When I first heard the news of Nash's departure I was floored. Not that he was leaving, I'd pretty much accepted that. I'd even made a bet (which I intend to collect on) that he was leaving in Nash's postseason player evaluation back on May 14th. It was the destination that was discomfiting. Nash was going to the Los Angeles Lakers.
A whirlwind of thoughts and emotions ensued. How could Nash go to the Lakers? How could the Suns let him go to the Lakers? How could the pride and joy of Phoenix become an instrument of their mortal enemy? There are 28 other teams that would be less repugnant to Suns' fans. The Mavericks had been in the mix and nobody batted an eye. What happened to the win-now Knicks and the Shumpert package? What became of the golden parachute offered by Toronto?
Then I was struck with an afflatus. I was going to go to bat for MVSteve just like he went to bat so many times for the Suns. Even if I don't completely agree with the decision he just made, I defend the totality of his character and his place as one of the great all-time Suns both on and off the court.
Jump it for more discussion on Steve's exodus.
The move isn't completely without precedent. The Suns have dealt with the Lakers before. They have facilitated the egress of stars in the past. They have made deals with the devil.
In 1994, the Suns traded Cedric Ceballos to the Los Angeles Lakers for a first round draft pick in the 1995 draft that became Michael Finley. Ceballos averaged 21.7 points and 8.0 rebounds a game for the Lakers the next season.
Before the 1996 season, the Suns traded Charles Barkley to the Houston Rockets. The very same Rockets that had knocked the Suns out of the playoffs in 1994 and 1995 on their way to consecutive NBA championships.
There seemed to be varying levels of mutual disinterest from both parties. The whispers suggesting it was time to move on were practically deafening. The Suns had either made an insulting offer or none at all according to various rumors. Nash's decision to go to the Lakers wasn't vindictive or spiteful. If the Suns had decided to play hardball, he could have been really petty and joined the Lakers by way of an exception to ensure the Suns got nothing. That didn't happen. It was an amicable split.
The Suns didn't want Nash. It was time for both sides to move on. The Suns could have forestalled this eventuality by trying to sign Nash in advance of the free agency period. They didn't.
Nash had the right to go where he wanted as an unrestricted free agent, but the Suns didn't have to acquiesce to Steve's sign and trade request. They could have stonewalled him. They could have dictated that they would work with any other team in a sign and trade. They didn't.
In light of Nash's overall contribution to the Suns and in the interest of cultivating comity into the future, the Suns gave Nash what he wanted and got something in return. Sometimes when you love someone, you have to let them go.
Steve was a good soldier while he was here. He didn't manipulate his way out of town or become a disruption as we've seen from so many others around the league. He didn't stage a coup to hold the franchise hostage and force his way to a destination of his liking. He played out the contract he signed, even though he was laboring to carry a misfit roster on his broad shoulders during the gloaming of his career.
Steve did what just about any of us would have done in his position. Steve did what was best for him and his family. The Lakers gave Nash an opportunity to win a championship. They gave him a contract that, financial compensation aside, signifies a degree of veneration. They enabled him to stay close to his family. He gets to live in an attractive metropolitan area, which he has an affinity for. The move makes sense on every level if you take the Suns/Lakers rivalry out of the equation. What other team affords Nash such a degree of accordance with this particular set of criteria?
In the end, it was a mutual respect for each other that ended up tipping the scale and Nash got what he wanted. The Suns got something better than the trade exception they received as a parting gift from Amare's departure. Maybe it wasn't the happiest ending ever scripted, but compared to recent fiascos involving peregrinating stars I think both sides comported themselves admirably.
There is a tendency to lionize star athletes that sets fans up to be disappointed. When a player is set upon such a high pedestal it is hard not to topple. Nash is human. He is not infallible. This is just a simple case where what was best for Steve Nash wasn't best for Suns fans. Steve chose Steve.
Nash leaves a legacy in Phoenix that the next generation of Suns' players will be hard pressed to live up to. He was loved by the organization, fans, and teammates alike. The Suns should be keeping his seat in the ring of honor warm. Jared Dudley offered this on his former floor general:
@SteveNash has not only been a the Best but the most unselfish player I ever played with. I only wish him the Best. He's deserves everything— Jared Dudley (@JaredDudley619) July 5, 2012
I have years of refulgent memories of Nash as a Sun that this latest incident won't tarnish. Am I disappointed that things turned out this way? Hell yes. Am I happy that Nash is a Laker? Absolutely not. Will it be surreal to see Nash playing alongside Kobe Bryant? Nauseatingly so. Does turning in his orange for gold make Nash a turncoat? I don't think so. He's still Two-Time to me.
Statement courtesy of ESPN.com
Steve Nash statement