life on Feb 16, 2012 3:04 PM MST up reply actions
lol
This front office has only done one thing and that is bog us down with bad contracts.
To rebuild or not to rebuild, dont act dumb because we have been rebuilding since last year. This team has the worst scrubs and no shot at unloading any awful contracts without including our bright spots.
I feel for Nash in all of this cause a HOFr should ride out into the sunset not be trade bait or slowly wither away on a dying star.
How many mid markets do you see superstars on that didnt draft them?
We need to clean house by any means necessary.
by theokiedoke on Feb 16, 2012 8:53 AM MST via mobile reply actions
Can somebody please tell me how a team can get more blown up than we are now?
I’d say that horse left the barn about two years ago.
I'm Michael Beasley's imaginary friend.
by suns68 on Feb 16, 2012 9:06 AM MST via mobile reply actions
its not “blowing it up” when you keep Nash and Hill and middling contracts. Its just purgatory.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
by Alex Laugan on Feb 16, 2012 12:10 PM MST up reply actions
We still have our best player
That counts as not blowing it up, IMO.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
There was a time
When the Suns rolled out a playoff team every year, and it wasn’t considered good enough.
The 98 Suns, for example. KJ, Kidd, Chapman, McDyess: A roster smack dab in the middle of a 6 year, post Barkley run of playoffs. But they kept getting knocked out in the first round, so they blew it up! Those use to be the expectations of this franchise.
I know this isn’t answering your point directly, but it points to the larger issue: The “don’t blow it up” argument from Sarver has very little to do with winning a championship, and everything to do with the bottom line. Colangelo would have never put up with 3 years (and it looks like 3 more coming) of mediocrity like this. Success doesn’t come to those who sit and wait; it comes to those who take it.
I get your point but lets not go overboard with JC…he didn’t win any rings here either and only got one for the Dbacks by spending a TON in a sport with no salary caps with a lot of that money deferred for years to come and then sold before having to pay the price.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 9:29 AM MST up reply actions
I will confess
To having unreasonable Colangelo nostolgia. But I do miss him.
Also, I’m fine with Sarver wanting the team in the black. It’s a business. He doesn’t have to go into debt like Colangelo, I get that. But just admit it. “The recession sucked, I have no cash flow, it’s gonna be tough for us to go over the luxury line.” Fine.
Just don’t pretend.
yes, the communication has been poor
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 9:42 AM MST up reply actions
here are the 2 things that kill me.
1) i get the don’t go over the luxury line thing…that was pretty clear from the Kurt Thomas move, where you were selling off your best interior defence and rebounding guy, WHEN THAT WAS BY A MILE THE BIGGEST DEFICIENCY ON A PRETTY CLOSE TO CHAMPIONSHIP LEVEL TEAM, with no apparent replacement in sight. That was a move that would not have been made by any owner that was win at all cost. and that move set off the dominoes as the poor rebounding led to the difficult start to the season, which led to the Matrix move.
But having said that, he has also cut off his nose to spite his face. The truth is that just ponying up at almost any point, would have kept this team at near championship level for multiple years, thereby making him a lot of money over the long term. the fact is that, and while hindsight is 20/20, the nucleus of ANY OF THE ROSTERS FROM 2004 to 2009-2010, would still be an elite, championship contending team today. Even the 2004 squad, with Matrix, Amare, JJ and Nash and no bench would still be super competitive with the most minor of tinkering, (especially if you include the off season move of Q for KT) today. I can not recall, a situation of kind of slowly blowing up a winning team like this where the nucleus if left untouched would have been great for multiple years, particularly where the Bird exception was available at all times to maintain the existing team.
2) The move to abandon Kerr (a GM who had pretty much performed one of the biggest miracles a GM had made in recent history, by restoring the team to near championship level one year after the team was almost in complete disarray) at pretty close to the most crucial moment in franchise history, and then making a series of franchise destroying moves seemingly on his own.
I thought for the most part Sarver went all out
In 04 he “overpaid” for Nash and then overpaid Q and Marion. It’s arguable whether Marion was overpaid.
In 05 he got Bell for a reasonable price and gave Amar’e his first big contract. Jones and House were signed as well. He did mess things up with JJ and even admitted it a few years later. According to Q-Rich, JJ got screwed twice and after the 2nd time he didn’t want to come back, so he asked Sarver to not match Atlanta’s offer. I don’t remember what those offers were or if they were ever reported, but obviously they offended JJ.
In 06, Sarv used some of the money he could have used on JJ to sign Rose, Banks, overpay Diaw and sign Barbosa to what I thought and still think was a reasonable deal. I’m pretty sure Piatowski also got signed for 2 million, but I could be wrong.
2007 was the only summer where Sarver wanted to save money by trimming his roster. He sent Kurt Thomas away for nothing, although it shouldn’t have taken 2 1st round picks. He also traded James Jones along with a 1st round pick for money. He got Grant Hill for cheap because he didn’t want a big contract and wanted to be in Phoenix. He also signed Tucker.
In 08, Sarv didn’t have much money to spend because he was still paying for Rose, Piatkajtejskjeia and Coach D. Shaq was the price of Marion and Banks combined. All he could afford was Matt Barnes for one year, Coach Porter, Lou Amundsen, Lopez and Dragic who was expensive for a rookie due to his buyout. We didn’t make the playoffs that year.
In 09, Sarver needed to re-sign Nash. That is one of the reasons why Shaq got traded for Wallace and why he got waived or bought out. Frye was signed to a 1 year deal, Earl Clark was signed, Nash and Hill were re-signed and they exercised their team option to keep Lou Amundson. However, what interest me is that Sarver was considering trading Ben Wallace for Tyson Chandler, but the training staff didn’t feel like they could repair him. I guess Sarver was willing to spend more money, but for some reason decided not to when he still could have brought in Kurt Thomas.
In 2010, Amar’e gave us a TPE and so Sarv used some of that to sign Warrick and Chill to overpaid, long-term deals. Barbosa was traded for Hedo who made 4 million more for 2 years longer. Frye and Dudley were also re-signed to what I think were reasonable deals.
Overall, the guy has spent a lot of money, he just spent a lot of it unwisely. 2007 was the only summer we could say he didn’t go all in. Perhaps 2009, but that’s up for debate. The Chandler situation still intrigues me.
Don't trade Dudley!
he sold all of our draft picks
thats the reason we’re in this position. He’s one of the worst owners OF ALL-TIME. He messed up having Steve Nash, Joe Johnson, Shawn Marion, and Amare Stoudemire on the same team. If he couldn’t capitalize on that lucky situation, how can we rely on him to build this team now? I don’t think i’m going out on a limb saying this, but the Suns will NEVER win a championship with Sarver at the helm.
I was just saying he spent a lot of money
Of course he also made a lot of dumb moves.
Don't trade Dudley!
sure he was over the luxury tax threshold a couple of times
but one of the reasons for that was he sold a bunch of draft picks
thorough response, Beavis...
I agree that he wasn’t exactly cheap and the problem was more who he signed than how much he paid…sorry I didn’t make that clear…when I said “ponying up” what I meant was quite specific.
If he had maintained the rosters of almost anyone of our teams since 04-05 we would still be elite, as JJ, Nash, Matrix, and Stat (+/- KT, Barbosa, Bell, Dragic, Jrich, Hill……….) or whatever or almost any combination thereof are all still pretty top notch players. So what I am saying is that if he had said at any point between 04 and 2010, “that is a really good team, I wiil use my bird exceptions to keep that team”, we would still be top 5 in the NBA, as many of the players of those Nucleii are STILL pretty top notch players. He didn’t ever really need to tweak this much at all. Now yes that would have meant paying some luxury tax to be sure, but he would have had two more playoff appearances, to help pay for that, a third this season, more season ticket holders, more merchandising revenue…
I don’t think I can recall such a systematic blow up of a team that 5 years later would have still been elite if they were just kept together.
this
Also, JC killed his team’s next 6-8 years due to those deferrals.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
by Alex Laugan on Feb 16, 2012 12:12 PM MST up reply actions
No he didn't
He killed profits for investors. You are assuming that if management had made profit they would have invested it in the team. Since books were opened on a few teams it’s been proven that you can profit from an MLB team by losing and not investing in your team. D’backs management loved using that as an excuse for signing bad players though. They even used that as an excuse when there was only a few million to be paid.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 2:25 PM MST up reply actions
KC is an example of not investing in your team and making a profit.
in 4th grade my girl friend was Cookie Rojas’ niece, she gave me a baseball with the entire 75 Royals starting lineup signed (yes, Brett), and I played catch in the street with it. yeah, dumbest thing ever
Pirates were exposed as well
It all comes down to the revenue sharing from the big TV contracts.
At least you had some fun with your autographed ball. My pretty awesome autograph collection of at least 500 autographs from my youth was stolen from storage. Rookie year autos of Randy Johnson, Ken Griffey Jr, to name a few.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 4:09 PM MST up reply actions
that sucks
I also had Larry Zonka signed photo when he retired in 73 or 74, I kept it in my toy box. Larry Zonka, Paul Warfield, and Jim Kick were in a mall in Orlando, after they won the superbowl and my dad took my borther and I to meet them. I just remember shaking their hand, and my entire arm fit in Paul Warfield’s hand.
When the Suns "blew it up" after 98 . . .
They kept making the playoffs. This franchise is not accustomed to tanking. Not for one season, and certainly not for five or ten. The Suns have been consistently competitive for a very long time, without the need for complete tanking.
Maybe blowing it up will work. But I maintain that the best thing for this franchise would be to find a way to rebuild without trading Nash and without suffering through any painful 20-win seasons. Fans in Arizona have endured short bouts of mediocrity and worse in between long stretches of great playoff teams, but we have never been forced to suffer through true bottom-of-the-barrel basketball before. That is a good thing.
Finally
Someone else realizes this. The Suns don’t build their team like a vast majority of the league. They don’t want to suck on purpose for a high draft pick. It seems they are on the same course once again.
You can argue whether or not our strategy works (since we don’t have a title) but we have had some damn good teams and have the 4th highest winning % of all the franchises in the league.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
Wait a minute, what 1998 blow up?
I don’t think that ever even happened!
