Bright Side Of The Sun: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: UNC 77, Ohio State 73

Now What?

In the past few days, the Suns have traded away their best (only) Tim Duncan defender, and their fans have learned that maybe all those crazy conspiracy theories surrounding the Suns-Spurs series weren't so crazy after all. Between this double-whammy and the one in May where the Suns lost out on a lottery pick just days after losing out on the playoffs, this is turning out to be one nightmare of a summer for Suns fans. For what it's worth, Bob Young of the Arizona Republic feels that the work of Eddie Rush was far more damaging in Game 3 than anything Tim Donaghy did. As for me, I'm afraid that after two months, my memory of that game isn't reliable enough to make a judgment one way or the other. However, I will say this: Even if I knew for sure that Donaghy changed the outcome of Game 3, my biggest beef with that series would still be that the rules of basketball weren't applied as stringently as the "off the bench" rule was applied to Amare and Boris Diaw. In my opinion, while that game might indeed be, as Bill Simmons described it, "the most atrociously officiated game of the playoffs", the entire series was called in a way that encouraged "dirty" play, while the league stood by and did nothing until the inevitable happened. Perhaps that's merely the biased opinion of a fan whose team came out on the losing side, but that's how I saw it at the time and still do. In other words, if I'm going to blame the Suns' playoff loss on anything other than the Suns themselves, then it would be David Stern and Stu Jackson incurring the brunt of my wrath for not cleaning up that mess before it got out of hand. But that doesn't mean I'm not horrified to learn that a referee may have violated the trust of the league and the fans in such an egregious fashion. And you can be sure the next time someone in my family complains about how their team (the Mavericks) was robbed of a championship in 2006, I won't be so quick to break out the eye roll.

But there's no way to change what happened in the playoffs, and there's no way to take back the Kurt Thomas trade either. Those things happened, it's done, and we move on. With the Suns now down to just Amare and Shawn Marks at the center position, they clearly need to fill that last roster spot with someone who can man the middle. Some names tossed around by the local media include P.J. Brown, Brian Skinner, Michael Ruffin, and Melvin Ely. A couple of our members here have offered up suggestions as well, with srp hoping for a Pike-Petro exchange with Seattle, and scout4blue looking at Scot Pollard. Anderson Varejao is another name I've heard mentioned, but it's hard to imagine him being available at a price the Suns could afford (plus he's restricted). So, time to play GM. Who would you like to see the Suns go get in a trade or sign via free agency? Remember, whatever roster the Suns end up with will probably have to be under or just barely above the luxury tax threshold, so try to stay within those guidelines if you want to keep it realistic.

Poll
If it has to be a free agent, who's your pick?
P.J. Brown
4 votes
Michael Ruffin
1 votes
Brian Skinner
5 votes
Melvin Ely
3 votes
Scot Pollard
3 votes
Anderson Varejao
7 votes
Somebody else
5 votes

28 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 11 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Cheap Cheap Cheap
$arver got into this mess by selling first round picks and getting rid of salary.  He won't spend any money to try to win a championship.  He will sell the whole team before he is finished.

by OneSunsFan on Jul 23, 2007 8:26 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, as they say in the tech industry...
Identifying the problem is the first step. Now it's time to solve it. What would you do if you were in Steve Kerr's position? (And no, "resign" is not an acceptable answer. :) ).

by TexSUN on Jul 23, 2007 8:58 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Selling the team
It's funny that you say that, because you are absolutely correct. He will sell the team. Just like when Colangelo sold the team, and Sarver bought it as the head of a group of INVESTORS! Sarver really doesn't have that much pull when it comes to major basketball decisions. Obviously he has some say, but he hires people like Steve Kerr to do that FOR HIM.

by ASUmike on Jul 24, 2007 2:30 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Take Orders.
I would say to Mr. $arver, "What do we do now, boss?"

by OneSunsFan on Jul 23, 2007 10:15 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I'll tell ya what I'd do...
...and that's sign dennis rodman to a 1-year deal. He's still playing for some league and has sobered himself, and he wouldn't need much dough. He's not a center per se, but he brings the same kind of effect that KT did...

other than that, there's otis george but that would be a really dicey concept for an unproven D-Leaguer to possibly start for the SUNS. But he can rebound and is close to KT size-wise...

other than that, I'd look for KEVIN WILLIS!

Texsun, look at the youtube vid. It will remind you of the referees's "night vision" capabilities - what you and me and every player and fan in the building sees, is seen differently when you are a ref in "night vision" mode.
 

by The Humongous on Jul 23, 2007 10:27 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Laughing Their Expletives Off
Not that I'd put too much credence in a blog that uses profanity in every other sentence (frequent use of profanity is usually a sign of a small vocabulary) ... but there are a few Spurs fans over at "that other site" laughing at the trade.  And, I don't blame them.

What to do now?  Kerr's already said (on the radio) that PJ Brown's not likely coming to us -- Kerr talked to Brown's agent.  Pollard?  Seriously?  "Kids, do drugs"?

Is this what we're reduced to?  Begging guys to come out of retirement and looking to guys who promote illegal drug use on national TV?

