Elston Turner Has Improved The Phoenix Suns Defense
At the end of last season, the Phoenix Suns decided that they needed a new focus on defense, so they hired Elston Turner as their lead assistant and "defensive coordinator".
Likely, given the existing crop of offensively-challenged players at the coaching staff's disposal, improving the defense was seen as the only way to stay competitive. But in the larger scheme and longer range plan, the Suns front office decided that having a solid, predictable and adaptable defensive scheme would serve the team well into the future.
Remember when Marcin Gortat arrived a year ago and declared the Suns' defense to be the worst in the league? He was right.
Unfortunately, Elston Turner's hands have been tied by the NBA lockout. There was no offseason player development, and training camp was no longer than the blink of an eye. But those aren't the worst outcomes of the lockout. The worst outcome of the lockout, from the standpoint of implementing a new scheme, is the utter lack of practice during the season. Nearly every day is a game day, travel day or mandated off day. So there is hardly any time to teach lessons and correct mistakes.
But having any scheme at all seems to be an improvement over last season. By the numbers, compared to the rest of the league, the Phoenix Suns are right in the middle of the pack in points-per-possession. This means that, on a possession by possession basis, the Suns are better than half the league in stopping the opponent.
So why are they still in the bottom third of the league in overall defense? Because they still can't rebound the ball (24th in defensive rebound rate), only securing the rebound 72%of the time when an opponent misses. It's frustrating when your solid defense has forced a miss, but then you give them another chance.
Marcin Gortat has the 8th highest defensive rebound rate among NBA Centers. Channing Frye is 17th and Markieff Morris is 22nd among Power Forwards in defensive rebound rate. Those three guys play 75% of the minutes on the front line. So why are the Suns so friggin bad at rebounding as a team?
Hit the jump for some fancy pictures.
Let's use some stats from 82games.com to illustrate where the Suns fall short in the rebounding.
Look at the 'Reb' column in the middle to get your answer. In terms of rebounding prowess, the Suns fall short at every single position on the floor.
The PFs (-0.1) and SFs (-0.2) pretty much hold their own but aren't good enough to net in the positive.
Marcin Gortat is 8th in the NBA in defensive rebounding % at Center, yet the Suns lose almost a rebound per game at the center position? How is that? Because Robin Lopez is the worst rebounding C in the game among qualifiers - 50th overall.
We could all have guessed that most opposing point guards are better rebounders than Nash (30th), Price (46th) and Telfair (not ranked, but worse than Price). So there's no surprise the Suns net 1.3 fewer rebounds per game than those three.
The most disappointing net loss, after the center position, is at shooting guard. Between Dudley, Brown and Redd, you'd think the Suns could come close to holding their own on rebounding since they know they're already losing ground on offense. But no. The Suns lose big time in this comparison (-0.9 rebounds per game), with every player near the bottom of the pack in defensive rebound rate.
If rebounding is the Suns' achilles heel, their defense is at least improving this season over last season. The Suns are better in nearly every category except, you guessed it, points allowed on offensive rebounds.
See the pretty charts below. Click on any of the graphs to make them bigger.
Suns' 2011-12 defensive numbers, thanks to MySynergySports.com:
Across the board, the numbers are better than the 2010-11 version of their defense (below). Looking inside the numbers, this year the Suns are much better at defending the pick-and-roll primarily because they their scheme is forcing a lot more jump shots (pick-and-pop) because the lane is more effectively blocked. It's the points off 'offensive rebounds' that are killing this team relative to any time in the past.
2010-11 defensive numbers:
And even compared to the WCF run in 2009-10, this defense isn't bad by comparison:
As you can see, the Suns in 2009-10 were better at post-up defense (thanks Lou!), but much worse at defending the pick-and-roll (thank again, Lou!).
So overall, I have not written anything you didn't already know. The Suns just cannot rebound the ball with any modicum of predictability. Not one position on the floor is a net positive, unless Gortat plays 48 minutes a game.
But at least the Suns are forcing a lot more misses than we're used to seeing. Progress.
34 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Like everything else on this team, defense and rebounding depends on a team effort.
W’eve all seen this team go into lockdown mode at times this season, and when they do, they turn games. They just don’t do it enough.