KJ and Chapman retired after the 99-2000 seasons as Suns, due to oldness and/or injury
Kid was traded in I think 2001, after a wife-beating scandal.
McDyess’ contract expired and he left , even though everybody was begging him to stay.
I'm Michael Beasley's imaginary friend.
Trading Jason Kidd
A reigning top 10 player in the L, was considered by everyone in the L as a blow-up move
No, it wasn't. Kidd was traded for Stephon Marbury.
And, as much as Marbury as seen as a joke now, he wasn’t then. He was coming off a 23.9 point, 7.6 assist per game season at age 24. The Suns marketed him as their next star, Starbury.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:11 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Yup.
It’s a shame really. All traces of Marbury’s stardom are now tattooed to the side of his head.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
He's known mostly as a Vaseline-eater on youtube
It is a shame. The guy was All-NBA 3rd team twice in his career.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:16 PM MST up reply actions
He did make the 03 all-star team
and we did make the playoffs. I didn’t mind him, but when we got Nash I just though that his kind of game, experience and leadership was better for our team. I thought Nash would make us a better team than Marbury did, a good team. I was wrong. He made us great.
Don't trade Dudley!
Yes, it was.
You are being a bit condescending. I do remember the trade; I’m the only person stupid enough to still have a Marbury jersey hanging in his closet. I loved Starbury.
But we were trading an in-his-prime MVP candidate for a young, risky player. Everyone (including the Republic) called it a blow-up move, because it was risky and a youth move.
I couldn't find anything from the Republic, but I did find this from The New York Times
Here’s a Colangelo quote.
‘’Marbury is tremendous. I think he is one of the top guys in the league. With him and Shawn Marion, we have a couple of young 24-year-olds who really know how to play the game.’’
It wasn’t about blowing the team up, it was because:
Kidd was arrested on Jan. 18 on a misdemeanor assault charge when he struck his wife during an argument over the feeding of their son, Trey. Kidd reached a plea agreement that included counseling. He missed four games in January, but was still named to his fourth straight All-Star game.
There was no intentional blowing up of the team. The Suns traded one all-star point guard for another, each of whom had baggage.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 17, 2012 2:49 PM MST up reply actions
Yeah, it wasn't intentional, but it still caused a rebuilding process
Which lasted only 3 years.
Don't trade Dudley!
I'll also try to answer the post directly,
1. The Bulls are already a bad example. Yes, they missed 6 years of the playoffs. But the Suns are in a 1 for 4 stretch, and nobody thinks they are coming back withing two years.
At the end of those 6 years, the Suns will have made the playoffs once, and have no discernable talent. At the end of the 6 years for the Bulls, they had an exciting young core that led to the team they are today. Don’t bring up the Bulls. I would love to switch places with the Bulls.
2. The Sonics. Had a great team in 2004, but blew it up in 2006 to rebuild. 3 short years later, they had 50 wins and a great core (as the Thunder).
3. Miami Heat. Blew up the team in 07-08; got the #2 draft pick and a few pick ups and made the playoffs the next season! As well as set them up for their cap space for 2010.
4. Boston Celtics. Won 45 games in 05, but ended up trading their better players (Antoine and Ricky Davis), won around 30 games the next two years. which enabled them to stockpile draft picks (and Al Jeff) to trade for Garnett and Allen.
5. San Antonio Spurs: Tank in 97 to get Timmeh.
6.Houston Rockets: Won a buttload of games and rings in the 90s. Facing an aging core, they trade Scottie Pippen blow up the team, winning 30 some games in the 99-00 season. Make the playoffs . .. the next year! With draft pick Stevie Franchise leading the way.
There are a lot more. I used to think the “wait it out strategy” was legit as well, but I have been convinced otherwise. It’s a ruse for the front office to talk about winning, and still field a semi-competitive team to sell tickets.
I'll bite.
1) Chicago was average as shit until they got Derrick Rose in 2008 and they basically had a lottery miracle to get him. In the post-Jordan years they used top 5 picks on Eddy Curry, Marcus Fizer, Jay Williams. They did snag Elton Brand in 1999 but weren’t winning anything so they dumped him for Tyson Chandler. They slopped around in the East Playoffs for a couple years with the epic core of Hinrich/Gordon/Deng (hilariously dumped a ton of money on Ben Wallace) and comically traded LaMarcus Aldridge (their 2nd pick) for Tyrus Thomas. They hit on Joakim Noah (who was the 9th pick) and then got the miracle Rose pick. So really of their current core only 1 guy was present even near w/in 6 years of their missed playoff run (Deng…and we know how he got there).
2) Let’s not start throwing around “great” with the 2004-2005 Sonics. They flukishly won 52 games sandwiched by a pair of 37 and 35 win seasons. There was nearly no discenrable roster difference between their 03-04, 04-05 and 05-06 teams. They kept the same crap together for 06-07 (basically in that Lewis/Allen were the “studs”), won 31 games, somehow lucked into the 2nd pick (very low odds) and then had Boston offer them a sweetheart deal for Ray Allen (the 5th pick for an aging SG??? nice).
3) Can you really call it “blowing up” when you keep your best player (Wade) and the only reason you were able to get rid of Shaq was because a certain former gunner on the Bulls/Spurs was dumb enough to trade for him?
4) Boston actually dumped Walker after 2003 for Raef Lafrentz and a first round pick. They were coming off a 2nd round appearance and it really looked like they were just trying retool. It obviously failed. I still maintain they got Garnett because Kevin McHale was helping out the Celtics and if they didn’t pull off that trade then the Ray Allen for the 5th pick would have just looked hideous (and that was the 1st domino to fall). They also never dumped Pierce which if I follow this site correctly, trading your best player is what “blowing it up” is.
5) I mean…yeah. Fuck those guys.
6) Scottie was there for one season (lockout year) and the season before they’d gone 41-41 with that aging core. The “haul” they got for Pippen was hilarious (Augmon, Cato, Ed Gray, Carlos Rogers who I had to wikipedia to make sure he was still alive, Brian Shaw, and Walt Williams). They actually still had Barkley and Hakeem the next year and you know the only reason they got Steve Francis was because he forced his way out of Vancouver…right? Francis was the 2nd pick and that certainly wasn’t owned by a Rockets team that went 31-19 the season before.
All a fun debate.
No longer trying to light Vince Carter on fire.
by Scott Howard on Feb 16, 2012 9:54 AM MST up reply actions 11 recs
Everyone read this.
This is a PRIME example of what real research and context does in a debate. Boom, Scott Howard. Boom. If I could put this whole thing as my signature I would.
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
Do it!
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Adding on to the MIami one,
the reason they got that #2 pick was because Wade had his shoulder knocked out of its socket. That #2 pick turned into Beasley, who turned into 2 2nd round picks I believe. They did it by creating cap space and having a great recruiter on the team.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Draft?
The little I’ve heard about this season’s draft prospects is that there isn’t very many stand outs, but a large number of potentials. Also, there are just as many if not more 1st rounders that fail to reach expectations than meet or over-achieve. I believe this makes blowing it up even more difficult and a higher risk. As of now, Nash “believes in his teamates” and wants to stay. Unless a no-brainer trade is offered, fullfill his wish.
by Think about it on Feb 16, 2012 11:22 AM MST up reply actions
BAM!
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
by Alex Laugan on Feb 16, 2012 12:14 PM MST up reply actions
Eh
Your probably right. I’m going to try to respond anyway.
1. I think your are focusing on the front office incompetence rather than my point: I am personally willing to have a few shitty years, if it leads to an entertaining young team (Gordon/Hinrich/Deng) which leads to a dynasty. At the very least, those Ben Gordon bulls were a lot more interesting to watch than the crap the Suns trot out now. I would be willing to go down this path.
2. I think the Sonics prove my point the best. The 06-07 Sonics had a lot of injuries, so yeah, their record went south. But their position is similar to ours. They let their PF (Lewis/Amare) walk because he was going to get paid too much. So they were left with a shitty roster around one great player (Allen/Nash). I’m saying they did the right thing by trading him, and bottoming out. And where they are now, and how quickly they got there, proves it. I think this is, again, the best example.
3. I think you can call it blowing it up. Shaq came thiisssssss close to winning an MVP award just a few seasons before this. It was a big deal, blow up the team trade. The draft didn’t help them, but clearing dead weight and “rebuilding” did. They had a championship team. They traded away the peices. They blew it up.
4. You are correct on the Toine timeline, but I think you are overrating how much “retooling” they were doing. They made a concerted effort to trade away players on a winning team for younger assets. But not the best example, I’ll give you.
5. Agreed.
6. Still works, I think. They brought in Scottie specifically to make a run at a title. It didn’t work. They then traded Scottie, their second best player. then traded their 3 of their top seven players for a rookie. How is that not rebuilding? Then two years later their traded their aging franchise cornerstone (sound familiar?) to rebuild even more, which led to Yao.
You may be right. Hell, I even argued again blowing it up earlier. But I’m tired of watching Steve kill himself for 48 minutes, only for Frye to brick a wide open shot, or watch our 2 guard blow a defensive assignment and give up a dagger. I’d rather have hope than mediocrity
The Sonics are not a good example
It’s actually kind of funny because it shows how you can make the best of a bad situation if you don’t panic and show your hand. Sarver panicked and shopped Amare and didn’t get jack or use his trade exception. The Nuggets and Jazz didn’t panic and got a huge core of talent and lottery picks for a star that wanted out. That’s the model to follow.
The Suns balked giving Amare the max. and the Sonics knew they weren’t going to pay Lewis max money, but since they were on good terms they got a trade exception. The Suns got a trade exception too, except Sarver didn’t use it (Maybe he used a small portion in the Barbosa/Hedo trade. Nice)
The Sonics waited until just before deadline and used their trade exception on a team desperate to get below the luxury tax. Remember that trade. That awesome trade of two first round draft picks and Kurt Thomas for a 2nd round pick?
So really what it boils down to is that Sarver and his new hires Babby/Blanks don’t have the competence or experience to rebuild a team from the ground up because the bottom line is all that matters and the only success he has had was due to him being handed a first place team.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 3:02 PM MST up reply actions
Nothing you said
Even remotely refuted my point. I’m not sure why you chose to frame it that way, because you make good points.
I agree with you that they were patient in rebuilding. The point of my post was that they did blow up their team, in the first place, to rebuild.
