Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: PHOTOS: Mike Moser's Dunk Face Is Spectacular

Some props for Shawn Marion

In his most recent poll, our gracious host poses the question: "After Steve Nash, who is the most important player to the Suns?" To cast my vote, I didn't even have to read past the first name. Without a doubt, Shawn Marion is the most important Sun not named Steve Nash. I would have said this even before last night's game helped drive the point home. In the past three years, I can't recall the Suns winning even one game when Shawn sat out. In fact, I can barely remember him missing a game at all, but when he did miss, I'm pretty sure it was a loss nearly every time.

The Suns proved for 54 games and two rounds of playoffs last season that they can win without Amare. They've also proven multiple times they can win without Raja, LB, and KT. They may not be a championship team without these players, but they are a solid playoff team all the same. They would probably be a playoff team without Marion too, but not without first filling the gaping hole that would be left without his presence. How many guys in the league rank near the top in both steals and rebounds? Not to mention dunks, blocks, and all the "little" things he does to facilitate the Suns fast break. And when Shawn has a bad game, the Suns often do too (see 2005 playoffs against the Spurs).

So is it annoying to hear Shawn complain from time to time that he doesn't get enough attention? Yes. Is it frustrating that he seems to "disappear" offensively sometimes when he's needed most (e.g., the games that Nash missed recently)? Of course. But those who call for Marion to be traded every time the Suns lose a game should take note of where we'd be without him. If last night's game is any indication, the word "struggling" would come to mind.

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good points
That's one of the reasons I posed the question.  It seems like after the Philadelphia game it would be obvious.  But before Amare went into the starting lineup, the Suns were a sub-500 team.  It's an interesting debate.  i'm curious to see where the discussion goes.

by Dan @ Bright Side Of The Sun on Mar 1, 2007 7:50 PM MST reply actions  

My take on the beginning of the season is...
There was the feeling of it being a temporary situation. I even made a comment to somebody at the time that since everybody knew Amare would eventually be in the starting lineup anyway, maybe D'Antoni should just go ahead and put him in, "earned" or not. Sure enough, the next game he did just that and the Suns started winning. But the team did just fine last season when they knew Amare wouldn't be there. They only struggled when there was uncertainty (e.g., when they tried to work him in mid-season, etc.). I don't buy the "Amare cures everything" argument. I'm a fan, and I think it's great what he brings to the team, don't get me wrong. But I have never bought into the argument that "all the Suns need to do is add Amare and it's championship time". The Suns will have to have Amare (and KT) AND re-discover the "champion's heart" they had during last season's playoff. Yes, I know they didn't win, but it wasn't for lack of heart. This year's team shows glimpses of that (especially Nash), but they haven't gotten all the way there yet. Hopefully they find it in time for the playoffs--and hopefully it won't take a 1-3 deficit in the first round this time to turn it on.

by TexSUN on Mar 1, 2007 9:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Amare
Amare has been a star all his basketball life. There was no way he was going to do well as a backup. When coach put him in the starting lineup, two things happened. 1- he was in a familiar situation, 2- it showed him that coach believed in him. That made him start playing much better. I am very impressed with his game but I am not sure that he is more important to the team than Shawn. After Fri.'s game it seems the Suns can win even without Shawn. That's the attitude needed to become a championship team.

I remember last year D'Antoni said during the playoffs that the team that was playing (I think it may have been during the 3rd round) was completely different from the team that was playing just a couple months earlier. That could happen again. The Suns need to turn it on, come playoff time.  People always talked about the resiliency of the Suns last year during the playoffs because they started winning close games. This year they are closing out close games better, so hopefully they won't have to go 7-games every round like they did last year.

by Vash01 @ Bright Side Of The Sun on Mar 3, 2007 3:29 AM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.

Friend Us On Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow BrightSideSun on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds


Managers

Seth_twitter_pic_4_small Seth Pollack

13531_1236944896270_1608674153_605227_1328752_n_small Wil Cantrell

Editors

Gortat_nash_dudley_small East Bay Ray

Authors

Divinginlevanto_small PHXgp

Eutychus_logo_small Eutychus

1216horry-autosized258_small Alex Laugan

Photo_3111433_9952_1451357_main_small 7footer