The lockout seems to have hurt the teams that are either older, or who ended last season on a low note. The teams who had a system in place, like OKC or Chicago or Miami have done better in this first half of the season than the teams – like the Suns, Boston, NY, and even Dallas – who had to adapt more on the fly.
Also, offensive success seems to lead to defensive success with Frye and Dudley. When they are engaged on one end of the floor, they perform better on the other end of the floor. So much of our success depends on these two, in the absence of a true star. But they do much better if Nash, or Hill, or someone else has early success. With these guys, it’s all about team and scheme.
We will be best served if Morris develops to the point where he can start next year. Moving Dudley and Frye back to the second team is a great step to making our second unit great again. If Redd keeps progressing, and if we are able to add an assassin at the two, and a reliable, in tune passing backup PG, we could be really good again.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
Great article, btw, Alex.
As usual.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
Nice write up Alex...
Yes, the rebounding issue is perplexing. While the defense has improved, the defensive rebounding has not, and I just can’t understand why.
I mean, I know why…but I don’t know why they are not fixing the problem. The rebounding, or lack thereof, all comes down to the most fundamental aspect of securing the ball…boxing out! Not only do I often notice a very poor effort/technique from the likes of Frye and surprisingly even Morris at times, but Gortat also has a bad habit of just standing in front of his man and trying to out jump him for the rebound rather than putting a body on him and taking him out of the equation completely.
Luckily for Gortat, he is tall and agile enough to still win the battle most of the time, but there have been numerous times where it has also cost us. Lopez on the other hand does try to box out most of the time, but because of the other players not holding their man, Lopez’s slow reaction to the ball, and also Lopez’s bad habit of trying to grab the ball with one hand, he has an even worse time.
The rebounding woes seem to be a very fixable issue in my opinion if the coaching staff would take the time to really address it, and put more emphasis on playing with sound fundamentals consistently.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from Gilbert, AZ.
Follow me on Twitter: @thereal7footer
by 7footer on Feb 26, 2012 11:08 AM MST via mobile reply actions
I think the boxing out is something that is a consequence of the defensive scheme. This scheme requires that everyone scrambles, and that takes the likes of Gortat out of rebounding position on many plays. Unlike the other bigs, Gortat scrambles to get back, and that often makes him look really bad, as he looks like he missed a box out, when in reality, he has scrambled well back and made a massive effort – one so good it looks like he’s missed a boxout.
It is like getting posterised. A GOOD defender WANTS to be posterised. A bad defender just gets out of the way. Gortat works hard to get into the best spot from where he started, which usually looks like a bad spot if you don’t watch him the whole time.
The rebounding woes seem to be a very fixable issue in my opinion
Sadly, the evidence doesn’t support this view, as rebounding is the most consistent stat in the NBA across time and seasons, and good rebounders appear born, not made. Here are Gortat and Frye’s career rebounder numbers per 48 minutes and they are pretty consistent, with Frye varying between slightly below average to bad for his career.
I think rebounding is misunderstood. It is a talent, but not of the traditional kind where teaching can make for big leaps (like shooting) but of the dedication kind. Rebounding translates very well from college to the NBA (e.g. Paul Millsap) and is the skill that is hardest to visually measure, as it is about dedication, effort and hustle.
Comparing KLove, Josh Smith and Aldridge per 48 and it is surprising because nothing really makes KLove better than the other two – he is less long, less athletic, though bulkier – but KLove is certainly the best.
The problem for the Suns is that pretty much everyone except Gortat is below average for their position as a rebounder. Markieff is right at average, as is Frye this year (but with a MASSIVE standard deviation), but otherwise, below average.
As the defensive scheme calls for everyone to scramble and has bigs out of rebounding position everyone needs to rebound and box out, and the inability of the wings to rebound well hurts us.
I think you hit the nail on the head-- it has ever been thus
I think the boxing out is something that is a consequence of the defensive scheme. This scheme requires that everyone scrambles, and that takes the likes of Gortat out of rebounding position on many plays.
Always rotating and rotating until our C is out on a G
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 26, 2012 5:40 PM MST up reply actions
You first mentioned this a few weeks ago
and since then I’ve been watching for it, and boy are you right…Everytime Gortat has to chase down a shooter on the 3 pt line I cringe because even if the shooter misses they’re probably getting the ball back.