I also agree that the current FO doesnt not have the competency to proceed
The Ray Allen Trade was a disaster
and it had alterior motives. Jeff Green is a bust. They also got Delonte West and Szerbiak. Ray Allen was crucial in winning a championship and coming oh so close to winning a 2nd. A Ron Artest 3 pointer close. So let’s recap. The team that failed to rebuild through young players and opted for vets (Boston) won 1 ring and almost got two. The team that tanked in order to change cities had a bust at #5 plus spare parts and only looks good now because they won the slimmest of lottery chances to the once a decade type talent (Durant) that they only got because Portland drafted Oden. I don’t see this as a model of success to copy because it took an amazing amount of luck. Had Seattle got any player besides Durant they would suck.
No team has ever offered anything close to a lottery pick for Nash, especially not a #5 pick + role players so it’s not even really an option for the Suns.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 3:36 PM MST up reply actions
the biggest thing to take away from the sonics example is...
they no longer exist.
by 2NASHTY on Feb 16, 2012 4:35 PM MST up reply actions 6 recs
Talk about blowing it up!
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:17 PM MST up reply actions 3 recs
Let's keep playing only because this is a fun/civil discussion
1) I think my point is more that they just got really, really fucking lucky. They didn’t suffer through those years and then have their current success to show for it. They suffered, made horrible decision after horrible decision and lucked into Derrick Rose. I don’t like our chances of replicating that method. As for those Gordon/Hinrich/Deng squads I feel like we perpetually had those teams in the late 90s / early 2000s. Somewhat fun product, never a threat to get out of the 2nd round.
2) But after the 52 win year they went back down to 35 before that 06-07 shit season. In that 05-06 year they won 35 games with Allen playing 78 games and Lewis playing 77. Flukeity, fluke fluke. And they actually never really bottomed out which was sort of my point with them. They won 31 games in 2006-2007 which was the 5th worst record in the league, they got passed by Portland in the lottery, lucked out not having to pass on Oden and took Durant. I’m sure Milwaukee (who had the 3rd worst record) would be in a much better place if they’d landed Durant instead of the 6th pick and Chairman Yi.
3) Agreed that Shaq was really good in 04-05 (MVP good) and then in 05-06 he was a good wing man to D-Wade and a huge reason they won the title then he got fat and started breaking down. Played 40 games in 06-07 and was damaged goods when the Suns snagged him (thank you Aaron Nelson). It was more rebuilding around a young superstar than blowing it up.
4) I looked into this one a little more and I think Boston just must have been on crack. Like seriously. This article is hilarious: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1642156 Ainge says they aren’t winning a title and he isn’t comfortable winning 44 games but why in the holy hell did he take SIX YEARS AND 69 MILLION worth of Raef Lafrentz? I don’t think he understands rebuilding.
5) Nothing to see here. Fuck the Spurs.
6) See I didn’t think we were talking about rebuilding here I thought we were talking about “blowing it up”. Houston actually seemed to be giving Beavis’ famous “conbuilding” a shot by hanging on to Chuck/Hakeem and putting Francis with them.
You may be right too – I really have no clue what this organization’s plans are I just can’t watch this shit anymore and about that I totally agree with you. It’s basically Steve Nash and the Basketball-Handicapped Dumpling Gang.
No longer trying to light Vince Carter on fire.
by Scott Howard on Feb 16, 2012 3:48 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Being below average at basketball myself, I find that offensive.
I would prefer the term “Steve Nash and the Basketball Challenged Dumpling Gang”
I remember crap Celtics with Ainge. He didn’t know what he was doing and without McHale that team goes nowhere. Dumping Perkins for Green almost seems like to perfect of karma.
I don’t think any Suns fan truly adores JC (Colangelo, not the other JC), but they can damn sure appreciate a basketball mind who recognized talent and was able to get it in a market that doesn’t ever attract top tier free agents.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 4:00 PM MST up reply actions
Well played
1. They definitely got lucky with Rose. Whereas I’m not gunning for a perpetual 7 seed, I do accept it as a step in rebuilding. Also, even Sarver/Blanks could handle the talent the Bulls had better than they did. Hell, my wife could have handled that talent better, and she asks me every game “which one is charles barkely?”
2. That team was probably more of a fluke than I want to admit, I’ve just always had a soft sport in my heart for Seattle-based teams. But, they did the right thing in trading Ray Allen when they did. If the Suns can get Rondo or Collinson for Nash, we should pull the trigger, like the Sonics did with Ray-Ray.
3. Now I’m starting to get depressed. I guess they were more rebuilding around a young player. Which made me look at the Suns roster for a young player to build around.
4. That article made me laugh so loud my young son heard me and started laughing as well. Then I got to thinking about how mishandled the C’s were and they still ended up with a title. Starting to get really depressed.
5. Ha. This made me a little happy again.
6. Back to depressing. They really were “conbuilding” and got a young building block to play with Hakeem. Which the Suns never did with Nash.
So, now I’m convinced that blowing it up doesn’t work, and the Suns don’t have young building block in place either.
Whiskey time.
Pretty much agree with everything.
I’d also like to add that the Spurs only tanked after Robinson was injured for the year and got ridiculously lucky in getting Duncan. If they don’t get Duncan at #1, chances are they get garbage because that draft sucked.
Now that the facts are out it is obvious that the Sonics dumped Ray Allen to tank on purpose to help further the casue of a shady owner to move his team to his home state. Ray Allen was at the peak of his career and they could have got a lot more then Jeff Green. Without Allen the Celtics sure as hell don’t go to Finals twice. He’s the best three point shooter of all time. I don’t care what draft you’re talking about, you aren’t going to find many teams willing to trade their best player for a #5 pick.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 2:43 PM MST up reply actions
Holy moly.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Any examples of the opposing viewpoint?
It does usually take a while to turn a team from a doormat into a contender, but you could argue that the reasons the teams have poor rosters is because their management is bad. The GM of a 20 win team sucks at his job, so why should we expect that he’ll nail a lottery pick the first time? It’s quite likely that blowing up the team and rebuilding could take a long time. That being said I’d like to hear any example of a mediocre team that held on to aging stars and overpaid role players who managed to turn it around. I agree that watching bad basketball for 5-10 years would stink, but is watching this team decline for 3-4 more years until time blows up the roster for us going to be any better?
and I think this question is a good example of why it’s time to step back and do the leg work starting with every NBA champ, finalist and conference finalist for the last 10 years and look at how they built their teams
There’s anecdotes for anything…including your scenario (Miami Heat).
The Suns situation (like every situation) is unique in that Nash is a special case and the roster moves Sarver made in 2010 set the entire thing back at least two years…maybe more…so Phx is starting from a different point.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 10:45 AM MST up reply actions
This might be the biggest point
Has their even been a team in the situation the Suns are in now? Super awkward . . .
None of the teams dealing at trade deadline last year needed the services of a Nash
And that hasn’t entirely changed. The potential deals are a mixed bag. Felton-Batum? Maybe. Nelson? Pass. If a Nash-for-Rondo type deal comes up I don’t know how this team turns it down, even if it meant losing Gortat as well. Letting Amare go was painful, but it was reasonable to think the team could remain competitive by retooling around Nash. Well the retool failed miserably. So the point-of-no-return moment centers on Nash. We are very fortunate Nash is an All-Star. Imagine if his play had noticeably dipped or major injuries would have other teams thinking twice about a trade. So cut the losses, drive a hard bargain or two and see what kind of talent All-Star Nash is worth these days. Does this FO expect Nash to play until he’s 42?
by ninecharacters on Feb 16, 2012 10:00 PM MST up reply actions
we are now the second worst team in the west
how much more “blown up” do we need to be? i mean…we are headed to doom by KEEPing an old 38-year old…it just happens that 38-year old is Steve Nash…but otherwise, we were already blown up when we let Amare go…
SUNS do not need to blow it up. The starting lineup needs a true scorer at either SF or SG or both. Then I think the bench needs a little retooling. I thnk we are playing pretty well even though we’re losing games. We dont look all that bad. Losing sucks but they are playing hard and dont seem to be laying any eggs. If we can get some young athletic talent I think we will be ok. Suns will need to get lucky & draft a potential superstar b/c I doubt they will get one in FA….Suns will be fine
by FourHorseman on Feb 16, 2012 10:52 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
I agree
we are a ‘Brooks’ player away from being a playoff team, thats it though
You guys did watch Brooks play w/ the Suns last year right?
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 4:47 PM MST up reply actions
yeah, but it was mid season,
and he does have skills. Trick is to make them fit. I remember JRich didn’t do well when he first came here, but the following year he started to fit in. I believe JRich has his head together much more than Brooks, but Brooks is faster and a bit better on the shooting.
this is mid-season too….all these guys have skills. All of them.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 7:16 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
not sure who you are talking about 'all of them'
I was a big fan of Brooks, being a Pac 10 guy, until he came here. Then I realized he is a head case. However, he is a definate improvement over Price and Telfair, both combined. I am leaning on the optimist side that Brooks can be a backup for the time being. They sure screwed up on that trade though.
heres the problem guys
we are bad now. gotta do something because this is bad. its not like were a playoff team debating on blowing it up. we suck. blow it up while the pieces still have some value. when nash is really old and bad in 2 years hes not gonna have any value left
Well, the Bulls made dumb decisions
They got their guy in Elton Brand and then traded him. They did get Jay Williams, but then he got in a career ending motorcycle accident. Either way, it takes luck and smarts. The Bulls didn’t have either and that’s why it took them a long time.
Don't trade Dudley!
Situation not as bad
Honestly, I think the FO is doing the right thing. Most teams mentioned to rebuild already had at least one star-player. Think about the Spurs rebuilding without Robinson, the Celtics without Pierce, the Heat without Wade. The Hawks rebuilt with JJ alone – are they contending any time soon? OK, Rose and Durant, but how many times does that happen. Think about the Suns rebuilding without Nash – who would actually come to Phoenix. The Draft is so much about luck, just ask the Blazers (has Oden retired yet?). The two most difficult positions to fill with great players are PG and C. Guess what, we’re set there. I don’t mind either Channing or Markieff playing the 4. We are missing one great wing! Imagine if we had Beasley at the 3 and Hill playing SG and guarding the best opposing wing. A bench with Frye/Morris, Dudley, Redd, Lopez, and Telfair.
