Shooting Guards/Small Forwards:
|Name||Height W/O Shoes||Height With Shoes||Weight||Wingspan||Standing Reach||Body Fat||Hand Length||Hand Width|
|C.J. McCollum (SG)||6' 2.25''||6' 3.25''||197||6' 6.25''||8' 0.5''||8.6||8||9.5|
|Ben McLemore (SG)||6' 3.5''||6' 4.75''||189.2||6' 7.75''||8' 4.5''||5||8.75||9.5|
|Victor Oladipo (SG)||6' 3.25''||6' 4.25''||213.2||6' 9.25''||8' 4.5''||6.55||8.75||9.25|
|Shabazz Muhammad (SF)||6' 4.75''||6' 6.25''||221.8||6' 11''||8' 8.5''||9||9||10|
|Otto Porter (SF)||6' 7.5''||6' 8.5''||197.6||7' 1.5''||8' 9.5''||6.65||8.75||9.25|
For the shooting guards, Oladipo stood out the most overall with his 6"9.25" reach, making him the longest guard in this group. While McLemore is technically the tallest, it's hard to call that a win for him being that he is only one-quarter of an inch taller than Oladipo, when many scouts thought he was 1"-2" inches taller. McLemore is the leanest with only 5% body fat, but Oladipo isn't much more at 6.55%, and when you couple that with his weight of 213 lbs, it shows that he has the strongest, most NBA-ready body by far.
As for the small forwards, it's a two-man competition for the prospective lottery players with Dario Saric not participating in the NBA Combine. Porter wins the measurabes with ease as he registers nearly three inches taller than Shabazz without shoes. Although Muhammad's 6'11" wingspan is very impressive, Porter still manages to one-up him here registering a 7'1.5" measurement. Muhammad does win the size contest weighing in at 221lbs compared to Porter at a svelte 197.6, but he's also at 9% body fat compared to Porter at only 6.65%. Still, Shabazz calculates to around 20lbs of total body fat compared to Porter at around 13lbs....only a 7lb difference. So Muhammad's weight advantage is still mostly muscle...which is good.
|Name||3/4 Court Sprint Time
||Lane Agility Time
|C.J. McCollum (SG)||3.32||11.02||2.91 (14th overall)
||32 (15th overall)
||38.5 (14th overall)
|Ben McLemore (SG)||3.27 (20th overall)
||11.87||3.11||32.5 (13th overall)
42 (Tied 2nd overall)
|Victor Oladipo (SG)||3.25 (17th overall)
||10.69 (11th overall)
||3.14||33 (11th overall)
||42 (Tied 2nd overall)
|Shabazz Muhammad (SF)||3.32||10.99||2.93||29.5||37|
|Otto Porter (SF)||3.4||11.25||3.06||27||36|
The story here for the guards is Oladipo's athleticism. While McLemore proved he is no doubt an elite athlete, Oladipo proved he is even more so. McLemore and Oladipo tied for 2nd place overall with 42" max verticals (only PG Shane Larkin registered higher at 44"). While Oladipo registered slightly higher in the standing vertical and 3/4 court sprint, the difference was very minor, so they are both fairly comparable in these regards. The biggest difference was in the lane agility drill, where Oladipo showed his lateral quickness and ability to move side-to-side, forward, and backwards with a substantial advantage over McLemore...who actually fell down at the conclusion of the drill by losing his balance. In contrast, Oladipo stayed very low to the court and showed terrific agility and body control...this was apparent just by watching him.
As for the small forwards, Muhammad ran the table on Porter here, but didn't really set himself apart from the rest of the pack in any substantial way. Porter is not an elite athlete, and while Muhammad is more athletic, he isn't considered high-level or elite by any means either. Tim Hardaway Jr. was actually the most impressive small forward in this regard, but is not considered a lottery pick by most accounts, so he was not part of this comparison.
If the Suns are going to draft a wing with their first round pick, which will fall somewhere between 1-7, there's a 99% chance it will be one of these five players. For the shooting guards, Oladipo showed he was the fastest, strongest, quickest, and most athletic, as well as the longest of the potential lottery SGs. As for the small forwards, in my opinion, Porter was slightly more impressive overall by virtue of his measurables. Although Muhammad showed he is the more athletic of the two, even his scores were mediocre, so I wouldn't really call that a win in his favor.
One thing to keep in mind is that these measurements and skills are only a small part of the total package of what constitutes a great basketball player. However, in a league where relatively small differences separate the cream from the crop, these metrics are important to many scouts and front office personnel who are trying to find the best indicators of potential and productivity. In other words, this isn't the be-all-end-all by any means, but it can certainly help or hurt your draft stock.
*All officially recorded stats from NBA.com