The only thing that would help that is for the wings to stay back instead of leaking out, which of course takes away from easy buckets we so desperately need.
So in the end, I guess it comes down to the personel
I'm kinda growing to like it
For ages, it really irked me how much time Gortat spent chasing down 3 point shooters. But I kinda get it now.
A team has to commit to either D or rebounding – SAS do that with transition defence, where they surrender Orebs in order to stop the break – they have a lower OREB% than us (marginally – .238 vs .240). SAS transition D always killed us in the 7SOL era.
The problem for the Suns is only Gortat can really rebound, Kieff is alright, but everyone else is below average, and the defensive system calls for EVERYONE to rebound. Miami, who run a similar scheme, make it work because Wade and LeBron are good rebounders, and Chicago has good rebounders everywhere.
We aren’t far from average in DRB% (.724 vs league average of .731) but we are below average t both sides of rebounding, don’t generate turnovers and allow a below average everything defensive.
Personally, I’m blaming the Bench. The staters are OK, but the bench is horrific at EVERYTHING.
don’t give the starters a free pass. Dudley has the worst defensive reb % of all wing players, for example. Nash is really bad at it too.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
You need to compare players to their position
This tool compares a player per 48 to the position’s average
Nash is about average for a PG, and Dudley is above for a SG, below for a SF, so half half at each position ~average.
The problem is EVERYONE except Gortat (and kieff) is slightly below average. Frye (average for a 4, below for a 5), Lopez, Hill (WELL below for a 3), Nash, Dudley, the entire bench. Take 10 players slightly below, and the team ends up well below.
We simply need more players above average – more than just Gortat anyway.
Good point MMotherwell!
Your absolutely right, the defensive scheme certainly has a lot to do with it. When the bigs are pulled out because of the defensive rotations they are unable to establish inside position for the rebound.
However, I have also noticed a general lack of boxing out even when the bigs stay in the painted area…Lopez ironically being the exception. If we could fix just that issue aside from the offensive rebounds caused by the defensive scheme, we would still be better off.
Blogging Suns basketball for Bright Side of the Sun from Gilbert, AZ.
Follow me on Twitter: @thereal7footer
by 7footer on Feb 26, 2012 8:55 PM MST via mobile up reply actions
Yes, both are true.
A lot of times, even when guys are in position, they just stand there and expect they are getting the ball instead of working to secure position, which is why we see opponents get a lot of rebounds that we should have. They just work harder.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
I think it is because of the scheme in a way
Because the defense has to come out and help a lot to deny penetration, it helps to defend the shot, but then players are out of position for their rebound. That is why often we see opposition players move in for easy offensive boards because we are out of position and miss box outs.
Carter having a glazed-eyes contest with Boris Diaw. Carter's winning, but Diaw might respond by eating his eyes.
Our perimeter defense is the problem.
I don’t know how many times I’ve seen an opposing player blow by his man outside, meaning Gortat or Morris has to come around to cover and challenge the shot, so they’re not in position to rebound.
Also, having Grant have to cover the other team’s 2 most of the time puts him out of position as well.
Price is the only guard who actually seems to guard anybody, and he never plays.
You can hide one sub-par defender, but not two (or more).
I'm Michael Beasley's imaginary friend.
by suns68 on Feb 26, 2012 1:01 PM MST via mobile reply actions
Yep. Perimeter defense is average.
Nash is good in that he is smart enough to know how to play it. But I would like to see a bench lineup of price, redd, chill, keef and lopez. Decent defense, and will be able to board well. Remember when we had that little run and Chill was playing. Also if Price can help limit their point guards penetration, that will help the defense/rebounding on the second unit
Carter having a glazed-eyes contest with Boris Diaw. Carter's winning, but Diaw might respond by eating his eyes.
Ive always figured that the lack of athletisim on this team...
Is why why suck a rebounding.
Like somwone said above rebounding is as much about the scheme s as it is about hustle. We have all our athleticism in the wrong player. Sure we could lead every game in rebound with a line up of price brown chilly morris and gorat. But that line up would get is murdered.
we have players who arent athletic. The score of skill(shooting, post ups,ft) not speed and muscle(iso,driving to hoop, fast break) because of this lack of speed and muscle we tend to lose 50 50 balls alot. Its like putting turtles and rabbits out there and getting mad when the turtles dont win.