Rebuilding and searching for a missing piece are two different things. I believe we’re a missing piece apart from being relevant again. No need to ‘blow it all up.’
by rfs17 on Feb 16, 2012 12:43 PM MST via mobile reply actions
those guys u mentioned teams rebuilded with wernt 38
nash cant do this forever. hes a wonder that he hasnt dropped up at all yet, but u gotta think next year or the year after u will see some rust. we cant rebuild with nash because we dont have enoguh time
I wish I read your post before I made mine
Talk about repetitive haha
Twitter: @FredLegittt
by modernage13 on Feb 16, 2012 12:48 PM MST up reply actions
I think we really just need a good backup PG.
It’s been the obvious problem for the last two seasons now. We both need a SG and backup PG but PG and center are the two most important position and I think if we do get a good backup PG it would be a great start to rebuilding the team. I don’t know if Augustin would be ok as a backup to Nash, but we can start from there and see where we are in a few seasons once we get that SG that we need although Redd is showing good signs.
Twitter: @FredLegittt
naive
we need a lot more than that lol
michael redd had like 2 good games in 10 and you think this 30+ year old guy can be our future at the SG spot?
This team is far away from being relevant again. Even if they had the best backup PG in the league they would not go nowhere.
This team has enough role players. What the team needs is 2 allstar caliber players but they can’t get that.
by TruthTelling on Feb 16, 2012 12:49 PM MST up reply actions
Redd is 30+, but he’s not 35. Our training staff did wonders for Nash, Hill, O’Neil, McDyess, and also Amare. We don’t need 10 years of Redd! He’s 32 and pretty much missed the last 3 years. He’s got at least 3-4 good years remaining. He’s been working with our staff for 3(!) month and is already showing flashes. Think about his comeback with the Bucks and then about another 3 month with our staff! He won’t need to score 26 points a night, but 15 would already be great!
by rfs17 on Feb 16, 2012 1:04 PM MST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
I didn't say he was our future
I’m just saying he can be our temporary solution to our long term problem. That’s why I said we’ll see where we are in a few seasons after that suggestion I made. Isn’t J-Rich like 30+ already? Him and Redd aren’t far apart in age although Redd has like 45 year old knees. He didn’t even wanna dunk last night on that fastbreak.
Twitter: @FredLegittt
by modernage13 on Feb 16, 2012 1:45 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Even if they had the best backup PG in the league they would not go nowhere.
…Is there something wrong with that or is it just my hangover…
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
If he's intending to say they would go somewhere, then it is correct.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Truth Telling, it's not go 'anywhere', sorry, my wife is an editor
I agree with Redd’s not the future, yet, maybe he can be, but at the moment, he is a good 6th man.
bad argument
Steve Nash is 38. Nobody is coming here to play with Nash.
And sorry but if this team had Beasley right now, they would still be every bit as mediocre as they are now. Maybe 2 wins more.
Nonsense
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
N8, it's hopeless.
The head of the tank patrol will not accept your opinion unless you echo his sentiments. It’s a lost cause.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
by NashMV3 on Feb 16, 2012 3:04 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
"Captain Sherman, Head of the Tank Patrol, reporting for duty, sir!"
“Dive, dive, dive…”
You’re idiots, you’re naive— I’m the only one allowed to have an opinion around here!"
As if the SUNS FO is sitting around, wringing their hands, waiting for BSotS to vote and make up their mind for them!
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 16, 2012 9:29 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Is this the Captain Sherman you speak of?

Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Would it be sad to say our main attraction for players to come here is our medical/training staff?
They should be getting the MVP’s haha
Twitter: @FredLegittt
I've got some ideas, but it involves bloggers, not teams.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
by haremoor on Feb 16, 2012 2:21 PM MST up reply actions 5 recs
Are you suggesting we blow up BSOTS and rebuild from scratch?
I like the idea, but I don’t know if it’s necessary. Unless I’m wrong, we rank somewhere in the top 5 in the SBN League. We’re contenders! All we need is a Jeremy Lin and we can say hello to that #1 spot!
Don't trade Dudley!
When we're faced with a flood of members who do nothing but cry tank...
it does get annoying.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
by NashMV3 on Feb 16, 2012 3:06 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
That's just how it is
I was originally for tanking 2 months ago, but realized I was starting to sound like a broken record. The FO just isn’t going to do it, I finally accepted it. It’s just not going to happen. Nash won’t ask for a trade and Sarver wants to sell tickets.
Don't trade Dudley!
I agree
It feels like an AZ central forum around here lately with a bunch of negative, know it all, people that will never see the opposing side of the argument.
by sunsfan87401 on Feb 16, 2012 4:23 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I have no trade value.
Might as well keep me around.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 3:13 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
But you do have a bloated contract
Amnesty is always an option, but that’s not my call.
Don't trade Dudley!
Aw, c'mon now, Ray--
I bet we could get a Jumbaco for you— well, a half a one, anyway…
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 16, 2012 9:32 PM MST up reply actions
I’m game….let’s hold a draft for new bloggers! Who’s submitting themselves as draft eligible? The pay is crap, the work is long and hard but it can be thankless at time.
Sign up now!
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 3:15 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
Not for me
21 years old, amazing potential, in my junior year now, blogging for BSOTS. I think you guys need to rebuild around me. Max contract for 4-5 years is what I’m looking for.
Don't trade Dudley!
Make the final 2 years of your contract dependent on your post count and it's a done deal.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Posting and Toasting is offering me a full guaranteed contract
Don't trade Dudley!
by Beavis 25 on Feb 16, 2012 4:21 PM MST up reply actions 3 recs
Take it Beav
If it’s post count, you’re a shoo-in. Nobody can talk to themself like you do.
Voted most likely to say "I told you so"
Ridiculous Upside your head, Beavis!
M-V-P! M-V-P!
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 16, 2012 9:34 PM MST up reply actions
We'll take him.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Nah, we don't have to blow up BSOTS.
But maybe we could do some trading with PTR, or SSnR, or some of the other blogs who would appreciate a few young go-getters who are willing to start from scratch.
Don’t worry, Beavis. I updated my sig to protect you.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
Well, Beavis, I took you up on it, and I have some bad news.
You’ve been traded.
I went into Seth’s office, sat down, and the conversation went like this:
“So, Seth, my boy wants a long term, max contract.”
“Get Bent.”
“But c’mon, Seth, look at his stats!”
“They’re bloated. He’s filling his stat line in the game threads in garbage time.”
“Look, okay, he likes it here, and I’m sure we can work something out.”
“No, Cleveland’s SBN blog has this one guy they’re willing to give up. I’m doing the trade.”
“That’s crazy. Beavis is a fan favorite! He invented the Escape Goat!”
“That was an accident. And you should see my inbox, dude. Since he’s jumped off the tanking bandwagon, I get at least ten e-mails a day begging me to trade him.”
“Ah, c’mon, Seth. Allright, one year, non-guaranteed, league minimum.”
“He’s gone. You want to go, too?”
“Ummm, do you validate?”
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
by haremoor on Feb 16, 2012 4:44 PM MST up reply actions 7 recs
Want me to negotiate you a new contract, 2Nashty?
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
Do I look like Shawn Marion to you
when your on a great team you don’t demand a trade.
by 2NASHTY on Feb 16, 2012 4:54 PM MST up reply actions 3 recs
I got traded to "Fear the Sword"?
There’s nobody there. I guess that’s OK though, Lebron got pretty far with nothing. I can do it too. I’ll just create some alter-egos and before you know it, that blog will be #1!
Don't trade Dudley!
Nah, I think we got WaveOcean in the trade.
It’s just Beavis, now. He IS Fear the Sword Escape Goat..
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
He alone will bring life to that blog.
It is the Mike Brown way.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
So... is this Bent person going to save us?
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
nope
He sucks. You guys will regret this trade. Maybe I’ll be nice and allow for a SnT before it’s a official. I’ll give you guys that nice TPE.
Don't trade Dudley!
You're just mad we shipped you off.
Don’t worry. In our hearts, you’ll always be our little Goran.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Actually you're more like our Leandro.
It all begins and ends with you.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
since we're blogg'o'bating
what will it take to land Skeet’s from TBJ
by 2NASHTY on Feb 16, 2012 5:06 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
It'll probably cost us all our staff writers.
I’ll say no to that.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
It's Bent Lin, dude.
He’ll save us.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
by haremoor on Feb 16, 2012 5:06 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm greening this, too
you guys are on a roll!
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 16, 2012 9:36 PM MST up reply actions
I gotta green this, haremoor!!
Laugh. Out. Loud!
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 16, 2012 9:30 PM MST up reply actions
hehehehehe
"We never tried Amar'e, Nash, and a live Grizzly bear." -Scott Howard, January 18, 2010
"All they’re fighting for is to stay as obscenely rich as they are now, based on their ability to bounce a ball and throw it in a hole." East Bay Ray, October 10, 2011
"the players and owners are squabbling over how to divide the pie that WE BAKE FOR THEM." East Bay Ray, October 31, 2011
8 - 10 years ...shame on you babby..the only way it takes 8-10 years is if the owner and or front office is deplorable..basically they are saying they dont trust themselves
by good like a-1 beer on Feb 16, 2012 2:25 PM MST reply actions
So lets get this straight.
The Front Office team led by Bob Sarver wants to" draft better, make wise personnel decisions via trades and free agency" And this will return the Suns to" Elite status"
Do we need to recap the player movement that Bob Sarver has spearheaded since he took over this team?
My trust and faith that Sarver and Co. will rebuild this team into a Western Conference Finals contender is nil.
Not much else to say. Hope the Suns get lucky.
there's always luck
"Clearly the Brewers didn't realize that going into Beast Mode raised their testosterone levels."
by tcyoung
Agree, the trajectory of this team is accelerating in the downward direction...
..and the owner and the FO do not have a clue what they are doing. SUNS will be lucky if they are a contender this decade, a new owner would help. The fastest guy on this team is the second oldest in the NBA, and HIll, Nash and Gortat are the only quality on this team. The rest aren’t worth the price of admission.