The answer to the question is that it simply does not matter who the Suns pick up.  Sarver's not going to pay for someone to put the Suns way over the luxury tax, otherwise he'd have kept Thomas.  Any other guy out there int he price range won't break the top 9 or 10 (Kerr essentially said that on the radio, too).  So, it really doesn't matter.  They should've just kept Pat Burke; at least we'd have some good time-out videos.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that we should get Burke back:

  1.  He doesn't hurt on the cap;
  2.  He -- just like whoever the Suns bring in -- is not going to play and he (and everyone else) knows it;
  3.  Good video skits; and
  4.  It doesn't matter who the Suns bring in.
The Suns will put on their tracks shoes and play faster this season, hoping to blow by SA and/or praying someone else beats the Spurs before the playoff meeting.

Alternative theory:

McHale hangs onto KG until Feb 2.  KG says to McHale, "Hey, I'm opting out this summer, so just let me go."  McHale, sensing the inevitable, waives KG who comes over to the Suns on Feb. 3.

Mmmmm ... Guinness

by JSun on Jul 23, 2007 10:28 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Pollard didn't promote drug use
He's a smart ass who let's his mouth get the best of him. He called the fans idiots for booing Jon Barry in Sacramento when Vlade Divac had said that day in the local Sac paper that they should. Pollard is a dumbshit. But the real problem is can he still play and stay healthy all season. Because when it comes to defending Tim Duncan there isn't a better guy available (including Kurt Thomas) then Pollard.
Bright Side of the Moon or Bright side of the Sun...take your pick

by pookeyguru on Jul 23, 2007 11:09 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

And for the record dude
I find it amusing you can call Pollard out for a stupid BS statement that was 'kids dont do drugs' which was about as ambigious as you could get. You have a signature that supports a beer (a drug). I take a multivitamin daily (another drug). That statement could literally be purported to sound anyway. Anyway I'll stop now but I just find it amusing you can disqualify Pollard on a stupid statement as opposed to his lack of production since leaving Sac combined with his numerous injuries since.
Bright Side of the Moon or Bright side of the Sun...take your pick

by pookeyguru on Jul 23, 2007 11:16 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Irrelevance
I'm glad this site doesn't censor for profanity, because, well ... I think I just proved my point.  Although extremely off-topic, I'm still relatively certain that illegal drugs are dissimilar to beer and even more dissilimar to multivitamins and other beneficial drugs.

As for "ambiguous," here's a link:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ambiguous

Getting back on-topic, my point is that anyone the Suns pick up will be irrelevant.  It doesn't really matter what the "last" off-season move is going to be (unless there is some sort of blockbuster coming out of nowhere).

What would I do as the GM?  Get the cheapest, biggest warm body out there.

Mmmmm ... Guinness

by JSun on Jul 24, 2007 4:45 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right because Alcohol is clearly
less dangerous that marijuana ecstacy or other commonly used drugs.
open to or having several possible meanings or interpretations; equivocal: an ambiguous answer.
That was my point actually. Thanks for bringing up the actual definition so those who weren't aware of it.

To quote you, Jsun:

What would I do as the GM?  Get the cheapest, biggest warm body out there.
Seems to me Pollard might be willing to move back to a warm climate close to his hometown where hs still lives in the offseason. If he's healthy he might be a Grant Hill lite kind of pick up.
Bright Side of the Moon or Bright side of the Sun...take your pick

by pookeyguru on Jul 25, 2007 1:42 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me clarify my last statement some
First off the definition was nice and I'm glad you posted it. Now everybody knows it too.

As far as Pollard it's pretty simple. He's a physical rebounding setting screen type of player that the Suns need. If he's healthy he's every bit the kind of player that Pat Burke only wishes he could be. Pollard's prime years were spent in Sacramento defending the likes of a much younger (and better) Tim Duncan, and well I might add, as well as the older Karl Malone types. When he went to Indy and Cle he wasn't effective in part because of the teams he went to and the styles they play. However at the price he will probably come at combined with the suns dire need of his style of play I think he would be the best player available for the Suns considering they no longer have Kurt Thomas.

Bright Side of the Moon or Bright side of the Sun...take your pick

by pookeyguru on Jul 25, 2007 1:48 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog devoted to all things Phoenix Suns.
Start posting about the Suns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sunslollo_small
The new Suns bring this thousands-miles-away fan back to the good ol' days
1nash_small
Between being and becoming..

Recent FanPosts

Small
Is Amare the problem?
Real_duffman_small
The world is schocked -- Tony Parker's Comrades Cheat, Too
1024_small
luke ridnour??
Small
Dudley + Jrich trade
Small
Best part of a bad LA game
Elektra2_small
Suns playing the best basketball in the league....
Teratorn-25ft_small
All praise Steve Kerr: Genius not Moron!
Small
Analysing the offense of the Suns
Small
Leandro's Brazilian Bash

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

RSS Feeds

Bright Side Of The Sun Feeds
Fanster.com Network Member


Editor in Chief

Seth_avatar_4_small Phoenix Stan

Photo Editor

Photo_1_small Max Simbron

Staff Writer

Suns_small ZonaFlash

Dsc03465_small PanamaSun

Real_duffman_small JSun

Mark_west_small Mike Lisboa

Amare_small watdogg10

P1000778_small Wil Cantrell