If you want rebounds go out and get the dynamic wing and PF who scores athletically and rebound that way too.
Nash- too old/not his job
Duds-nothis job although he is 6’7
Hill- hes doing everything else
Frye-yes im looking at you
Gortat- aolid a solid job but I see him getting rebounds knocked away from him alot. Could from up hos game average by 2-3 but boxing out better.
These guys make up most of the minutes played and only one of them possesses great athleticism for their position.
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose"
by phxpurple on Feb 26, 2012 2:13 PM MST via Android app reply actions
I agree the lack of athleticism really hurts. Especially when you combine it with a lack of effort. We give up a lot of long rebounds because our wings stand and watch while the opponents run after the ball.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Read my thoughts on Creighton University athletics at Creightonian.com
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Frye is improving in the rebounding department as his offense gets back on track.
Over the last 14 games, he has raised his average to 6.21/game, up from 5.5 for the first 20 games. That includes 3 double digit efforts in the last 10 games. He’s also posting up more effectively against bigger and better defenders, and playing much more aggressively and with more attitude.
Our scheme doesn’t lend itself to Frye getting rebounds on the offensive end – but he’s getting more as he’s playing closer to the basket more often. I’m not even sure that’s a good thing – he got 7 ORB in the GS game, and his previous season high was 3.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
Very nice Alex
It is nice to see that our defense is improving overall, but it makes it that much more frustrating at the same time for the obvious reason, rebounding. It is very hard to me to imagine the coaching staff isn’t stressing the fundamentals and going over rebounding often. Of course we have less practices this season, but they have shown improved defense as well so that is not an excuse for the lack of rebounding.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
We were a great rebounding team in 09-10 when Lopez was put in the starting lineup
Now that wasn’t because Lopez himself is a good rebounder. He sucks. However, he is very good at boxing out. He’s got the weight, length and strength to do it very well. He’s also great at not grabbing the ball with both hands. Instead, he likes to tip it to another teammate.
Yeah, that’s not how you rebound the ball, but it was acceptable for that season as it allowed guys like J-Rich, Hill and Amare to get the rebound more frequently. Also, all three of those players crashed the boards. They had that “gang rebound” mentality. J-Rich averaged 5rpg, Hill close to 6rpg and Amar’e about 9rpg. Lopez’s size, inability to rebound and volleyball skills just made it easier for them. That was either good coaching or just luck of the drawl. It’s amazing how a player’s weakness can be disguised and turned into a strength for his team when you put the right players and system around him.
Anyway, we have one guy who will crash the boards really well and one guy who will box out really well. Both are centers, so we can’t put them together to form a great rebounding duo.
In the starting line-up, Gortat needs a guy next to him that will box out. Frye doesn’t do that, neither does Morris. That’s a shame because I speculate that it would help our rebounding improve quite a bit seeing how Gortat himself is one of the best at going for and getting the ball. He can get a lot of rebounds, but he can’t make this team a good rebounding team if nobody else is helping.
As for the bench, Chill can crash the boards if he brings the effort and Morris is decent in that area as well. You would think that with Lopez, our bench would be a good rebounding squad and thus capable of creating many 2nd opportunities due to the fact that they can’t score the ball. Unfortunately, Chill and Morris are inconsistent and Lopez doesn’t get enough minutes or play well enough to stay in the game.
So yes, our rebounding sucks. I’m not so sure if a different scheme or better coaching/teaching would help. The players we have on this team just don’t compliment each other well enough or aren’t consistent enough to do so. We have this puzzle, but the pieces just don’t fit. Once again, the answer comes down to “We need more talent”. Now I’m not a genius and so I could be wrong. There could be another way that I just haven’t thought of, but until then, this team looks as if they’re playing as well as they possibly can. Practice will only take us so far. We need different players.
Don't trade Dudley!
We need different players.
That’s the crux of it, isn’t it? I think that’s true, too, to a certain extent, and I’m planning on writing a post on it soon.
But I also think that there is something to be said for getting the players we have to play better. In 09/10, people were pretty happy with Duds and Frye, excited about Lopez, Dragic, and even Earl Clark. Then, Amare’ left, we filled his spot with Turkoglu and Warrick, and all of a sudden, everybody else forgot how to do what they had been doing? No. They now had to do DIFFERENT things.