No need blow up anything b/c there isnt anything to blow up. Nash isnt worth trading b/c he’s worth more on the team than trade bait. I’m greedy and dont want to see him get a ring with another team. Morris has a bright future, not to mention a full training camp next year will definately help his growth. We have a SOLID center in Gortat. A couple draft picks, and maybe some FA signings and we’ll be fine. We will get younger next year. And who knows, maybe the FO will pull off a merical trade or signing. Phx does have some appeal. We have had stars on our team in the past. It will take a little time to be a championship contendor. Playoff contendor isnt hard to achieve.
This is my recipe
1. Draft a SG this year.
2. Resign Brooks. He’s going to be at his lowest value of his career.
3. Keep Gortat and Morris
4. Trade Frye/Hak. It might seem impossible, but I’ve seen MUCH worse overpaid players dumped before.
5. Stuck with Chilly, but consider amnesty if they can sign an all-star caliber player at any position
6. Resign Nash, but reduce his minutes like Stockton because they will have a competent backup in Brooks.
7. Brown, Seabass, Price, RoLo – Start a fight and get suspended, preferably with the Lakers this week. Let’s do this “World Peace.” You talk a lot NY smack, but really you didn’t do jack shit in the Malice at the Palace except go after the wrong guy and get punked by Ben Wallace.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 3:15 PM MST up reply actions
Jr. smith signing with the knicks
Perfect for for this team. Scoring sg/sf start start and or split minutes with hill
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose"
by phxpurple on Feb 16, 2012 3:20 PM MST via Android app reply actions
JR is way too hood for the Suns
It just wouldn’t work PR wise. Same goes for Beasley.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 3:39 PM MST up reply actions
Not only is JR Smith too hood for the Suns
He’s even too hood for the Nuggets, and that’s saying something.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:20 PM MST up reply actions 3 recs
Aside from He-Who-Needs-To-Buy-A-Mirror (aka Birdman)
there’s no real trace of the original Thuggets anymore. After a brief stint in China, they now appear to be moving to the Los Angeles Clippers.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Birdman...
Should be an extra on Breaking Bad
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 5:55 PM MST up reply actions
I thought Sons of Anarchy
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 8:13 PM MST up reply actions
Pleeeaaasee!
If anybody knows a video link of JR Smith’s family/friends getting in a scuffle and getting arrested in China please post it here! All I saw were still photos and they are hilarious.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 5:56 PM MST up reply actions
That plan reminds me of the Knicks of the early to mid 2000s
Only thing is, this team’s in Phoenix not the Big Apple. Even though the Knicks play in Madison Square Garden they were still signing second tier free agents back then. So what will we be able to sign? Third tier free agents? Maybe better than Warrick and Chilldress but it still is not going to get it done.
Best case scenario we get a good pick in the 7-10 range, maybe a Shawn Marion type impact player(just throwing a name out there..) -2012-2013 Nash signs elsewhere and we become one of the league’s worst teams. We draft another impact player in the 1-5 range and then sign a second tier all star free agent in 2013.
2013-2014= playoffs
"Clearly the Brewers didn't realize that going into Beast Mode raised their testosterone levels."
by tcyoung
Here's the teams to look at:
Over the last 15 years there have been a total of 22 teams that made it to the “final four”. I hope we can agree that if you make it to the “final four” of the NBA you can be considered a contender.
Eight teams like the Heat, Bulls, Sonic/Thunder and Lakers and Magic made it back to the top through two different cycles.
Dallas Mavericks (2011 Champ, 2006 Finalist, 2003 WC Finalist)
Miami Heat (2011 Finalist, 2006 Champ, 2005 EC Finalist, 1997 EC Finalist)
Chicago Bulls (2011 EC Finalist, 1998 Champ, 1997 Champ, 1996 Champ)
OKC Thumber (2011 WC Finalist, 1996 Finalist )
Los Angeles Lakers (2010 Champ, 2009 Champ, 2008 Finalist, 2004 Finalist, 2002 Champ, 2001 Champs, 2000 Champs, 1998 WC Finalist)
Boston Celtics (2010 Finalist, 2008 Champ, 2002 EC Finalist)
Orlando Magic (2010 EC Finalist, 2009 Finalist, 1996 EC Finalist)
Phoenix Suns (2010 WC Finalist, 2007 WC Finalist, 2006 WC Finalist)
Cleveland Cavaliers (2009 EC Finalist, 2007 Finalist)
Denver Nuggets (2009 WC Finalist)
Detroit Pistons (2008 EC Finalist, 2007 EC Finalist, 2006 EC Finalist, 2005 Finalist, 2004 Champ, 2003 EC Finalist)
San Antonio Spurs (2008 WC Finalist, 2007 Champ, 2005 Champ, 2003 Champ, 2001 WC Finalist, 1999 Champ)
Utah Jazz (2007 WC Finalist, 1998 Finalist, 1997 Finalist, 1996 WC Finalist)
Indiana Pacers (2004 EC Finalist, 2000 Finalist, 1999 EC Finalist, 1998 EC Finalist)
Minnesota Timberwolves (2004 WC Finalist)
New Jersey Nets (2003 Finalist, 2002 Finalist)
Sacramento Kings (2002 WC Finalist)
Philadelphia 76ers (2001 Finalist)
Milwaukee Bucks (2001 EC Finalist)
New York Knicks (2000 EC Finalist, 1999 Finalist)
Portland Trail Blazers (2000 WC Finalist, 1999 WC Finalist)
Houston Rockets (1997 WC Finalist)
Twitter me at: @sethpo
Here's my first one... Dallas
I would say that Dallas did more through trades and free agency than the draft strategy but of course, either approach needs a bit of both to work.
Dallas Mavericks (2011 Champ, 2006 Finalist, 2003 WC Finalist)
The Mavericks have been on a long run of success that started in 2001 with a trip to the conference semifinals and culminating in 2011 with a championship. They made the playoffs 11-straight time (and counting) with one ring, one loss in the Finals and one loss in the Conference Finals.
Before their run of success, the Mavericks went 10 full years without making it to the playoffs. Their fortunes changed in1998 when they traded the 6th pick (Robert Traylor) for the 9th pick (Dirk Nowitzki) and the 19th pick (Pat Garrity). They then flipped Garrity and their 1999 1st round pick and some spare parts for Steve Nash. That pick turned into Shawn Marion for the Suns in 1999.
Making the connections between the Suns and Mavs even deeper, Michael Finley, the third part of the Mavs core for the early 2000’s, was drafted by the Suns in 1995 with the 21st pick. He was traded to the Mavs in 2006 for Jason Kidd.
In 1999 the new Mavs won 19 games, in 2000 they won 40, in 2001 with three years together the Dirk, Finley and Nash trio won 52 games and the dynasty was off. Marc Cuban, took over in 2000. As we know, all through the 2000’s the Mavs under Cuban spent heavily and moved a lot of pieces in an out around Dirk but at no point did they miss the playoffs.
The Mavs worst years in the 90’s were 11 wins in 92-93 and 13 wins in 93-94.
The Mavs highest picks in the 90’s were Jason Kidd (#2) in 1994 that they flipped for Finley. That 6th pick they turned into Dirk and Nash (wow) and the 4th pick in 1992, Jim Jackson.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 4:14 PM MST up reply actions
I guess I just missed researching obscure things so...
Out of all these Final 4 finishers I decided to go look at how many of them achieved their finish with a Top 3 player of theirs (i.e. how Nash/Stoudemire/Marion were the Suns top 3) whom they themselves drafted with a Top 5 pick (which is what we can go ahead and call “bottoming out”). You can debate bottoming out / who a team’s top 3 is but I figured this would be interesting:
Dallas – None
Miami – Wade (#5 pick 2003) : 2011, 2006, 2005
Chicago – Rose (#1 pick 2008): 2011, Jordan (#3 pick 1984): 1998, 1997, 1996
Oklahoma CIty/Seattle: Durant (#2 pick 2007), Westbrook (#4 pick 2008), Harden (#3 pick 2009): 2011 , Payton (#2 pick, 1989) : 1996
Lakers – None.
Celtics – None (Antonie Walker was the 6th pick)
Magic – Howard (#1 pick 2004): 2010, 2009. Shaq (#1 pick 1992), Hardaway (#3 pick 1993): 1996
Suns – None.
Cavaliers – James (#1 pick 2003): 2009, 2007
Nuggets – Anthony (#3 pick 2003): 2009
Pistons – None
Spurs – Duncan (#1 pick 1998): 2008, 2007, 2005, 2003, 2001, 1999, Robinson (#1 pick 1987): 2003, 2001, 1999
Jazz – Deron Williams (#3 pick 2005): 2007
Pacers – None.
Timberwolves – Garnett (#5 pick 1995): 2004
Nets – Martin (#1 pick 2001) 2002 and 2003 – K-Mart definitely wasn’t their top player though.
Kings – None
76ers – Iverson (#1 pick 1996) – 2001
Bucks – Glenn Robinson (#1 pick 1994) – 2001 (Ray Allen and he were probably 1 and 1a)
Knicks – Ewing (#1 pick 1985) – 1999, 2000 (hard to say old man Ewing was still their best guy. Missed those 1999 Finals).
Blazers – None.
Rockets – Olajuwon (#1 pick 1984) – 1997
So unless I missed something (entirely possible) the only teams that had more than 1 of their Top 3 players come from the Top 5 of the draft was OKC last year and they had a fun little grace period called “we’re moving to the midwest so it’s OK that we suck” and then the Shaq/Penny team that I believe they changed the lottery rules because of.
If my quick math is right then 34 of the 60 “Final 4” appearances happened by teams that didn’t feature a Top 5 pick of their own amongst their Top 3 players. Obviously that’s heavily weighted with Detroit, the Lakers, Boston, and the Suns (20 of the 34) but interesting nonetheless.
No longer trying to light Vince Carter on fire.
by Scott Howard on Feb 16, 2012 4:18 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
Ignore my last paragraph. I suck at counting.
No longer trying to light Vince Carter on fire.
by Scott Howard on Feb 16, 2012 4:19 PM MST up reply actions
Revised
If my quick math is right then 31 of the 64 "Final 4" appearances happened by teams that didn’t feature a Top 5 pick of their own amongst their Top 3 players. Obviously that’s heavily weighted with Detroit, the Lakers, Boston, Pacers and the Suns (27 of the 31) but interesting nonetheless.