Now, I’m pretty good at my job, and very few other people can do what I do. Without bragging or going into great detail, I can say with confidence that I’m probably in the top 5 in the world at my job. But if I have to do a lot of detailed paperwork (which I suck at) or take out the trash, or answer phone calls, I’m no longer at the top of my game – I’m just one ig puddle of suck. It’s the same as these guys – Frye’s job was to stand at the 3 point line and watch Steve and Amar’e work inside while a center guarded him, until the center decided to go and help on Amar’e, and then make him pay by draining a 3 – something he did that year better than just about anyone else in the NBA. It got us to the WCF, too. The next year, he had to play a new position. He had to learn – on the fly – to play defense inside, rebound, create his own shot, and a lot of other things – some of which he did well at, and some of which he didn’t. But he’s improved every aspect of his game, except for outside shooting, and you can’t say that about a lot of 27 year olds who had just signed a big contract.
This applies across the board, too. JRich left, and Dudley had to change, they moved from the 2nd team to the starting team, which messed up Dragic, and so on. Then, the lockout, no pre-season, no practice, a new defensive coordinator…
So, yeah. A lot of these guys aren’t really multi-talented – but they’re all good at something. Nobody – and I mean nobody – is good at everything in basketball, not Kobe, Lebron, Melo, Stat, or even Jordan. Maybe Magic, I’m not sure. But the talent is spread too thin over too many teams to be able to have really talented, athletic players at ten positions – it’s an economic impossibility. So, role players are an absolute necessity, and we have more than any team other than Houston. I think that’s a great thing! Put Kevin Love on this team this year, with a full pre-season and a normal schedule, and we’re probably at least a top 5 team in the west.
So overall, I’m encouraged. We only have 2 guys that we should expect to be major rebounders, and one is, and the other one is a rookie. If Grant Hill was asked to be a rebounder, he’d be one of the best – but he has other responsibilities, now. We are still mostly built to be an offensive team – we just don’t have anybody (STAT) to give us open shots, and let people play where they should, rather than where they have to.
Sorry to be so long winded – but there’s so much to say about this… we just aren’t as bad as people think, and we have some really good players who aren’t playing. I really think we were unprepared, more than anything this year. I’m tempted to blame Gentry, but it’s not all his fault, either – and that’s several more paragraphs, so I’ll stop now.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
by haremoor on Feb 26, 2012 5:02 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
we just aren’t as bad as people think, and we have some really good players who aren’t playing. I really think we were unprepared, more than anything this year.
I agree with your first sentence, but not entirely with your second sentence. We have pieces to different puzzles out there. What we need are pieces to the same puzzle. Good luck, FO.
Blogging Suns Basketball at Bright Side of the Sun
Don't disagree, Alex.
And not to torture the analogy (even more), but doing puzzles right takes time, looking at the overall picture, and trying a piece here, then there, then there – hard to do without a pre-season and a compressed schedule.
I think Gentry has adjusted to it fairly well – of course, he didn’t read BSotS enough, or he would have done better – but I do think his frustration has colored his vision. Still, putting two puzzles together in a moving car, with missing pieces and an outdated picture…I find it hard to blame him for much of anything. Or any of the guys, really. When you say to a puzzle piece “I know you don’t really fit there, but can you just kind of suck it in here and push it out there, then change your colors a little bit…” , the result isn’t likely to be what was originally intended. And the same goes for the FO – we are dealing with the results of like 7 different philosophies in the space of just 4 or so years. Just trading some puzzle pieces for new ones with no regard for how they fit is probably not the best course of action. I think it will take patience, and I’m pretty sure there won’t be enough of it.
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
right on, haremoor
all these role players were fine doing their bits, but when the big engine of the offense walked off to NY, and the void he left was filled by an under-inflated Boll, an over-inflated euroAfro, and a warRickety stepladder, there wasn’t enough offensive explosive to cover up the glaring lack of rebounding anymore, or come close to offsetting it…
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 26, 2012 5:55 PM MST up reply actions
Yes, Dudz, Hill and Frye have been asked to do different things because nobody else can do them and they’re all we have, but that’s only a few players.
Perhaps our answer to this problem is different?
I want to fix this by getting rid of players who either suck or don’t fit our style and replacing them with players who do. That can’t be fixed till this summer.
It seems as if you believe plugging in a scorer will fix all this? If so, I agree about needing a scorer, but if the FO’s plan is to compete and re-sign Nash, which it is, we’ll need a lot more than that.
Let’s go over our needs:
1. A reliable backup PG
2. A scorer
3. A PF that can rebound or at least box out.
4. A better bench.
5. A replacement for Hill a long with a starting SG and PF.
That’s 4-6 quality players we’ll need to sign/draft/trade for. That’s a lot of holes to fill and I’m not confident the FO can get all that in one summer. Going into this off-season, we’ll have two starters, Nash and Gortat and three bench players, Dudley, Morris and Frye. I think those are 5 good players.
However, Frye or Morris aren’t good compliments to Gortat because neither box out or help him on the boards enough. I also don’t believe they’re a good compliment to each other on the bench. Both shoot threes and are good at it. Somebody needs to be in the paint though. This makes one of them expendable. I wonder how much we could get for a package of Frye, Redd/Brown and Lopez at the deadline? Something to think about.
Anyway, I agree with Alex, we need pieces to the same puzzle. The team we have right now isn’t the kind of team we want around Nash. Only 4 players on this current roster are worth keeping if that’s the direction were going to go in. I suppose I’d keep Hill if he doesn’t want to retire, so maybe 5.
Don't trade Dudley!
Extended thought
This summer is going to be exciting. I mean the FO said they want us to be an elite team again. I’m going to interpret the again part as being next season because Nash has only got about 2 more good years in him. Is that a realistic goal? Well, we’ll have lots of capspace and a good draft pick, so maybe:)
Don't trade Dudley!
I agree but you are pessemistoc about our needs
We have 3 solid NBA players – Gortat, Dudley and Nash, a prospect in Kieff who i think can be a solid 4, and two OK pieces in Frye, Hill (whose offensive plummets have really hurt us). We have NO bench at all.
What we need are three players:
1. Another rebounder.
2. A backup 1/2 – not a backup PG for 18 minutes, a 30 minute 1/2.
3. Some athletes – we have not a single plus athlete in amongst our good players.
If we can get 3 guys to go with Nash, Dudley, Gortat, Kieff, Frye and Hill, we have a solid 9 man rotation that can compete. I said it elsewhere, but Gerald Wallace, Batum and George Hill would be ideal.
I probably am
Batum, Wallace and George would make us a playoff team. I’m not so certain an Elite team. Than again, if we get really lucky with our 1st round pick, we could become an elite team again.
Don't trade Dudley!
I'd be happy with Playoff team
Really happy.
I wrote this long, protracted reply, and then I said to myself...
“Self? Do you really want to attempt to convince Beavis of something at 11 PM on a Sunday night, with the wife waiting upstairs?” And you know what I said back?
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
by haremoor on Feb 26, 2012 9:04 PM MST up reply actions 3 recs
no. what did you say? haremoor...?
hello…? haremoor? what did you say?
hello?
by SteveNash, QuantumPhysicist on Feb 26, 2012 9:11 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
Honestly
After I first read your response, I wasn’t sure whether you were disagreeing or agreeing with me. I wasn’t sure how to reply. You had me confused for a moment, which almost had me beaten because I began to think that that was the intent.
You had almost succeeded in writing a response that sort of disagreed with me, got your point across, but also confusing me to the point of not being able to reply, thus avoiding a debate. Wow, I was impressed. I felt like I had been beaten in a way nobody has ever beaten me before. I felt I had been bamboozled! Smackledoorfed! However, I then realized that it was probably unintentional because you can’t possibly be that smart.
Don't trade Dudley!
Ahh, but I am!
"The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
Don't trade Beavis
We just need to trade Nash
If we can get Anderson, Reddick, Liggins, 2012 1st round pick, 2013 2nd round pick from Orlando for Nash, Warrick, Frye we have to do it.
by cgcardzfan on Feb 28, 2012 2:47 AM MST via mobile reply actions

by 






