I think the problem is that it’s actually the last 16 years and 3 of your years weren’t bolded. Anyone feel free to correct me if I’m wrong because that’s definitely a possibility.
BAMF goes HAM.
I think this is an extremely good idea for a post
But I think it needs to be teased out a bit. I would be interested in saying "lottery pick’ instead of “top five pick”. Amare, for example, should count as the Suns drafted him, and if they had picked 16 that year, instead of 9, we don’t make any playoff appearances over the past 10 years.
The argument is tanking vs staying the course
We’ll have a lottery pick this year so an article debating if we should blow it up and tank shouldn’t include all lottery picks.
BAMF goes HAM.
Also
4 of those players were drafted top 5 after their team hit the lottery and moved up in the draft. Here’s the list…
Chicago
33-49 (9th worst)
Rose (#1 pick 2008): 2011
Seattle
41-41 (9th worst)
Payton (#2 pick, 1990) : 1996
Orlando
41-41 (11th worst)
Hardaway (#3 pick 1993): 1996
*Still had Shaq from the previous year
New Jersey
31-52 (7th worst)
Martin (#1 pick 2000) 2002 and 2003
BAMF goes HAM.
Here's the Heat
…another team that didn’t tank and rebuild through the draft:
Miami Heat (2011 Finalist, 2006 Champ, 2005 EC Finalist, 1997 EC Finalist)
The Heat have been an extremely successful franchise going back over the last 16 years since Pat Riley joined the team. They’ve only missed the playoffs three times in that span. Twice Riley led the Heat through rapid rebuilds.
The first came after the mid-to-late 90’s Heat led by Tim Hardaway and Alonzo Mourning. When that window closed, the Heat won 36 and 25 games respectively in 2002 and 2003 and drafted Caron Butler with the 10th pick in 2002 and Dwyane Wade with the 5th pick in 2003. Riley also signed RFA Lamar Odom from the Clippers in 2003.
In 2004, the Heat flipped Butler and Odom for Shaq and they made the Eastern Conference Finals that season and won a ring the next year in 2006. The following season Shaq was injured and Wade missed 31 games. The Heat won just 15 games and traded away Shaq’s big contract.
They got the second overall pick in 2008 and took Michael Beasley (instead of Kevin Love, Russell Westbrook, Eric Gordon or Danilo Gallinari). But the plan was to clear cap space for the Summer of LeBron and we know all know how that turned out in 2010.
At no point during Riley’s 16 year run did he trade away core players or “tank” to get picks. The one time they ended up with a top pick due to Wade’s injuries and the Shaq trade, they whiffed and ended up passing on much better players.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 4:40 PM MST up reply actions
I agree that the draft didn't help him
But I don’t know how the Shaq trade was anything else than a mini-tank. They were clearly giving up on that season
the Shaq trade was a salary dump…they found a sucker to take the final years of his deal and then flipped Marion to clear even more space.
So yeah, it was a dump but not a tank…???…
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 4:54 PM MST up reply actions
Why people rant on Shaq? i didn´t follow that season but from what i´ve seen he played pretty well.
roses are red violets are blue, Michael Redd is coming for you!
I don't think that was a rant on Shaq
It was more a rant on his contract. 20 MILLION for a 36 year old, 14 and 10, role player.
Don't trade Dudley!
Role player?
Shaq was the leading rebounder and second leading scorer on the team for his one full season in Phoenix, and made 3rd-team All-NBA. 18 points and 8 rebounds per game on 61% from the field.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:27 PM MST up reply actions
I was referring to 07-08
Then he got that summer to get in much better shape. We also can’t deny that Porter kind of helped beef those stats.
Don't trade Dudley!
The main problem with Shaq on the Suns
Was not his horrible individual play, but how his isolation post one-on-one play made the rest of team worse. Shaq eas a 1/2 cour player and the Suns were a fast break team. It was a bad fit and any fan could see that a mile away. Some people thought “well maybe they can defend the paint now?”, but by that point his individual defense was gone.
Also Shaq + Amare was a bad combo because Shaq dominated the ball. You see the same thing happening with Carmelo and Amare.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 5:31 PM MST up reply actions
No the main problem was Terry Porter's offense.
He was the one who drew up plays where Steve and the other 4 Suns would just dump it into Shaq and have Shaq score. When Gentry took over, our offense exploded with Amare and Shaq in the frontcourt. If not for Amare’s eye, that team could’ve made a good push for that 8th playoff spot.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Good point
I forgot about Terry Porter. At least Gentry was smart enough to rectify that.
Maybe even higher then 8th. They would have been a damn dangerous low seed.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 5:41 PM MST up reply actions
Also Shaq + Amare was a bad combo because Shaq dominated the ball. You see the same thing happening with Carmelo and Amare.
That was true with 08-09, but not with 07-08. When Shaq first got here, Coach D used him as a role player. Porter made Shaq the #1 option on offense. Gentry reversed that when he took over.
Melo has always dominated the ball. Combine that with no decent PG play (until Lin) and Amar’e was in the worst possible system he could be in.
Don't trade Dudley!
It shows Amares limtiation too
He just sits there and sulks with Melo.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 5:45 PM MST up reply actions
Yeah, before Shaq, wasn't Amare complaining
That he didn’t want to play center because he was getting beaten up too much, and that the Suns needed to bring in a legit center to take the heat off of him?
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:46 PM MST up reply actions
Then Shaq arrives
and Amare can’t get in the paint because he had to get around his defender and Shaq and Shaq’s defender.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 5:51 PM MST up reply actions
Bulls
Chicago Bulls (2011 EC Finalist, 1998 Champ, 1997 Champ, 1996 Champ)
With the Bulls there’s life before Michael Jordan and life after Michael Jordan. No single man changed a franchise’s fortunes more than M.J.
Jordan was famously picked third overall in the 1984 NBA Draft. The Bulls won 27 games that season to get him and had won just 28 games the year prior. From Jordan’s first year in the league in (he averaged 28 points per game as a rookie) until he finally left the building in 1998, the Bulls never missed the playoffs and they won six rings. Jordan. Yup.
Then the rebuilding started and for the next six years the Bulls didn’t win more than 30 games in a single season. They were really bad and during that time had the first overall pick once (Elton Brand, 1999) and seven total lottery picks that included Brand, Chris Mihm (7th, 2000), Marcus Fizer (4th, 2000), Eddy Curry (4th, 2001), Jay Williams (2nd, 2002), Kirk Hinrich (7th, 2003) and Ben Gordon (3rd, 2004).
That group was good enough to get Chicago back in the playoffs in 2005, 06, and 07 but they didn’t get past the second round. In 2006 they traded Curry and some other stuff to the Knicks for the 2nd overall pick and some other stuff. They used the 2006 2nd pick on LaMarcus Aldridge and shipped him to Portland for the 4th pick, Tyrus Thomas and Viktor Khryapa (remember him?).
That didn’t work out so well and the Bulls only won 33 games in 2007-08 but they struck it rich in the lottery. They jumped over eight other teams and with just 17 lottery balls managed to win Derrick Rose. The Heat, by the way, had 250 lottery balls and ended up with Michael Beasley. Could you imagine a Rose, Wade backcourt in Miami? Fate.
Rose has obviously changed the Bulls fortunes just like Jordan did although we’ll have to wait and see if Derrick will win six rings like M.J. did (doubt it).
From the time the Bulls started to rebuild through the draft in 1998, it took six years to get back to the playoffs and 12 years to be a contender again. Of course, they also made numerous really bad decisions during that time and suffered the misfortune of Jay Williams motorcycle accident after his rookie season.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 7:59 PM MST up reply actions
All comes down to smarts and luck
The only thing the FO can control is their smarts.
Don't trade Dudley!
by Beavis 25 on Feb 16, 2012 8:03 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
Thunder...if everything goes right, this is what you get
OKC Thunder (2011 WC Finalist, 1996 Finalist )
The Sonics/Thunder are the poster child team for those who advocate rebuilding through the draft.
The Sonics got to the NBA Finals in 1996 (and lost to Jordan). That team was led by Gary Payton and Shawn Kemp in their prime and had some great role players around them. Kemp famously ate his way through the NBA lockout of 1999 and was never the same again although the Sonic did make the playoffs four of the next six years but weren’t a real contender.
In 2003, Seattle traded Payton and parts to the Bucks for Ray Allen. Allen joined Rashard Lewis who was drafted in the 2nd round of the 1998 Draft. Those two managed 52 wins in 2004-05 but didn’t get past the second round. The same core only managed 35 and 31 wins the next two years.
Then, just like the Bulls with Derrick Rose, the 31-win Sonics got lucky in the 2007 lottery and jumped from the 5th pick to the 2nd pick and watched the Trail Blazers take Greg Oden which left Kevin Durant on the board.
At this point with Durant already picked, the Sonics dumped Ray Allen and got the Celtics 5th pick, Jeff Green. They also smartly choose not to overpay for Rashard Lewis who they shipped to the Magic for a $9m trade exception.
It’s worth noting here that the Sonics struck out in the 2006 draft with Mouhamed Sene (10th pick) and in the 2004 draft with Robert Swift (12th pick) but they did get Nick Collison in 2003 with a 12th pick.
In his rookie season, Durant’s team won 20 games which was good enough to earn the 4th pick in 2008 (Russell Westbrook) and they used the Suns 24th overall pick acquired in the Kurt Thomas salary dump to draft Serge Ibaka.
In their first year together, Durant and Westbrook won just 23 games, good enough to land the 3rd pick which they used on James Harden in 2009. That year the team won 50 games and then last year the Thunder were in the Western Conference Finals. And now….
No team pulled off a better, faster rebuild than the Sonics/Thunder. From the point they dumped Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis, it took just two years of a combined 43 wins to get back into the playoffs and be set for a long time although they did go 15 years between contending in 1996 and 2011.
It’s no wonder the Thunder are the best example of rebuilding through the draft. They got top value for Ray Allen, they made brilliant use of their salary cap to get extra picks from the Suns, they made perfect draft picks with Durant, Westbrook, Ibaka and Harden, and they got super lucky in 2007 to jump three spots and get Durant.
The Thunder’s rebuilding was a rare combination of skill and luck that’s hard to replicate. If everything goes right, this is what you get.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 8:37 PM MST up reply actions
That 04-05 Sonics team was an enigma
There’s a pretty good article on them, http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2011/08/the-lost-season-the-seattle-supersonics-04-05/.
I’m not sure if anyone can replicate how the Thunder rebuilt. They just got really lucky and made smart moves.
Don't trade Dudley!
What are the chances Sarver moves the Suns to Anaheim to financially save his own ass?
The Kings were really close and I don’t think a Lakers/Clippers lawsuit would have stopped it.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 4:17 PM MST reply actions
Phoenix is a helluva lot bigger market than Sacramento.
That’s not gonna happen.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:27 PM MST up reply actions
No argument there
But Sarver would make money with the move.
by oLLiE Boombayay on Feb 16, 2012 5:33 PM MST up reply actions
Here is some build through the draft fun facts.
The Celtics, Bucks, Hawks, Nets, Sixers, Rockets all averaged about 6 top 15 first round draft picks since 2000. Look at
where most of those teams still are, good but not great. Best/Worst example of drafting is not a quick fix. The Clippers,
who until 2 years ago were pretty much the poster child of mediocrity; have had 11 top 15 first round draft picks!!! They
had all those “Great” picks and it still took them 8 years to be thought of as playoff contenders.
Handy men Earl. We are Handy, Men.----- Valentine McKee
This was just Elgin Baylor's fault
worst basketball executive ever. Makes Isiah’s run with the Knicks look pretty by comparison.
Voted most likely to say "I told you so"
It believes a return to being an elite team will come from better drafting, wise personnel moves via trades and free agency, and taking advantage of the significant amount of salary-cap space it will have available next season.
Wow, they have a lot to prove. This summer is going to be huge. Who could we possibly trade though? Lopez and Redd to a contender for a 1st round pick at the deadline? I can’t really think of anything else.
Don't trade Dudley!
Dudley
Dudley has value to Boston. Lopez might have value in New Jersey to play keep his valuable Twin brother happy. Nash to the Heat for a first round pick in 2022 to be sure it will be after Wade, Bosh and Lebron have retired. Gortat has value for somebody maybe worth a couple of high first round picks. Rebuild explode this scrub collection and get some actual assets! Frye needs amnestied immediately. Keef Morris at his worst is a better player than 90% of Frye’s games though that one game in 20 that Frye get’s hot shooting.
by smeagolheart on Feb 16, 2012 4:49 PM MST up reply actions
see, here’s the thing….we just don’t know. Did ANYONE predict they’d be able to trade Hedo and JRich and EC55 for Gortat?
You just don’t know what’s out there and as crappy as the moves have been under Sarver, the Babby / Blanks regime has basically done three things: The Gortat trade (long term win), the Dragic/Brooks trade (fail but not super major bad), the Morris draft pick (so far so good).
But yeah, this summer will be big although I suspect it will take more than one summer to unscrew the mess Sarver made in 2010. The big test is not to screw up more. Patience.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 4:52 PM MST up reply actions
Yes, I don't remember who
It was fanpost. I think it was Hedo and Clark for Gortat. Close, but the Magic didn’t want any of those guys. Those players just ended up being the price they had to pay in order to take our #1 scorer for their backup C.
Still, that was just 1 person and I see your point. We don’t know what will happen. In 08, I really thought KG was going to be a Sun. We were the favorites, had the pieces to get him and somehow he ended up in Boston.
Yeah, it’ll take more than 1 summer, but we really can’t afford to screw up anymore.
Don't trade Dudley!
I think we did a horrible signing on Hedo, it was the longest contract.
roses are red violets are blue, Michael Redd is coming for you!
It was a trade, not a signing.
Blame Toronto for his stool sample of a contract.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Yep
Chill and Warrick were the guys we signed. That’s 10 million that could have been spent on David Lee…
Don't trade Dudley!
IIRC, not many people wanted Lee.
Apparently he was throwing up “empty” stats. And here Charles was saying you can’t fake rebounding.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
I did
I really wanted him. Sarver considered him, but didn’t want to spend as much as GS.
Don't trade Dudley!
I was pushing for us to get either Lee or Scola.
Either would’ve worked just fine.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
I'm pretty sure some people are gonna use the Denver situation to rebuke this.
But Carmelo is not a superstar and Gallo, Billups, and Chandler were not role players.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Denver robbed NYK
Because Melo sells Shoes and Tshirts, that is why he is a star, Gallo is the best shooter i´ve seen in a long time…trading him for a super overrated hog player was a simple robbery.
They also dumped Billups´s contract and got Wilson Chandler.
roses are red violets are blue, Michael Redd is coming for you!
If they hadn't dumped Billups, we wouldn't have Linsanity crippling the known basketball universe.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
I hated that trade from the beginning
They should have been more patient and just kept their players. Of course, New Jersey was bluffing and so they panicked.
Don't trade Dudley!
that KG to the Suns for Marion deal was so close the press release was drafted and ready to go. Shawn killed it.
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 6:34 PM MST up reply actions
And didn't want to go to Boston because the team wouldn't have been good enough
But then smiles on his way to a 30 win Miami team.
Keep him out of the ring of honor
I think we can execute a blow up plan pretty fast
Hill for Tiago Splitter
Nash for Bledsoe or
Lopez and Nash for Kirk Hinrich and 1st rounder
Trade Brown to any team for a 2nd pick
Next season let´s waive Chilly, why Chilly instead of Warrick? he´s contract is longer.
Re sign Michael Redd just to have some leadership on this team, 2 years/4mil.
This Draft is full of Power Fowards and Centers, let´s pick Talent over needs.
Sign Nic Batum and Nick Young, each 4 years/9mil.
Maybe we will still suck by that time and probably get another decent Draft Pick next year for a good shooter, not the best scorer in the league, not the best defender but a good shooter and say you have this.
2014 VERY POSSIBLE ROSTER
Kirk Hinrich/ Eric Bledsoe
Nick Young/ Redd/ Pick ( Good shooter)
Nicolas Batum/ Dudley
Frye/ Morris/Tiago.
Gortat/ Pick ( Decent C)
I think that team can pull of a great run…Blowing it up…is not a hard thing to do, it takes great bussiness skills, and i think Babby is capable of that and much more,and scouting, so i would probably try to lure San Antoine scouting people to Phoenix.
roses are red violets are blue, Michael Redd is coming for you!
It isn't hard to do and I understand your reasoning
It’s just that it won’t happen. Nash won’t ask for a trade and Sarver needs Nash to sell tickets. What will likely happen is that they re-sign Nash this summer and hopefully sign and draft a couple studs.
Don't trade Dudley!
Nash...i respect him
But i really hate being mediocre…and it have gotten to the point that i don´t really care about this season anymore..i will write a letter and send it to Phoenix Suns front office and my roster will happen and we will be happy again.
roses are red violets are blue, Michael Redd is coming for you!
If you're gonna write a letter to the Suns' FO,
You might as well write a letter to Santa asking why he’s so late with your Christmas presents. I believe you’d have a better shot of having Santa address your concerns rather than the Suns’ FO.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
If we lose nash
I say blow it up anf yry and get lucky in the draft.
If we fail oh well but nash is the only reason im for retooling. If hes gone then we must blow it up.
With the new cba well have a better shot at landing some fa’s
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose"
by phxpurple on Feb 16, 2012 10:58 PM MST via Android app up reply actions
You must explain to me why SA would trade a 27 year old big man, the heir apparent to Duncan, making 3.4 mil a year,
for Nash, 38 years old and making10.3 mil, when they already have Tony Parker.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
Sorry, I mis-read that.
You must explain to me why they would trade Splitter for Hill, who’s even older, and who they need even less.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
Oh haremoor...
Let the young ‘uns rosterbate in peace. It can’t be helped.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
Oh, all right.
Hurry up, then.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
That's the thing, though. They're NEVER done.
Remember the stamina when you were young?
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from California wine country.
Twitter: @EastBayRaymundo
by East Bay Ray on Feb 16, 2012 5:38 PM MST up reply actions
Had to rosterbate for 5 miles, uphill, both ways. In the snow.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
The snow was probably the problem, H
it isn’t good for that kind of thing
Voted most likely to say "I told you so"
You heard the master, jc.
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
San Antonio could use Hill
They were pushing hard for him before we gave him 6 mil to come back another season, i believe they were looking for a defensive edge player to add more solid defense to that roster.
roses are red violets are blue, Michael Redd is coming for you!
He didn't look too "declined" last night.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
I hate saying it....OH GOD! I hate saying.
but Nash in SA would be a very good fit…
…I must now shower and scrub with steel wool.
We're working out Jermaine Taylor, another SG
what the hell is wrong with the FO.
"I don't lift weights because they are heavy, and I don't run because it makes me tired." - Charles Barkley
@ SETH
“that KG to the Suns for Marion deal was so close the press release was drafted and ready to go. Shawn killed it.”
How or why can a player kill a deal like that just trade his arse, as the players keep saying its a buisness.
"SIR ALEX FERGUSON" Greatest Manager of all time
Just as with Amare (and Chris Paul, Melo, Dwight, etc.) he was being asked to sign an extension as part of the deal and he didn’t want to sign to stay in Boston. It was a three-way deal that would have sent KG from Minnie to here w/ Shawn going to the Celtics.
Just imagine…
Twitter me at: @sethpo
by Seth Pollack on Feb 16, 2012 7:15 PM MST up reply actions
I'm imagining KG as a Sun...
and simultaneously remembering Robert Horry as a Sun.
I'm Michael Beasley's imaginary friend.
by suns68 on Feb 16, 2012 7:55 PM MST via mobile up reply actions
Everybody stand back.
This could get violent.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
by haremoor on Feb 16, 2012 7:57 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
whoa whoa whoa
why would you call getting rid of steve nash “blowing the team up”? it’s one guy! it isn’t like we want to get rid of a bunch of pretty good players that can lead us to a low playoff seed. We are already a HORRIBLE team. WE SUCK.
this FO screwed up, we are in a horrible position. We have a pretty good center and steve nash, and thats about it. What are we blowing up here? we are getting rid of one guy who won’t be in the league long enough to see us make the playoffs again. being one of the worst teams in the league is not ideal, however, the FO made this happen through their horrible decisions.
We're not horrible.
We’re just ridiculously mediocre. I’d like to think there’s a difference :3
Just because Steve Nash has that "dirty hipster" look doesn't mean he's in need of a shower. Steve Nash bathes in the tears of his victims on a nightly basis.
Mark of a Beast, baby. Mark of a Beast.
we are the 8th worst team in the league.
i bet we will be lower by the end of the season.
with Steve
we have no chance to get that low haha. I think we could get as low as 6th worst with him. If he gets hurt, we could get lower though.
Well, since Steve Nash is this team
Just like Peyton Manning is the Indianapolis Colts, getting rid of him would basically be the equivalent of blowing up the team.
Joe Saunders: "They Giants played a really good game, so hats off to us"
I was half for blowing up, half for trying to make the Playoffs still
But now that I see we’re never going to tank on purpose, then I guess I just have to look forward to this summer and hope the FO can pull something off. I’d like us to focus on the bench, and get a good scorer to lead them. Someone like Dragic maybe.
And hey, Dwight Howard, Deron Williams, and Jeremy Lin. I can dream, you know?
Joe Saunders: "They Giants played a really good game, so hats off to us"
I was just reading how Seattle is making an arena
They were saying how Phoenix, Sacramento and some other team could potentially go in the future (I’m guessing our hockey team the Coyotes) but how awkward would it be if Sarver sold the Suns there and they decided to keep the name….Seattle Suns….most ironic name ever haha.
Twitter: @FredLegittt
Man if sarver sold the team
Thatd suck balls. But the nba wouldnt allow it. Phoenix is a proud organization and this city is a huge money maker in terms of ticket sales,jersay sales veiwing games etc. sac-town cant do any of that and they dont even have their arena stuff in check.
NOLA or Sactown or even washington will go before us
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose"
by phxpurple on Feb 16, 2012 11:54 PM MST via Android app up reply actions
I think it'll be New Orleans
nobody goes to games there anymore since Chris Paul left and people are still struggling from the Katrina aftermath. I think they’re more of a football city than basketball. That town will still be in the gutter in 10 years…I wouldn’t be surprise if the debris from the Katrina aftermath is still there in 20 years. This country don’t have the money to rebuild it.
Twitter: @FredLegittt
by modernage13 on Feb 17, 2012 12:21 AM MST up reply actions
I yes people dont realize how bad it still is there
People have more things to worry about rebuilding their lives rather than rebuilding a team.
At least football rallies people and is cheaper to view. Sell the team and use the profits to fund the city. leave the sports to the saints
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose"
by phxpurple on Feb 17, 2012 1:39 AM MST via Android app up reply actions
Proof my Sarver hate is too much
The idea of Sarver moving the franchise to Seattle, (and them becoming the Sonics again), then Stern would turn around and give us another franchise pronto (we’re a better market than charlotte and it took them only a few years) means we would have a Suns team not owned by Sarver . . . . I’m not saying I’m on board. I’m just depressed enough that I saw the positives, which is pretty bad
Sarver sucks but
we could always have an even crappier owner. I just try to appreciate the Suns as much as I can…even if that appreciation is in an all time low…like .00001%
Twitter: @FredLegittt
by modernage13 on Feb 17, 2012 12:18 AM MST up reply actions
there's no chance
that the suns were listed as a possible team that would go to seattle.
That's why I said it was the Coyotes when they mentioned Phoenix
Because the arena is both for NBA and NHL.
Twitter: @FredLegittt
by modernage13 on Feb 17, 2012 12:10 AM MST up reply actions
I was just watching the insider on TNT a few minutes ago
And Charles was talking about Indiana being the third best team in the playoffs because they play defense and could win 4 out of 7. He then explained why defense was important by saying when he was in Phoenix they never made it to the championship (except that one year) because nobody played defense around him. It made me think about this franchise how we never really play defense. We had Porter to help Suns play defense which was a complete fail and we’re repeating the same thing over again. I realize even if we had 3 all star players on our team that we wouldn’t reach the championship as long as we don’t play defense. We got lucky reaching the Western finals with Nash a few times. Charles then pointed out the Carmelo issue how if the Knicks don’t rebound and play defense that they as well wouldn’t even reach the Eastern finals no matter how much they score. Kinda depressing as to why this team can’t play defense. I’m not that old so can someone tell me if this franchise has actually played well defensively in the past?
Twitter: @FredLegittt
Charles Barkley played defense?
I’m not that old so can someone tell me if this franchise has actually played well defensively in the past?
Yes, in fact there was a year where we were #1 in the league, but I don’t think we made the playoffs because our offense sucked.
The 1992-93 Suns are the best example. They ranked 9th in defense and 1st in offense. More than one player would have to play defense in order for that to happen. Also, Charles Barkley wasn’t a good defender and admitted it a year ago. I don’t know what he’s talking about and sometimes he doesn’t either. He’s what in his late 40’s? People start forgetting things around that age.
Also, the Suns only got lucky making the WCF’s once with Nash and that was 06. In 05, they were just that good. They swept the Grizzlies and beat the 58-24 Mavs in 6 games without Joe Johnson. Steven Hunter was our 6th man for that series, STEVEN HUNTER. If anything they got unlucky. In 2010, they were as good as they got. They were the 2nd best team in the WCF’s and that’s how far they got. Really, the Lakers were the only NBA team I didn’t think the Suns could beat. The SSOL Suns did play defense, they were average. It just wasn’t their focus.
I like Barkley, but sometimes he can be an idiot.
I do think this franchise needs a change though. Perhaps we should stop building around PG’s?
Don't trade Dudley!
I disagree with OKC doing thoings right
They failed a LOT. L:et me (again) list the failures:
1. Jeff Green – bust for a 5th pick
2. Aldrich – BUST lottery pick (might turn it around buts still…)
3. BJ Mullens – BUST – 1st rounder.
4. DJ White – BUST 1st rounder.
5. Rescinding Tyson Chandler trade – already cost them a title.
6. Perkins trade – good trade but Perk is a bust
The trick OKC has played is to be ABLE to fail, e.g. doing so much that 6 failures didn’t overly hurt them. And all their failures were of the right kind, e.g. bigs, which are almost impossible to find, and have the lowest replacement value (e.g. Dowdell is better than Earl Barron).
If you want to blow it up rebuild, you need to be able to fail repeatedly to have any success, otherwise you end up as Sacramento.
How do the Suns create that opportunity to fail? That is the question I want an answer to.
You have a weird way of looking at things
First of all, you think all top 5 picks should be superstars. That’s just not possible. If the guy plays a big role on the team, then the pick was a good one.
Now, let’s look at the so called “failures”
1. Jeff Green: addressed his situation above. He was a key part of the team, plus he turned into Perkins.
2. Aldrich: we’ll have to see. He hasn’t got much of a chance. He’s got good guys in front of him.
3. Mullens: he was 19 when he came into the league, and really raw. He’s turning into an ok player for Charlotte. OKC just didn’t want to wait around for him to develop.
4. DJ White: I hope u r joking…he was the 29th pick and he’s playing solid minutes right now for the Bobcats.
5.Sure it did, but can u blame them for being cautious?
6. Good trade. Without him they would have no chance at a title.
Of course, no one makes the right move in the draft or free agency all of the time. But OKC has done about a good of a job with drafting as any team in history.
And I think the point that you’re missing is that free agency is just as risky, but WAY more expensive. In the end, you need to do well in the draft and in free agency, but you have to draft well. Drafting well attracts free agents, and gives you assets to trade.
by forget on Feb 17, 2012 12:07 PM MST via mobile up reply actions
My point stands
A team WILL make mistakes in the NBA with player acquisition. EVEN OKC, the team that everyone points to as the tank example, even they made plenty. If a team can’t afford to make mistakes, e.g. you don’t have extra first rounders and extra cap space, you end up as Sacramento or Milwaukee.
As for your specifics, they don;t change anything. When everyone that screams “TANK” wants, and I am quoting here, a “top 5 pick”, which is EXACTLY what Jeff Green was, that alone supports my view. Forget the heart thing, Green was never even starter quality, let alone a franchise star.
But back to my point, what OKC did right is tow things:
1. They gave themselves the room to make mistakes, which I believe is vital.
2. They didn’t deny mistakes. If they got a player who didn’t fit, they traded them elsewhere, e.g. rather than keep Lopez, who hasn’t played great and is well behind Gortat, Sam Presti would have moved him for a pick or another prospect. OKC didn’t fall for the trap of justifying picks that aren’t working – a very common NBA problem – but admitted the mistake and got return value.
Back to the Suns, remember Earl Clark? He was a mistake, and one that hurt us because we haven’t kept enough picks. Ditto Brooks, and Alando Tucker.
Summing up, my point stands: when even the best team makes mistakes, if you plan to tank, you need to have lots of rolls of the dice to have a chance.
you didn't even read my post! lol
just because you pick a guy in the top 5 doesn’t necessarily mean you expect him to be a franchise player. its not realistic. you expect him to be a key contributor, which Green was. He averaged around 15 pts and 6 boards.
Here’s what OKC did, they had a 4 top 5 picks, and they got 3 great players and a good player. They struck gold with Ibaka. They hit on their high draft picks! thats all they did.
i really hate that you guys are using the word “tank”. We are talking about getting rid of one guy! we aren’t overhauling the roster. its one guy that might not even play for more than one more season. Can we turn this team into a playoff team in two more offseasons with Nash(thats if we even sign him!)? i don’t think so. we’ve made too many mistakes, it will take a while to undo them. The thing you guys don’t understand is this process will take 3-4 years MINIMUM. this team is a mess!
and i’ll post something again from my last post, since you really didn’t read it:
I think the point that you’re missing is that free agency is just as risky, but WAY more expensive. In the end, you need to do well in the draft and in free agency, but you have to draft well. Drafting well attracts free agents, and gives you assets to trade.
I don't see how it's an "either/or" situation
blow it up and rebuild through the draft or stay the course and trust the front office to make wise decisions with trades, free agent signings and the draft.
Blowing it up would lead to trust in the FO
Free Steve Nash!

by 





























